Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-04-22 Council Agenda Packet
Corcoran City Council Agenda April 22, 2021 - 7:00pm 1.Call to Order / Roll Call 2.Pledge of Allegiance 3.Agenda Approval 4.Commission Representatives* 5.Open Forum – Public Comment Opportunity 6.Presentations/Recognitions 7.Consent Agenda a.Draft Minutes of April 8, 2021 Council Work Session* b.Draft Minutes of April 8, 2021 Council Meeting* c.Financial Claims* d.Recruitment Process – Maintenance Worker* e.Municipal State Aid Resolution* f.Noise Ordinance Exemption* g.Special Use Permit for Bird Banding* h.Charter Commission Resignation and Application 8.Planning Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.Rear Setback Variance at 6433 Bluestem Circle* b.Preliminary Plat and Variance Application for “Franzen Estates” at 23020 Strehler Road* c.Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Cook Lake Highlands” at 19220 County Road 10* d.PUD Sketch Plan for Refuge at Rush Creek* 9.Unfinished Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements* b.Appaloosa Woods Street Improvements* 10.New Business – Public Comment Opportunity a.2021 Dust Control Program* b.Corcoran Trail East/West Improvements Finance Plan* c.Planning Commission Appointment* d.2021 Work Session Schedule* e.Full-Time Police Officer Job Offer* f.Resolution 2021-34 Accepting 2020 Donations* 11.Staff Reports a.Active Corcoran Planning Applications* b.Pandemic Response Update 12.2021 City Council Schedule* 13.Adjournment Due to the COVID-19 health pandemic, the City Council’s regular meeting place is not available and is not open to the public. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 13D.021 the one or more members of the City Council may participate by telephone or other electronic means. * Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the House Agenda Packet book located by the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City website at www.corcoranmn.gov. Meeting Held Via Telephone/Other Electronic Means Call-in Instructions Means Call-in Instructions Call: +1 312 626 6799 US Enter Meeting ID: 878 0682 9929 Press *9 to speak during the Public Comment Sections in the meeting. Video Link and Instructions: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87806829929 visit http://www.zoom.us and enter Meeting ID: 878 0682 9929 Participants can utilize the Raise Hand function to be recognized to speak during the Public Comment sections in the meeting. Participant video feeds will be muted. For more information on options to provide public comment visit: www.corcoranmn.gov STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 4. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Commission Representatives Action Required: None – Informational Summary: The advisory commission representatives for the April 22nd Council meeting are as follows: • Planning Commission: Jim Shoulak • Parks and Trails Commission: Judy Strehler Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: N/A Attachments: N/A DRAFTCITY OF CORCORAN City Council Work Session Minutes April 8, 2021 – 5:30 pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 8, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee was present at City Hall. Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Thomas were present via telephonic or other electronic means. Councilor Bottema was excused. City Administrator Martens and Administrative Services Director Beise were present at City Hall. Public Works Director Mattson and Director of Public Safety Gottschalk were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Call to Order / Roll Call Mayor McKee called the work session to order at 5:31 pm. 2.Staff Planning and Compensation Philosophy Discussion City Administrator Martens noted topics of discussion for the work session, reviewed the future organizational workflow for the City of Corcoran through 2022 with proposed changes to the organizational chart. Council and staff discussed future positions in staffing needs, budget, and funding.City Administrator Martens presented a compensation policy, challenges the City faces regarding recruitment and employee retention. Council and staff discussed steps in establishing a compensation philosophy, comparable organizations,and similarity in positions, creating a vision, and the implementation process to achieve the philosophy.Council and staff discussed police negotiation variables in considering future compensation.Provided direction to staff to review steps necessary to begin the process of implementing a plan for compensation data, initially beginning internally, and utilizing external sources as necessary pertaining to a compensation philosophy plan. 3.Adjournment MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to adjourn. Voting Aye:McKee,Nichols, Thomas,and Schultz (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 6:37 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk Agenda Item 7a. CITY OF CORCORAN City Council Meeting Minutes April 8, 2021 - 7:00 pm The Corcoran City Council met on April 8, 2021, in Corcoran, Minnesota. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 13D.021 and due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council meeting was held remotely through electronic means using the audio and video conferencing platform Zoom. Mayor McKee was present at City Hall. Councilor Nichols, Councilor Schultz, and Councilor Thomas were present via telephonic or other electronic means. Councilor Bottema was excused. City Administrator Martens and Administrative Services Director Beise were present at City Hall. Public Works Director Mattson, Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, and City Planner Lindahl were present via telephonic or other electronic means. 1.Call to Order/Roll Call Mayor McKee called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. 2.Pledge of Allegiance Mayor McKee invited all in attendance to rise and join in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3.Agenda Approval City Administrator Martens reviewed the Open Forum comment opportunity for items not on the agenda and noted the other public comment opportunities throughout the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise reviewed the addition of 5 claims to item 7c. Financial Claims, noting 4 of the additional claims were 2020 Bring Your Own Device stipends, and one claim for the furniture purchase for the remodel. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to approve the agenda as modified. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4:0) 4.Commission Representatives Mayor McKee noted Planning Commissioner Jacobs and Parks and Trails Commissioner Meister were present via telephonic or other electronic means. Mayor McKee invited Commissioner Jacobs and Commissioner Meister to speak on relevant agenda items. 5.Open Forum (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Open Forum discussion for items not included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the Open Forum. 6.Presentations/Recognitions a.Fire Department Annual Reports i.Hanover Fire Department ii.Loretto Fire Department iii.Rogers Fire Department Chief Toby Heinz, Hanover Fire Department, reviewed community involvement and fundraisers completed by the Hanover Fire Department, noted call volume by year, by individual city, and calls made by days of the week. Chief Heinz noted the 27 calls in Corcoran in 2020 and totaled 14.75 percent of calls received. Chief Heinz outlined the calls by category with the highest number in the medical calls, followed by fire alarm calls and fire calls. Council asked for clarification on fire alarm calls and fire calls. Chief Heinz clarified fire alarm calls pertain to calls received that are fire alarm only with no emergency fire services needed, such as a false alarm through a security system. Chief Heinz reviewed the total yearly service hours of 297.55 for 2020 for Corcoran, and noted calls averaged DRAFTAgenda Item 7b. 2 higher during the daytime. Chief Heinz noted the average response time to the scene of appro ximately 10 minutes with 12 responders per incident, with a duration average of 53 minutes per incident. Chief Heinz reviewed the total person hours for 2020 and the number of mutual aid responses. Council thanked Hanover Fire Department for their service and inquired on total firefighter staffing within the department. Chief Heinz noted the department has 10 new probation members, bringing the total number to 31 firefighters which is capacity, and includes staffing of 6 firefighters available during the daytime hours. Chief Jeff Leuer, Loretto Fire Department, reviewed data on Corcoran noting 43 total calls for 2020, a total of 760 on-scene hours, with many calls being medical, alarms, and fires. Most calls were between 8am and midnight, with majority of calls happening on the weekends. Chief Leuer indicated an average response time of approximately 9:24 minutes per incident. Chief Leuer reviewed auto and mutual aid calls, noting total number of hours for the department for the year. Chief Leuer reviewed public events included the Holiday Train and Night to Unite events. Chief Leuer reviewed highlights for the year included a gear washer grant, numerous birthday party drive-bys, and the purchase of new turnout gear with Cares Act Funds. Council inquired on total firefighter staffing within the department and changes within the last year. Chief Leuer noted staffing is full capacity at 35 members with 3 currently on a waiting list. Chief Leuer noted staffing for day call includes a response of usually about 10-12 firefighters per call. Council and Chief Leuer discussed the impacts to staff within the department during the COVID pandemic. Council thanked the Loretto Fire Department for their service to Corcoran. Chief Brad Feist, Rogers Fire Department, noted staffing in the Rogers Fire Department includes 3 full-time staff, and currently 37 firefighters, with approval of up to 41. Chief Feist outlined the cities and areas the Rogers Fire Department services. Chief Feist noted sanitizing processes in place for COVID relating to equipment, and protection processes in place for firefighters regarding personal injury calls during COVID. Chief Feist reviewed public community activities noting virtual station tours, drive-thru parade for National Night Out, drive-thru graduation at Rogers High School, virtual birthday greetings and a mask drive. Chief Feist touched on training topics in 2020, noted a call history increase of about 10 percent from 2019 to 2020, with 2021 estimated to surpass calls in 2020. Chief Feist re viewed the highest percentage of calls occurring on Thursdays, with majority of calls occur ring mid-afternoon. Chief Feist reviewed the 2020 EMS call activity and indicated a factor in the increase of calls is due to faulty, or expired fire detectors. Chief Feist noted 54 calls within the City of Corcoran, with the highest number of calls falling under medical calls, false alarms, mutual aid calls. Chief Feist reviewed initiatives in recruiting to find more firefighters, and noted a new fire engine will arrive in December 2021. Council thanked Rogers Fire Department for their service. 7. Consent Agenda a. Draft Minutes of March 25, 2021 Council Meeting b. Draft Minutes of March 25, 2021 Council Work Session c. Financial Claims d. Assessment and Financing Agreement – NAPA e. Northwest Trails Sponsorship Resolution f. 2021 City Calendar Amendment g. City Hall Remodel – Pay Request #5; Change Order #4 h. Resolution 2021-26 - Accepting Donation for the Memorial Garden i. Resolution 2021-27 Supporting Grant Application – Hennepin County Youth Sports Equipment Grant j. Request for City Council Acknowledgement Conditions of Resolution 85-5 Approving Final Plat of Meadow Trails Have Been Met Council requested item 7h. be pulled for discussion. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Thomas to approve the consent agenda items 7a.-7g., 7i., and 7j. as presented. DRAFT 3 Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4:0) Council noted a special acknowledgement of the item 7h.; and gave special thanks to Hazel Lutz and Tom Anderson for their donation of $2,500 to the Memorial Garden. Council inquired how the donation will be utilized. City Administrator Martens noted the Parks and Trails Commission oversees the Memorial Garden Fund, and funds will be utilized for specific Parks and Trails projects. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Thomas to approve the consent agenda item 7h. Resolution 2021-26 Accepting Donation for the Memorial Garden as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4:0) 8. Planning Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the public comment opportunity for Planning Business items included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a. Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development Plan for Tavera City Planner Lindahl briefly reviewed tabling of the application from a previous Council meeting. City Planner Lindahl noted previous Council approvals encompassing a 549-unit project, in 8 phases with a mix of residential housing. City Planner Lindahl also noted the recent Hennepin County approval of an 80-acre lot division on the south end of the original Wessel 160-acre parcel on January 25, 2021 and includes a 40-acre split on the northern portion of the parcel proposed in the phase 1 plat. City Planner Lindahl outlined phase 1 of the development includes 33 single-family homes and 3 outlots, includes construction of Horseshoe Trail entrance with turn lanes on County Road 116, and includes grading beyond the first phase plat limits south to Hackamore, and grading on the north Wessel property related to the new Horsehoe Trail entrance. City Planner Lindahl noted the final phase 1 plat area and the phase 1 grading plan areas. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the out standing issues and conditions related to engineering and wetland permits not yet finalized that could impact final plans, and noted applicant is continuing to work on conditions with city engineer. City Planner Lindahl noted the will City coordinate the design, bid and management of County Road 116 improvements with the developer financing the improvements. City Planner Lindahl reviewed landscaping irrigation plan regarding water and water reuse balance and is tied to the wetland issue. City Planner Lindahl explained there was a decrease in the preservation of an ecologically significant area from 44 percent to 42 percent and appears related to changes in off-road trails required by the City as a condition of the preliminary plat approval. Overall, City Planner Lindahl noted the applicant is providing 52 percent woodland preservation. City Planner Lindahl noted in future phases the City will be taking land in the form of trail easements and a future neighborhood park on the west side of the development. City Planner Lindahl reviewed the master development contract which identifies fees and costs and requirements for payment in each phase of the project. City Planner Lindahl noted an example of improvements to Hackamore Road and estimated costs, however, the estimated costs for the Hackamore Road improvements would not be due with phase 1 but instead with a later phase per the development contract. Council and staff discussed grading outside of the phase 1 area and the stockpile or dirt being moved and remaining within the restricted size and height , and how it would be enforceable. Public Works Director Mattson explained each development has been allowed grading with conditions regarding distance from property lines. Public Works Director Mattson noted the Tavera project has been more specific with the grading details management plan. Council reviewed the dirt stockpile size, height, and adjacent properties of the development. Public Works Director Mattson noted erosion control, drainage maintenance, and stormwater components are part of normal grading operations. Council and staff discussed public safety review. City Administrator Marten noted City standards apply to all roads and right of way within the final plat and plan, however, in the future the City can change road standards. Council reviewed the grading in the first phases with stockpile located in adjacent parcel in phase 1 and asked for clarification if it is typical to allow grading outside of the phase, but not DRAFT 4 outside the plat. City Planner Lindahl noted not allowing grading outside of the platted area has been a City of Corcoran practice, and other cities do allow developers to grade after preliminary plat approval. City Planner Lindahl noted Corcoran has been more cautious and has not allowed grading outside of the plat area. Council discussed completion of each phase per year, and with allowing grading to move to an area outside the approved plat, and if the stockpile is not diminished possibly for a long period of time, how that could impact local landscape in the surrounding neighborhoods. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the drainage corridors northeasterly from southern half of parcel, along with a secondary drainage corridor is part of a cascading design to make sure the overall development stormwater plan works. Public Works Director Mattson noted restricting the grading and stockpile within the first phase may adversely affect the drainage plan in place to make sure neighboring properties are not impacted. Council discussed ensuring proper drainage across entire site with additional grading exceeding the platted area to avoid water issues. Council noted concern of size and the ambiguous amount of time the stockpile will remain outside of the developed area. City Administrator Martens reviewed the grading plan conditions, and noted as phase move forward, Council can request the developer to move the stockpile if developer is not in compliance with phase 1. Council and staff discussed compliance and the ability to request a change with the developer. Council asked where the stockpile will be located, grading outside the platted area regarding stormwater drainage, and if stockpile is larger than what is needed. Staff noted the drainage is reasonable due to the terrain and wetlands, and constraints of the property. Public Works Director Mattson noted grading and stockpiling of materials are two separate issues. Council noted stockpiles moving within the developments as phases progress, vegetation around stockpiles, trees impacted, phasing and how phases will change as development progresses. Council noted the extended grading that is necessary due to proper drainage and noting using flexibility in condition to note compliance with stockpile storage. Council discussed the location of stockpile and cul de sac in existing neighborhood faces forward where the stockpile will be located and seems close to the neighbors and discussed what screening looks like regarding the impacted properties. Paul Tabone, Lennar Homes, discussed phasing, including a planned phase 2 later in 2021 and referenced how allowing a stockpile, allows for dirt to not be hauled off site, that is needed for a future phase. Mr. Tabone reviewed the efficiency of utilizing the site materials, with proper elevations for proper drainage, and utilizing dirt in the future as project moves north. Mr. Tabone noted erosion control and silt fences will be in place with erosion control mix of clover and grass on the stockpile and is a couple hundred feet back from County Road 116. Council inquired about the proposed amount of 4,000 cubic yards, and 200 x 400 stockpile material size. Mr. Tabone noted Lennar engineering has reviewed the entire south side in a final stormwater and grading plan, and also trying to keep the material that is needed for the north side. Council reviewed concerns regarding the undefined term of how long the stockpile will remain, and if grading is being completed in the future and including a reassessment timeline of 3 years for discussion of stockpile if it remains. Council addressed past concerns from a resident that lives in an adjacent parcel to the Ravinia neighborhood and how the resident’s property was negatively impacted due to grading while the Ravinia development was constructed. Public Work Director Mattson noted drainage flows easterly with development on the upstream side and is managed through swales directing away from properties; if system were to fail it will impact property owned by Lennar. Council and staff discussed condition of any inactive material needs to have vegetation coverage with weed control after 21 days and is a condition of a performance permit for erosion control and compliance and is managed by the City and state agencies. Council discussed condition 17 regarding addition of a notation on the certificate of survey as it relates to the property setback requi rements for decks to reduce risk of misunderstanding to future property owners. Council and staff discussed what the certificate of survey requirements are, and changing City ordinance for future developments. Council discussed condition 18 and existing HOAs and topic was reviewed in the administration and performance of HOAs. Council discussed condition 19 and landscaping plans approved at the preliminary plat and the risk of tree pests with landscaping trees selected. Council discussed condition 20 and stockpiles and boundaries. Council discussed condition 21 and refuse and construction debris left on construction site, noting it is DRAFT 5 a citywide issue and code exists for garbage left on construction sites, and specified it is not a building inspection issue but a code enforcement issue, and includes lose debris flying into wetlands. Council reviewed how the City can address issue. Council discussed if it is a condition or conversation on City beautification. Council discussed architectural standards not being satisfied, and what the requirements are and how the City will manage future architectural standards. City Administrator Martens reviewed the recent staff transition incorporating a construction services coordinator to oversee future architectural standards. City Planner Lindahl noted the current architectural standards for single-family homes are being met. City Planner Lindahl noted there are over 100 different home plans, and staff is working through them to approve, and with each building permit the construction services coordinator will review for compliance all architectural standards. Council noted there is mechanism to make sure there is compliance and eliminate mistakes which occurred in the Ravinia neighborhood. Council discussed the homes in the Ravinia neighborhood out of compliance and actions the City can take. City Administrator Martens noted occupied homes do not allow for any recourse, however the new homes under construction can be reviewed for compliance. Council reviewed the process of house construction and if the certificate of occupancy has not been issued, does the City have recourse to require the builder to adhere to PUD requirements architectural standards. City Planner Lindahl noted the new construction services coordinator position will review final inspections before the certificate of occupancy is issued, and upon discovery of non-compliance, have the builder remove materials and replace them with compliant materials. Council discussed the homes that are currently non-compliant, the City’s responsibility, and insurance. Council and staff discussed the possibility of siding replacement due to natural disaster, and how the permit would be handled. Council noted the need to document the non-compliance for future reference for owners and future sale of homes. Council asked for the siding conversation be reviewed and brought back to Council at a later date. Council also noted tracking non-compliance homes. Council noted staff changes will eliminate non-compliance issues in the future with new home construction. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by McKee to approve Resolution 2021-22 Final PUD Development Plan (PUD) for Tavera “1st Addition” for Lennar (PID 35-119-23-41-0002) (City File 20- 042) with amendment: 15. The stockpile as shown on the grading plan is approved and must remain in compliance with the planned dimensions. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4-0) Council asked for clarification on item 24 of contract, letter b, if item referencing other items other than architectural standards. City Planner Lindahl confirmed it is not relating to architectural standards. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by McKee to approve Resolution 2021-23 Final Plat and Development Contract for Tavera “1st Addition” for Lennar (PID 35-119-23-41-0002) (City File 20-042). Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4-0) 9. Unfinished Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Public Comment opportunity for Unfinished Business items included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the public comment opportunity. a. Appaloosa Woods Street Improvements – Accept Feasibility Study, Order Improvement Hearing, & Authorize Plans and Specs Public Works Director Mattson outlined previous Council authorization for the feasibility study, staff work to date in aligning with Maple Grove’s project in 2021 to achieve cost savings for the City. Public Works Director Mattson noted the properties within the development, outlined the areas on the street for the improvement project, noted the preliminary assessment roll of properties impacted by the street improvements, reviewed project schedule and next steps in the street improvement project. Public Works Director Mattson stated May 4 is the Maple Grove bid opening deadline and noted the May 13 DRAFT 6 Council meeting would include an improvement hearing, review of cooperative agreement with Maple Grove and bid awards. Public Works Director Mattson reviewed the assessment hearing would need to be scheduled and briefly outlined the street improvement construction timeline for 2021. Public Works Director Mattson outlined improvement funding would be a combination of special assessments and local participation from the Asphalt Fund with improvement costs updated after bids are received and reviewed at the improvement hearing prior to consideration of award. Public Works Director Mattson noted the cost to design the plans and specifications is approxim ately $5,000. Council reviewed the redevelopment was initiated by Maple Grove, and also noted Maple Grover no longer is providing maintenance options to that area for Corcoran. Council noted the unique circumstance of access to Corcoran properties through a Maple Grove road. Council noted for clarity the practicality of servicing dirt roads, and the need for a better way to fund infrastructure regarding cost distribution. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Thomas to accept Option 1 Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Feasibility Study, Order Improvement Hearing, and Authorize Plans and Specifications in the amount of $5,000. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4-0) 10. New Business (Public Comment Opportunity) Mayor McKee invited residents to communicate telephonically during the Public Comment opportunity for New Business items included on the agenda. Administrative Services Director Beise explained the instructions to participate in the meeting via the Zoom video format and reviewed instructions for participation in the meeting through telephone or computer. No residents participated in the Public Comment opportunity. a. Code Enforcement Update City Administrator Martens presented code enforcement updates and noted proactive code enforcement is now in its third year, and includes driving through areas with obvious violations, and continuing to respond to complaints. City Administrator Martens noted the highest number of complaints in 2019 were related to storage nuisances. In 2020, there 279 violations at 190 properties with 20 violations sent to the city attorney for prosecution with repetitive court delays due to the pandemic. City Administrator Martens clarified what level of visible debris constitutes a violation, reviewed enforcement action regarding vehicle and trailer improper storage, inoperable vehicles, etc. Council discussed what is enforceable. Council discussed what may be viewed from neighboring property and the complaint-based process involved. Council and staff discussed complaint-based and proactive sweep code violations differences. City Administrator Martens noted staff would follow-up with Council on the percentage of complaint-based versus proactive code violation findings. Council and staff discussed the City budget for code enforcement and components of service. Council noted communication of the code violation and clarity for both staff and residents is necessary regarding the violation in direction from Council. Council noted review of RV storage from paved to unpaved surface and eliminating sign enforcement policy. Council discussed intent of sign enforcement policy regarding code enforcement for campaign signs, miscellaneous signs, etc. City Administrator Martens noted the code enforcement sign sweeps included all miscellaneous signs and not just campaign signs. City Administrator Martens noted review of campaign sign policy will be scheduled for a later Council meeting for discussion. City Administrator Martens and Council reviewed the process for code enforcement in specific areas of the City. Council noted the current cases pending in the court system and asked for status update. City Administrator Martens noted code violations are a low priority within the court system and noted the goal is to help residents find a solution to the code violation and be compliant with the City Code. b. Finance Manager Hiring Process City Administrator Martens outlined the Finance Manager position, job description, budgeted amo unts for 2021, and recruitment and hiring processes. Council and staff discussed the timeline with applications due May 10, candidate selection, and process in finding the right candidate. DRAFT 7 MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Thomas to approve the finance manager job description and authorize staff to begin the recruitment process as presented. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4-0) c. Government Fee Analysis Proposal City Administrator Martens reviewed the proposal to review costs and processes for reviewing building permit applications and assisting with annual reporting requirements, and proposal of $17,500 from Abdo, Eick, and Meyers. MOTION: made by Nichols, seconded by Schultz to authorize staff to proceed with the governmental fee analysis proposal. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4-0) d. City Council and Commission Ordinance Discussion Council discussed serving roles in tandem as councilmembers and as a commissioner. Council discussed Charter Commission discussions and the acceptability of serving in multiple roles. City Administrator Martens noted the city attorney would need to review pro cesses regarding discussed changes, and an ordinance could clarify City Council roles serving on the City Council and commissions. Council discussed term limits for serving the Council and commissions. Council discussed an ordinance referencing number of seats on each commission. Staff noted review with city attorney will be forthcoming on process for term limits and process for updating language for restrictions in serving in multiple roles with the City. e. Charter Commission Application Council discussed the application. MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by McKee to table item until the April 22, 2021 Council meeting. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, and Schultz Abstain: Thomas (Motion carried 3:0:1) 11. Staff Reports a. Pandemic Response Update City Administrator Martens updated Council on daily operating procedures, vaccines, 12. 2021 City Council Schedule City Administrator Martens reviewed upcoming Council items and noted the upcoming work sessions on April 22. Council requested the Krominga item be advanced to the beginning of the agenda on April 22. Council discussed items being added to the packet after the packet has been posted. Administrative Services Director Beise noted late documents added to the physical paper copy of the Council packet can be added to the electronic version; but will greatly depend on when the item is received and staff availability. Administrative Services Director Beise referenced an example of item turned in right before a scheduled Council meeting, updating the electronic version on the website may not always align with the scheduled Council meeting. 13. Adjournment MOTION: made by Schultz, seconded by Thomas to adjourn. Voting Aye by Roll Call Vote: McKee, Nichols, Schultz, and Thomas (Motion carried 4:0) Meeting adjourned at 10:08 pm. ________________________________ Michelle Friedrich – Deputy Clerk DRAFT Agenda Item 7c. Council Meeting Date: 4/22/2021 FINANCIAL CLAIMS Prepared By: jrotz CHECK RANGE FUND #500 ESCROW CLAIMSAgendaItem: 7c. Paid toAmountProject name 500-20482$461.50LANDFORM - NELSONTRUCKINGCUP, SP, VAR20-022 500-20488$1,286.00LANDFORM - RushCreekReserveFPandFPUD20-030 500-20469$71.00LANDFORM - Ravinia15thFP, PUD, FPUD20-033 500-20497$176.00LANDFORM - KarineimiFP20-036 500-20209$154.00LANDFORM - OrthSolarCofC20-038 500-20471$142.00LANDFORM - St. ThereseMinorSubdivision20-041 500-20332$2,888.00LANDFORM - TaveraFPandFPUD20-042 500-20485$105.00LANDFORM - TessmerFP20-043 500-20215$35.50LANDFORM - HennADUIUP20-045 500-20490$3,577.00LANDFORM - CookLakeHighlandsRZPPPUD20-047 500-20217$248.50LANDFORM - WrightHennepinSubstation20-048 500-20221$1,526.50LANDFORM - FranzenPP20-049 500-20436$355.00LANDFORM - PULTEPUDCONCEPT20-050 500-20224$355.00LANDFORM - LARSONIUPFORCHOL21-003 500-20223$1,775.00LANDFORM - NAPACUPANDSP21-004 500-20459$477.00LANDFORM - REFUGEATRUSHCREEKVACATION21-005 500-20226$106.50LANDFORM - THARPLOTLINEADJUSTMENT21-006 500-20477$1,562.00LANDFORM - SCHERBERCUPANDSP21-007 500-20332$568.00LANDFORM - MEADOWTRAILS2NDADDITIONPPVARFP21-009 500-20219$868.75LANDFORM - KROMINGAVARIANCE21-010 500-20227$245.50LANDFORM - D&DSERVICECUPSPANDVAR21-012 500-20459$71.00LANDFORM - RAINSPUDSKETCHPLAN21-013 500-20332$4,130.00LENNAR - MEADOWTRAILS2NDADDITION21-009 500-20218$348.50M.T. CARPENTERLANDSCAPE, INC. - 10500MAPLELANEWCAESCROWREFUND 500-20390$921.31WRIGHTHENNEPIN - RaviniaStreetLights 500-20420$260.35WRIGHTHENNEPIN - BassLakeCrossingStreetLights 500-20436$149.80WRIGHTHENNEPIN - PulteBellwetherStreetLights Total 22,864.71 Total Fund #500 = 22,864.71 SeeattachedPaymentsDetail) ALL OTHER FINANCIAL CLAIMSAgendaItem:7c.$ 311,271.89$ 334,136.60TotalChecks SeeattachedCheckDetailRegister) Total of Auto Deductions 104,523.48 TOTAL EXPENDITURES FOR APPROVAL$ 438,660.08 Auto Deductions / Electronic Fund Transfer / Other Disbursements DatePaid toAmount 4/5/2021ProfessionalLawEnforcement - St. Paul, MN$ 35.00PDmemberships 4/5/2021Dick'sSportingGoods$ 123.56Parks & RecreationSupplies 4/5/2021K2AwardsandApparel$ 340.40Parks & RecreationSupplies 4/5/2021Walmart.com$ 518.23Parks & RecreationSupplies 4/7/2021USPS - Hamel, MN$ 1,000.00Water/Sewerbillingpostage 4/9/2021USPS - Hamel, MN$ 1,389.76Newsletterpostage 4/9/2021Zoom.us$ 16.11Remotemeetinglicense 4/9/2021Zoom.us$ 69.88Remotemeetinglicense 4/12/2021Fleetio.com - Birmingham, AL$ 30.00PDSupplies 4/14/2021Zero9SolutionsLLC$ 149.85PDTraining 4/16/2021Minnesota StateColleges$ 265.00MCFOAClerkTraining 3/30/2021NSFCheckFee$ 4.00NSFCheck 4/5/2021ACHFILEFEE$ 15.00Automaticsewer/waterpaymentACHfee 4/6/2021SUNLIFE $ 2,104.83SunLifeLifeInsurance, STD, andLTD 4/6/2021SUNLIFE $ 2,158.98SunLifeLifeInsurance, STD, andLTD 4/7/2021REVTRAKSV9T$ 916.96CreditCardFeesforMarch 4/8/2021PayrollTaxes$ 19,405.11Payrolltaxes 4/8/2021NetPayrollPP07$ 52,212.21NetpayrollPP07 4/12/2021StateofMN - Roth$ 2,282.32Deferredcompensation paymenttoStateofMN 4/12/2021StateofMN - MSRS$ 2,467.90StateofMNhealthcaresavingsplan 4/12/2021OPTUM, PLANFUND$ 3,674.82Healthsavingsaccount 4/12/2021MNPERA, PERA$ 15,026.56Pensionplan 4/15/2021USBankEquipmentFinance$ 317.00Copierlease Total 104,523.48 H:\\City Hall Information\\CITY GOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\Council Information\\Council Claims\\2021 Claims Workbook.xls 10100FarmersStateBankUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-41941-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43100-321TelephoneE100-43100-380Utility & Services (GENERAL)E100-41951-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-433DuesandMembershipsE100-45200-261RecreationProgrammingE416-41951-580OtherEquipmentE100-43100-212MotorFuelsE100-42100-212MotorFuelsE100-43100-212MotorFuelsE100-42100-417UniformsE100-45200-261RecreationProgrammingE400-41951-210OperatingSuppliesGENERAL)Total CENTERPOINTENERGYHOUSTONTotal AMAZONCAPITALSERVICESTotal CANVASSOLUTIONSINCTotal BEAUDRYOILCOMPANY Total CENTURYLINKTotal ASPENMILLSTotal BERGANKDVTotal BURNSRYANTotal BSNSPORTSADP, LLCCINTAS - 470CENTURYLINKCENTERPOINTENERGYHOUSTONCANVASSOLUTIONSINCBEAUDRYOILCOMPANYASPENMILLSAMAZONCAPITALSERVICESTotal ADP, LLC$3,452.40$2,120.04$2,250.00$1,074.41$242.34$280.50$173.39$118.00$175.00$259.05$109.50$229.17$300.68$34.97$17.06$87.08$25.795780481550402219884559-703-5754460-33/25754177-33/204052104052191220504011248951803010180301018030092720321TDT-QKVX-W139K-499P-1VWORKFORCENOWPAYROLLSOLUTIONSBUNDLELANDLINE/FIREMONITORING-9100763-498-7515NATURALGAS-9100NATURALGASNATURALGASCANVASSUBSCRIPTIONREIMBURSEMENTSFOPLEGALDEFENSEPLANBASEBALLSUPPLIESSOFTWARECONVERSIONGASOLINESQUADFUELDIESELUNIFORMSUPPLIESSUPPLIESBASEBALLSUPPLIESREMODELITSUPPLIES04/16/2110:25AMCITYOFCORCORAN3,788.05$2,120.04$2,250.00$1,209.70$242.34$280.50$308.45$262.08$259.05$229.17 Page 1 Check Detail Register© April 2021 Check AmtInvoiceComment UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE601-49400-215WaterMetersE601-49400-215WaterMetersE602-49450-400RepairsMaintCont (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41900-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41951-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-42100-321TelephoneE100-41941-321TelephoneE100-43100-417UniformsE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-417UniformsE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210 OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)Total CROWRIVERFARMEQUIPMENTTotal COMPUTERINTEGRATIONTECHTotal CULLIGANBOTTLEDWATERTotal CORPORATECONNECTIONTotal CUMMINSNPOWERLLC Total EMPLOYEERELATIONSTotal COMCAST-INTERNETTotal CINTAS - 470COMCAST-INTERNETFERGUSON WATERWORKSCULLIGAN BOTTLEDWATERCROW RIVERFARMEQUIPMENTCORPORATE CONNECTIONCOMPUTER INTEGRATION TECH$12,009.45$4,215.00$121.33$412.09$361.00$720.55$105.97$792.00$967.50$139.18$139.17$143.26$121.33 143.26$24.10$10.42$71.00$69.00$72.28$79.05$24.10$16.35$46.73$10.0040808018710471320047005389937E4-29060114X79646101199367571263079323077253076103073470412210412214081415637408141546940814154664081415439408141543140814153804080802172408080201140808019534080801937FLOOR MATS - POLICEMETERSMETERSBACKGROUNDCHECKSERVICEONGENERATOROFFICEWATERSUPPLIESJACKETSITMANAGED SERVICE - MTHITMANAGED SERVICE - MTHITMANAGED SERVICE - MTHITMANAGED SERVICE - MTHPDINTERNETCITYHALLINTERNETUNIFORMSTOWELSPUBLICWORKSFLOOR MATS - POLICECITYHALLHAND SANITIZER & MICROFIBERWIPESUNIFORMSPUBLICWORKSHANDSANITIZERCITYHALL04/16/2110:25 AM CITYOFCORCORAN6,043.50$801.79$361.00$720.55$105.97$278.35$71.00$ 10.42 Page 2 Check Detail Register© April 2021 UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-41941-201Postage/ShippingG500-20459RefugeofRushCreekFP18-028G500-20227D&DServiceCUPSPVAR21-012E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20219KromingaVariance21-010G500-20332LennarTaveraDevelopmentG500-20477ScherberCR30WCALGUG500-20226TharpLotLineAdjust. 21-006G500-20459RefugeofRushCreekFP18-028G500-20223NapaSitePlanCUP21-004G500-20224LarsonIUPforCHOL21-003G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20221FranzenMinorSubd #20-049G500-20217WrightHennSubstation20-048G500-20490CookLake - SchommerG500-20215HennADUIUP20-045E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)G500-20485Tessmer -TopoExemption20-007G500-20332LennarTaveraDevelopmentG500-20471St. ThereseSketchPlan19-006G500-20209OhrtSolarCofC20-038G500-20497KariniemiPP20-016G500-20469Rav11-1318-040, 19-002 & 012G500-20488RushCreekReserveG500-20482NelsonSketchPlan19-023E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-323RadioUnitsE100-42100-301PrisonerE100-41540-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-42100-810 Refunds/ReimbursementsTotal GALLAGHERBENEFITSERVICESINCTotal FERGUSONWATERWORKSTotal HENNCOSHERIFF-MC131Total GALLSINCORPORATEDTotal FPMAILINGSOLUTIONS Total HENNEPIN COUNTYARFPMAILINGSOLUTIONSLANDFORMHENNEPIN COUNTYARHENNCOSHERIFF-MC131GALLAGHER BENEFITSERVICES INCGALLSINCORPORATED$2,000.00$1,136.00$1,562.00$1,775.00$1,526.50$3,577.00$2,888.00$1,286.00$1,416.73$138.55$245.50$868.75$568.00$106.50$477.00$355.00$355.00$248.50$248.50$105.00$142.00$154.00$176.00$461.50$220.95$150.00$948.78$15.00$71.00$35.50$71.00RI1048114903149231492314923149231492314923149231492314923149231490314903149031490314903149031490314903149031490314903149031490314901000164311100016458310001645161000163829225349018020379QTRLYMAILMETERRAINSPUDSKETCHPLAN21-013D&DSERVICECUPSPANDVAR21-012RESIDENTIALORDINANCEAMENDMENT21-011KROMINGAVARIANCE21-010MEADOWTRAILS2NDADDITIONPPVARFP21-009SCHERBERCUPANDSP21-007THARPLOTLINEADJUSTMENT21-006REFUGEATRUSHCREEKVACATION21-005NAPACUPANDSP21-004LARSONIUPFORCHOL21-003PULTEPUDCONCEPT20-050FranzenPP20-049WrightHennepinSubstation20-048CookLakeHighlandsRZPPPUD20-047HennADUIUP20-045HuntersPlace2ndAdditionPPandFP20-044TaveraFPandFPUD20-042St. ThereseMinorSubdivision20-041OrthSolarCofC20-038KarineimiFP20-036Ravinia15thFP, PUD, FPUD20-033RushCreekReserveFPandFPUD20-030NELSONTRUCKINGCUP, SP, VAR20-022RadioFees - PublicWorksRadio Fees / MDC - (Inv. )Prisoner Fees - Booking / HousingENGAGEMENT: 2020GASB 75BODYARMOR04/16/2110:25 AM CITYOFCORCORAN12,421.54$2,000.00$1,787.68$138.55$948.78$ 15.00 Page 3 Check Detail Register© April 2021 UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-45200-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E602-49450-312MCESSewageTreatmentE100-43100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41300-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E601-49400-310OtherProfessionalServicesG500-2021810500MapleLaneWCAR100-41900-34103Zoning/LandUseApplFeeG500-20332LennarTaveraDevelopmentE100-41400-364WorkersCompInsuranceE100-41910-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E100-41920-300 ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)TotalM.T.CARPENTERLANDSCAPE, INC.Total LEAGUEOFMNCITIESINSUR.TRSTTotal METROPOLITAN COUNCILENVIROTotal MARIERIDGEWAYLICSW, LLCTotal MIDWESTMACHINERYCO.TotalMENARDSMAPLEGROVETotal MAPLEGROVE, CITYOF Total MILLERCHEVROLETTotal MARTENS, BRADTotal LANDFORMLEAGUEOFMNCITIESINSUR.TRSTMNDEPTOFLABOR & INDUSTRYMILLERCHEVROLETMIDWEST MACHINERYCO.METROPOLITANCOUNCILENVIROMENARDSMAPLEGROVEMARTENS, BRADMARIERIDGEWAYLICSW, LLCMAPLEGROVE, CITYOFM.T. CARPENTERLANDSCAPE, INC.LENNARTotal LENNAR$220,320.00$6,061.50$1,177.76$6213.01$4,130.00$2,271.50$300.00$117.74$150.00$348.50$800.00$500.00$50.00$63.99$8.4931492CVW16908123488030001122229810348070604052112672021Q1ESCROWREFREFUND #21-REFUND #21-172463149231492CITY PLANNINGREPAIR PARTSREPAIR PARTSMATERIAL TREATMENTSUPPLIESSUPPLIESCELL PHONEREIMBURSEMENT FEB21OFFICER/STAFF SESSIONMAPLE GROVE WATER HOOKUP CHARGES FORQ110500MAPLELANEWCAESCROWREFUNDMEADOWTRAILS2NDADDITION21-009MEADOWTRAILS2NDADDITION21-009WORKER'SCOMP - ADMINCITYMEETINGSCODEENFORCEMENT04/16/2110:25AMCITYOFCORCORAN220,320.00$27,072.25$4,930.00$1,177.76$6,213.01$500.00$117.74$150.00$348.50$50.00$72.48 2021 Page 4 Check Detail Register© April 2021 Check AmtInvoiceComment UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E100-42400-437SurchargesE100-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-223BuildingRepairSuppliesE100-42100-208TrainingandInstructionE100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-41941-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-45200-221MaintenanceProjectsE100-42100-208TrainingandInstructionE100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E100-43100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)R601-49400-36233 Refunds/ReimbursementsE 100-42400-437 SurchargesTotal NORTH MEMORIAL EMSEDUCATIONTotal STREICHER SPOLICE EQUIPMENTTotal MNDEPTOFLABOR INDUSTRYTotal ON-SITEMEDICAL SERVICES INCTotal NAPA AUTOPARTS - CORCORANTotal NUTRIEN AGSOLUTIONS, INC. Total MUNJULURI, HARISHTotal OFFICEDEPOTTotal PAINTERATIMUNJULURI,HARISHSTREICHERSPOLICEEQUIPMENTPAINTERATION-SITEMEDICALSERVICESINCOFFICEDEPOTNUTRIENAGSOLUTIONS, INC.NORTH MEMORIAL EMS EDUCATIONNAPA AUTO PARTS - CORCORAN$10,689.67$16,404.82$1,344.00($19935)($100.00)$116.28$155.88$530.47$610.00$185.53$157.48$199.35$14.41$37.79$16.48$35.00$28.79$68.29$12.29($6.59)$6.59$6.992020 4QI1495393209191644086100011641372590011641372550011641320840011640363010 0144697358VVY-LSQ-1S8343338343301343300343298343281343275343271343198343192REFUND2021 1Q4THQTR SURCHARGESUPPLIES50% PAYMENTHEARING TESTING, MEDICAL QUESTIONNAIRE, OFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIES80 BAGS 50# LBS 20-10-10TRAININGSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESSUPPLIESWATER/SEWER REFUND1ST QTR SURCHARGE04/16/21 10:25AMCITYOFCORCORAN27,094.49$1,344.00$116.28$155.88$530.47$610.00$146.79$281.26$35. 00 RESPIRATOR FIT TESTING Page 5 Check Detail Register© April 2021 Check UnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaidUnpaid E205-42100-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsE100-42100-220Repair/MaintSupply (GENERAL)E416-42100-580OtherEquipmentE100-42100-323RadioUnitsE100-42100-321TelephoneE100-45200-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-41920-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-41400-219Covid-19CoronavirusE100-41951-210OperatingSupplies (GENERAL)E100-42100-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E601-49400-300ProfessionalSrvs (GENERAL)E400-41941-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)Total TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVETotal WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE Total THEUPSSTORE #1533Total TACTICALSOLUTIONSTotal WATCHGUARDVIDEOTotal VERIZONWIRELESSTotal THEBIGBLUEBOXTACTICALSOLUTIONSWRIGHTHENNEPINCOOPELECTWESTSIDE WHOLESALETIREWATCHGUARDVIDEOVERIZONWIRELESSTRANSUNIONRISK & ALTERNATIVETHE UPSSTORE #1533THEBIGBLUEBOX$2,236.00$175.00$685.68$356.00$568.59$349.22$167.12$10.71$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$46.78$41.78$40.01$75.008360041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421ACCINV003009876366453987636645398763664539876366453987636645398763664533609221-0321000000 0649698092DRAGONEYE SPEED LIDAR & HOLSTERGleasonPkwy 150-1695-9398Gleason Pkwy150-1695-9396GleasonPkwy 150-1695-9395PrairieSageLN/BridlePath 150-1695-8438PrairieSage LN150-1695-8436PrairieSageLN 150-1695-8435PrairieSage LN105-1695-8432BridlePath 150-1695-8431BLACKOAKLN 150-1695-7149BLACKOAK LN/BLACKOAKCT 150-1695-6371BLACKOAK CT150-1695-6367COACHHOUSE LNLOT #1 150-1695-6365ANNABELLECT 150-1695-6359SERVICEV300, BATTERY, REMOVABLE AND RECHARGEABLERADIO UNITSCELL SERVICECELL PHONESCELL PHONESCELL PHONESCode Enforcement IpadSERVICEWATER SAMPLE TESTING40' OFFSITERENTAL04/16/2110:25 AM CITYOFCORCORAN2,236.00$1,213.50$175.00$685.68$356.00$10.71$ 75.00 Page 6 Check Detail Register© April 2021 G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLights$15.46$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$23.67$14.98$23.67$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$30.43$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$15.46$15.46$15.46$15.46$15.46$15.46$15.46$15.46$1498$2.74041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421Bridle/Gleason: 150-1690-5131WILDFLOWERTRL150-1694-4505SUNFLOWERCOURT150-1694-4503PRIMROSECOURT150-1694-4502ANNABELLELOT5150-1694-0821FIRLN N/LOT #5: 150-1694-008272NDAVEN: 150-1694-0081FIRLNN/72NDN: 150-1694-0080FIRLN N/LOT #8: 150-1694-0079FIRLNN: 150-1694-0078FIRLNN/CR10: 150-1694-007674THAVEN: 150-1693-7077FIRLNN/CR10: 150-1693-7076FIRLN/74THAVE: 150-1693-7075FIRLNN: 150-1693-7074FIRLN/75THAVE: 150-1693-7072Gleason/Wildflo: 150-1693-5986Wildflo/Gleason: 150-1693-5734Primrose/Wildfl: 150-1693-573319399Primrose: 150-1693-573219315Primrose: 150-1693-573119343Annabelle: 150-1693-572619367Annabelle: 150-1693-57246370SteepleLN: 150-1693-02026310SteepleLN: 150-1693-020119345GoldenTR: 150-1693-020019389LupineLN: 150-1693-019919437LupineLN: 150-1693-0197Bridle/66thAve: 150-1692-837466TH/CEDAR: 150-1692-83736398Larkspur: 150-1692-09086485Larkspur: 150-1692-090719065Galloway: 150-1691-808219130Galloway: 150-1691-80806657Bridle: 150-1691-80796681Bridle: 150-1691-80666675Carriage: 150-1691-806419301Annabelle: 150-1691-8063ElderberryCt: 150-1691-0178BridlePath: 150-1691-0177Prairie/Bridle: 150-1691-0174Bridle/Bluestem: 150-1691-0168Bridle/Steeple: 150-1691-01586471Carriage:150-1691-0155Paddock/Bridle: 150-1690-5158BridlePath: 150-1690-5146PaddockLn150-1690-5137Bridle/Paddock: 150-1690-513504/16/2110:25 AM CITY OF CORCORAN Page 7 Check Detail Register© April FundSummaryUnpaid 10100FarmersStateBank100GENERALFUND602SEWER601WATER500ESCROWHOLDINGFUND416CAPITAL-EQUIPMENTCERTS400CITYHALLREMODEL2020-2021205DWIFORFEITUREFUND201RESERVESDONATIONFUNDG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20436PulteEncore - PUDSkch17-029G500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20390RaviniaStreetLightsG500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012G500-20420BassLakeCrossMIHome17-012TotalWRIGHTHENNEPINCOOPELECT Total XCEL ENERGYXCEL ENERGY$232,868.53$62,913.3 2$22,864.71$2,236.00$6,933.56$2,606.00$3,627.40$87.08$133.83$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$14.98$18.27041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421041421WILDFLOWERTRL150-1694-4506STREETLIGHTING9525CAINROADANNABELLELN/BLACKOAKLN150-1695-6352COACHHOUSELN/ANNABELLE150-1695-6351COACHHOUSELN150-1695-6350102NDPL/JACKPINELN150-1695-5964102NDAVE/JACKPINELN150-1695-5963102NDAVE150-1695-5961JACKPINELN/IRONWOODCT150-1695-5957IRONWOODLN/10NDPLACE150-1695-5955IRONWOODLN150-1695-595463RDAVEN150-1694-9987LARKSPURLN/63RD150-1694-9986STIEGROAD150-1694-8544STIEGROAD150-1694-8543102NDPLACE/ 103RDAVENUE150-1694-7926STEEPLECHASELN150-1694-7920MEADOWRUECT150-1694-7919SNOWBERRYCT150-1694-7918MEADOWRUECT150-1694-7911HICKORYLNN150-1694-689475THAVEN150-1694-689374THAVEN150-1694-6892JACKPINELNN150-1694-689174TH PL & MAPLE150-1694-688904/16/2110:25AMCITYOFCORCORAN1,331.46$133.83 10100 Farmers State Bank$334,136. 60 334,136. 60 Page 8 Check Detail Register© April 2021 Check CityofCorcoran ConsultantSummary 4/22/2021 NameInvoice DateAmount Due Carson, Clelland & Schreder Landform04/12/21 27,072.25 Metro West Inspection Wenck Associates Total$ 27,072.25 H:\\CityHallInformation\\CITYGOVERNMENT\\Council, Commissions & Committees\\CouncilInformation\\Council Claims\\2021ClaimsWorkbook.xls STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7d. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Recruitment Process – Maintenance Worker Action Required: Approval Summary: The adopted 2021 budget includes an additional maintenance worker position with a mid-year start. Staff is requesting approval to proceed with the recruitment process as follows: • April 22: Council approves hiring process • April 30: Post position • May 24: Applications due • May 31: First round interviews (week of) • June 7: Second round interviews (week of) • June 24: Job offer approved by City Council • July 6: Potential start of employment Financial/Budget: The adopted 2021 budget includes funds for this position. Council Action: Authorize staff to proceed with the recruitment process for the additional maintenance worker as presented. Attachments: 1. Job Description – Maintenance Worker PW MAINTENANCE WORKER ©City of Corcoran 2020 1 Department: Public Works Reports To: PW Superintendent Points: 228 Grade: 7 FLSA: Non-Exempt Bargaining Unit: NA Revision Date: September, 2020 Job Summary: The Public Works Maintenance Worker provides maintenance of roads, drainage, wastewater and surface water collection, water distribution, equipment maintenance, parks and buildings. The Maintenance Worker performs heavy equipment operation, operation of power tools and physical labor as needed. Scope of Impact: The PW Maintenance Worker is responsible for providing public service and for preservation of public assets through timely attention to problems and careful operation, including attention to safety procedures. Essential Duties and Responsibilities: • Performs assigned work in an efficient and safe manner. o Follows all safety procedures according to industry best practices and state and federal regulations; follows all City and Department policies; o Strives to learn and gain proficiency in a broad variety of equipment operation; o Performs work in a manner that protects public and private assets; o Responds immediately to problems with sewer or water; identifies problems and, after taking action to mitigate further damage; confers with the Superintendent or Crew Leader on follow-up action; o Monitors weather conditions and is alert for possible early call-in to address snow, ice or flooding; o Suggests improved methods and practices for public works when experience and common sense dictates. • Operates appropriate equipment to clear brush, install culverts, mow grass, remove silt and other drainage obstructions, patch potholes, erect signs, repair frost boils, remove and replace concrete curbs and asphalt roadways and other duties relating to park and roadway maintenance. o Blacktop work will include sub cutting, removal, installation, compaction of asphalt, and seal coating; o Concrete work will include removal of concrete, forming, curb pouring, and finishing; o Performs right-of-way maintenance to avoid obstruction of view, overhanging trees, clogged ditches and retention ponds; City of Corcoran PW MAINTENANCE WORKER ©City of Corcoran 2020 2 o Drives medium, heavy, and light trucks in order to deliver and pick up materials and supplies; o Operates snow removal equipment in a safe, responsible manner in order to provide a passable condition and maximum safety on public roads and property. • Performs maintenance of equipment and facilities. o Monitors hours on motorized equipment and ensures that manufacturer recommended services are performed; o Inspects equipment at the beginning and end of shifts to ensure safety and readiness of equipment; o Troubleshoots motorized equipment problems and reports observations based on seriousness; o Carries out maintenance of grounds and parking areas at city hall, parks and public works facilities; o Ensures that the public works facility is organized and safe; o Assists with the seasonal opening and closing of park facilities and the maintenance of grounds and active play areas; applies chemicals on park property. • Performs work necessary to maintain the water and sanitary sewer system. o Installs water meters, flushes hydrants; o Shuts off water to properties in emergencies or as directed; o Inspects to ensure that sump pumps are not discharged into the sanitary sewer system; o Assists with lift station maintenance, etc. • Carries out mitigation services for nuisance properties or noxious weeds and reports time and materials used. • Responds to emergencies and natural disasters with equipment. o Works to restore the transportation network so that emergency vehicles can pass; o Assists with support to other communities with joint powers agreements in the event of a natural disaster. • Performs other duties and activities as assigned. Minimum Qualifications: The job requires a high school diploma and two or more years of experience in the operation power tools, trucks and heavy equipment, or equivalent. A Class D driver’s license is required. At the directive of the Superintendent, to address Department needs, a Class A CDL license with air brakes endorsement must be obtained within six months. A DOT Physical Health Card is required. At the directive of the Superintendent it may be necessary to obtain licenses necessary to operate the water and sanitary sewer system. Additional training post-hire may be required. Ability to respond to emergency calls within 30 minutes. PW MAINTENANCE WORKER ©City of Corcoran 2020 3 Desired Qualifications: Additional desired qualifications include a Class B CDL, experience in a municipal or government setting, experience operating heavy equipment, experience with buildings and grounds maintenance, and road maintenance. Coursework or certifications in civil engineering inspections are preferred. Water and wastewater operation, construction inspection and mechanic training and are preferred. Knowledge, Skills and Abilities Required for Successful Job Performance: • Knowledge of equipment used by the department; ability to analyze and resolve problems; mechanical ability and knowledge of equipment troubleshooting and maintenance procedures; • Knowledge of civil engineering principals and road construction procedures; ability to read engineering drawings and to use specialized equipment to read elevations and locate boundaries and right-of-ways; • Knowledge of materials, methods, & operations used in street, building, parks & ground maintenance; • Knowledge of the functions and responsibilities of City Departments, staff, and key community members; • Ability to perform in a professional and courteous manner to requests from other staff members; ability to maintain a positive attitude toward work, the public, and coworkers; ability to be public service oriented with tactful and effective conflict resolution skills; • The ability to work independently; • Knowledge of traffic laws, ordinances, and regulations involved in equipment operation; • Knowledge of water distribution and wastewater collection; ability to read control panels, meters and gauges, to be able to detect when problems are occurring, and respond appropriately; • Knowledge of the occupational hazards and safety precautions necessary to perform manual and maintenance work; • Knowledge of the location of City streets, easements and alleys; knowledge of plow routes; • Knowledge of erosion control and conservation management practices; • Ability to have a creative, inquiring and innovative manner willing to explore new approaches, implement new methods, and be receptive to suggestions of others; • Ability to operate a telephone or radio to communicate effectively with City staff; • Ability to follow oral and written instructions; • Will have a high degree of integrity and a high sense of personal and professional ethics. Physical and Mental Requirements: Physical effort ranges from light to heavy, with lifting, pushing, pulling or carrying up to 60 pounds intermittently. Heavier work may require use of a helper or power equipment. Lifting over 60 pounds without assistance is discouraged and should be a last resort. Plowing snow may require high attention to the road and environment to avoid accidents. PW MAINTENANCE WORKER ©City of Corcoran 2020 4 Working Conditions: Work is mainly outdoors or in a vehicle. Work includes driving within the City of Corcoran to perform maintenance activities. There is exposure to weather conditions and dirt, grease, noise, biting insects and unpleasant odors. Some work requires wearing safety apparel. There is exposure to traffic, slippery footing and working close to moving equipment. Work may include extended or irregular hours. Some requirements in this job description may exclude individuals who pose a direct threat or significant risk to the health and safety of themselves or other employees. All requirements are subject to modification to reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities. Requirements are representative of minimum levels of knowledge, skills, and experience required. To perform this job successfully, the worker must possess the abilities and aptitudes to perform each duty proficiently. This document does not create an employment contract, implied or otherwise, other than an "at will" employment relationship. The City Administrator retains the discretion to add duties or change the duties of this position at any time. Employee Signature and Date: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Supervisor and / or Department Head Signature and Date: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7e. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Kevin Mattson Topic: Municipal State Aid Resolution Action Required: Approval Summary: The Municipal State Aid System (MSAS) street designations are reviewed periodi cally to ensure that significant corridors and roadways are included in the State Aid system and to maximize the allotted mileage designations and associated benefits. The City’s MSAS mileage is certified each year. As verified with the 2020 certification, the City has 1.32 miles of additional street mileage available. The recommended system changes are summarized below and represented on the attached figure. Add • Designate City Center Drive from County Road 116 to 79th Place (0.32 non- existing miles) • Designate 79th Place from County Road 116 to City Center Drive (0.15 non- existing miles) With these designations the City’s remaining available MSAS mileage will be reduced to 0.85 miles. The areas served by these roadways are planned to include significant development in the future Town Center. To execute the MSA Roadway System Designation changes, Council is required to approve a resolution establishing the latest system revisions. Financial/Budget: With the addition of these roads in the MSA system, the future street improvements become eligible for funding. Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2021-33 Establishing Municipal State Aid Streets in the City of Corcoran as presented. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Page 2 Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2021-33 Establishing Municipal State Aid Streets in the City of Corcoran as presented. Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2021-33 Establishing Municipal State Aid Streets in the City of Corcoran as presented. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2021-33 Establishing Municipal State Aid Streets in the City of Corcoran 2. MSAS Exhibit City of Corcoran County of Hennepin State of Minnesota April 22, 2021 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-33 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS IN THE CITY OF CORCORAN WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of Corcoran that the Municipal State Aid designations for the streets hereinafter described should be added to the City’s Municipal State Aid system under the provisions of Minnesota Law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA: 1. Designates the addition of a segment approximately 0.32 miles in length of non-existing future street from CR 116 to non-existing 79th Place, to the City’s Municipal State Aid System, referred to as City Center Drive. 2. Designates the addition of a segment approximately 0.15 miles in length of non-existing future street from CR 116 to non-existing City Center Drive, to the City’s Municipal State Aid System, referred to as 79th Place. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized and directed forthwith to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for consideration, and that upon approval of the designation of said roads or portion thereof, that the same be constructed, improved, and maintained as Municipal State Aid streets. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7f. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Recreation Coordinator Christensen Buck Topic: Noise Ordinance Exemption Action Required: Approval Summary: A waiver request for amplified sound was received on April 13, 2021. The request is for amplified sound from 11:00 am to 4:00 pm for Saturday, May 1, 2021 at 20200 County Road 50, pavilion at City Park, for a birthday party. This is a private event, with approximately fifty guests attending, with a processed pavilion reservation. Staff recommends approval as submitted. Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: Authorize a waiver for amplified sound until 4:00 pm on Saturday, May 1, 2021 for 20200 County Road 50. Attachments: 1.Event Request for Noise Ordinance Exemption STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7g. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Recreation Coordinator Christensen Buck Topic: Special Use Permit for Bird Banding Action Required: Approval Summary: A special use permit for an exemption to the 6’ leash ordinance was received on April 13, 2021. The request is for an exemption for Nathan Freshour that would allow him to unleash his dog on the City Hall property. In order to be successful in the attempt at bird banding, he would need his trained pointer to be off-leash while searching for a female hen with a brood of chicks. The information that he puts together, then gets shared and used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the United State Geological Survey. He has been working with Minnesota Wildlife Managers to have access to Minnesota Public Lands. Attached is his permit from the United States Department of the Interior. Some information has been redacted that either is not applicable or is information for others that were also given federal bird banding permits. Financial/Budget: N/A Council Action: Authorize a special use permit for an exemption to the 6’ leash ordinance for Nathan Freshour at 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 to allow for Woodcock banding. Attachments: 1.Nathan Freshour’s Federal Bird banding permit 2.Email from Nathan Freshour requesting permit STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 7h. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Jessica Beise Topic: Charter Commission Resignation and Application Action Required: Accept Resignation Summary: The City has received a resignation letter from Manoj Thomas from his role as a Charter Commission member. The City Council should accept the resignation. The application submitted by Jon Bottema for the Charter Commission has been withdrawn. Financial/Budget: None. Charter Commission members serve without compensation. Council Action: Consider a motion to accept the resignation of Manoj Thomas. Attachments: 1. Resignation Letter – Manoj Thomas 1 Jessica Beise From:Brad Martens Sent:Friday, April 16, 2021 9:50 AM To:Jessica Beise Subject:Fwd: Charter commission Brad Martens From: Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 9:37:23 PM To: Brad Martens <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us>; Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Charter commission Hi Brad ‐ I went back and forth on this topic during the last few months and agree in principal that the perception may not be inline with reality. I still believe that I should wait till the new members are appointed to the charter or till we are able to pass the ordinance limiting multiple roles in the city like we discussed during the last council meeting. Having said that, I am willing to take a leap of faith and resign from the charter commission to prevent making this a larger distraction than it needs to be. Please consider this my resignation from the corcoran city charter. Regards, Manoj Thomas 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 15, 2021 for the April 22, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Rear Setback Variance for the Property located at 6433 Bluestem Circle (PID 36-119- 23-42-0032) (city file no. 21-010) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:June 12, 2021 1.Application Request Andrew and Pamela Krominga, the applicants, have requested approval of a variance to allow construction of a deck and four-season porch which would encroach into the rear setback. The porch and deck would be constructed with a varying setback from 15 to 22.4 feet from the lot line where 25 feet is required. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at the April 1st meeting. In addition to the applicant, one resident was present to speak on this item. The Commission found that the variance standards have not been met for the patio and deck variance and recommended denial of the request, but felt that some relief was needed to address this issue. The Commission recommended approval to allow a 6-foot encroachment into the 25-foot rear setback for the deck/patio but not for the porch. The attached resolution reflects the Planning Commission recommendation. 3.Context Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. Zoning and Land Use The property is in the Planned Unit Development (PUD) District and is guided Low Density Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The property is in the Ravinia development. Agenda Item: 8a. 6433 Bluestem Circle Rear Yard Variance (21-010) 2 April 22, 2021 Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties are also zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and guided Low Density Residential. Natural Characteristics of the Site The site is part of the Ravinia neighborhood. A Wet Prairie is shown on the City’s Natural Resource Inventory Areas and is directly behind the site. This wetland was delineated as part of the Ravinia development and is subject to the approved wetland buffers and buffer setbacks, which encroach into the north corner of the lot. 4. Analysis of Request Variance The 0.27-acre parcel at 6433 Bluestem Circle was platted as part of the “Ravinia 3rd Addition” subdivision and final approvals were approved with Resolutions 2015-32 and 2015-33. The approved plat showed the required setback lines and included a footprint for a new house in compliance with the ordinance and PUD standards. The applicant states in the narrative that the restrictions of the lot were not clearly shown on the documents the developer shared with them. However, the building plans reviewed by the City on June 1, 2017 clearly show the building setbacks. The applicant is applying for a variance to construct a 14 ft. x 24 ft. deck and 14 ft. x 14 ft. four- season porch that will encroach into the rear setback. The approvals for the Ravinia development require a 25-foot rear setback. The applicant has requested that the deck and four-season porch be constructed with the following setbacks: • 15 ft. setback from the nearest corner of the four-season porch to the lot line • 16.3 ft setback from the furthest corner of the four-season porch to the lot line • 16.3 ft. setback from the nearest corner of the deck and • 22.4 ft. setback from the furthest corner of the deck. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following variance criteria from Section 1070.040 Subd. 2(B) have been met: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The narrative from the applicant states that the practical difficulty in complying with the Zoning Ordinance comes from the design of the home. The doors are located at the rear of the home and the home is on a walkout lot that requires an elevated deck. The design of the home was selected by the applicant as one of the approved plans for the Ravinia development. Setbacks were established in the neighborhood to protect natural resources and to ensure a uniform and safe development. The developer and the landowner 6433 Bluestem Circle Rear Yard Variance (21-010) 3 April 22, 2021 had a responsibility to ensure that the home fit on the lot and that with the door on the second level that a deck could be constructed to provide access. Staff finds that the home design selected by the applicant for this lot does not allow for a deck off the existing sliding glass doors. There is a practical difficulty in not allowing any structure from this door to the backyard. However, staff finds that the requested porch and deck is not the minimum action necessary to alleviate the difficulty. The four-season porch is an addition to the home and should meet the required setbacks. However, staff notes that uncovered decks are sometimes treated differently. The wetland buffer standards allow patios and decks to encroach six feet into the required wetland buffer setback. While this does not apply to this site, because it is a rear yard setback and not buffer setback, staff believes it would be reasonable to allow a similar deck encroachment on this lot to allow access to the rear yard. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The applicant’s narrative states that the unique condition for this parcel of land is that that the lot is wedge shaped, has more width than depth, and that the lot backs up to a wetland. The applicant also states that the plans provided to them were not clearly marked compared to one given to a nearby lot. Staff does not believe this is a unique condition to the site. Two neighbors on the same cul- de-sac as the applicant have wedge shaped lots, that have more width than depth and that abut wetlands on the rear. This is a standard shaped lot on a cul-de-sac and exists throughout the City. Lennar offers many different home plans to fit the variety of lots in the development. The applicant states that the developer provided two surveys for separate lots with different levels of detail while the applicant was deciding between lots. While the developer should have made the lot restrictions clear during the design process, the style of home and lot selection were all choices made by the applicant. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. The narrative states that granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Four season porches and decks are present in the neighborhood on many homes. However, staff finds that granting the variance will alter the essential character of the locality. The single-family home is consistent with the area but the encroachment into the setback are not consistent with PUD district standards. No other setback variances have been granted in this development. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The purpose of the PUD district is to allow for specific flexibility in exchange for specific requests by the City. The proposed variance is a large encroachment into the rear yard 6433 Bluestem Circle Rear Yard Variance (21-010) 4 April 22, 2021 setback and is not in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance to maintain green space and usable back yards for single family homes. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is established to guide future development within the city. The Comprehensive Plan does not identify any goals or implementation items that are achieved through the requested variance. The guidance for the Low Density Residential land use is to develop areas of the city within the MUSA. Additionally, residential development within or adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas will be guided as Low Density Residential to reduce development impacts to these areas. This encroachment into the setback is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. With the findings given above, staff does not believe the variance criteria has been met. 5. Conclusions The Planning Commission and staff find that the variance standards have not been met. Lack of a 14 ft. x 14 ft. four season porch and a 14 ft. x 20 ft. deck is not a practical difficulty and Planning Commission recommends denial of the request. However, they found that a smaller deck that minimizes the encroachment into the rear yard setback may be reasonable. The Planning Commission recommendation is to allow a six-foot encroachment into the rear setback for an uncovered deck/patio, similar to the wetland buffer setback encroachment allowed by Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. Although this is an encroachment onto the 25 foot rear setback, not the buffer, the concept is similar. This would allow an approximately 11 ft. x 24 ft. deck. Following the Planning Commission meeting, Council member Nichols prepared a slide deck with his opinion on the application. That has been included as an attachment to the staff report. If the Council wishes to adopt something different than the Planning Commission recommendation, they should provide direction for staff to prepare a new resolution for adoption at the next Council meeting. 6. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-31, as recommended by the Planning Commission to deny the variance as submitted but allow an uncovered deck/patio to encroach six feet into the 25-foot rear yard setback at 6433 Bluestem Circle. 6433 Bluestem Circle Rear Yard Variance (21-010) 5 April 22, 2021 Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-31 2. Site Location Map 3. Engineer’s Memo dated March 23, 2021 4. Applicant’s Narrative dated February 12, 2021 5. Porch and Deck Exhibit dated February 12, 2021 6. Survey received February 12, 2021 7. Neighboring Lot Survey received February 12, 2021 8. Analysis from Council member Nichols City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-31 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6433 BLUESTEM CIRCLE (PID 36-119-23-42-0032) (CITY FILE 21-010) WHEREAS, Andrew and Pamela Krominga (“the applicants”) have requested approval of a variance to allow for a rear yard setback encroachment has been proposed for the property legally described as: Lot 2, Block 3, Ravinia 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the variance at a duly called Public Meeting and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a variance subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The applicants have requested a variance for a four-season porch and deck to encroach into the required rear yard setback as shown on the application received by the City on January 26, 2021. 2. The City finds that the variance standards are not met for the variance as requested, based on the following findings: a. That there are no practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant has proposed a four-season porch and deck which would encroach into a rear setback. The design of the home was selected by the applicant and does not constitute a practical difficulty. Setbacks were established in the neighborhood to protect natural resources and ensure a uniform and safe development. The developer and landowner had a responsibility to ensure that the home fit on the lot and that the rear door on the home could be used. Staff finds that the door cannot be used, however, the proposed addition is not the minimum action necessary to alleviate the difficulty. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are not unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were created by the landowner. The shape of the parcel and the orientation of the house on the lot are not unique. The applicant states that the developer provided two surveys for separate lots with different levels of detail while the applicant was deciding between lots. While the developer should have made the lot restrictions clear during the design process, the style of home and lot selection were all choices made by the applicant. c. That the granting of the variation will alter the essential character of the locality. The single-family home is consistent with the area but the encroachment into the setback are not consistent with PUD district standards. No other setback variances have been granted in this development. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-31 Page 2 of 3 d. The proposed variance would not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The purpose of the PUD district is to allow for specific flexibility in exchange for specific requests by the City. The proposed variance is a large encroachment into the rear yard setback and is not in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance to maintain green space and usable back yards for single family homes. e. The variance is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan is established to guide future development within the city. The Comprehensive Plan does not identify any goals or implementation items that are achieved through the requested variance. The guidance for the Low Density Residential land use is to develop areas of the city within the MUSA. Additionally, residential development within or adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas will be guided as Low Density Residential to reduce development impacts to these areas. This encroachment into the setback is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan 3. A variance to allow an uncovered deck/patio to encroach six feet into the required 25-foot rear yard setback is approved, based on the following findings: a. There are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The placement of the building creates a nearly unusable rear yard. Additionally, the doors on the rear of the house must be connected to a structure be used. b. The conditions are unique to the land as the building that was constructed on the site was constructed 2.2 feet from the rear setback line. While the home choice was the applicant’s the platting and shape of the lot was the choice of the developer, the owner’s need some relief from the setback to access the rear yard from the existing door. c. The granting of this variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The construction of an uncovered deck encroaching into the rear yard setback will not stand out or cause an obstruction to the view line around the locality. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The variance will not change the general purpose or intent of the ordinance, will not be a visible change to passersby and will allow the use of the rear doors on the existing structure. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which calls for Low Density Residential land to be used to develop areas of the city within the MUSA. Additionally, residential development within or adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas will be guided as Low Density Residential to reduce development impacts to these areas. f. Variance is approved to allow an uncovered deck/patio to encroach six-feet into the required rear setback. The request for the four season porch, which is an addition to the existing home is denied. g. A building permit is required prior to construction of the deck. The new plans must show compliance with the approval for the deck/patio only. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-31 Page 3 of 3 VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Date: 3/24/2021 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 1 inch = 200 feet Legend FEMA Floodplains - 100 Year A AE FLOODPLAIN AH AO AE FLOODWAY Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - NWI PID: 3611923420032 Address: 6433 BLUESTEM CIR, CORCORAN Owner Name: P KROMINGA & A KROMINGA Acres: 0.27 ¯ Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Project: B002294-20-502 Date: March 23, 2021 Subject: Krominga Variance Blue 6433 Stem Lane Public Infrastructure • The variance does not affect public infrastructure. End of Memo KROMINGA VARIANCE ANALYSIS JEREMY NICHOLS CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIANCE: STATE STATUTE PERTAINING TO VARIANCES STAFF ANALYSIS PER PLANNING COMMISSION PACKET-GRANTING DECK APPROVAL ONLY ASSERTION: A 3 OR 4 SEASON PORCH MEETS THE VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS IN CODE AND STATUE I have reviewed the issue after listening to the planning commission hearing and reviewing the application and the circumstances surrounding it with staff and with Lennar. Lennar is aware of persistent issues with homeowners being unaware of building limitations and has started new practices to reduce the risk of this going forward The combination of lack of notification, the open space behind the home, and other nearby homes with even smaller rear yards create a viable rationale for a reasonable council to grant the residents their request. That rationale is presented on the following slides. CRITERIA A: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES/REASONABLENESS City statute lists practical difficulties as a unique criteria, but there are 3 tests in statute which are requirements B and C in city code. I will therefore treat Criteria A as “reasonableness,” the named test in statute that is not explicitly duplicated in city code. LMC guidance states this factor means that the landowner would like to use the property in a particular, reasonable way but cannot do so under the rules of the ordinance. This test is satisfied because: Decks, patios and additions are common in the neighborhood. I counted 4 similar porch structures and 16 decks/patios within 1 block of this home (see next slide) Nearby homes have decks closer to trails than this home’s would be to its lot line There is no neighbor adjacent to the lot line, and there is no wetland setback issue as the portion of the lot in question adjoins a stormwater pond, not a wetland A: REASONABLENESS: SUBJECT PROPERTY AND NEARBY AREA B: CONDITIONS ON WHICH THE REQUEST IS BASED IS UNIQUE TO THE LAND AND NOT CAUSED BY THE LANDOWNER This criteria is not perfectly aligned with the text of statute, which says “The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner.” This is a clearer meaning than Corcoran statute, and per LMC guidance, statute can be considered to override local ordinances. State statutory requirements are clearly met because: As staff notes, the building was constructed 2.2 feet from the rear setback line when Lennar built the home. The record indicates the homeowners were clear with Lennar that they wanted to build a porch on the back of the home before they purchased and Lennar did not raise the setback issue, which could have led to a better solution, such as choosing a different lot. The lack of builder communication makes the siting of the home, the cause of the plight, not caused by the landowner. As commissioner Shoulak noted in the planning commission meeting, the builder also could have oriented the home on the lot to provide for a larger buildable envelope in the rear of the home. The city bears some responsibility also because it issued a permit for a home with a deck door and no room to build a deck per usual code. This is a unique circumstance. Had the city rejected the permit for the plan, that could have prevented this issue from requiring a variance by prompting Lennar and the homeowner to change plans or sites. C. THE GRANTING OF THE VARIANCE WILL NOT ALTER THE ESSENTIAL CHARACTER OF THE LOCALITY Several factors mitigate the impact of a porch in this specific case and keep it from altering the character of the area. There is already a fence in the yard which demarcates the stormwater pond and the yard. Expanding the home’s envelope closer to the fence does not meaningfully impact the apparent size of the home site or impact the space available for wildlife in the area. There is no neighbor immediately behind the home to be impacted by the structure. The open space in the stormwater pond reduces the visual impact of the smaller yard by ensuring considerable open space remains between structures. Neighbors across the stormwater pond have lots truncated by the public trail and have smaller rear yards than this home will have. This application does not introduce an aberrantly small yard to the local area. Rear and side views of the subject property VIEW OF NEARBY HOME FROM PUBLIC TRAIL SMALL REAR YARDS EXIST IN THIS AREA D: THE PROPOSED VARIANCE WOULD BE IN HARMONY WITH THE GENERAL INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE This criteria is met because: The distance between structures created by the minimum setback requirements on adjacent lots is exceeded in this case due to the stormwater pond and trail area between the applicant’s home and neighbors to the rear. Because of the unique siting of the lot, the staff rationale supporting a variance for a deck also applies in this case (for a porch rather than a deck). The construction of a porch does not change the general purpose or intent of the ordinance, will not be a visible change to passersby (because it is in an isolated location far from the trail with no adjacent homeowner impacted) and will allow the use of the rear doors on the existing structure. E: THE PROPOSED VARIANCE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This criteria is met because: Porches are permitted in RSF-2 zones and exist on several neighboring homes. The rear of the home adjoins open space that is not a wetland and is not subject to buffers and additional building setbacks from wetland buffers. The comprehensive plan’s desired spacing between homes is preserved because of the existing of the stormwater pond and trail, preventing the impression of an overall increase in the density in the local area even if a porch is constructed instead of a deck. 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8b. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 15, 2021 for the April 22, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Preliminary Plat and Variance Application for “Franzen Estates” on the property located at 23020 Strehler Road (PID 17-119-23-32-0003) (city file no. 20-049) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: May 9, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicants are requesting approval of a three lot subdivision and a variance from the lot width and street frontage requirements. This subdivision would use all of the development rights on the property. 2.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at a public hearing on April 1, 2021. In addition to the applicant, there were several residents who spoke at the public hearing and written comments were also provided to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, approval of the lot width variance and denial of the private drive variance. The Commission recommended that the developer provide a shared private drive coming off the existing cul de sac for the two new lots and the property at 23105 Larsen Road. The City Administrator spoke to the applicant and the owners of 23105 Larsen Road after the meeting and they have requested that the existing driveway remain separate from the new private drive in the existing easement. If the Council wants to allow the two driveways in the existing easement condition #7 in Resolution 2021-30 should be revised to as follows: 7.The plans must be revised to show a single shared private drive off the cul-de-sac for the existing driveway and the two new driveways. a.The three driveways should be combined into a shared entrance onto Larsen Road and centered within the roadway easement. This should continue until such point that the three driveways are split approximately 80 feet from the end of the existing gravel turnaround. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to finalize the design prior to submittal of the final plat. b.Driveway drainage conveyance (swales/culverts) needs to be designed and identified on plans to ensure offsite drainage is not impacted. This includes but is not limited to runoff from Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 2 April 22, 2021 the exception parcel and Lot 1 across Lot 2 drive and runoff from Larsen Road Across all of the drives. c. Provide a draft maintenance agreement for maintenance of the shared portion of the private drive for review and approval by the City Attorney. 3. Parks and Trails Commission Review This item is scheduled for Parks and Trails Commission review on April 15th. Staff will provide an update with their recommendation at the Council meeting. 4. Background In 1993, the City Council approved a lot split that allowed the Franzens to split off the 10-acre parcel at 23105 Larsen Road. As part of that approval, they provided a 60-foot roadway easement across the north portion of the new lot to provide access to the remaining property. At that time, the City acquired deeds for additional land at the end of Larsen Road to ensure a full 60 feet of access from the cul-de- sac. The existing home and accessory structure will remain on the proposed Lot 1 with access to Strehler Road and the two new lots would be sold for custom homes. Those two lots would have access off the end of the Larsen Road cul-de-sac. 5. Context Zoning and Land Use The site is guided Rural/Ag Residential in Comprehensive Plan and zoned Rural Residential (RR). The properties to the east, north and west are guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned RR. The property to the south across Strehler Road is guided Agricultural Preserve and zoned RR. Natural Characteristics of the Site There are no natural resources identified in the NRI. However, the northwestern portion of the site does border a High Quality Natural Community (maple/basswood forest). The are a number of wetlands on the site and the southwest portion of the site is in the FEMA floodplain. 6. Analysis Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 3 April 22, 2021 A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outline in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the variance standards have been met. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Preliminary Plat Lot Size The applicant is proposing create three lots from this 29.75-acre site. The applicant is requesting variances from the lot width and lot frontage requirements. A comparison of the RR district standards and the proposed lots is reflected in the table below with red text where a variance is required: RR district standard Lot 1 (existing home) Lot 2 Lot 3 Minimum lot area 2 acres 9.7 acres 10 acres 10 acres Minimum lot width 200 feet 329.97 feet 129.96 feet 200 feet Minimum lot depth 300 feet 1,277.37 1,320.40 1,320.35 Minimum Principal Structure Setbacks: Front 50 feet 330+/_ feet 50 feet 50 feet Side 25 feet 102 +/- feet 25 feet 25 feet Rear 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet N/A N/A N/A Setbacks The existing home and structures on proposed Lot 1 comply with setback requirements. The plan generally complies with the required setbacks except that Lots 2 and 3 do not meet the lot width requirements because they do not have frontage on a public street or private drive as currently shown. There is an existing 60-foot road way easement that extends 329.96 feet west of Larsen Road. This easement could be extended an additional 70.04 feet west to provide the required lot frontage for Lot 2. If improvements were made to build either a public street or private drive as outlined in the ordinance it would also provide the frontage to create the front lot line from which to measure the front yard setback. Lots 2 and 3 are shall be required to comply with the 50-foot front yard setback requirement from the south lot line. The preliminary plat must be revised to dimension this setback on the plans. Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 4 April 22, 2021 Streets/Access The preliminary plat will dedicate the required 40-foot ½ right-of-way for Strehler Road adjacent to Lot 1. When the property was split in 1993, a right-of-way easement was granted and with this plat it will be deeded as right-of-way. The applicant is proposing access for the two lots from Larsen Road. The City acquired additional land at the end of the cul-de-sac to allow for a 60-foot wide extension that aligns with the 60-foot roadway easement to provide access to this site. However, the easement is not long enough to provide the required 200 feet of frontage for Lot 2. Section 945.020, Subd. 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires each lot to “abut and have direct access to an improved street or private drive”. The public street could be extended to serve the two lots, but the Council may also approve a private drive if the Council finds that a public street connection is not required for the public street network. In this case, the property to the east is already developed and no public street connection to the east is viable. The private drive standards require a 20-foot wide drive in accordance with engineering standards (Sheet STR-3) with turnaround as required by public safely. The ordinance would require a maintenance agreement for the shared drive. There is an existing driveway coming off the shared easement to provide access to 23105 Larsen Road. Three driveways as proposed by the applicant raises a number of maintenance concerns and creating a single shared driveway with maintenance costs shared by the benefiting landowners will limit potential future conflicts. The City Engineer has included a condition requiring that the existing driveway and the proposed driveways for the new lots be combined into a shared driveway for at least an 80-foot extension from the existing gravel on the Larsen Road cul-de-sac centered within the right-of-way if the variance is granted. Staff recommends that the easement be extended to provide the required lot width and the private drive be built to provide access to the new lots. This is discussed in more detail in the variance section of this report. Utilities The new lots will be served by private well and septic. The plans show a primary and secondary septic site for each lot. The applicant must obtain preliminary approval of the septic locations from Hennepin County Public Health Department prior to submittal of a final plat application. The applicant has completed a preliminary wetland review, but the delineation has not yet been approved. The plans must be updated prior to submittal of the final plat to show that the septic locations comply with the 75-foot minimum setback from the approved wetland. Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 5 April 22, 2021 Wetlands The applicant has contracted with Kjolhaug Environmental to complete the wetland delineation. The City as the Local Government Unit (LGU) for the Wetland Conservation Act will not be able to finalize the delineation until spring. The applicant must obtain approval of the wetland delineation and revise the plat drawings to reflect the wetland delineation prior to submittal of the final plat application. The wetland delineation must include an analysis of the wetland quality and provide the required wetland buffers. If the wetlands are defined as medium quality, the applicant must provide a 25 foot average wetland buffer plus a 15-foot setback from the buffer. The applicant will be required to show wetland buffer monument signs on the plans and install them on site in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance Section 1050.010 requirements. The ordinance requires a wetland buffer monument at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge Additionally, where acceptable natural vegetation exists in buffer strip areas, the retention of such vegetation in an undisturbed state is preferred. However, if the LGU finds that the buffer has been disturbed, it must be planted with wetland buffer vegetation as described in the Zoning Ordinance. Park Dedication The Parks and Trails Map in the Comprehensive Plan shows the northern portion of this site bordering a potential Community open space Park and a future on-road trail on Strehler Road. The Parks and Trails Commission will review the request at the April 15th meeting and that recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council. Park dedication is required for the two lots. If the Commission recommends park dedication be cash-in- lieu of land, it would be based on the park dedication in place at the time the final plat is released. The current fee schedule would require $ 9,256.00 (2 x $4,628.00). Landscaping The applicant’s plan indicate that no significant trees will be removed. Section 1060.070 of the Zoning Ordinance requires one overstory street to be planted on each of the new lots. This has been included as a condition of approval. Signage No development signage is proposed. Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 6 April 22, 2021 Variance The applicant is requesting variances from the 200-foot minimum lot width requirements in Section 1040.030, Subd. 8 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 945.020, Subd. 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires each lot to “abut and have direct access to an improved street or private drive”. Section 970.030 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 1070.040 of the Zoning Ordinance have the same standards for variances. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that all of the following criteria have been met: 1. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds no practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards for constructing a private drive. The developer could construct the private drive in the existing roadway easement as required by the ordinance. It appears that the request for the variance is primarily economic based on the landowner’s desire to avoid constructing the private drive; however, both MN Statute §462.357 and the ordinance state that economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. However, there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance lot width standards. When the Franzen property was split in 1993, the roadway easement was provided to allow a subdivision as shown on the plans and extending the easement to provide additional space for lot width is not practical. 2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. The conditions upon which the variance from the private drive requirements are not unique to the parcel of land. The property directly to the east (Strehler Preserve) was approved for subdivision in 2016 and requested the ordinance amendment that the City Council adopted to allow private drives as an option to public streets. Since that time there have been 2-3 other small subdivisions that were allowed to build a private drive rather than a public street to meet the lot width requirements. There is no physical reason that this subdivision cannot build a private drive to serve the two new lots. There are certainly other developers who would prefer to avoid the cost of either a new public street or private drive to provide access. However, the conditions upon which a petition for a lot width variance are based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. When the Franzen property was split in 1993, the roadway easement was provided to allow a subdivision as shown on the plans. 3. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. Granting the variance may not alter the character of the locality. Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 7 April 22, 2021 However, approval of the variance would likely encourage other developers to make the same request to save development costs and if approved for multiple developments could change the character of the locality. 4. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance. The private drive variance would not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance, which required each lot to have frontage and access onto a public street or private drive. The ordinance ensures that access to homes is built to minimum standards to ensure access is maintained to minimum standards to allow public safety vehicle access to the new homes. However, the lot width variance is consistent with the 1993 vision for future development off the roadway easement. 5. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The variance is not inconsistent with any specific Comprehensive Plan policies. Denial of the private drive variance would require the applicant to construct a private drive in accordance with City standards. Summary Staff finds that the variance standards have not been met. The draft resolution denies the variance and approves the preliminary plat with conditions attached to require a private drive that would address the lot width and access requirements of the City Code. However, if the City Council finds that there are unique conditions because of the previous approvals and actions taken to ensure access with the 60-foot easement, they could recommend approval. Staff has drafted an alternative resolution for consideration. 7. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-30 approving the preliminary plat, approving the lot width variance and denying the private drive variance, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Franzen Estates PP and Variance (20-049) 8 April 22, 2021 Attachments a. Resolution 2021-30 b. City Engineer’s Memo dated March 24, 2021 c. Site Location Map d. Applicant Narrative dated January 26, 2021 e. Preliminary Plat dated March 11, 2021 f. Deed and Easement documents g. Emails and letters from residents City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-30 Page 1 of 5 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “FRANZEN ESTATES” ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 23020 STREHLER ROAD (PID 17-119-23-32-0003) (CITY FILE NO. 20-049) WHEREAS, Greg and Deb Franzen (“the applicant”) have requested approval of a preliminary pat to allow for a three lot subdivision on property described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance from the lot width requirements and the requirement for frontage on a public street or private drive, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the submitted preliminary plat and variance at a duly called Public Hearing, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a preliminary plat subject to the following findings and conditions; 1. A preliminary plat is approved, in accordance with the plans received by the City on December 30, 2020 and revisions received on January 26, 2021 and March 10, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The requested variance from the frontage on a public street or private drive requirements is denied based on the following findings: a. That there are no practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance standards. The developer could construct the private drive in this extended easement as required by the ordinance. It appears that the request for the variance is primarily economic based on the landowner’s desire to avoid constructing the private drive; however, both MN Statute §462.357 and the ordinance state that economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. b. The conditions upon which vacation is requested is not unique to the parcel of land. The property directly to the east (Strehler Preserve) was approved for subdivision in 2016 and requested the ordinance amendment that the City Council adopted to allow private drives as an option to public streets. Since that time there have been 2-3 other small subdivisions that were allowed to build a private drive to meet the lot width requirements. There is no physical reason that this subdivision cannot build a private drive to serve the two new lots. There are certainly other developers who would prefer to avoid the cost of either a new public street or private drive to provide access. c. Granting the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-30 Page 2 of 5 d. The variance would not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance, which required each lot to have frontage and access onto a public street or private drive. The ordinance ensures that access to homes is built to minimum standards to ensure access is maintained to minimum standards to allow public safety vehicle access to the new homes. e. The variance is not inconsistent with any specific Comprehensive Plan policies. 3. The requested variance from the lot width is approved based on the following findings: a. That there are practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. When the Franzen property was split in 1993, the roadway easement was provided to allow a subdivision as shown on the plans and extending the easement to provide additional space for lot width is not practical. b. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and were not created by the landowner. When the Franzen property was split in 1993, the roadway easement was provided to allow a subdivision as shown on the plans. c. That the granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the locality. d. The proposed variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Ordinance to allow single family homes. The plat is consistent with the vision for future development anticipated in 1993 when the Franzen parcel was split and the roadway easement granted. e. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. There are no development rights remaining after the land is platted. 5. The applicant shall comply with comments in the City Engineer’s memo dated March 23, 2021. 6. The 50-foot front yard minimum setback shall be measured from the south lot line on Lots 2 and 3. 7. The plans must be revised to show a single shared private drive off the cul-de-sac for the existing driveway and the two new driveways. a. The three driveways should be combined into a shared entrance onto Larsen Road and centered within the roadway easement. This should continue until such point that the three driveways are split approximately 80 feet from the end of the existing gravel turnaround. The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to finalize the design prior to submittal of the final plat. b. Driveway drainage conveyance (swales/culverts) needs to be designed and identified on plans to ensure offsite drainage is not impacted. This includes but is not City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-30 Page 3 of 5 limited to runoff from the exception parcel and Lot 1 across Lot 2 drive and runoff from Larsen Road Across all of the drives. c. Provide a draft maintenance agreement for maintenance of the shared portion of the private driveway for review and approval by the City Attorney. 8. The approval is subject to the review and approval of the wetland delineation. a. The applicant shall comply with any conditions of approval from the wetland Local Government Unit. b. The plans must comply with the wetland buffer and setback requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. c. The plans must show the required wetland buffer monuments on the preliminary plat. d. The plans must show compliance with the wetland buffer strip planting requirements in Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. e. The plans must show the minimum 75-foot setback from the delineated wetland. 9. Park dedication shall be due for the two new lots and shall be cash-in-lieu of land, subject to the park dedication fees adopted at the time the final plat is released for filing. 10. Prior to submittal of the final plat application, the applicant must: a. Revise the preliminary plat to provide drainage and utility easements over the approved wetland and wetland buffers. The preliminary shall be revised to show these easements. b. Revise the preliminary plat to show front yard setbacks of 50 feet from the south lot line. c. Provide proof of preliminary approval of the septic locations from Hennepin County. d. Provide a recorded copy of the 60-foot roadway easement or title work to confirm the that the easement has been recorded for review by the City Attorney. 11. Prior to issuance of building permits: a. Wetland buffer monument signs must be installed as required by Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. b. Lot monuments shall be installed as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. c. Each lot must show one overstory tree to be planted on the lot. d. Record the approving resolutions, mylar and all related documents at Hennepin County and provide proof of recording to the City. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-30 Page 4 of 5 e. The applicant shall provide the approved preliminary and final plat drawings to the City in an electronic (AutoCAD) format. f. The applicant must enter into a site improvement performance agreement and submit a financial guarantee for the proposed work as outlined in Section 1070.050, Subd. 9 of the Zoning Ordinance. 12. Approval of the preliminary plat shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-30 Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT A The West 659.91 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the West 659.91 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter which lies West of the East 329.96 feet thereof. Also Except Road. Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Franzen Preliminary Plat Date: March 24, 2021 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the Preliminary Plat drawings by DEMARC Land Surveying and Engineering with revision dated 3/10/21. Three lots are being proposed with the existing homestead as Lot 1. Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the project is subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. Wetland delineation and WCA process is required. 4. Provide either an exemption letter or review letter from Elm Creek Watershed for erosion control and stormwater requirements. 5. The existing and proposed drainage and utility easements shall be shown. Driveways An existing driveway is located within the Roadway Easement connecting to Larsen Road. Based on the proposed configuration the following comments apply: 1. The three driveways should be combined into a shared entrance onto Larsen Road and centered within the roadway easement. 2. Driveway drainage conveyance (swales/culverts) needs to be designed and identified on plans to ensure offsite drainage is not impacted. Grading and Drainage The site drainage is north/northwest and receives drainage from Larsen Road (west), the Exception parcel (south) and Strehler Preserve to the east. City approval of conveyance of this drainage shall be approved prior to Final Plat. 1. Identify offsite subwatershed areas for contributing area to the onsite swales and driveway culverts. 2. Design conveyance for offsite drainage (see Driveway comment) must be provided and it appears the following is necessary. March 22, 2021 Franzen Preliminary Plat Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 a. Shared swale between Lots 1 and 2. b. Shared swale between Lots 2 and 3. Individual Lots City requires that individual lot grading/site plans be submitted and approved with final plat that show the septic, well, driveway culverts and building setback constraints. 1. Variation from the house locations identified may need additional permitting and engineering review. For example, driveway modifications may impact wetlands on Lots 2 and 3. More information will be known after the delineation is approved and represented on plans. 2. Show radius for drinking water well setbacks. 3. Install new mailbox in accordance with U.S. Post Office guidance in terms of placement and height. It is recommended to install a swing-away style to assist with winter maintenance needs. Floodplain 1. Floodplain is shown on Lot 1 (existing homestead) but does not affect the plat. Redevelopment or additional improvements on Lot 1 would require additional analysis. End of Comments Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Date: 3/8/2021 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 1 inch = 800 feet Legend PID: 1711923320003 Address: 23020 STREHLER RD, CORCORAN Owner Name: G F & D L FRANZEN Acres: 29.75 ¯ LARSEN ROAD60Edge of Ri g h t of W a y PROPOSEDEASEMENT 11.512.012.0Portion of propertyconveyed to City ofCorcoran for Roadwaypurposesper Doc. No.6457667 1320.35N 00°22'53" W329.96 S 89°57'20" W Easterly extension ofthe south line of Lot 7 Portion of propertyconveyed to City ofCorcoran for Roadwaypurposesper Doc. No.6405426 Easterly extension ofthe North line of Lot 11 ROADWAY EASEMENTEXISTINGEdge of Gravel LARSEN ROADS 89°57'34" W 329.97N 00°22'53" W 1287.37 S 89°57'20" W 329.96N 00°22'53" W 1320.35N 89°57'07" E 659.9260659.91E X C E P T I O N329.96N 00°22'53" W 2607.79 60' R/W 3340 40 33 1000 100099899810009969981 0 0 210021002 1 0 0 4 100610201012101410161018102210241026102810001000100210041006 1012 1010 10081012L O W L A N D T R E E L I N E C U L T I V A T E D F I E L D FLOOD ZONE "A" C U L T I V A T E D F I E L D T R E E S BUILDING S E T B A C K L I N E 10021004 1006 1008 1020101610181022 102410261028 STREHLER ROADApprox. ExistingSeptic Location Tank Existing 60' Roadway EasementSOUTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22NORTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22 NORTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THESW 1/4 SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22EAST LINE OF THE WEST 659.91 FEET OF THE W 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22 Portion of property conveyed to Cityof Corcoran for Roadway purposesper Doc. No.6457667 See Detail Portion of property conveyed to Cityof Corcoran for Roadway purposesper Doc. No.6405426. See Detail ShedHouseShed Sheds Shed & Silo Sheds Existing gravel drive to neighbors G r a v e lAdjoining Owner:Ashley Craig / Brian Derosier22900 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Todd & Kathy Sarinen22930 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Matt & Andrielle Sarkinen22960 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Ryan & Rebecca Erickson22990 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Debra Weinand22945 Co. Road No. 10Adjoining Owner:Jim & Cecilia Kozicky23110 Garrison Road Adjoining Owner:Steve & Marilyn Rickson23110 Larsen Road Adjoining Owner:David & Sharen Johnson23107 Larsen Road Adjoining Owner:Raymond Ehrlich & Eve Noehles23105 Larsen Road 996.3 1006.7 1001.5 1002.2 1021.5 1019.9 998.5 1027.1 1020.2 1012.2 1008.0 1016.0 996.6 997.2cim Well Existing gravel driveWetlands percounty GIS (typ.)delineation in process Flood Zone A per FEMA MapNo. 27053C0151F,effective date 11/04/2016 1 OF 1 SHEET NO. PROJECT: 89399REVISIONS DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY GREG FRANZEN 23020 Strehler Road Corcoran, MN 55340GRP Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992 Surveyed this 23rd day of February 2021. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.RP FB No: 1114-75 7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428 (763) 560-3093 DemarcInc.com 32020 Strehler Road, Corcoran, MN 55340 Property located in Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota Address: SURVEY FOR The West 659.91 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the West 659.91 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter which lies West of the East 329.96 feet thereof. Also Except Road. Legal Description Zoning Information Miscellaneous Notes Property Address: 23020 Strehler Road, Corcoran, MN 55340 PID No.: 17-119-23-32-0003 Total area of Parcel = 1,296,113 sq. ft. (29.75 acres) By graphic plotting only, this property was found to be located within Flood Zone "X" and "A" (at SW corner of property next to Strehler Road) of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0151F, which bears an effective date of 11/04/2016 (No base flood elevation). Title insurance commitment showing property description and any encumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change. Property located in Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota Topography from MnTOPO using LiDAR technology. 1 2 3 4 5 6 1"=20' Property Currently Zoned: RR, Rural Residential Proposed Zoning: RR, Rural Residential Zoning Ordinance Requirements: Building Setbacks Front - 100 feet from major roadways Front - 50 feet from all other roadways Side Yard - 25 feet Rear Yard - 25 feet Minimum Lot Size - 2 acres Minimum Lot Width - 200 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 300 feet Refer to City code for additional requirements FRANZEN ESTATES D E T A I L Developer: Greg Franzen 23020 Strehler Road Corcoran, MN 55340 E-Mail: gregfranzen@netzero.com Property Owner: Greg Franzen 23020 Strehler Road Corcoran, MN 55340 Personnel SURVEYOR Demarc Surveying and Engineering 7601 73rd Avenue N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Attn: Greg Prasch phone: 763-560-3093 fax: 763-560-3522 e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.com DE Basis of bearings per Hennepin County coordinates FIELD BY:F:\survey\17-119-23 - hennepin\23020 strehlen road\01 Surveying - 89212\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg Legend Denotes preliminary wetland per available maps Denotes flood plain boundary 03.11.21 ADDRESS LARSEN ROAD60Edge of Ri g h t of W a y PROPOSEDEASEMENT 11.512.012.0Portion of propertyconveyed to City ofCorcoran for Roadwaypurposesper Doc. No.6457667 1320.35N 00°22'53" W329.96 S 89°57'20" W Easterly extension ofthe south line of Lot 7 Portion of propertyconveyed to City ofCorcoran for Roadwaypurposesper Doc. No.6405426 Easterly extension ofthe North line of Lot 11 ROADWAY EASEMENTEXISTINGEdge of Gravel LARSEN ROADSTREHLER ROADS 89°57'34" W 329.97N 00°22'53" W 1287.37 S 89°57'20" W 329.96N 00°22'53" W 1320.35N 89°57'07" E 659.9260659.91E X C E P T I O N329.96N 00°22'53" W 2607.79 60' R/W 3340 40 33 200.001320.40 1277.39 1277.37 7.00 N 10°46'03 " E 1 3 4 4 . 2 2 459.92200.007.00 (road dedication)L O T 3 L O T 2 L O T 1 1000 100099899810009969981 0 0 210021002 1 0 0 4 100610201012101410161018102210241026102810001000100210041006 1012 1010 10081012459.92329.97L O W L A N D T R E E L I N E C U L T I V A T E D F I E L D FLOOD ZONE "A" C U L T I V A T E D F I E L D T R E E S BUILDING S E T B A C K L I N E 10021004 1006 1008 1020101610181022 102410261028 STREHLER ROADPrimary Septic Alternate Septic P r im a r y S e p t i cAlt e r n a t e S e p t i c Approx. ExistingSeptic Location Tank Proposed Building Pad Proposed Building Pad Existing 60' Roadway EasementSOUTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22NORTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22WEST LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22 NORTH LINE OF THE SW 1/4 OF THESW 1/4 SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22EAST LINE OF THE WEST 659.91 FEET OF THE W 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC. 17, TWP. 119, R.22 Portion of property conveyed to Cityof Corcoran for Roadway purposesper Doc. No.6457667 See Detail Portion of property conveyed to Cityof Corcoran for Roadway purposesper Doc. No.6405426. See Detail ShedHouseShed Sheds Shed & Silo Sheds Existing gravel drive to neighbors G r a v e lAdjoining Owner:Ashley Craig / Brian Derosier22900 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Todd & Kathy Sarinen22930 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Matt & Andrielle Sarkinen22960 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Ryan & Rebecca Erickson22990 Strehler Road Adjoining Owner:Debra Weinand22945 Co. Road No. 10Adjoining Owner:Jim & Cecilia Kozicky23110 Garrison Road Adjoining Owner:Steve & Marilyn Rickson23110 Larsen Road Adjoining Owner:David & Sharen Johnson23107 Larsen Road Adjoining Owner:Raymond Ehrlich & Eve Noehles23105 Larsen Road Proposed Driveway996.3 1006.7 1001.5 1002.2 1021.5 1019.9 998.5 1027.1 1020.2 1012.2 1008.0 1016.0 996.6 997.2cim Well Prop o s e d D r i v e w a y Existing gravel driveWetlands percounty GIS (typ.)delineation in process Flood Zone A per FEMA MapNo. 27053C0151F,effective date 11/04/2016 LARSEN ROAD11.512.012.0Proposed Driveway Proposed Driveway Existing Driveway 1 OF 1 SHEET NO. PROJECT: 89399REVISIONS DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PRELIMINARY PLAT GREG FRANZEN 23020 Strehler Road Corcoran, MN 55340GRP Signed: ____________________________________________ Gregory R. Prasch Registration No. 24992 Prepared this 1st day of March 2021. The only easements shown are from plats of record or information provided by client. I certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.RP FB No: 1114-75 7601 73rd Avenue NorthMinneapolis, Minnesota 55428 (763) 560-3093 DemarcInc.com 32020 Strehler Road, Corcoran, MN 55340 Property located in Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota Address: SURVEY FOR The West 659.91 feet of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except that part of the West 659.91 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter which lies West of the East 329.96 feet thereof. Also Except Road. Legal Description Zoning Information Miscellaneous Notes Property Address: 23020 Strehler Road, Corcoran, MN 55340 PID No.: 17-119-23-32-0003 Total area of Parcel = 1,296,113 sq. ft. (29.75 acres) By graphic plotting only, this property was found to be located within Flood Zone "X" and "A" (at SW corner of property next to Strehler Road) of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0151F, which bears an effective date of 11/04/2016 (No base flood elevation). Title insurance commitment showing property description and any encumbrances of record not provided, survey subject to change. Property located in Section 17, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota Topography from MnTOPO using LiDAR technology. All commonly owned contiguous land is included in the proposed plat. No significant trees to be removed 1 2 3 4 5 6 1"=20' Property Currently Zoned: RR, Rural Residential Proposed Zoning: RR, Rural Residential Zoning Ordinance Requirements: Building Setbacks Front - 100 feet from major roadways Front - 50 feet from all other roadways Side Yard - 25 feet Rear Yard - 25 feet Minimum Lot Size - 2 acres Minimum Lot Width - 200 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 300 feet Refer to City code for additional requirements Proposed Number of Lots = 3 Area of proposed: Lot 1, Block 1 = 422,475 sq.ft (9.70 acres) Lot 2, Block 1 = 435,668 sq.ft (10.00 acres) Lot 3, Block 1 = 435,660 sq.ft (10.00 acres) Dedicated Right-of-Way along Strehler Road = 2,310 sq.ft (0.05 acres) FRANZEN ESTATES D E T A I L Developer: Greg Franzen 23020 Strehler Road Corcoran, MN 55340 E-Mail: gregfranzen@netzero.com Property Owner: Greg Franzen 23020 Strehler Road Corcoran, MN 55340 Personnel SURVEYOR Demarc Surveying and Engineering 7601 73rd Avenue N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Attn: Greg Prasch phone: 763-560-3093 fax: 763-560-3522 e-mail: gregprasch@demarcinc.com DE Basis of bearings per Hennepin County coordinates Proposed Drainage & Utility Easements are shown thus: BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING INTERIOR LOT LINES.10105 5 R/W LineLot Line7 8 FIELD BY:F:\survey\17-119-23 - hennepin\23020 strehlen road\01 Surveying - 89212\01 CAD\01 Source\01 Survey Base.dwg Legend Denotes building setback line Denotes preliminary wetland per available maps Denotes flood plain boundary 1"=20'DRIVEWAY DETAIL 03.10.21 CITY COMMENTS 03.11.21 ADDRESS 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:RE: City File 20-049, 23020 Strehler Road From: Michael Pingel <pingelmichael@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 7:22 AM To: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: City File 20‐049, 23020 Strehler Road Hello Natalie, thank you for returning my call yesterday. I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed extension of Larsen Road to accommodate access to the subdividing of 23020 Strehler Road, PID 07‐119‐23‐13‐0003, City File 20‐049. If possible I would like this email and attachment included in the "planning meeting packet". As a resident on Larsen Road since 1992 I was unaware that a "60 foot Road Easement" was granted at the east terminus of Larsen Road. I was aware that a single driveway easement had been granted. I would like to see the process history and documentation for the "60 foot Road Access". Please advise how I can secure that documentation. Granting a 60 foot Road easement will impose an adverse impact upon the residents of Larsen Road in terms of additional traffic, road deterioration and safety. Conservatively assuming each of the 2 lots has two vehicles making 2 trips per day, an additional 3,000 vehicle trips per year on Larsen Road would be generated. Clearly there are at least 2 other points/routes of access to the proposed subdivision via Strehler Road. Access via Strehler road would have the least impact on the fewest residents. Strehler Road is already a "connector" road with continuing access to Country Roads 19, 10 (via Bechtold Rd) and 50 and a much better option than Larsen Road.. See red lines on attached maps. As you stated in our phone conversion today, acces via Larsen road was chosen because it is "the most cost effective option for the property owner". You did not cite a compelling environment, traffic, or safety concern. It appears the only concern is what is most profitable to the property owner/seller. I was unaware that the City Of Corcoran is responsible for boosting property owners profits. I do not see how shifting the traffic burden and access "cost" to the residents of Larsen Road so that the property owner can make a larger profit is cost effective or equitable to the residents on Larsen Road. Why should the cost of access be shifted from the property owner onto the residents of Larsen Road? The burden and cost of poor planning by the property owner should not be shifted to the residents of Larsen Road. My position is that acces should be granted to the least impactful option to the residents of Larsen Road, not the most "cost effective for the property owner". Access should be from Strehler Road. Sincerely, Michael Pingel 2 23120 Larsen Road, Corcoran (Hamel) MN 55340 612.248.0913 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP To:Natalie Davis Subject:RE: City File 20-049 23020 Strehler Rd From: Renee Meuwissen <moosewagon@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 7:55 AM To: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: City File 20‐049 23020 Strehler Rd To the city council and Mayor of Corcoran, My name is Renee Meuwissen and I live at 23230 Larsen Rd. My family have been residents of Larsen Rd since 1993. Upon seeing the "For Sale" sign at the intersection of Larsen Rd and County Rd 19 I learned of a single driveway easement from the cul de sac at the east end of our road. From my neighbors I was notified of the letter they received regarding the larger impact to our road. First off, I am extremely disappointed that we did not receive the information from the city as an increase in traffic on the road will affect our property and lifestyle, too. Those who currently live on Larsen Rd and Garrison Ln moved here for the quiet of country living. Increasing traffic on the road will adversely affect our lives, as well as the condition of the road. We have already seen an increase in traffic due to the vehicles of perspective buyers. Don't kid yourselves, we do know what vehicles to belong in this neighborhood and those that don't. We do look out for our neighbors. I have learned from Michael Pingel, the reason for using Larsen Rd for access is because it is "the most cost effective option for the property owner." We all know the cost of adding other access will be passed on to the prospective buyer. I don't understand why the city believes it is the responsibility of the residents of Larsen Road to bear the burden of the increased traffic. I would like it to be known that our house does not agr.ee with your proposal 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:FW: Larsen Road Extension From: Steve Rickson <srickson70@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 6:08 PM To: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Fwd: Larsen Road Extension ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Steve Rickson <srickson70@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:40 PM Subject: Larsen Road Extension To: <srickson1973@gmail.com> In 1995 my neighbors Dave and Sharon Johnson, and Marilyn and I were asked by Greg Franzen and a lawyer for Corcoran to grant an Easement for a single family driveway to cross the south east side of our property for a house to be built by Ray Ehrkuch. We met with the lawyer for Corcoran and we were told that they do these easements all the time. That an easement meant that we still owned the property but were giving the right for a driveway. In October 2020 I was told that the property adjacent to ours was sold and two more driveways were going to come in over our property. I talked to Jessica Beise on 11/5/20, and she told me that we owned the property and we would have to give permission for more driveways. It was not until january 28 2021 that I received documents of the sale of two lots on the east of our property and the proposed extension of Larsen Rd. Also a copy of a Quit Claim Deed that we were told 35years ago was an easement contract. Both Johnsons and ourselves thought this was for an easement. (Bait and Switch). 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP To:Natalie Davis Subject:RE: Fwd: ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Steve Rickson <srickson70@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 6:06 PM Subject: To: <srickson1973@gmail.com> I think there are other options that Corcoran should consider. Put a road on east side of Franzens property, get permission to use private road on east side of Franzens. Johnsons and us bought property on a dead end cul de sac because we wanted the privacy to raise children and grandchildren without a lot of cars, to limit the amount of dust in our house, the quiet solitude. There are a lot of neighbors that feel the same way. I hope you consider this before making a decision. Steve E Rickson 23110 Larsen Rd 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:FW: Development of 23020 strehler road. I have already submitted a message but dont know if it went through. From: srickson1973 <srickson1973@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:20 AM To: ndavis@corcoran.mn.us Subject: Development of 23020 strehler road. I have already submitted a message but dont know if it went through. In 1995 we agreed to an easement for a single use driveway off of the cul de sac. Greg fransen knows this as well as ray Ehrlich and Dave johnson. I guess we are too trusting in people to do the honest and ethical thing. The lawyer who wrote up that agreement appears to have said that we sold the land which we did not. Where is the payment for that land? Larsen road can not handle this much for traffic. The road is not maintained well enough. The road should be paved to handle that amount of traffic. Corcoran told us that notice of this plan would go out to everyone on this road. It only went to four households. This affects EVERYONE on this road as well as everyone on Garrison road and lane. Sent from my T‐Mob LTE Devi 1 Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:FW: City File 20-049, 23020 Strehler Road From: Laura Schulte <lauralschulte@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:34 AM To: Natalie Davis <ndavis@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: City File 20‐049, 23020 Strehler Road Hello Natalie, I am a resident of Larsen Road. I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed extension of Larsen Road to accommodate access to the subdividing of 23020 Strehler Road, PID 07‐119‐23‐13‐0003, City File 20‐049. Please include my email in the planning packet for the upcoming meeting. It was our understanding that only 1 single driveway easement was granted for 23020 Strehler Road, PID 07‐119‐23‐13‐ 0003, City File 20‐049. There were not 2 additional easements granted. I would like to see the documentation that allows for 2 additional easements. Please advise the process for obtaining that. As residents of Larsen Road we are very concerned about the additional traffic that will result from 2 more homes being added. Already we have noticed the increased wear and tear on our road from the additional traffic that has resulted from the land being for sale. We are a very close neighborhood, we know who lives in our neighborhood and which cars are new. We are very aware of any new traffic when it comes through. Granting a 60 foot road easement will have a negative impact on the residents of Larsen Road. It will add additional traffic and increase road deterioration. There appears to be other access points to the proposed subdivision that could be utilized. They may not be the most cost effective for Franzen’s but they would be more beneficial for the residents of Larsen Road. There are 16 homes (if you include the homes along Garrison which accesses via Larsen Road) which will be negatively impacted by the additional traffic that would be generated. The welfare of 16 family homes should be taken into consideration and should be more important than what is financially advantageous for the seller. Access via Strehler Road would have the least amount of impact on the fewest number of residents. My husband and I would like to attend the upcoming planning meeting. Is the 4/1/2021 meeting an in‐person meeting that we can attend? If it is not, could you please provide the call in information so we can participate. Thank you. ‐Laura Schulte ‐Peter Schulte 612‐750‐4853 lauralschulte@gmail.com peterdschulte@gmail.com 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kevin Shay through Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 15, 2021 for the April 22, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Development Plan for “Cook Lake Highlands” at 19220 County Road 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (City File 20-047) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE:May 5, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant is requesting approval of “Cook Lake Highlands” which contains a 102-unit senior living cooperative, 20 single family residential villa lots, a 12,987 square foot child care and early education facility and a 20,781 square foot assisted living and memory care facility. The site is located on the northwest corner of County Road 10 and Brockton Lane. The development plan shows development of the project in a single phase. 2.Parks and Trails Commission Review The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed the item on April 15, 2021. Staff will provide a summary of the discussion and recommendation in the presentation at the meeting. 3.Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed the item on April 1, 2021 and recommended 4-0 to deny the project. Since the Planning Commission review, the developer has submitted revised plans which removes the apartment building, includes an additional 8 single-family villas, moves the large stormwater to the previous apartment location and shows the retention of the existing Bass Lake Crossing trail in the northwest corner of the site with an extension within this site. The revisions to the plan have been incorporated into the staff report. 4.Context Zoning and Land Use The property is guided Mixed Residential and zoned RMF-2 Mixed Residential. The property is in the 2020-2025 phase of the 2040 Staging Plan and municipal services are available Agenda Item: 8c Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 2 April 22, 2021 Surrounding Properties There is an exception parcel in the northern portion of the site that is owned by the Metropolitan Council for a lift station with an easement access over the eastern portion of the site. This property is guided Public/Semi-Public and zoned P-I Public/Institutional. The property to the north is guided Low Density Residential and zoned RSF-2 Single Family Residential. The property to the west is developed as a single-family residential subdivision “Bass Lake Crossing”. The property to the east is located in Maple Grove and is currently going through the review process to be developed as a single-family residential subdivision. The property to the south is guided Mixed Use and zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. It is currently Lions Park. Natural Characteristics of the Site There is a large wetland on the northern portion of the site. Cook Lake is located northeast of the site and imposes Shoreland restrictions on this site. The Natural Resource Inventory map identifies a high-quality maple/basswood natural community and a rare species occurrence on the site. There are areas of FEMA floodplain in the northern portion of the site. 4. Analysis of Request A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application. The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. If the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to implement the goals and standards set in the Comprehensive Plan. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUDs. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City’s discretion in approving a preliminary plat is limited to whether the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the City’s subdivision and zoning ordinance and the conditions of preliminary plat approval. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Staff has reviewed the application for consistency with Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and City Code requirements, as well as City policies. The City Engineer’s comments are incorporated into this staff report, the detailed comments are included in the attached engineering memo and the approval conditions require compliance with the memo. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 3 April 22, 2021 Rezoning The property in this proposed development is zoned Mixed Residential (RMF-2). The applicant is requesting that the properties be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezoning would be consistent with the future Medium Density land use designation, which requires development at 5-8 units per net acre. It is possible for the developer to meet the current mixed-use land use density requirement of 8-10 units per acre, however this would require removal of the memory care facility and daycare for housing units such as townhomes. The Mixed Residential district would require 171 to 214 units to comply with the density range on this site. The applicant would need to add an additional 49 residential units to meet the minimum density of 8 units per acre. The project includes a mix of single-family villa, a senior co-op, a memory care facility and a daycare/young education facility. All of these uses are permitted in the RMF-2 zoning district, except the memory care facility which is considered a nursing home in the current ordinance and only permitted in commercial districts. However, since it is a facility where people will live, staff finds that it could be considered an appropriate use in a residential PUD. The Zoning Ordinance has established a PUD zoning district with the purpose of promoting a creative and efficient use of land by providing design flexibility in the development of residential neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas that would not be possible under a conventional zoning district. In this case, the developer is requesting PUD flexibility as outlined below. The project is requesting PUD flexibility for: 1. Flexibility from the shoreland standards to reduce the minimum lot size and width for the villa home lots. 2. Flexibility from the shoreland and RMF-2 district standards to reduce the side yard setback for the villa home lots. 3. Flexibility from the shoreland and RMF-2 district standards to increase the maximum building height for the senior co-op. 4. Flexibility from the shoreland standards to increase the maximum impervious coverage for the site. 5. Flexibility from the parking standards to reduce the parking stall length for the site. 6. Flexibility from the fence standards to have a taller fence than the 4-foot allowed within the required front yard setback. In exchange for this flexibility, the applicant will: a. Provide additional landscaping beyond the ordinance requirements a. The plans show 206 trees and 598 shrubs where 188 trees and 112 shrubs are required b. Provide additional right-of-way (ROW) for County Road 10 future improvements a. Additional 20 feet is being dedicated as ROW. c. Dedicate a lot in the development for a City booster station. d. Dedication of 9.61 gross acres of park. e. Provide easements for City and Metropolitan Council utilities and access. f. Provides a mix of uses that would not otherwise be possible under standard zoning. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 4 April 22, 2021 The PUD flexibility and the detailed development plan is discussed in the PUD Development Plan section of this report. The City must review this request for compliance with the PUD standards as follows: 1. The planned development is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The planned unit development uses are not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the proposed pre-development net density is 5.3 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan notes that the City calculates net density (gross land area - wetlands and land below the 100-year OHWL) to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan goals. This is the calculation that the City has used for other development reviews in Corcoran. The net density is not consistent with the 8-10 units per acre that is expected in the Mixed Residential land use classification. If approval is received from City Council, the applicant should submit a comprehensive plan amendment application immediately following the meeting to reguide the property from Mixed Residential to Medium Density Residential which allows development density at 5-8 units per acre. The City has built some flexibility into the Comprehensive Plan and changing this property to a less dense land use would not require the City to change the land use of another property to a higher density classification because the City is above the 3.0 minimum density required for the City. These density calculations are based on the entire site. While only the units in the villas and co- op are considered dwelling units for the purpose of calculating density, the entire site is calculated for net land area. Staff believes that the applicant accurately calculated density based on the definition in the Zoning Ordinance: DENSITY, NET (PRE-DEVELOPMENT): The number of housing units divided by the net residential acreage (gross land area minus wetlands and areas below the 100-year ordinary high water elevation). For proposed developments, net acreage is based on the predevelopment conditions of the site. Existing public streets are deducted from the predevelopment land area. However, staff notes that this development results in an estimated post-development net density of 7.3 units per acre. It is not possible to calculate the post development net density until the final plans are approved because this formula also deducts wetland buffers, stormwater ponds and other areas protected by easements; therefore, this is not the number cities use to calculate density at this stage. However, that is the number that will be provided to the Metropolitan Council as part of the plat monitoring program which is a tool to ensure that cities are meeting their density goals. The plan incorporates the trail and street connections anticipated within the site and preserves significant portions of the existing natural resources on site. 2. The planned development is not in conflict with the intent of the underlying zoning district. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 5 April 22, 2021 The planned development of a 102-unit senior living cooperative, 20 single family residential villa lots, a 12,987 square foot child care and early education facility and a 20,781 square foot assisted living and memory care facility is consistent with the intent of the RMF-2 district and the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing options. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to allow for modification to the building height, provide a mix of lot sizes and reduced setbacks for this development at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The planned development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide additional landscaping, an increased ROW for County Road 10, land for a future booster station, public easements beyond what would typically be required, a mix of land uses that might not otherwise be possible. The PUD allows the developer to request flexibility from the performance standards in the ordinance in exchange for a better development than might otherwise be expected. The Planning Commission could find that the PUD flexibility requested by the developer results in deviations from the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance that are not off-set by the PUD benefits proposed by the applicant and, therefore, are in conflict with the appliable provisions of the ordinance. 4. The planned development or unit thereof is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that its construction, marketing, and/or operation is feasible as a complete unit without dependence upon any other subsequent unit or phase. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project will be completed in a single phase. 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails and sidewalks along with some private trails. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 6. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. The planned development is a mixed residential development which transitions from single family to a multi-story residential structure located on the furthest portion of the site and, Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 6 April 22, 2021 therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. However, the Planning Commission could find that the height of the building, the density of the project and the overall massing is out of character with the surrounding land uses and would have an undue impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood. 7. The quality of the building and site design proposed by the PUD plan shall substantially enhance the aesthetics of the site, shall demonstrate higher standards, more efficient and effective uses of streets, utilities and public facilities, it shall maintain and enhance any natural resources within the development, and create a public benefit that is greater than what would be achieved through the strict application of the primary zoning regulations The PUD would provide quality building design, install and provide streets, utilities and public facilities that may not otherwise be installed. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving high quality natural resources, providing trails, a park and quality architecture. The Zoning Ordinance states that “the rezoning of the property defined in the development plan shall not become effective until such time as the City Council approves an ordinance reflecting said amendment, which shall take place at the time that the City Council approves the final development plan.” Preliminary PUD Development Plan The entire project will be built in a single phase includes: • 20 single family homes • 102 senior co-op units • Daycare • Assisted living and memory care facility The market rate apartment that was included in the previous version of this plan has been eliminated. Shoreland Overlay District The property includes a shoreland overlay district from Cook Lake located to the northeast of the property. Cook Lake is a Natural Environment Lake and the standards that apply for this lake classification are in Section 1050.020 of the City Code. The lot area, lot width and building height standards have been included in the table shown below. The shoreland overlay district extends 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of the lake and encompasses most of this site. Natural Environment Lakes have additional setback standards which are measured from the OHWL. A Natural Environment Lake requires a 150-foot setback for all structures. The proposed location of all structures meets this standard. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 7 April 22, 2021 Lots within the shoreland overlay district is limited to a maximum impervious surface coverage limit of 25%. The applicant is requesting flexibility to calculate the impervious surface area of the entire site rather than individuals and to exceed the maximum impervious surface limit with a total of 38.8% impervious surface for the entire site. Individual sites range from 26.65% to 58.5% impervious surface coverage. The underlying zoning district does not have an impervious surface limit. It is worth noting that any development on this site will require flexibility from the impervious surface limit from the shoreland standards. The shoreland overlay district also includes standards for buffers to be established adjacent to the OHWL of the lake. In this case, there is a wetland located adjacent to the lake that extends towards the property and will establish its own buffers. These wetland buffers are discussed further in a later section of the report. Lot Dimensions and Setbacks The development is being reviewed against the RMF-2 district standards and the Shoreland Overlay district standards. The applicant is requesting some flexibility from the lot size, lot width and side yard setbacks standards for the single-family villas and the building height for both multi-family buildings as follows (shown in red): RMF-2 District Standards Shoreland Overlay Standards Proposed PUD Standards Single Family Apartment All uses Single Family Villas Senior Co-op Daycare Memory Care Minimum Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 1 acre 20,000 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. 4.47 acres 1.88 acres 2.14 acres Minimum lot width 60 feet 100 feet 125 feet 50 feet <125 feet <125 feet <125 feet Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet N/A N/A N/A 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping) 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping) Front, From all other streets 25 feet 25 feet N/A 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Side 10 feet 30 feet N/A 5 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Rear 25 feet 25 feet N/A 30 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 25 feet 35 feet 55 feet 22 feet ~23 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Internal: 20 feet between attached or multi-family principal structures separated by common area. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 8 April 22, 2021 Staff notes that the smaller lots are consistent with the lot area/width for other developments in the City. The City did approve a similar lot area/width in the Ravinia and Bass Lake Crossing developments. However, Lots 10-12 do not meet the minimum 50-foot lot width. The 50-foot minimum has been measured in similar PUDs at the front setback line. Meeting the 50-foot minimum lot width will result in at least one lot being removed. The applicant is requesting that the maximum building height be increased to allow a 55-foot 4-story senior co-op. The building height for this structure exceeds the allowed building height for the zoning district and the shoreland overlay. The City has approved building height flexibility from the shoreland standards for Rush Creek Reserve. The developer is requesting side yard setback flexibility to allow a minimum of 10 feet between buildings. The previous Council has discussed the single-family district standards at a July 25, 2019 work session and the consensus was to maintain a minimum of 15 feet between buildings. However, staff notes that the Bass Lake Crossing development does have the smaller setbacks requested by the applicant. Staff recommends that the 15 feet separation be maintained, but the Planning Commission could find that a smaller setback similar to the adjacent neighborhood is appropriate and modify the approving resolution. Fences The applicant is proposing a fence on the daycare lot to the east of the principal structure. The fence is proposed to be six-foot-tall ornamental fence which will enclose a recreation area for the daycare. The northeast corner of the fence and the south portion of the fence are located within the required front yard setback for the principal structure. The ordinance requires all fences over four feet high to meet the front yard setback requirements. Staff does not support the request for PUD flexibility in the front yard on the northeast corner where traffic visibility would be reduced by the fence and recommends that the fence be reconfigured to comply with the setback requirements in this area. Retaining Walls The applicant is proposing a number of retaining walls to achieve the desired grading on the site. Several retaining walls have been removed from the previous version, but there are still a number of retaining walls on site with the largest at a height of 9 feet. Engineering will need to review certified designs for all the walls that exceed four feet in height. Utilities The City Engineer’s memo provides detailed utility comments. This project will extend municipal sewer and water through the site. The City ordinance requires developers to stub sanitary sewer, water and streets to the property line, which means development of this infrastructure makes development possible for adjacent properties. The developer is proposing to dedicate a 0.30-acre parcel, shown as Lot 3, Block 2 on the eastern boundary of the plat, to allow for construction of a City owned, operated and maintained booster Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 9 April 22, 2021 station. The booster station is needed for continued and expanding water service to the residents of the City. Staff views the dedication of this land for a booster station as a PUD benefit. Transportation The plan shows a 60-foot right-of-way with a 30-foot street section for 74th Avenue and the new cul- de-sac street. A 26-foot private drive is proposed to serve the senior co-op. Improvements are proposed to the intersection of 74th Avenue and County Road 10 including a dedicated eastbound left turn lane and westbound right turn lane on County Road 10. Additionally, a 20-foot fire lane is proposed which wraps around the north and east sides of the senior co-op building. The eastern portion of the fire lane is located within an existing Metropolitan Council access easement. The applicant has been working with the Metropolitan Council to revise the existing easement to include new language allowing joint access through the area. A condition has been included in the draft resolution that the city will require a letter from the Metropolitan Council agreeing to the easement changes. The access provided for the daycare and memory care uses is proposed to be a shared access on the daycare lot. A shared access and maintenance easement agreement will be required with a final plat application and has been included as a condition of approval. Additionally, the private drive and shared access are not aligned to create a safer intersection. Staff encourages aligning the access points for shared access and the private drive to provide a safer intersection for both entrances. The offset access points increase the potential for conflicts for vehicles and pedestrians. However, with the apartment building removed and the reduced traffic from the northern access, if the developer cannot accommodate the aligned accesses then they will need to work with city staff to include a safe pedestrian crossing as an alternative. The City Engineer’s memo provides more detailed transportation comments. The draft resolutions require compliance with the engineer’s memo. Parking The parking standards in Section 1060.060 Subd. 4 require parking areas to be setback 10 feet from all side and rear lot lines and to be setback equal to the principal structure for the front lot line. The parking areas comply with this standard with the exception of the parking area located south of the building on the daycare lot. The parking area is required to be setback 100 feet or 25 feet with additional landscaping provided as outlined in Section 1060.070, Subd. L. The applicant is proposing to have the parking area setback 50 feet from the southern lot line. Staff supports a reduction in the required parking setback with the condition that additional landscaping is provided to meet the requirement. All the lots are shown with 90-degree parking stalls. The dimensional requirements require a minimum stall depth of 18 feet 6 inches. The applicant is seeking flexibility to provide all parking stalls with a minimum depth of 18 feet. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 10 April 22, 2021 The Zoning Ordinance requires two parking spaces per residential unit for single family. The single- family villa homes can meet their parking requirements with the attached garage and driveway. All driveways in front of garages must be a minimum of 22 feet long to allow a vehicle to park in front of the garage without conflicting with sidewalks and streets. Additionally, on-street parking will be allowed on one side of the 28-foot wide public street. The Zoning Ordinance requires 1.5 parking stalls per residential unit for senior housing. The senior co-op building contains 102 units and will be required to have 153 parking stalls. The senior co-op is proposing to provide 121 garage parking stalls and 75 surface parking stalls, with a total of 196 parking stalls being provided. This complies. The Zoning Ordinance does not specify the number of parking spaces required for a daycare use. As such, planning staff is directed to use the most similar use from the parking requirements or to consult reference materials to determine an appropriate parking requirement for the use. Based on staff’s research we recommend that the daycare provide one space for each employee plus one space for every six individuals of licensed capacity. The daycare is proposing to provide 43 surface parking stalls. The number of employees and the licensed capacity for the building has not been provided so it unclear at this time if the parking requirements have been met. The Zoning Ordinance does not specify the number of parking spaces required for a memory care/assisted living use. As such, planning staff is directed to use the most similar use from the parking requirements or to consult reference materials to determine an appropriate parking requirement for the use. Staff recommends that the memory care/assisted living provide four spaces plus one for each 3 beds offered. The memory care/assisted living is proposing to provide 19 surface parking stalls. The number of beds offered has not been provided so staff is unable to determine if the parking requirements have been met. Use Parking Requirement Required Parking Surface Parking Underground Parking Total Parking Single-Family Villa 2 per unit 24 24 N/A 24 Senior Co-op 1.5 per unit 153 75 121 196 Daycare 1 per employee plus 1 per six individuals of capacity Unknown 43 N/A 43 Assisted Living/Memory Care 4 plus 1 per 3 beds 12 19 N/A 19 The number of parking stalls complies with ordinance requirements. Public Safety The public safety committee reviewed this request and provided comments related to public safety access. The memo is attached to this report and compliance is included as a condition of approval in the draft resolution. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 11 April 22, 2021 Stormwater The plans show a number of stormwater ponds on site to comply with City, Watershed and State requirements. Additional details are needed from the applicant to ensure compliance with regulations and manage drainage near adjacent properties during construction. Wetlands The wetland delineation was approved in 2020 and shows a large wetland in the northeastern section of the site and a smaller wetland in the southeast corner of the site. The applicant is proposing wetland impacts to the wetlands identified in the delineation. The wetland mitigation plan must be approved prior to submittal of the final PUD. This has been included as a condition of approval. Section 1050.010 of the Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for the wetland overlay district. This includes establishment of wetland buffer strips with an average buffer width of 25 feet plus a 15-foot structure setback from the buffer. Wetland buffer signs are required to be installed at each lot line where it crosses a wetland buffer, and where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer, with a maximum spacing of 200 feet of wetland edge. The plans need to be revised to show the 15- foot structure setback from the buffer and to show wetland buffer monuments consistent with the ordinance standards. A wetland buffer planting and maintenance plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. The 15-foot structure setback is reduced to 5 feet for roads and parking lots. Trails that serve an interpretive function are exempt from the setback requirement but must be located outside of the buffer. It appears that there is a conflict with the northwest corner of the road surrounding the senor co-op where is appears to encroach within the structure setback. The applicant should use wetland buffer averaging to provide the minimum width in this location and to provide additional width in areas with no conflicts. This will allow the fire lane to remain in the same location. Floodplain Section 1050.030 of the City Code establishes the floodplain standards and the Comprehensive Plan shows a floodplain area in the northeastern portion of the site generally in the area of Cook Lake and the large wetland. The FEMA floodplain boundary is shown on the preliminary plat. No impacts are proposed. Natural Resources The Comprehensive Plan includes a Natural Resource Inventory Areas map (Map 1-7) that shows a high-quality maple/basswood forest and a rare species occurrence and an Ecologically Significant Natural Areas map (Map 1-12) that shows a small mixed emergent marsh. The City does not have a tree preservation ordinance. However, the applicant did provide a tree preservation plan which shows 30% of the woodland areas on site being preserved. These trees are located within the high-quality maple/basswood forest identified on the Natural Resource Inventory Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 12 April 22, 2021 Areas map. This is an increase from the 11% shown in the previous plan in response to concerns heard at the March 4th public hearing. Landscaping The applicant is required to provide one overstory tree for each dwelling unit for the single-family villas and senior co-op. For the non-residential uses including the daycare and memory care the applicant is required to provide one overstory tree per 1,000 square feet of gross building floor area or one tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater and One understory shrub for each 300 square feet of building or one tree per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. The overstory trees may be substituted with understory or ornamental trees at a ratio of 3 to 1. The table below indicates the landscaping required for each site and the landscaping provided. The applicant should revise the landscape plan to indicate the correct number of plantings required and the correct number of plantings provided for each individual site and the overall landscape plan as the numbers are inconsistent and do not match. A setback reduction from 100 feet to 50 feet is requested as allowed by Section 1060 of the Zoning ordinance along the south lot line of the daycare and memory care, which allows the reduction by right if additional landscaping is provided. The ordinance requires 1 overstory deciduous tree, 1 overstory coniferous tree, 2 ornamental trees, and 10 understory shrubs per 100 ft. of the project site where the reduction is requested. This is in addition to the site landscaping required as shown above. This would require an additional 3 overstory deciduous trees, 3 overstory coniferous trees, 6 ornamental trees and 30 shrubs each for the daycare site and the memory care site. The plans need to be revised to show these additional buffer plantings. Building Design Standards The applicant has provided building renderings and elevations for the proposed structures. The City has adopted design standards as part of the Zoning Ordinance and guidelines as part of the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines. The developer will be required to show compliance with these standards or request PUD flexibility. The Southeast District guidelines are not included in this report as staff does not have enough information regarding the buildings to accurately evaluate the consistency of the structures with the guidelines; however is it worth noting that the buildings will need fit with the agrarian contemporary, farmhouse and arts and crafts prairie styles identified in the Southeast District Guidelines. This will be evaluated with the final PUD. Use Trees Required Trees Provided Shrubs Required Shrubs Provided Single Family Villas 40 51 0 0 Senior Co-op 102 100 0 485 Daycare 22 26 43 48 Memory Care 24 29 69 65 Total 188 206 112 598 Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 13 April 22, 2021 The single-family villa renderings are sample products from M/I Homes and vary from 1,734 – 1,935 square feet and all include 2-car garages. All the single-family villas are subject to the following standards listed in Section 1040.040, Subd 8: A. Front Elevation: 1. Definition: i. For the purpose of this Section, front elevation shall be the elevation facing the front lot line on the street of the mailing address for the property when the property has more than one front lot line. 2. Materials used: i. The front elevation shall have material consisting of brick, stone, stucco, fiber cement board, redwood, cedar or other similar materials. A minimum of two different materials is required, except that brick may be used on the entire elevation. ii. Vinyl siding is permitted when combined with the materials listed in Subd. 8.A.2.i of this Section. A minimum of 3 different variations in color, style and/or material is required. For example, if vinyl siding is used, the home shall have combination of each lap, shake or board and batten plus brick or stone. The percentage of each used material/style of materials used shall be shown on the plans. iii. Except for brick, stucco and/or natural or artificial stone, the front elevation shall have no more than 75% of one type of exterior finish. The percentage of materials used shall be shown on the plans. 3. Architectural Elements: i. The front elevation façade shall consist of doors, windows and variations of the wall face with the use of pilasters or columns, wainscots, canopies or other architectural elements. 4. Design: i. Front elevations shall be varied with a minimum of five different styles provided in the development. ii. Homes in proximity to each other shall not look alike in terms of the combination of color of siding, accent and roofing materials. The home under consideration will be compared to the two homes on each side and to the three homes directly facing it. B. Garages: 1. The garage shall not comprise more than 55 percent of the viewable ground floor street-facing linear building frontage. This standard is based on the measurement of the entire garage structure and not on a measurement of the garage door or doors only. Corner lots are exempt from this requirement on one street elevation. 2. Garage doors shall be architecturally styled (this includes details such as raised panels, accent color, windows, etc.) to match the exterior design of the home. C. Roof: 1. Roofing materials including asphalt shingles, wood shingles (including shake), concrete, clay, ceramic tile roofs or residential steel roofing material (with hidden fasteners) are required on all roofs. 2. Overhangs must be a minimum of 12 inches. D. Other Elevations: Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 14 April 22, 2021 1. Equal architectural treatment on all sides of the building (materials, articulation, etc.) shall be used for all new residential construction when located on or visible from a street or public park. Each elevation facing a street or public park should use a minimum of 2 different materials and/or styles compatible with the front elevation as described in this Section. All other elevations shall make a good faith effort to demonstrate that elements of the front elevation have been considered for incorporation on these elevations. 2. Each side elevation shall have at least one window or door opening. 3. A maximum of 18 inches of the foundation wall may be exposed on any elevation. The applicant provided renderings but did not provide elevations with materials percentages indicates and staff is unable to determine compliance with a majority of the ordinance standards. The applicant indicated that they are only requesting flexibility from the side yard setbacks, do not require flexibility from the requirements in Section 1040.040, Subd 8 (B) and will comply with all other design standards. Staff has included a condition in the draft resolution that elevations with material percentages will be required with the Final PUD to ensure compliance with the code standards. The Applewood senior co-op building is 4-stories and has a building footprint of 49,846 square feet and is subject to the standards for apartments listed in Section 1040.070, Subd. 8 as follows: A. Unit Size: Floor Area: Five hundred (500) square foot minimum floor area for efficiency apartment units. Minimum eight hundred (800) square feet for a one-bedroom unit plus one hundred (100) square feet for each additional bedroom. Seven hundred (700) square foot minimum floor area for one-bedroom apartment dwelling units in retirement housing developments, plus one hundred (100) square feet for each additional bedroom. Garages, breezeways and porch floor spaces shall not be credited in determining the required floor area of units B. Parking: The design and maintenance of off street parking areas and the required number of parking spaces shall be in accordance with Section 1060.060 of this title. Private driveways for garages in townhouse developments shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in length to allow vehicle parking on the driveway. C. Trash Handling and Recycling: All trash, recyclable materials, and trash and recyclable materials handling equipment shall be stored within the principal structure, totally screened from public view by the principal building, or stored within an accessory structure constructed of building materials compatible with the principal structure, enclosed by a roof, and readily served through swinging doors. D. On Site Screening: All mechanical equipment, utility meters, storage and service areas and similar features shall be completely screened from the eye level view from adjacent properties and public streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment of the principal structure. E. Building Design and Materials-Multi-family (stacked): All buildings shall be designed to accomplish the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan. Building materials shall be Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 15 April 22, 2021 attractive in appearance, durable, and of a quality which is both compatible with adjacent structures and consistent with the City's standards for the district in which it is located. All buildings shall be of good aesthetic and architectural quality, as demonstrated by the inclusion of elements such as accent materials, entrance and window treatments, contrasting colors, irregular building shapes and rooflines, or other architectural features in the overall architectural concept. a. Major exterior surfaces on all walls facing a public street, park or open space shall include a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the combined area of all building facades of a structure shall contain following permitted major exterior materials: face brick (glazed or unglazed), clay faced tile, stone masonry (granite, limestone, marble, slate, sandstone, or quartzite). 2. Accent materials may include: finished texture stucco (cement or synthetic), natural or cultured stone, exterior finished wood siding (painted, stained, or weather sealed), exterior finished metal siding (factory finished), exterior finished vinyl siding or fiber cement siding in lap or panel design (color impregnated or painted). Panel seam lines shall be architecturally integrated into the building design so that they are not visible. Seam lines can either be filled, covered with accent material or some other method to make seam lines invisible. Accenting materials and design shall be included on all facades. 3. All building and roofing materials shall meet current accepted industry standards, and tolerances, and shall be subject to review and approval by the City for quality, durability, and aesthetic appeal. The applicant shall submit to the City product samples, color building elevations, and associated drawings which illustrate the construction techniques to be used in the installation of such materials. 4. If complementary building styles, materials, and color schemes are proposed for a development, the developer shall submit to the City a plan showing the distribution of the styles, materials, and colors throughout the development. 5. All townhome designs shall comply with the standards in Section 1040, Subd. 9 (RMF-1 Design Requirements). F. Parking Lot Screening: 1. The light from automobile headlights and other sources shall be screened whenever it may be directed onto residential windows. 2. When required parking areas abut any residential district, the edge nearest the lot line shall be completely screened to a height of at least three and one- half feet (31/2') above the parking grade. Such screening shall either be constructed of durable building materials designed in harmony with the principal structure or accomplished through use of earth mounds and/or landscape materials as approved. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 16 April 22, 2021 3. When the design of the site is such that parking occurs in the front yard, a minimum of ten feet (10') landscaped area shall be provided between parking and building, in addition to the required setbacks. G. Recreational Facilities: On site recreational facilities, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, play equipment, walking trails, gardens, and basketball courts, that are suitable for the projected population of the development shall be provided when the nearest public park is more than one-half (1/2) mile or across a thoroughfare or arterial roadway from the development. H. Common Areas. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in the RMF-3 district governing common areas: 1. Ownership: All common areas within an RMF-3 development not dedicated to the public including, but not limited to, open space, driveways, private drives, parking areas, play areas, etc., shall be owned in one of the following manners: a. Condominium ownership pursuant to Minnesota statutes 515A.1-106. b. Twinhome or townhome subdivision common areas shall be owned by the owners of each unit lot, with each owner of a unit having an equal and undivided interest in the common area. 2. Homeowners' Association: A homeowners' association shall be established for all townhome developments within the RMF district, subject to review and approval of the City attorney, and shall be responsible for all exterior building maintenance, approval of any exterior architectural modifications, landscaping, snow clearing and regular maintenance of private driveways and other areas owned in common when there is more than one individual property owner having interest within the development. Staff does not have enough information to determine compliance with these standards, but the applicant has indicated a willingness to comply with all standards. The applicant provided a building rendering and elevation with a material table for the Applewood senior co-op which includes materials consistent with the ordinance standards. It appears that this building will comply with ordinance standards, however, no percentages were included so staff in unable to determine compliance with the standards. A condition has been included in the draft resolution to provide the additional information. The applicant provided colored building elevations for the daycare which show a combination of stone veneer, composite wood shake siding and prefinished metal coping in earth tone colors. No material percentages were provided with the building elevations. A condition has been included in the resolution for final architectural design with materials percentages to be included with the final PUD application. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 17 April 22, 2021 The applicant provided colored building elevation for the memory care which uses cultured sone veneer, LP lap siding and LP shake siding as building materials with earth tone and blue colors. No material percentages were provided with the building elevations. A condition has been included in the resolution for final architectural design with materials percentages to be included with the final PUD application. If the project is approved, staff would work with the applicant to ensure that the daycare and memory care architecture is revised as needed to comply with the purpose and intent of the ordinance. Lighting The applicant provided a photometric lighting plan which shows the proposed streetlight locations and illumination levels for the site. No lighting details were provided by the applicant. Street lighting will be provided by Wright Hennepin Electric. Cut sheets for the proposed street lighting shall be provided to the City to ensure compliance with City standards. Streetlights are generally located on the sidewalk side of the street. Signage Chapter 84 of the City Code regulates signage. The applicant is showing signage in the following locations: • One monument sign on each side of the shared access for the daycare and memory care and one sign on the south side of each lot. • One monument sign on the east side of the private drive for the senior co-op Section 84.05 of the City Code allows two 32-square-foot signs at the primary entrance of a subdivision or medium and high-density apartments and one 16 square-foot sign at a secondary entrance. Non-residential uses (daycare and memory care) are allowed one 32-square-foot sign each with a maximum height of six feet. The applicant has provided examples of the sign design but has not designed the individual signs as of the date of the report and no PUD flexibility is requested. Staff recommends approval of the monument signs at the shared drive on the north and south of 74th Avenue and the gateway sign at the corner of County Road 10 and 74th Avenue. The gateway sign is no longer proposed as a PUD benefit. The ordinance requires signs to be set back 10 feet from the property line and outside the sight visibility triangle. The applicant must show compliance with these setback requirements when the building permit is requested. Trails and Sidewalks Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 18 April 22, 2021 The plans will be sent to the April 15th Parks and Trails Commission to review the revised plans and provide a recommendation to the City Council. The 2040 Parks and Trails Plan map shows an off-road trail that runs along the western property line abutting the Bass Lake Crossing development and an on-road trail that runs along County Road 10. The on-road trail will be constructed when the improvements to County Road 10 are completed by Hennepin County. The off-road trail was constructed with the Bass Lake Crossing development and an easement was put in place for a portion of the trail on the Cook Lake property. The revised Cook Lake Highlands site plan preserves the trail in its existing location and will have it run through the backyard of the single-family villa lots. A connection to the trail from the cul-de-sac is not shown on the plans. The applicant will need to revise plans to include a 20-foot easement with an 8-foot wide trail connecting to the existing trail. City policy is to require an 8-foot wide trail in a 20-foot easement for off-road trails and give credit for the area of off-road trails shown on the Comprehensive Plan. In this case the easement is already in place for the “Bass Lake Crossing” portion of the trail. Only newly dedicated easements would qualify for park dedication credit. The Parks Commission could consider providing park dedication credit for the portion of the trail easement in the open space if the Parks Commission does not accept the proposed open space as park land. A trail is shown on the northwest side of the site in the proposed park area which connects to the existing trail constructed with “Bass Lake Crossing”. A sidewalk is shown on the south side of 74th Avenue which continues until the intersection with the Maple Grove street connection. The sidewalk should continue south to County Road 10. The applicant is working with the City of Corcoran, the City of Maple Grove and the Metropolitan Council to provide a trail connection which crosses the boundary between the two cities near the booster station. Trails will be maintained by the City according to City trail policy and sidewalks will be maintained by building management or homeowners. Park Dedication Calculation The Comprehensive Plan does not indicate any parks in the area; however, the applicant is seeking to dedicate the area identified as Outlot C as a public park. Outlot C is 9.61 gross acres with 3.83 net acres qualifying for park dedication credit. The nearest planned parks are in the Town Center to the west. Typically, the City would only accept and give credit for parks that are shown on the Comprehensive Plan. Due to the timing of the meetings the Parks and Trails Commission has yet to review the public park dedication request. The Parks and Trails Commission recommendation will be presented to the City Council. If the park is taken as dedication a credit will be granted towards the park dedication costs. Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 19 April 22, 2021 Under the current ordinance, park dedication of land is required at 28% of the net pre-development area for Mixed Residential land. Park dedication is only taken for newly created lots. The ordinance would require 5.98 net acres of park dedication for the 21.34 net acres being platted. Park dedication of land is required at 17% of the net pre-development area for medium density residential. Park dedication is only taken for newly created lots. The ordinance would require 3.63 net acres of park dedication for the 21.34 net acres being platted. Park dedication credits would be given for any trail easements taken for off road trails shown on the Comprehensive Plan. As noted above only the new trail easements for this plat would receive park dedication. Where no park land is shown on the Comprehensive Plan, the City should take cash-in-lieu of land. For residential developments, the current cash in lieu of land fee has been calculated based on the per capita share of park system costs at $4,628 per single family unit, $3,141 per multi family unit and $4,498 per commercial and industrial unit. Because no trail easements are being dedicated and staff does not recommend this site for a park, the full cash-in lieu of land fee is required. The calculations below outline the park dedication fees for each use based on the current plan: 20 villas x $4,628 = $92,560 102 senior living x $3,141 = $320,382 1 memory care facility x $4,498 = $4,498 1 daycare facility x $4,498 = $4,498 TOTAL = $421,938 The final park dedication calculation will be based on final land area calculations and the fee schedule in place at the time of release of the final plat. The draft resolution continues to recommend cash-in-lieu of land for park dedication, but will be updated to reflect the Parks and Trails Commission recommendation after the April 15th meeting. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat is for 24 lots and 5 outlots. The applicant has requested PUD flexibility from various requirements as noted earlier in the PUD section of the staff report. The approval conditions recommended in this staff report and draft resolutions will likely result in changes to the site plan layout. The site plan includes a ghost plat of the Ebert property located to the southwest to ensure that the proposed street stub will allow for a future extension. Conclusion The City has a high level of discretion in approving or denying a PUD. The Council must find that that purpose and intent of the PUD as outlined in the ordinance have been met. This is a significant project that provides a mix of uses that are not currently available in the City and offers public Cook Lake Highlands RZ, PP and PUD (city file 20-047) 20 April 22, 2021 infrastructure improvements and coordination that exceeds what would be found in a standard subdivision. We have prepared a resolution for denial consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that the purpose and intent of the PUD is not met. However, staff has also drafted resolutions and ordinances for approval should the Council wish to approve. Staff has included conditions that would require changes we believe would be necessary to meet City standards. Site plan changes are needed to address the conditions and approval would be contingent upon approval of a reguiding from Mixed Residential to Medium Density Residential to be consistent with the reduced density. Reguiding this property would require Metropolitan Council review, but would not impact the City’s overall density and would not require changes to other parcels in Corcoran. 5. Recommendation Move to adopt Resolution 2021-35 denying the project, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Alternatively, if the Council finds that the intent of the PUD has been met, move to recommend approval of the following: i. Ordinance 2021-15 rezoning to PUD ii. Summary Ordinance 2021-16 iii. Resolution 2021-37 approving findings of fact for rezoning iv. Resolution 2021-36 approving preliminary PUD development plan v. Resolution 2021-35 approving preliminary plat Approval of the summary ordinance requires a 4/5 vote of the Council. All other actions require a simple majority. Attachments 1. Resolution 2021-35 denying the request 2. Ordinance 2021-15 approving rezoning to PUD 3. Summary Ordinance 2021-16 4. Resolution 2021-37 approving findings of fact for rezoning 5. Resolution 2021-36 approving preliminary PUD development plan 6. Resolution 2021-35 approving preliminary plat 7. Site Location Map 8. Engineer’s Memo dated March 22, 2021 9. Public Safety memo dated January 13, 2021 10. Hennepin County memo dated February 5, 2021 11. Applicant’s Narrative dated March 24, 2021 12. Plan drawings dated March 15, 2021 13. Building and Elevation Drawings dated February 12, 2021 14. Public Comments Received 15. Additional materials received on March 25, 2021 City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-35 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN FOR 19220 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (CITY FILE 20-047) WHEREAS, Beth Hustad of Trek Development Inc. (“the applicant”) has requested approval to rezone 27.31 acres legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends denial, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a rezoning, based on the following findings: 1. The planned unit development is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed pre-development net density is 5.3 units per acre. The property should be within the 8-10 units per acre expected in the Mixed Residential land use classification. 2. The planned development of a 102-unit senior living cooperative, 20 single family residential villa lots, a 12,987 square foot child care and early education facility and a 20,781 square foot assisted living and memory care facility is consistent with the intent of the RMF-2 district and the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing options. However, the applicant is seeking extensive flexibility from the Zoning Ordinance standards which results in an overcrowding of the site, due to taller buildings, increased impervious surface coverage and reduced setbacks. 3. The development is in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, the developer is seeking a large number of PUD flexibilities as discussed in the staff report. The benefits to the PUD do not balance with the PUD flexibilities being granted and the overall project is not of higher quality than what would be allowed through normal zoning standards. 4. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project could be completed in a single phase. 5. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails and sidewalks along with some private trails. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 6. The planned development is a mixed residential development developed and such use is not, in and of itself, inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan but with the given City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-35 Page 2 of 3 magnitude of the proposed buildings and the proximity to adjacent residential uses, it will have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighboring properties. 7. While the uses provided within the development are desirable for the community, the overall site design and quality of the development do not create a project that is superior to what could be achieved through adherence to the primary zoning regulations. Additionally, it has not been sufficiently demonstrated how the aesthetics of the site have been substantially enhanced to justify departure from the primary zoning regulations. FURTHER, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a preliminary plat based on the finding that the minimum lot size and side yard setback requirements are not met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for a preliminary PUD plan based on the finding that the rezoning to create a PUD zoning has been denied. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared denied on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-35 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A All that part of Section 25, Township 199, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow: All that part of the East ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ lying North of County Road No. 10; the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of said Section 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East 175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-415 Page 1 of 2 Motion By: Seconded By: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT 19220 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25-119-23-14- 0003) (CITY FILE 20-047) THE CITY OF CORCORAN ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Mixed Residential (RMF-2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), legally described as follows: See Attachment A Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon adoption of the resolution approving the final PUD development plan for this project. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota ORDINANCE NO. 2021-15 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT A All that part of Section 25, Township 199, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow: All that part of the East ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ lying North of County Road No. 10; the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of said Section 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East 175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota Page 1 of 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2021-416 Motion By: Seconded By: CITY OF CORCORAN SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2021-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP IN TITLE IX OF THE CORCORAN CITY CODE (CITY FILE 20-047) Title X of the City Code of the City of Corcoran, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Corcoran Zoning Map from Mixed Residential (MRF-2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). A printed copy of the entire amendment is available for inspection by any person at City Hall during the City Clerk’s regular office hours. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-37 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING FOR 19220 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25- 119-23-14-0003) (CITY FILE 20-047) WHEREAS, Beth Hustad of Trek Development Inc. (“the applicant”) has requested approval to rezone 27.31 acres legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcels from Mixed Residential (RMF-2) to Planned Unit Development (PUD); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the request of Trek Development Inc. for the reclassification of the property, based on the following findings and conditions: 1. The rezoning to PUD is contingent upon approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to reclassify this property from Mixed Residential (8-10 units per acre) to Medium Density Residential (5-8 units per acre). 2. The planned unit development uses are not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the proposed pre-development net density is 5.3 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan notes that the City calculates net density (gross land area - wetlands and land below the 100-year OHWL) to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan goals. This is the calculation that the City has used for other development reviews in Corcoran. The net density is not consistent with the 8-10 units per acre that is expected in the Mixed Residential land use classification and must be reclassified as Medium Density Residential which allows development density at 5-8 units per acre. 3. The planned development of a 102-unit senior living cooperative, 20 single family residential villa lots, a 12,987 square foot child care and early education facility and a 20,781 square foot assisted living and memory care facility is consistent with the intent of the RMF-2 district and the Comprehensive Plan goals to provide a variety of housing options. The applicant is requesting approval of PUD zoning for design flexibility to allow for modification to the building height, provide a mix of lot sizes and reduced setbacks for this development at a density consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The development is not in conflict with other applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance, except that PUD flexibility is requested as noted in the staff report. In City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-37 Page 2 of 3 exchange for this flexibility, the developer will provide additional landscape, an increased ROW for County Road 10, land for a future booster station. 5. The planned development is feasible without dependence upon any other subsequent phase. The project will be completed in a single phase. 6. The planned development will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned development. The developer is providing public trails and sidewalks along with some private trails. The development includes the construction of all public infrastructure needed to serve this site at the developer’s expense. 7. The planned development is a mixed residential development which transitions from single family to a multi-story residential structure located on the furthest portion of the site and, therefore, will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of the neighborhood property. 8. The PUD would provide quality building design, install and provide streets, utilities and public facilities that may not otherwise be installed. The development will meet the City’s density goals while preserving high quality natural resources, providing trails, a park and quality architecture.. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-37 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A All that part of Section 25, Township 199, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow: All that part of the East ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ lying North of County Road No. 10; the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of said Section 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East 175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-36 Page 1 of 6 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR “COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS” AT 19220 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (CITY FILE 20-047) WHEREAS, Beth Hustad of Trek Development Inc. (“the applicant”) has requested approval of “Cook Lake Highlands” a mixed-use subdivision on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council approves the request, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary PUD development plan is approved to create 24 lots and 5 outlots for “Cook Lake Highlands”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on December 15, 2020 and revisions received on December 31, 2020, January 4, 2021, February 5, 2021, February 12, 2021 and March 15, 2021 except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning and preliminary plat. 3. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment to reguide the property from Mixed Residential (8-10 units per acre) to Medium Density Residential (5-8 units per acre). 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Public Safety memo, dated January 13, 2021. 5. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated March 22, 2021. 6. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Hennepin County memo dated February 5, 2021. 7. The preliminary PUD development plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 8. The shoreland overlay district boundary must be clearly shown on the site plans. 9. Drainage and utility easements should be shown on the perimeter of each lot and should cover Outlot A, B and E. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-36 Page 2 of 6 10. PUD flexibility is granted to establish the following lot standards for this development: RMF-2 District Standards Shoreland Overlay Standards Proposed PUD Standards Single Family Apartment All uses Single Family Villas Senior Co- op Daycare Memory Care Minimum Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 1 acre 20,000 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. 4.47 acres 1.88 acres 2.14 acres Minimum lot width 60 feet 100 feet 125 feet 50 feet <125 feet <125 feet <125 feet Front, From Major Roadways* 100 feet 100 feet N/A N/A N/A 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping) 100 feet (60 feet with landscaping) Front, From all other streets 25 feet 25 feet N/A 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Side 10 feet 30 feet N/A 5 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Rear 25 feet 25 feet N/A 30 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Maximum Principal Building Height 35 feet 35 feet 25 feet 35 feet 55 feet 22 feet ~23 feet *Major Roadways are Principal Arterial, A Minor Reliever, A Minor Expander and A Minor Connector Roadways as shown on the 2030 Roadway Functional Classification map in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. **Internal: 20 feet between attached or multi-family principal structures separated by common area. 11. PUD flexibility is granted to allow an increased impervious surface percentage of 39% for the entire site. 12. All garages must have a minimum 22-foot wide parking area between the garage and right-of-way that does not overlap into sidewalks, drives or streets. 13. Plans shall be revised to comply with the 50-foot minimum width at the building setback line for all single-family villa lots. 14. Driveways may not encroach in the drainage and utility easements on the side yards. Architectural and Design standards 15. The applicant shall provide elevations including the material details and percentages for the single-family villas, senior co-op, daycare and memory care with the final PUD plan application. 16. The applicant must submit a color palette and material sample board to ensure compliance with the Zoning Ordinance standards in the Southeast District Plan and Design Guidelines (Appendix B) and Section 1040.040, Subd. 8 (A)4 for the single-family villas and with Section 1040.070, Subd. 8 for the senior co-op, memory care unit and daycare. Landscaping and Lighting 17. The applicant shall finalize the fixtures proposed in the submittal and provide detailed specifications that demonstrate compliance with 1060.040 (Lighting) of the Zoning Ordinance for the project. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-36 Page 3 of 6 18. The applicant shall revise plans to include the required number of trees on the senior co- op lot and the required number of shrubs on the memory care lot. 19. The applicant shall revise the tables shown on each landscape sheet to correctly identify the landscape requirement for each site. 20. The applicant shall provide the required 1 overstory deciduous tree, 1 overstory coniferous tree, 2 ornamental trees, and 10 understory shrubs per 100 ft. of the project site on the southern lot line of the daycare and memory care lots. This is in addition to the minimum landscaping required on each lot. 21. Any request to for the City to inspect the required landscaping in order to reduce financial guarantees must be accompanied by recertification/verification of field inspection by the project Landscape Architect. A letter signed by the project Landscape Architect verifying plantings (including wetland and pond buffers) have been correctly installed in compliance with the plans and specifications will suffice. Signage and Fencing 22. Signage is approved in the following locations: a. A project sign on each side of the shared access entrance for the apartment/co-op (one per lot). b. A project sign on each side of the shared access entrance for the daycare/memory care (one per lot). c. A Corcoran Gateway sign at the corner of 74th Avenue/ CR 10 with a final design and size to be determined by the City Council. 23. The applicant shall provide details including size, height, material, lighting and design for each of the project signs with the final PUD. 24. Signs must be set back 10 feet from the property line and outside the sight visibility triangle. 25. Sign permits will be required prior to construction of any signs. 26. The plans should be revised to remove the fence encroachments into the front yard setback on the east and northern lot lines of the daycare on Lot 1, Block 1. 27. PUD flexibility is granted to allow a six-foot-tall ornamental fence within the required front yard on the south lot line for the daycare on Lot 1, Block 1. Wetlands 28. The wetland mitigation plan must be approved prior to submittal of the final PUD application. 29. A wetland buffer planting plan and maintenance plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-36 Page 4 of 6 30. The plans should be revised to show the 15-foot structure setback and the 5-foot setback for roads and parking lots from the wetland buffer. 31. The wetland buffer should be averaged to provide a minimum width where the fire lane conflicts with the structure setback. 32. The plans should be revised to show wetland buffer monuments where the wetland buffer crosses a lot line, where needed to indicate the contour of the buffer and with a maximum spacing of 200 feet. 33. All permanent wetland buffer monument signs must be erected along the wetland buffer line as required by Section 1050.010, Subd. 7 of the Zoning Ordinance. a. Wetland signs shall be purchased from the City. b. The final locations must be inspected and approved by City staff. c. Monuments and signs shall be installed prior to approval of the building permit. Streets, Parking and Utilities 34. The development shall comply with the City’s requirements regarding fire access, fire protection and fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections and fire lane signage. 35. A letter or easement document for approval of the fire lane location within the existing Metropolitan Council easement should be provided to the City with the final PUD. 36. The shared access for Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 requires a shared access easement agreement. A copy of this easement agreement should be provided to the City with the final PUD. 37. No parking is allowed on the private drive. 38. The HOA documents shall provide a mechanism for maintenance of the private drive in perpetuity. 39. Utilities shall be stubbed to the property lines for future extension to adjacent properties. The stubs shall be at the developer’s expense. 40. All utility facilities shall be located underground. 41. PUD flexibility is granted to allow 18-foot deep parking stalls where 18.5 feet is required. Park Dedication 42. Plans shall be revised to include a 20-foot easement with an 8-foot trail connection from the cul-de-sac to the existing trail. 43. Park Dedication will be satisfied by cash-in-lieu of land, subject to the following conditions: a. Park dedication shall be subject to park dedication fees in place when the final plat is released for recording. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-36 Page 5 of 6 Miscellaneous 44. The sidewalk on the south side of 74th Avenue should extend to County Road 10. 45. The developer shall deed Lot 3, Block 2 to the City of Corcoran. 46. The final plat and final PUD plan application shall be consistent with the conditions of this resolution. 47. The applicant shall provide copies of the final HOA documents/covenants for City review as part of the final PUD application. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-36 Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT A All that part of Section 25, Township 199, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow: All that part of the East ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ lying North of County Road No. 10; the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of said Section 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East 175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-35 Page 1 of 3 Motion By: Seconded By: APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS” AT 19220 COUNTY ROAD 10 (PID 25-119-23-14-0003) (CITY FILE 20-047) WHEREAS, Beth Hustad of Trek Development Inc. (“the applicant”) has requested approval of “Cook Lake Highlands” a mixed-use subdivision on property legally described as follows: See Attachment A WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORCORAN, MINNESOTA, that the Corcoran City Council approves the request for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to create 24 lots and 5 outlots for “Cook Lake Highlands”, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on December 15, 2020 and revisions received on December 31, 2020, January 4, 2021, February 5, 2021, February 12, 2021 and March 15, 2021 except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the preliminary PUD development plan for Cook Lake Highlands. The developer shall comply with all conditions of preliminary PUD development plan approval (Resolution 2021-__). 3. Park dedication is due as required by the PUD approvals, prior to release of the final plat for recording. 4. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Engineer’s memo, dated March 22, 2021. 5. Approval shall expire within one year of the date of approval unless the applicant has filed a complete application for approval of a final plat. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-35 Page 2 of 3 Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-35 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENT A All that part of Section 25, Township 199, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow: All that part of the East ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ lying North of County Road No. 10; the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Northeast ¼ of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of said Section 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning. EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23 Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter and the point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East 175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning. Hennepin County Natural Resources Map Date: 8/27/2020 Comments: This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2020 1 inch = 800 feet Legend FEMA Floodplains - 100 Year A AE FLOODPLAIN AH AO AE FLOODWAY DNR Buffer Protection - Public Waters Undefined General Development Natural Environment Natural Sensitive Recreational Development Special Protection Wetlands Potential Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - HCWI Probable Wetland - NWI PID: 2511923140003 Address: 19220 CO RD NO 10, CORCORAN Owner Name: ALBERT SCHOMMER ESTATE Acres: 27.31 ¯ Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE PW Director From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: Cook Lake Preliminary Plat/PUD Plan Review Date: March 22, 2021 Exhibits: This Memorandum is based on a review of the following documents prepared by Civil Site Group: 1. Cook Lake Highlands City Submittal Drawings, with revision dated 3/15/21. 2. Stormwater Management Report, with revision dated 3/15/21. 3. Preliminary Plat: TREK Corcoran, dated 3/12/21. Comments: General: 1. A written response shall be provided for each of the following comments. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per these plans, the proposed plans are subject to addition planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. Final approval by the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission must be attained before any site grading or activity may commence. 4. Improvements are shown on adjacent parcels. The applicant shall obtain rights to perform all improvements outside of the plat boundary. 5. Lift station access road shall be reviewed and approved by MCES. 6. All existing utility easements shall be shown clearly on the plans including all grading and utility sheets. 7. The applicant shall show all drainage and utility easements provided with the plat and all platting requirements met per City Code. For example, drainage and utility easements shall be provided along all property lines. 8. Drainage and Utility (D&U) easements shall be provided over Outlots A, B, and E. Transportation 1. We recommend aligning the access points to Block 1 and Block 2 to provide a safer intersection for both Blocks. The offset access points are a concern for potential conflicts and pedestrian safety. Both drivers and pedestrians maneuvering at this intersection would have vehicles entering 74th Ave. from multiple points which increases potential of conflict. If drive aisles are not aligned, further coordination with the city will be necessary to ensure pedestrian crossing is safe. March 22, 2021 Cook Lake Plan Review Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 5 2. Additional ROW is dedicated along County Road 10 to facilitate future realignment of the roadway by Hennepin County. The ROW dedication should be reviewed by Hennepin County to confirm it is appropriate. 3. The turn lanes into the project site are anticipated to be a City-led project. The developer shall establish an escrow to initiate design and bidding phase. Site Plans 1. The existing and proposed drainage and utility easements shall be labeled. 2. The wetland buffers shall be clearly identified and labeled. Grading /Stormwater Storm Sewer 1. Plans should clearly identify privately owned storm sewer vs. City owned. 2. A portion of the runoff is routed to the SE of the site through the City of Maple Grove and treated within stormwater ponds within the City of Maple Grove. The city has begun preliminary conversations with the City of Maple Grove on the implementation of this approach. The City will need to negotiate a stormwater agreement with the City of Maple Grove. Both upfront and maintenance costs in the agreement shall be the responsibility of the developer. 3. Easements shall be provided over all storm sewer pipes, including private systems and ponds. Easements shall be shown on the utility plan to ensure they are adequate. 4. CBMH-105 should be relocated to the north side of the roadway. 5. Sumps will be required in the last accessible structure prior to filtration basin 1C (listed below) and all storm structures with vertical drops of 18” or greater. o MH 32 o CBMH 12 o CBMH 22 6. Rational method calculations shall be provided to confirm all pipe sizes and inlet capacities. 7. Revise the civil plan sheets to reflect the following: o The correct invert elevation for the 6” drain tile within Filtration Basin 1C. It appears the invert elevation should be 960.00 to match the drain tile clean out and invert in OS 2. o The correct Outlet Structure 2 detail plate on Sheet C5.5. The OS detail has not been updated to reflect the revised Filtration Basin 1C outlet design. 8. Curb cuts and riprap are identified on the eastern side of the access road as a measure to manage runoff from this area, the response indicated that 6” bit curb would be added but this is not reflected in the grading plan. Curb may be required to be concrete. March 22, 2021 Cook Lake Plan Review Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 5 Stormwater Modeling 9. Provide additional documentation to identify the 100-year HWL of Cook Lake (Zone A). 10. Provide a more detailed subwatershed delineation of proposed conditions and revise HydroCAD model accordingly. A portion of subwatershed COR-PR1F-East is routed from Corcoran to Maple Grove through the curb cuts along the bituminous fire lane based on proposed grading. The quantity and rate of stormwater flow crossing city boundaries is necessary for city agreements. See Figure Below. 11. Revise Existing Soils text within Section 2.2 of the SWMP. The text states that HSG D soils were assumed for existing conditions, but the model accurately uses HSG C soils. 12. Revise existing and proposed impervious surface area in SWMP and HydroCAD to correspond. March 22, 2021 Cook Lake Plan Review Kevin Mattson Page 4 of 5 13. Revise the proposed stormwater management and routing to match the existing discharge rate routed to the adjacent property west of site. The proposed discharge rate may be acceptable if within 5% of the existing rate. Ponding/Biofiltration 14. Raise Filtration Basin 1C top of berm to be a minimum of 1’ above the EOF. 15. Raise Filtration Basin 1D top of south berm to be a minimum of 1’ above the EOF. Alternatively, lower the EOF to be 1’ below existing berm grade while maintaining 1’ above HWL. 16. Permanently reinforce the EOF downslope of Filtration Basin 1C and 1D. City may require rip rap or permanent reinforcement mat. Grading These comments are based on initial plans, however a grading review will be conducted at each final plat application. o All retaining walls should be moved outside of the City ROW. They will be evaluated for impacts on access to utilities on future submittals. 17. Identify and label the EOF’s for all areas where water will be collected including all low areas in roadways and greenspaces. 18. All drainage swales shall maintain a minimum of 2% slope and all side slopes should be 4:1 or flatter unless approved by the city engineer. 19. All walls higher than 4’ shall be designed by a certified engineer and the design and certification of those walls shall be provided to the City. 20. Address potential overflow of runoff at the north end of the central road and at the end of the northwest road. It appears runoff may surcharge the catch basins and potentially cause erosion toward Cook Lake and Filtration Basin 1C. o Provide a permanent turf reinforcement mat and update the HydroCAD model accordingly (using secondary overflows). 21. The intersection of 74th Ave. and New Street should be raised to better accommodate access to the Exception Parcel. The high point on 74th west of this intersection should be shifted east. 22. A D&U easement should be provided over the backyard swale in Lots 2-12 of Block 3. 23. Reference the City of Corcoran Stormwater Guidelines for Development Review for standards for stormwater systems and modeling. 24. Revise the drainage design of bituminous fire lane. City staff calculates shear stress values of 3-6 lbs/ft2 downstream of the proposed curb cuts. The permissible shear stress of the existing soil type is 0.075 lbs/ft2. Therefore, provide permanent stabilization downslope of curb cuts to toe of slope, or slope the fire lane westerly to a ditch and/or collection system. March 22, 2021 Cook Lake Plan Review Kevin Mattson Page 5 of 5 25. North of the single family homes there is a significantly eroded slope (gully) which could be a risk to downstream water quality. This area should be restored as part of the development. Coordinate with City Engineer. Watermain/Sanitary Sewer 1. Applicant proposes to sleeve a forcemain through existing sleeve under County Road 10. Details of that extension shall be reviewed by Hennepin County and additional extension of the casing pipe may be necessary. 2. A parcel is identified as a future booster station with utility infrastructure identified to support it. The building and generator pad appear appropriate for the expectations for the building footprint. The impervious surface from the roof and future parking should be accounted for the in the site’s Stormwater Management Plan. 3. The stubs and valves provided to the booster pump station should be adjusted to be outside of the building footprint. 4. Plan and profiles for all utilities shall be provided. 5. Valve locations to be reviewed at time of final plat. Generally valves shall be located at all intersection as one less valve than the number of legs. Valves should typically be located out from the end radius points unless specific circumstances don’t allow. 6. Water services into the commercial and apartment buildings should be split into separate fire and domestic lines within the limits of the easements on the outside of the building with separate shutoffs which are accessible to City staff. 7. Hydrant spacing to be reviewed at time of final plat. 8. The fire access lane has significant slope, this should be reviewed with Public Safety to ensure it is navigable with equipment. 9. City will want to review and participate in any access agreements over the booster pump station lot. Additionally, if this area is used as a fire access, all of the easements over the fire access lane should be reviewed and approved by the City. 10. A profile shall be provided for the sanitary sewer from SANMH3 to SANMH4. Additional easements may be necessary beyond those shown to ensure that access to the sewer can be maintained. It is unknown if this could potentially effect the buildability of a lot in this area. 11. Water valve on the west leg adjacent to SANMH2 should be moved west to the cul-de- sac. 12. Velocity calculations should be provided for the steeper portions of the sanitary sewer to ensure the velocity is in line with the guidance of the 10-States Standards. 13. The City will require the installation of a grinder pump on the services from facilities. Details shall be provided at time of final plat and shall be installed as part of the development at no cost to the city. End of Comments CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planner Lindahl) From: Director Gottschalk Date: January 20, 2021 Re: Cook Lake Highlands Plan Review A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 01/06/2021. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, and Fire Chief Leuer. The comments are very preliminary and additional meetings with developers and architects will be required. The following comments and necessary points of clarification are provided for the project: Daycare -Hydrant locations (w/ hydrant within 100’ of FDC) -Sprinkler room location -Parking lot any dead ends 150’ and more require a turn around Memory Care -Hydrant locations (w/ hydrant within 100’ of FDC) -Sprinkler room location -Apparatus circulation plan Proposed Apartment -Hydrant locations (w/ hydrant within 100’ of FDC) -Sprinkler room location -Apparatus circulation plan -Standpipe locations with parking (Outlets to be located outside of the stairwell) Proposed Senior Apartment -Hydrant locations (hydrant within 100’ of FDC) -Sprinkler room location -Apparatus circulation plan -Standpipe locations with parking (Outlets to be located outside of the stairwell) This memo serves as a preliminary review and assumes that all specifications not articulated in the concept meet City standards. Additional fire and building codes will apply. Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us February 5, 2021 Ms. Kendra Lindahl, AICP Principal Consultant City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran, MN 55340 Re: Preliminary Plat Review – Cook Lake Highlands (Received 1/12/21) County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 10 (Bass Lake Road) @ Brockton Lane Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3711A (Reviewed 1/19/21) Dear Ms. Lindahl: Please consider the following county comments of this preliminary plat proposal for a multi-phase development (28 acres) including 12 single family homes, a 102-unit senior living facility, memory care facility, 84-unit apartment building and child-daycare center. Access: Two development accesses are proposed on Bass Lake Road via Brockton Lane (city street) and Fir Lane (existing) which connects to 74th Avenue. Construction of a westbound right-turn lane and eastbound left-turn lane are required on Bass Lake Road at Brockton Lane for safety and operations purposes. A complete intersection plan set will need to be reviewed and accepted by county staff prior to permitting approvals. Please also ensure that the monument sign at the northwest corner of Bass Lake Road and Brockton Lane will not impact intersection sight distance. Right-of-way: We support the proposed right-of-way dedication along Bass Lake Road, consistent with our future corridor needs. We understand ‘Outlot B’ in the southwest corner of the site is not part of this replatting. However, with future development it will be essential to further extend this planned right-of-way dedication westerly to Fir Lane. Please also ensure that the proposed public right-of-way is regraded level with the current Bass Lake Road profile with removal of any agricultural drain tile in this space, as identified in the 2020 Cook Lake Development Infrastructure Feasibility Study. Bicycle and Pedestrian: We support the proposed sidewalk connection(s) along Brockton Lane to Bass Lake Road. We also support the City of Maple Grove’s plan to construct an off-road trail along Bass Lake Road to connect with CSAH 101 with redevelopment to the east (Edgewater on Cook Lake). Storm Water / Drainage: County staff is in the process of reviewing the provided stormwater report, to ensure discharge rates remain less than existing flow rates. The county storm water system will not take water from new drainage areas. Additional treatments may be necessary if flow rates cannot match existing. Contact: Drew McGovern at 612-596-0208 or drew.mcgovern@hennepin.us Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepin.us Permits: Please inform the developer that all construction within county right-of-way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact: Michael Olmstead, Permits Coordinator at 612-596-0336 or michael.olmstead@hennepin.us Please contact Jason Gottfried: 612-596-0394, jason.gottfried@hennepin.us for further discussion. Sincerely, Carla Stueve, PE, PTOE County Highway Engineer LOT 11.88 ACLOT 14.78 ACNEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINELOT 22.14 ACPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)25' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK2 25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK100' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK 30' BLDG. STBK 25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBKPROPOSEDAPARTMENT(84 UNITS)(112 GARAGE PARKING)100' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK3 WETLANDWETLANDWETLAND4 5 6 7 8 9 10135' BLDG. STBK NOPARKINGMEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)NOPARKINGBSTR.PUMPSTATION11LOT 23.56 ACBLOCK 1BLOCK 2BLOCK 1BLOCK 2BLOCK 3 BLOCK 3 25' BLDG. STBK12PONDGHOST PLATGHOST PLATNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSOTL. B0.05 ACOTL. A0.36 ACOTL. C8.41 ACOTL. C8.41 ACOTL. C8.41 ACOTL. D0.07 AC30' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:20011. .. .. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12/15/20REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLANOVERALL. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPRIVATE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PADOR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEEDETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY OF CORCORAN NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.CITY CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL.1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TOLOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THEFIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TOBUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS,PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TOREJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OFCROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCALGOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:OPERATIONAL NOTES:BLOCK 1, LOT 1:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN TRASH ENCLOSURE.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.BLOCK 1, LOT 2:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN TRASH ENCLOSURE.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.BLOCK 2, LOT 1:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN BUILDING.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.BLOCK 2, LOT 2:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN BUILDING.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.Zoning:Existing Zoning: RMF-2 ( Mixed Residential District, 8-10 u/a)2040 Land Use Guide:Mixed ResidentialProposed Zoning/ Land Use:PUDOverall Net Density:198 units/lots (10 u/a)Block 1, Lot 1, Kid Day Care: 0 unitsBlock 1, Lot 2, Memory Care: 0 unitsBlock 2, Lot 1, Senior Living:102 units Block 2, Lot 2, Apartment: 84 unitsBlock 3, Villa SF lots 50' x 125' min.: 12 lotsTYPICAL VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK20' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 25' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SF S88°50'44"W 305.00S01°09'16"E 175.00 N88°50'44"E 305.00N01°09'16"W 175.00 S88°50'44"W 168.59S89°09'17"E 670.07S01°09'16"E 1325.73 75.74 S00°17'10"E345.90Δ=10°00'33"R=1980.04N83°33'44"W 334.45N00°10'59"W38.85S01°09'16"E 1085.00N00°49'56"W 241.21 S88°50'44"W 551.60N26°02'57"E 1219.94S67°31'58"E22.56209.98Δ=40°06'09"R=300.00N72°21'53"E 234.13112.73Δ=21°31'47"R=300.00S86°06'20"E 169.3746.34Δ=8°51'03"R=300.00S77°15'17"E 190.75337.09R=250.00Δ=77°15'17"S0°00'00"E 84.29 40.41N63°30'53"E28.94Δ=8°59'14"R=184.5074THAVENUES88°50'44"W 557.70Line Parallel with the East Line ofSec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 East Line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 East Line of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of theNE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23;and the West Line of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe with Cap #44890NW Corner of E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of theNE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23Found 3 Inch Open Iron PipeSE Corner of E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 ofthe NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23(LARKIN ROAD)C.S.A.H. NO. 1038.85 16.40S Line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23;and the N Line of the NE 1/4 of theSE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23N Line of C.S.A.H. NO. 10(LARKIN ROAD) per HENNEPIN COUNTYSTATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10 PLAT 855.25 S86°06'20"E 679.35322.86281.8014.55 20.49 950.58168.04 86.33 90.83Δ=18°35'14"12.9315.36Δ=5°41'42"296.64Δ=77°15'17"82.25 N03°53'40"E 304.99 133.2290.04N06°32'00"W52.32Δ=11°06'07"49.14Δ=10°25'40"169.3741.71Δ=8°51'03"57.53234.1382.39Δ=14°18'17"161.2141.83 24.44123.52Δ=21°26'44"365.32224.81 W Line of the E 168.59 feet of theE 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23West Line of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of theSE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23Wet LandWet LandSE'ly Line of BASS LAKE CROSSING Drainage & UtilityEasement121212East Line of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23N Line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23S00°17'10"E 2580.51 N01°09'16"W1325.73NE Corner of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23SE Corner of Sec. 25,Twp. 119, Rng. 233OUTLOT AOUTLOT COUTLOT B123456789101112S55°37'11"E 207.17131.16267.95555.69 127.85Δ=11°19'25"42.39Δ=46°21'38"226.56S63°30'53"W11.10190.75Δ=6°27'15"37.17N09°14'38"E104.38N02°48'33"W 275.78Δ=2°23'48"13.80169.37Δ=21°31'47"124.00176.9739.4053.37Δ=43°41'04"276.85 44.57Δ=72°58'08"R=35.00125.59Δ=109°46'38"N88°50'44"E 214.855.37 Δ=75°33'26"86.44169.63206.9727.15N17°38'07"W69.4076.24Δ=43°41'04"R=100.00 N26°02'57"E 322.47 N61°10'54"E61.78289.41Δ=252°58'08"R=65.55N63°57'03"W65.5565.55S09°01'05"WN84°19'42"ES76°38'27"ES63°57'03"ES63°57'03"ES63°57'03"ES63°57'03"ES63°57'03"ES63°57'03"ES63°57'03"E 125.01165.36129.91125.00125.00125.00125.00125.00125.00S63°57'03"E 125.00S63°57'03"E 128.06S63°57'03"E 128.06S30°54'43"E34.0223.72S03°41'02"W 539.40 452.0750.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0073.8399.0743.0220.68Δ=39°29'53"186.1339.38Δ=15°16'16"34.65Δ=19°01'51"43.18Δ=9°22'57"21.2924.1050.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 S26°02'57"W48.89Δ=38°18'34"43.8332.44Δ=28°21'25"15.18S24°40'23"E1.11Δ=0°58'06"31.0831.5330.0730.0730.0630.06 Drainage & UtilityEasementUtility, Access andDrainage Easement perDoc. No. A10548351270.12221.21S01°09'16"E 390.81 Utility Easement per Doc. No. A10027482 COOK LAKEORDINARY HIGH WATER=942.1 FEET(NGVD 29 DATUM)Edge ofWet LandEdge ofWet LandCorner Falls in Water.No Monument Found or Set.NEW STREET Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #40062Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #23300(Width Varies)Corner Falls in Water. No Monument Found or Set. Monument Set On Line 108.60WetLandWet LandOUTLOT DN87°41'29"E105.70S25°05'59"W60.47Δ=21°05'45"103.09Drainage &Utility Easement88.52N87°02'57"EN88°50'44"E95.88107.96S41°59'31"EΔ=20°28'16"23.4296.87 Drainage &Utility Easement70.03 N00°49'56"WN89°09'17"W 305.1177.37 Drainage & Utility EasementOver All of OUTLOT DS08°47'49"W55.7927.09S03°53'40"W 245.24 22.00 Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & Utility EasementOver All of OUTLOT CVICINITY MAPCook Lake Development Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Eden Prairie, Minnesota Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 20011COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV2.0PRELIMINARY PLAT. .. .. .. .. .. .N44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-10-2020NCLIENTOVERHEAD UTILITIESFIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERTELEPHONE LINECABLE LINE WATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECABLE TV BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXTRAFFIC SIGNALGAS METERELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVEAIR CONDITIONERBOLLARDCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFLAG POLEHANDICAP SYMBOLFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEPAVER SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRECONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEGUARDRAILROOF DRAINCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BY.CJRS.PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTESPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:All that part of Section 25, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:All that part of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying North of County Road No. 10; The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast1/4 and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of saidSection 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning.EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described asfollows:Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter andthe point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning.DATE OF PREPARATION:11-10-2020NOTE: Background existing conditions shown hereon per survey by Sunde Land Surveying, provided to us by client.FLOOD ZONE:This property is partially contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and partially contained in Zone A (Special FloodHazard Area Without Base Flood Elevation) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0159F, effective date of November 4, 2016.APPLICANT:Trek Real Estate & DevelopmentBeth HustadPhone: 952-914-9610Eden Prairie, MN 55347EXISTING ZONING:RSP-3 (Single & 2 Family Residential)2040 Land Use Guide: Mixed Residential (8-10 u/a)PROPOSED ZONING:PUDProposed Setbacks:See Site Plan________________________________________________________Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565rory@civilsitegroup.comPRELIMINARY PLAT:TREK CORCORAN160408004080SCALE IN FEETAREAS Cook Lake Highlands Revised Plan Narrative 3/15/2021 Planned Unit Development Revised Preliminary Plat Application Existing Land Use Cook Lake Highlands proposed development is located on the Albert Schommer homestead which the family purchased in 1939. It is approximately 27.17 acres located in the southeast quadrant of Corcoran. The City of Maple Grove is adjacent to the east (also a part of the original homestead) M/I Homes, Bass Lake Crossing project is adjacent to the west and across CSAH 10 to the south. The Lyons Park property is also across CSAH 10, south of the property. The site is located at the northwest quadrant of Bass Lake Road and future required extension of Brockton Lane North. Cook Lake, Rush Creek Golf Course, and the Geurs family farm is located just north of the property. The site consists of rolling topography with farm fields, stands of trees, one homestead, and wetlands adjacent to Cook Lake. The Property is subject to • A Metropolitan Council Lift Station Parcel - consisting of approximately 1.5 acres located at the center of the property. • A permanent easement in favor of the Metropolitan Council for sanitary sewer and water utility purposes, dated December 11, 2012 recorded November 13, 2013. Doc. No. A10027481 • An easement in favor of City of Corcoran for sanitary sewer and water utility purposes, dated December 26, 2012 and recorded on November 13, 2013. Doc. No. A10027482 • A trail easement per the M/I Homes, Bass Lake Crossings approved plan. The property owners agreed to and permitted M/I Homes Bass Lake Crossings to construct the trail on this site to collaborate with M/I on the placement of the trail. M/I Homes was aware that we may need to relocate the trail when we completed our plans for the site and have agreed to our trail relocation plan. • Hennepin County taking of an additional (40’+ 20’) 20 feet of ROW required to correct a road alignment for safety reasons. Zoning, Guiding and Proposed Land Use The Property is zoned RMF-2 Mixed Use Residential per the September 2020 city zoning map and is guided according to the Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan as Mixed Residential with medium density allowing for 6 units/acre. The M/I project, Bass Lake Crossings adjacent to the west is currently being developed as a PUD and was also guided mixed-residential, medium density. The M/I project to the Southwest, is Bass Lake Crossing South which was guided mixed residential and developed as a PUD with single family homes and an industrial self-storage building. The Lyons Park directly South of Cook Lake Highlands is guided mixed-use, the same as the mixed-use properties adjacent to the east in Maple Grove. We are requesting the City of Corcoran review and consider approving a revised Cook Lake Highlands Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat consisting of the following mixed residential and complimentary non-residential Child Care Early Education Center and Senior Memory Care Home. • Applewood Pointe- Senior Co-op Applewood Pointe of Corcoran is a proposed 4-story 102 +/- unit senior cooperative. The cooperative is a “for sale” product with average home sizes of 1,584 sq. ft. The proposed exterior materials include a combination of high quality, low maintenance stucco, lap siding and shake, as well as cultured stone and brick. All homes have at least two bedrooms and two baths, with many having a sunroom or den. The total site area is 4.78 acres with a proposed building size of 259,000 gross square feet including the underground parking garage. The community includes numerous common areas that encourage a true community feel, the amenities include: a great room with kitchen facilities, library, sunroom, game/club room, fitness center, craft room and a hobby shop for woodworking. The exterior amenities include walking paths, a screened gazebo, fire pit, garden beds and a pickle ball court or bocce ball. The average buyer at an Applewood Pointe is approximately 70 years old, is active, and is drawn to the amenities within the area. United Properties completed a demand assessment for senior cooperative housing in Corcoran on November 24, 2020. This study concluded that competition for senior cooperatives is light and most of the competitive supply is over 16 years old, with the exception of Applewood Pointe of Maple Grove at Arbor Lakes, which opened in January 2020, sold out prior to construction completion and has a current waitlist of approximately 35. There is one unit available among the competitive housing supply in the primary market area at Gramercy Park Cooperative Northwest, which is over 5 miles away. The study concluded there is unmet demand. United Properties intent would be to begin marketing the community late-2021. They must reach 60% presales before HUD authorizes us to break ground. Given recent marketing experience, we would anticipate reaching presales by early- 2022. The construction timeline is typically 17 months. Their last several cooperatives have been sold out by the time that construction is complete. United Properties has been in business for over 100 years and has developed 15 Applewood Pointe Cooperatives; 1 is currently under construction and they will break ground on a 16th Applewood Pointe early-2021. There is strong demand for this product supported by a significant (doubling) increase in the senior population over the next 25 years. o The Building Height is approximately 55’ from grade to the mid gable. Cook Lake Highlands site design, and the Applewood building location, are different from the neighboring mixed residential in Maple Grove. The Applewood building is set back 450’ feet from CSAH 10 and as much as 10’ below CSAH 10, creating a transition of distance and minimizing the height Impact from the roadway. The 22‘ Childcare and Memory care buildings will create an additional transition to the Applewood and the Single Family homes. • Single Family Villa Homes – by M/I Homes or Others The 20 single family homes (1 & 2 stories in height) will be of similar quality and design as the adjacent Bass Lake Crossing M/I Homes product. The single-family homes and the existing wetland that lie between the two will provide distance, like kind product, a similar lifestyle, and an appropriate transition for the Bass Lake Crossing homes and neighbors. The code requires 10’ side setbacks. We are proposing 5’ side setbacks. The same setbacks as Bass Lake Crossings adjacent to the west. o Off Road Trail and Park Dedication We are proposing the existing off-road trail remain in place. We are also proposing to add an additional off-road trail that will loop the park land tie into the existing off-road trail. We are proposing to add an extension to the trail along the north park property line to overlook the lake and wetland. This trail will be constructed on Outlot C of the proposed plat. Our revised plan proposing to dedicate Outlot C to the City as Park, with the understanding the development will receive cash park credit for all upland property dedicated. Outlot C consists of 9.61 acres, of which 4.19 acres are upland park dedication and 5.42 acres are wetland park dedication. This park land dedication represents 26% of the proposed project. • New Horizon Child Care and Early Education – single story building with outdoor play space. A Minnesota, family-owned and operated company, has been serving young children since 1971. New Horizon Academy’s, founder, Sue Dunkley, began her career as an elementary school teacher. Sue knew she needed to provide a nurturing place for children to go before they ventured out into the big world; a place that would help them believe in themselves. That is why New Horizon was born. Today, Chad Dunkley, Sue’s son and one of New Horizon Academy’s first students, is our Chief Executive Officer. Chad ensures that the commitment to excellence that Sue strived for New Horizon’s early years continues to be the cornerstone for each New Horizon Academy. New Horizon thrives as one of the nation’s most successful and respected child- care providers with over 80 schools in Minnesota, Idaho, Iowa and Colorado. As New Horizon Academy continues to grow and serve more families each year, we will always have family roots, a warm atmosphere, an open door, and a commitment to excellence. New Horizon is committed to quality. In fact, they became the first organization of their size to accomplish 100% national accreditation by the National Association for the Education of Young Children, the gold standard in our field. Each of the schools has also earned the highest quality rating in the of the state they operate in, including Minnesota’s Parent Aware program New Horizon Academy’s insatiable appetite for continuous improvement leads the industry every day by adopting the newest research and evidence about how to create the best early childhood classrooms. Children flourish in New Horizon Academy’s thoughtfully planned programs designed specially to meet children’s specific needs at each stage of development. Learning programs include infants, toddlers, preschool, pre-kindergarten, school age, distance and e-learning, summer camp program, and enrichment programs, such as music, fitness, language, and dance. Children build the necessary skills to succeed not only in school, but also in life. With uncompromising commitment to excellence and passionate, talented teachers, families are delighted to discover the difference at New Horizon Academy. The Building Height: The center great room (center of the building) reaches approximately 22’, which is the highest point of the New Horizon Academy building. • Rivers of Life Memory Care/ Enhanced Assisted Living – single story building Overview-High Acuity Memory Care In response to an increased demand for high acuity memory care and senior living in Corcoran, Rivers of Life Memory Care is proposing to develop an assisted living and memory care community to serve the care needs of the elderly citizens of the community. Specialized memory care services are lacking and currently in the twin cities it is estimated that there will be a 27% increase from 2018 to 2025 in the number of people needing Dementia care in the state of MN. This highly visible site offers many advantages and easy access for caregivers and families to visit loved ones often. Rivers of Life Memory Care of Corcoran will feature a total of 32 private units with the bulk of them providing high acuity assisted living services in memory care. The assisted living residents will be able to enjoy a home-like atmosphere in a setting that allows them the freedom to participate in many amenities that not only help assist them in their daily care needs but also provide them with a higher quality of life than that offered in a more institutional setting. The memory care residents are provided with their own secure area of the building that has its own separate amenities like a congregate dining room, activity/craft area and a secure memory garden. These residents benefit from a life enrichment program that is specially designed for residents with Alzheimer’s and Dementia. Staff at Rivers of Life Memory Care will be trained in serving those with Alzheimer’s/Dementia, Parkinson’s and other specialty needs usually unmet by other senior care facilities. This Memory Care will employ about 30 full-time and part-time positions. A simple floor plan design and small home-like environment (32 units) differentiates Rivers of Life Memory Care from other Senior Living assisted living providers in the area with a more focused specialty in higher acuity and more advanced memory care services unlike that of large campuses (93-155 units) which includes independent living (minimal to no services). There is a large demand for this more focused care and practitioners across the state are struggling to find residences to place seniors with higher levels of dementia. At Rivers of Life Memory Care, our goal is to provide our residents the right care at the right time and bring about 30 jobs to the community and fulfill a need in the immediate community for geriatric residents. Rivers of Life communities are designed to be a niche, boutique model of memory care that is resident focused with a high level of care. Rivers of Life Communities owns all of its real estate and the management company for quality control. Rivers of Life Communities offers a high acuity memory care “home” for those that need a higher level of care. The de-institutionalization of health care is a key component to our model. In addition to living accommodations, our focus will be on offering a higher level of care to those affected by memory loss and higher acuity assisted living. Our highly trained staff will offer a higher level of cognitive activities to help stabilize and give our residents the best quality of life possible. Rivers of Life Communities provides a housing and care solution for those that need a level of care beyond the typical assisted living model. Many residents need 24-hour care and many families do not want their loved ones living in a “facility” or hospital-like institution. We provide a home. Our primary resident consists of seniors that are experiencing memory loss on all levels, behavioral issues and those in need of additional living assistance on a daily basis. We will target those in need of a high acuity as it relates to care. What separates our model from the competition: We specialize in high acuity memory care for everyone including those with an early on-set of memory loss (age 40+). Our residents will have state of the art landscaping, amenities, activities, staffing, competitive pricing for cares, and a highly visible and convenient location for friends and family to visit their loved ones. Those individuals who are suffering from an early onset or advanced stages of Alzheimer’s/dementia, behavioral issues associated with memory loss, and residents that are in need of a higher level of assisted living to complete daily tasks are Rivers of Life Memory care’s core focus. The high level of fit and finish, the “home” vs “facility” atmosphere and high acuity care will be our competitive advantage. The overall de-institutionalization of our health care model will set us apart from the other buildings on the market. With exponentially rising rates of people being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia. Our high acuity memory care facilities are in high demand and will be for many years to come. The future of our memory care model depends on the prevalence of the disease state we are catering to, which is Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia. Recent studies have revealed that Alzheimer’s disease is on the rise and the new onset of people diagnosed with the disease is projected to triple by the year 2050. Advanced memory care, will not only be the cornerstone of our model, but also the catalyst to a successful memory care facility for many years to come due to the growing demand. As care providers we are aware that Alzheimer’s cannot be cured; but merely the symptoms can be treated to offer comfort. Recently, an estimated 5.7 million American had some level of Alzheimer’s. Approximately 200,000 individuals were under the age of 65 who had an early onset of Alzheimer’s. As the baby boomer generation ages, the demand for assisted living facilities and specialized memory care facilities grows rapidly. Healthcare providers need to be aware of the rising rate of new patients being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease annually. The key to a successful memory care facility is creating a highly patient centered and focused atmosphere that promotes the well-being of patients and promotes a high quality of living in an ever so destructive disease. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, “In 2013, 15.5 million family and friends provided over 17.7 billion hours of unpaid care to those with Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia. The value of this care was estimated at $220.2 billion, which is nearly eight times the total revenue of McDonalds in 2012.” Today dementia care is costing Americans closer to 277 billion on an annual basis to treat those with Alzheimer’s. That being said, Alzheimer’s is the most expensive medical condition in the nation for ongoing care. In 2018, the ongoing cost of caring for those will Alzheimer’s totaled an estimated $277 billion, including $150 billion in costs to Medicare and Medicaid. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, a recent study revealed that Alzheimer’s will cost an estimated 1.1 trillion per year, by the year 2050. These growing numbers are not surprising and will create a large demand for new facilities across the U.S and will most likely create a shortage of facilities in the near future. Nearly one out of every five dollars spent by Medicare is on patients with Alzheimer’s or another form of dementia. The average per-person Medicare spending for those with Alzheimer’s is 3 times higher than those without the condition. The average per-person Medicaid spending for patients with the disease and other dementias is 19 times higher than the average per-person Medicaid spending for all other seniors. The financial toll of Alzheimer’s spending is clearly on the rise and patients are spending 36 billion dollars out of pocket annually. As the growing need for Memory care facilities rises, so does the need for a smaller scale and more patient centered memory care facility like our model. Our model is patient centered with daily activities and we will promote a higher quality of life to those in need of memory care. We will offer smaller facilities and promote independence, more interactive activities to engage patients with the level of care they deserve and will have highly trained professionals to differentiate us in the market. Levels of Care Offered: Dementia Level One Minimal amount of Assistance and Supervision • Help with dressing • Help with personal care • Toileting and/or occasional help with incontinence • Weekly scheduled shower • Two loads of laundry per week • Monthly Simple medication set-up • Simple medication administration • Weekly housekeeping • 24-hour supervision • Wander Guard/Secured environment • Nightly checks every four hours • Three meals a day Dementia Level 2 Moderate amount of Assistance and Supervision • All of the above, plus: • Additional personal care & bathing two times per week • Additional loads of laundry, up to four loads per week • Additional Housekeeping up to ½ hour per week • Additional support with eating • Additional support with social cueing • Frequent redirection & intervention to reduce the risk of elopement and/or inappropriate behavior • Occasional two-person assist with transferring Dementia Level 3 Extensive amount of Assistance and Supervision • All of the above, plus: • Assistance with toileting (every two-hour program) • Additional shower schedules up to five times per week • Unlimited Laundry • Additional Housekeeping up to 1 hour per week • Approx. every two hour checks for safety & security • Daily two-person assist with transferring Dementia Level 4 Considerable amount of Assistance and Supervision • All of the above, plus: • Two person transfers with care • Incontinence assistance (total) • Physical assistance/support with eating • Daily one-to-one interactions • Approx. every 15 minute checks for safety & security • Management of periodic aggressive behaviors, i.e.: hitting, biting, pushing, chocking, or other behavior that could cause physical harm to the resident or other residents. • Mechanical lifts • Management of inappropriate toileting behavior i.e.: urinating or defecating in inappropriate locations • Wound care Parking Stall Depth The code requires 18’.5” deep parking stalls. We are proposing 18’ deep parking stalls to minimize the hardcover impact as much as possible. Intersection of Bass Lake Road (CSAH 10) and Brockton Lane Trek has provided a $25,000 surety required to complete the feasibility report for the intersection of Bass Lake Road (CSAH 10) and Brockton Lane North. This intersection is designed to provide access for this concept PUD, the adjacent Cook Lake Maple Grove project, the Metropolitan Council L-80 lift station, and ultimately access to a controlled intersection for the adjacent Bass Lake Crossing neighborhood. The feasibility study revealed a cost estimate for the intersection to be in excess of $1.1M. This amount does not include the value of land required to be contributed by this project for future corridor/community development. Also, this amount does not include an adjustment required, resulting in additional land to be taken for realignment of CSAH 10 for safety compliance or the land for the Corcoran Booster Station. Shoreland Overlay - The PUD is located within the shoreland overlay district of Cook Lake • Impervious Calculation- The Shoreland Overlay District allows 25% hardcover. We are requesting a change from our original proposal of 43.3% hardcover to 39% hardcover. The hardcover calculations for Cook Lake Highlands PUD are increased, in part by the demand for additional property to improve and correct the existing roadways and to provide sewer for future corridor development to benefit the greater community. This calculation does not include the property occupied by the MCES Lift station. If considered as a significant public benefit and thus included, it would further reduce the actual hardcover for this shoreland district. • Building Heights - We are proposing 20 single family Homes with heights similar to adjacent products., a high quality, four Story, for sale Senior Cooperative building, located on the back portion of the site, approximately 1 ½ football fields away from CSAH 10. It overlooks Cook Lake and has long views of Rush Creek Golf Course. The Adult and child Care Homes are also one story buildings situated on CSAH 10 at the entrance of the project. (Height 22’). Storm Water Treatment for Corcoran CSAH 10 – • Our proposal has been designed to treat the storm water for the future/expanded CSAH 10 from Fir Lane East to the Corcoran City limits at Brockton Lane. Trails - Cook Lake Highlands will have trails throughout the project including an additional off-road trail within the dedicated park property which will connect to the M/I off road trail system, the Corcoran trail system and to the Maple Grovel proposed trail along Cook Lake, providing a path to the church and to the adjacent neighborhood services. In summary, Trek Development is requesting a PUD Preliminary Plat approval consistent with the City of Corcoran’s 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan, recently adopted and approved. We are proposing to develop approximately 20 net acres and 27.17 gross acres into 21 single family homes, 102 Senior for sale homes, a child-care learning center, a senior memory care home, and 9.61 acres dedicated as park and open space with an off -road trail extension. The PUD Application provides both developer and community with a framework to master plan, design, and develop a neighborhood with a mix of uses that create appropriate transitions to and from neighboring uses. Master planned developments like Cook Lake Highlands purposefully interface multiple elements and uses to creatively combine community services and housing needs that co- function well. This includes a collaborative design and use of community infrastructure, trails, park land and green space/wetlands. The Cook Lake Highlands PUD/master plan proposal creates an opportunity to integrate residential uses with complimentary non-residential uses and establish appropriate transitions from intersections and well-traveled County roadways that will provide for future corridor and community development. The mix of these uses fills gaps of currently unmet demand and creates added value as high-quality housing and services are developed. This PUD has a mix of uses that intentionally provide benefits to those who live within the neighborhood and to those who live within the community. • Cook Lake Highlands PUD benefits: o Community and Corridor Infrastructure Improvements Providing Storm water storage for future CSAH 10 from Fir lane to City limits at Brockton Lane Provide a mix of residential product not currently offered. Providing land for L- 80 Lift Station and access to Community Lift Station Providing additional permanent and temporary utility and access easements for public utilities and public access. Providing Land for additional ROW needed to correct a County roadway design for safety standards. Providing Land for future county roadway improvements. Provide Land and access for City of Corcoran community water pump station. Collaborate with public entities and neighboring community to coordinate and share in the cost to construct the shared access intersection. o Trail connections and Park Dedication Provide and dedicate to the public 9.61 acres of Park, Trails and open space throughout project. Provide public trail connections to existing community trail system and to neighboring community trail which will extend access to walking trail along open space adjacent to Cook Lake. Trail networks and Park dedication provide important environmental, economic, social, and health benefits for individuals and communities. The presence of trails encourage physical activity, and bring communities together around shared assets such as Cook Lake. o Other Designed to create efficient, collaborative, shared uses such as roadways, fire lanes, trails, Open Space and Public Access. Provide a mix of residential and non-residential, relevant, neighborhood and community services such as Child Care and Memory Care at the same time providing appropriate transitions from CSAH 10, Bass Lake Crossings, and future development to the North. Provides a multigenerational model which integrates child-focused services, parent and caregiver services, and adult- focused services. Services for children often aim to improve school readiness, and care giving, while services for adults target economic assets such as housing, job opportunities, social groups, health, well-being and care. Site Construction - Cook Lake Highlands will be developed in one phase. The infrastructure construction plan is designed to be constructed as one project. The pad sites will be sold to the buyers/ team members as pad ready sites developed by Trek Development. Cook Lake Highlands has expansive, beautiful, long views overlooking the wetlands, the Lake, and Rush Creek Golf Course. The design for this site optimizes the views to the north for the residents and the visibility from CSAH 10 for two the care centers. The neighborhood services, adjacent at the Markets of Rush Creek make Cook Lake Highlands, Ravinia and other nearby neighborhoods, desirable places to live. Unlike Ravinia, Cook Lake Highlands PUD is located within the Rockford School district. The Rockford district does not have a school nearby, making this mixed residential property a challenging site for single family homes that target school age children. The Rockford high school is located approximately 9 miles west of Cook Lake Highlands. Even in an existing market of low residential inventory and high demand, the absence of close schools negatively affects the viability of a single family, school age, residential product/neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Elisabeth Hustad Trek Development, Inc President Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202048776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET. .. .. .. .. .. .COOK LAKE HIGHLANDSCORCORAN, MINNESOTASITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTALDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:TREK DEVELOPMENT INC.135 CRABAPPLE LNEXCELSIOR, MN 55331952-941-4392ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRHAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC2825 CEDAR AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407SUNDE LAND SURVEYING9001 E BLOOMINGTON FWY, SUITE 118BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420952-881-2455SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE SURVEY 1 OF 7V1.0GRADING PLAN OVERALLC3.0SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0SITE PLAN NWC2.4C3.1C3.2C3.4GRADING PLAN SEGRADING PLAN NWSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.3 SITE PLAN WSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3GRADING PLAN NEC1.0 TREE PRESERVATION & REMOVALS PLAN OVERALLC3.3 GRADING PLAN WSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5C4.0 UTILITY PLAN OVERALLC1.1 REMOVALS PLAN SEC1.2 REMOVALS PLAN NEREMOVALS PLAN WC1.3C1.4 REMOVALS PLAN NWC2.0SITE PLAN OVERALLC2.1 SITE PLAN SEC2.2 SITE PLAN NEUTILITY PLAN SE - SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINC4.1C4.2C4.3C5.0UTILITY PLAN NE - SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINCIVIL DETAILSUTILITY PLAN W - SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINC4.4 UTILITY PLAN NW - SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAINC5.1 CIVIL DETAILSC5.3 CIVIL DETAILSC5.2 CIVIL DETAILSC5.4 CIVIL DETAILSL1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN SEL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN OVERALLL1.2LANDSCAPE PLAN NEL1.4LANDSCAPE PLAN NWL1.3LANDSCAPE PLAN WL1.5LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILSSHEET INDEXC5.5 CIVIL DETAILSC5.6 CIVIL DETAILSUTILITY PLAN SE - STORM SEWERC4.5C4.6C4.7UTILITY PLAN NE - STORM SEWERUTILITY PLAN W - STORM SEWERC4.8 UTILITY PLAN NW - STORM SEWERWETLAND IMPACT PLANC2.5SITE LOCATION EXHIBITC2.6SITE SURVEY 2 OF 7V1.1SITE SURVEY 3 OF 7V1.2SITE SURVEY 4 OF 7V1.3SITE SURVEY 5 OF 7V1.4SITE SURVEY 6 OF 7V1.5SITE SURVEY 7 OF 7V1.6LT1.0SITE LIGHTING PLAN REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.0SITE SURVEY. .. .. .. .. .. . NEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEREMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202048776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.3/15/2101" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0TREE PRESERVATION &REMOVALS PLANOVERALL. .. .. .. .. .. .Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY,COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT.REMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENTCONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSEDPLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHINTHE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTIONSHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ANDAPPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORKHOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. ATNO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVALBY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, ANDFLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTEDWITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN AMANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.17.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.CITY OF CORCORAN REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:DRIPLINE WIDTH1REMOVAL OF WOODS AND SCRUB TREESTREE PRESERVATION & REMOVALS:·EXISTING ON-SITE WOODED AREA: 338,140 SF·REMOVED ON-SITE WOODED AREA: 300,131 SF (89%)·SAVED ON-SITE WOODED AREA: 38,009 SF (11%)·INDIVIDUAL ON-SITE TREES REMOVED OVER 8" NOTIN WOODS: (100% SITE REMOVALS)9" SPRUCE9" SPRUCE10" SPRUCE16" SPRUCE16" SPRUCE18" SPRUCE3-10" TREE2-10" CRAB12" CRAB30" OAK2-31" OAK2-34" OAKDLTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'POSTSANDFENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREEPROTECTIONSIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE,ORCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSFURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHEREPOSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIP LINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ONPOSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA. LOT 11.88 ACLOT 14.65 ACNEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINEFEMA FLOODPLAIN LINE20'X30' EMERGENCYOVERFLOW. INSTALL MNDOTCATEGORY 4 TURFREINFORCEMENT MAT ANDMNDOT CATEGORY 4 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.TURF REINFORCEMENT MATSHALL BE SOIL FILLEDLOT 22.14 ACPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)25' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK2 25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK100' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK 30' BLDG. STBK 25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK100' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK3 PONDPONDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND4 5 6 7 8 9 101 NOPARKINGMEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)NOPARKINGBSTR.PUMPSTATION11BLOCK 1BLOCK 2BLOCK 1 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 312PONDGHOST PLATGHOST PLATNOPARKINGNOPARKINGOTL. B0.05 ACOTL. A0.32 ACOTL. C9.61 ACOTL. C9.61 ACOTL. D0.07 ACPOND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1D30' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBKOTL. E0.009 ACNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS25' BLDG. STBKLOT 20.31 AC25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK1314151617182019CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLANOVERALL. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPRIVATE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PADOR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEEDETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY OF CORCORAN NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.CITY CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL.1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TOLOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERSREPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THEFIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TOBUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS,PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TOREJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OFCROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCALGOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.18.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:OPERATIONAL NOTES:BLOCK 1, LOT 1:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN TRASH ENCLOSURE.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.BLOCK 1, LOT 2:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN TRASH ENCLOSURE.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.BLOCK 2, LOT 1:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN BUILDING.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.BLOCK 2, LOT 2:SNOW REMOVAL: ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR ON SITE.TRASH REMOVAL:TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR: IN BUILDING.DELIVERIES:DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR FRONT DOOR.Zoning:Existing Zoning: RMF-2 ( Mixed Residential District, 8-10 u/a)2040 Land Use Guide:Mixed ResidentialProposed Zoning/ Land Use:PUDOverall Net Density:198 units/lots (10 u/a)Block 1, Lot 1, Kid Day Care: 0 unitsBlock 1, Lot 2, Memory Care: 0 unitsBlock 2, Lot 1, Senior Living:102 units Block 3, Villa SF lots 50' x 125' min.: 20 lotsTYPICAL VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK20' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 25' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SF R300'60'28'F-F14 1743 PARKING STALLS 87319 PARKING STALLSR 1 5 '32'R184.5'18'9'26'R5'26'LOT LINENEW ROW LINE7'75.8'151'BIT. PVMT.,TYPB612C&G,TYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.CONC. WALK, TYPACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSMONUMENTSIGNROW LINEROW LINELOT LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE RIBBONCURB6' TALLORNAMENTALFENCEB618 CONC.CURB, TYPB618 CONC.CURB, TYPSURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB,TYPROW LINECROSSWALKSTRIPING, TYPNEW ROW LINEST26'9'18'R5'HC5' CONC.WALK, TYPPVMT.STRIPINGTYP.R20.7' R2 5 0 'R250'R40'R4 0 '12'2'12'12' 2'12'12'14'60' 28' F-F OTL. A0.32 ACR300'8' BIT. TRAIL, TYPR40'R4 0 '2'12'12' 2'12'12'14'25' BLDG. STBK25' PKG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK50' PKG. STBK10' PKG. STBK25' PKG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK25' PKG. STBK100' BLDG. STBK10' PKG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK50' PKG. STBK100' BLDG. STBKNOPARKINGMEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)NOPARKINGBSTR.PUMPSTATIONBLOCK 1BLOCK 2BLOCK 1GHOST PLAT939'18' 26'FIRE LANETURN AROUNDMONUMENT SIGN4' TALLORNAMENTALFENCE5' CONC. WALK, TYPSTSTB612 C&G, TYP.ACCESS EASEMENTLINE10' PKG. STBK4' GATE4' GATE7' CONC.WALK, TYPRIBBON CURB26'7' CONC.WALK, TYPD&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENT LINE12'PED. RAMP (TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)10' CURBTRANSITION (TYP.)10' CURBTRANSITION (TYP.)10' CURBTRANSITION (TYP.)STRIPING, YELLOW(TYP.)STRIPING, YELLOW(TYP.)PED. RAMP(TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)R20'11'5'CONC. WALK,TYP6' TALL ORNAMENTALFENCE6' TALL ORNAMENTAL FENCE7'26'26'R5'R6'R15'5'26'R15'R48.4'R16'R3'R12'R3'SURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB, TYPGATEGATEGATEGATELOT 11.88 ACLOT 22.14 ACLOT LINE STRIPING (TYP.)STRIPING (TYP.)STRIPING (TYP.)HEAVY DUTY BIT. PVMT. MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP.)HEAVY DUTY BIT. PVMT.MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENTSECTION (TYP.)2' GRAVEL SHOULDER (TYP.)2' GRAVELSHOULDER (TYP.)B618 CONC.CURB, TYPB618 CONC.CURB, TYPSTRIPING (TYP.)EXISTING STRIPING(TYP.)1PLAYGROUNDAREARETAININGWALLMONUMENT SIGNPOND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1DTRASH ENCLOSUREAREA, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSMONUMENT SIGNSTREET LIGHT (TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)ACCESSIBLE ROUTEARROW. DO NOT PAINT,FOR CODE REVIEWONLY, TYP.ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL. SIGNAGE,STRIPING AND RAMPS,TYP.HCHC6' CURB TAPER (TYP.)DEVELOPMENTSIGN5' CONC.WALK, TYP5' CONC.WALK, TYP8' BIT. TRAIL,TYP8' BIT. TRAIL,TYP8' BIT. TRAIL,TYPRET. WALLTRASH ENCLOSUREAREA, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS22275 SURFACEPARKING STALLSB612 C&G, TYP.MONUMENTSIGND&U EASEMENTLINEST74TH AVENUED&U EASEMENTLINE74TH AVENUEROW LINEROW LINE20' WIDE BIT. FIRE LANEBOOSTER STATIONBY CITY.7LOT LINEB612 C&G, TYP.CONC.WALK,TYPLOT 14.65 ACACCESSIBLE RAMP (TYP.)3' CURB TAPER (TYP.)RETAININGWALLSTREET LIGHT (TYP.)6" SHOE FORMEDBITUMINOUS CURB,PER CITY DETAIL, TYP.CLASS III RIP RAP3' BIT. CURB CUT, W/CLASS III RIP RAPLOT LINE25' BLDG. STBKLOT 20.31 AC25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK28,922 SF8,550 SF 60'X13' BOCCECOURTCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.1SITE PLAN SE. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPRIVATE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PADOR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEEDETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL. R300' 60' 28' F-F R30'R94.1 '1443 PARKING STALLS 87319 PARKING STALLSR1 5 '32'R184.5'18'9'26'R5'26'7'75.8'CONC. WALK, TYPACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL.SIGNAGE, STRIPINGAND RAMPSMONUMENTSIGN18'9'26'20'20'ROW LINEROW LINELOT LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE RIBBONCURB6' TALLB618 CONC.CURB, TYPB618 CONC.CURB, TYPSURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB,TYPCROSSWALKST26'9'18'R5'HC5' CONC.WALK, TYPR20.7' R2 5 0 ' 60' 28' F-F OTL. A0.32 ACR300'8' BIT. TRAIL, TYPWETLAND LINEBUFFER LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)25' BLDG. STBK25' PKG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK30' BLDG. STBK10' PKG. STBK25' PKG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK25' PKG. STBK10' PKG. STBK 25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBKNOPARKINGMEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)NOPARKINGBSTR.PUMPSTATION10' PKG. STBKOHWLOT LINEBLOCK 2GHOST PLAT3MONUMENT SIGNSTB612 C&G, TYP.4' GATE7' CONC.WALK, TYPRIBBON CURB26'7' CONC.WALK, TYPD&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINED&UEASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENT LINESTREETLIGHT (TYP.)10' CURBTRANSITION (TYP.)STRIPING, YELLOW(TYP.)PED. RAMP(TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)R20'5'6' TALL ORNAMENTAL FENCENOPARKINGNOPARKING10' PKG. STBK9'26'26'20'R5'R12'R1 2 'R5'R3'R5'R6'R15'R5'R25' R21'R6'R6 ' R 1 5 'R15'R3'R3'R5'7' 5'5'26'26'26'R15'R48.4'R16'R3'R12'R3'SURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB, TYPGATEGATELOT LINE 1RETAININGWALLR35'R100'R55'WETLAND LINEBUFFER LINESURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB,TYPROW LINEFEMA LINETRASH ENCLOSUREAREA, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSSTREETLIGHT (TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)ACCESSIBLE PARKINGSPACE, INCL. SIGNAGE,STRIPING AND RAMPS,HC6' CURB TAPER (TYP.)5' CONC.WALK, TYP5' CONC.WALK, TYP8' BIT. TRAIL,TYP8' BIT. TRAIL,TYPRET. WALLTRASH ENCLOSUREAREA, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILSNOPARKINGNOPARKING CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS20' WIDE BIT. FIRE LANE222ACCESSIBLE ROUTEARROW. DO NOTPAINT, FOR CODEREVIEW ONLY, TYP.75 SURFACEPARKING STALLSBIT. PVMT.,TYPB612 C&G, TYP.PVMT. STRIPINGTYP.CONC. WALK, TYPACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE,INCL. SIGNAGE, STRIPING ANDRAMPS, TYP.MONUMENTSIGNLOT LINERIBBON CURBRIBBON CURBD&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINE150' STBK. LINEFROM OHWST74TH AVENUELOT LINED&U EASEMENTLINEWETLAND LINEBUFFER LINEWETLAND LINEBUFFER LINE74TH AVENUEROW LINEROW LINED&U EASEMENT LINE20' WIDE BIT. FIRE LANEWATERLINE(AT TIME OF SURVEY)FEMA LINEBOOSTER STATIONBY CITY.781410410GARDENLOT LINE B612 C&G, TYP.B612 C&G, TYP.CONC.WALK,TYPCONCRETEPATIOBIT. PVMT. MATCH CURRENTDRIVE LOCATION.FIRE LANESIGN, TYP.LOT 14.65 ACACCESSIBLE RAMP (TYP.)3' CURB TAPER (TYP.)RETAININGWALL4' TALL ORNAMENTAL FENCE &GUARDRAIL, TYPRETAININGWALL, TYPSTREET LIGHT (TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)HCHCHCHCRETAININGWALL6" SHOE FORMEDBITUMINOUSCURB PER CITYDETAIL, TYP.6" SHOE FORMEDBITUMINOUS CURB,PER CITY DETAIL, TYP.INSTALLSALVAGEDGUARD RAIL3' BIT. CURB CUT, W/CLASS III RIP RAP3' BIT. CURB CUT, W/CLASS III RIP RAP3' BIT. CURB CUT, W/CLASS III RIP RAP3' BIT. CURB CUT, W/CLASS III RIP RAPLOT LINE25' BLDG. STBKLOT 20.31 AC25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK21350'x60'PAD1440'x70'PAD1540'x70'PAD1640'x70'PAD1740'x70'PAD7,199 SF8,922 SF8,550 SF7,153 SF6,606 SF 11,781 SF 14,714 SF60'X13' BOCCECOURTFILTRATIONBASIN 1CCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.2SITE PLAN NE. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPRIVATE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PADOR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEEDETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL. 60'28'F-FROW LINEROW L INE LOT LINEPRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE B618 CONC.CURB, TYPB618 CONC.CURB, TYP5' CONC.WALK, TYPOTL. A0.32 ACR300'R300'ROW L INE ROW L INE PRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE8' BIT. TRAIL, TYP8' BIT. TRAIL, TYPWETLAND LINEBUFFER LINEOTL. B0.05 AC74TH AVENUE 30' B L D G . S T B K 40'x70' PAD 2 30' BLDG. STBK50' PKG. STBK10' PKG. STBK100' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG . STBK25' PKG . STBK25' BLDG. STBK60'30.3'B-B2 5 ' B L D G . S T B K 40'x 7 0 ' PAD 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 40'x70' PAD 1 MEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)40'x 7 0 ' PAD 40'x 7 0 ' PAD 40'x 7 0 ' PAD 40'x 7 0 ' PAD 40'x 7 0 ' PAD 40'x 7 0 ' PAD 40'x 7 0 ' PAD BLOCK 1 BLOCK 3 PONDGHOST PLATGHOST PLAT4' TALLORNAMENTALFENCEB612 C&G, TYP.ROW L I N ECONNECT INTOEXISTING TRAIL, TYP4' GATE4' GATE7' CONC.WALK, TYPRIBBON CURBD&U EASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENTLINED&UEASEMENTLINED&U EASEMENT LINER20.7'STRIPING, YELLOW(TYP.)10' CURBTRANSITION(TYP.)PED. RAMP(TYP.)STRIPING, YELLOW (TYP.)CROSSWALKSTRIPING, TYPSTREETLIGHT (TYP.)CONNECT INTOEXISTING ROAD, TYPSURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB, TYPLOT 22.14 ACRETAININGWALLRETAINING WALL (TYP.)R100'STSURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB,TYPR O W L I N E ROW LINEROW L I N EROW LINETRASH ENCLOSUREAREA, SEE ARCH'LPLANS FOR DETAILS30' B L D G . S T B K 25' B L D G . S T B K MONUMENT SIGNSTREETLIGHT (TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)5' CONC.WALK, TYPOTL. E0.009 ACCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1350'x60'PAD1440'x70'PAD1540'x70'PAD1640'x70'PAD1740'x70'PAD1840'x70'PAD2040'x70'PAD1940'x70'PADR100'R150'Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.3SITE PLAN W. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPRIVATE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PADOR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEEDETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL.TYPICAL VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK20' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 25' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SF 18'9'26'PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINE WETLAND LINEBUFFER LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK25' BLDG. STBK PONDPONDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND5 6 7 8 9 10 10' PKG. STBKOHW11 LOT LINE40'x70'PAD 40'x70'PAD 40'x70'PAD 40'x70'PAD 40'x70'PAD 40'x70'PAD 40'x70'PADBLOCK 31240'x 7 0 ' PAD ROW LINE D&UEASEMENTLINEPARKING10' PKG. STBK20'R5'R12'R1 2 ' R3'R6'R6 'R15'R5'26'26'R35'R100'R55'WETLAND LINEBUFFER LINE150' STBK. LINEFROM OHWLOT LINESURMOUNTABLECONC. CURB,TYPROW LINE ROW LINEOTL. C9.61 ACOTL. C9.61 ACWETLAND LINEBUFFER LINEFEMA LINEFEMA LINEWATER LINE ATTIME OF SURVEY30' BLDG. STBK STREETLIGHT (TYP.)CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS20' WIDE BIT. FIRE LANEBIT. PVMT.,TYPRIBBON CURBLOT LINED&U EASEMENTLINEWETLAND LINEBUFFER LINED&U EASEMENT LINE81410GARDENB612 C&G, TYP.BIT. PVMT. MATCH CURRENTFIRE LANESIGN, TYP.4' TALL ORNAMENTAL FENCE &GUARDRAIL, TYPRETAININGWALL, TYPSTREET LIGHT (TYP.)HCRETAININGWALL1350'x60'PAD1440'x70'PAD1540'x70'PAD1640'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD8' BIT. TRAIL, TYPR100'R150'CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.4SITE PLAN NW. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 40'-0"40'-0"20'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPRIVATE CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PADOR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FORAGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEEDETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL.TYPICAL VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK20' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 25' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SF 2' Gutter2' Gutter SHORELANDOVERLAY LINELIFTSTATIONLAKELOT 11.88 ACLOT 14.65 ACNEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINEPOND /FILTRATIONBASIN 1APOND /FILTRATIONBASIN 1BFEMA FLOODPLAIN LINE20'X30' EMERGENCYOVERFLOW. INSTALL MNDOTCATEGORY 4 TURFREINFORCEMENT MAT ANDMNDOT CATEGORY 4 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.TURF REINFORCEMENT MATSHALL BE SOIL FILLED20'X30' EMERGENCYOVERFLOW. INSTALL MNDOTCATEGORY 4 TURFREINFORCEMENT MAT ANDMNDOT CATEGORY 4 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.TURF REINFORCEMENT MATSHALL BE SOIL FILLEDLOT 22.14 ACPROPERTY LINEPRO P E R T Y L I N E PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)2 3 PONDPONDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 MEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)BSTR.PUMPSTATIONOHW11 MET COUNCILPROPERTY1.22 AC12 PONDGHOST PLATGHOST PLATOTL. B0.05 ACOTL. A0.32 ACOTL. C9.61 ACOTL. C9.61 ACOTL. D0.07 ACPOND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1DPOND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1APUD ZONINGPUD ZONINGRSF-2 ZONINGURBAN RESERVEZONINGOTL. E0.009 ACLOT 20.31 AC1314151617182019Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.6SITE LOCATION EXHIBIT. .. .. .. .. .. .0150'-0"75'-0"1" = 150'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR NEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINEOTL. A(521,789 SF)15.0'15.0'60.0' 32.0'B-B FEMA FLOODPLAIN LINE20'X30' EMERGENCYOVERFLOW. INSTALL MNDOTCATEGORY 4 TURFREINFORCEMENT MAT ANDMNDOT CATEGORY 4 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.TURF REINFORCEMENT MATSHALL BE SOIL FILLED20'X30' EMERGENCYOVERFLOW. INSTALL MNDOTREINFORCEMENT MAT ANDMNDOT CATEGORY 4 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.TURF REINFORCEMENT MATSHALL BE SOIL FILLEDPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)2 3 PONDPONDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND4 5 6 7 8 9 101MEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)BSTR.PUMPSTATIONOHW11 12POND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1DCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1314151617182019CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSEOF=988.90EOF=967.70Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202048776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLANOVERALL. .. .. .. .. .. .1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOILCORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOILTESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALLREQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATIONSYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.4.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FORUTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.5.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.7.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:18.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNEDAND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVALPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TOESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLETO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.10.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO ANAREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE.11.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED INEMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERETURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUMDEPTH OF 6 INCHES.12.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDINGADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPESBETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISHGRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVEBECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THECONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEWWORK.13.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THEDIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALLDETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANYUNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.14. TOLERANCES14.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THEPRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.14.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.14.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESSDIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.14.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.15.MAINTENANCE15.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.15.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURINGTHE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BERESEEDED AND MULCHED.15.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER,CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF CORCORAN GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, DATED 08-07-2018GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM 978.50 TO 985.50THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS:SB-3NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-8NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-4978.50SB-9NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-5985.50SB-10NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-6NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-11NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-7NONE ENCOUNTEREDSB-13NONE ENCOUNTEREDPROPOSED FOOTING DRAIN TILE INVERT ELEVATION = XXX.XXSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS NEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINEFEMA FLOODPLAIN LINE20'X30' EMERGENCYOVERFLOW. INSTALL MNDOTCATEGORY 4 TURFREINFORCEMENT MAT ANDMNDOT CATEGORY 4 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET.TURF REINFORCEMENT MATSHALL BE SOIL FILLEDPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)2 3 PONDPONDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND4 5 6 7 8 9 101 MEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)BSTR.PUMPSTATION11 12 POND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1DCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1314151617182019CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSEOF=988.90EOF=967.70Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202048776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLANOVERALL. .. .. .. .. .. .GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:UTILITY LEGEND:CITY OF CORCORAN UTILITY NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES.01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROMTHE PLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACEANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN ANDSERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITYENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE PVC PER CITY OF CORCORAN STANDARDS, EXCEPT HYDRANT LEADS SHALL BE DIP.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTMF794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELYRESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BESUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS AREINCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BEREQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTHWATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALLUTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THECITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITYSTAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENTCONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BEESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) ANDTHE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVALBY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTSOF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERSREQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OFIRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEERUPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENTRUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BETESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 25' IN EACHDIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORTRECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONLT1.0SITE LIGHTING PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .2020Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR NEW ROW LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINENEW ROW LINEFILTRATIONFEMA FLOODPLAIN LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPOSEDSENIOR(102 UNITS)2 3 PONDPONDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND4 5 6 7 8 9 101 MEMORY CARE(20,781 SF)PROPOSEDDAYCARE(12,987 SF)BSTR.PUMPSTATION11 12 POND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1DPOND/ FILTRATIONBASIN 1ACONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTIONLIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS1314151617182019CONSTRUCTIONLIMITSEOF=988.90EOF=967.70INLETPROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS,TYPINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPLACE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 4:1OR STEEPER, TYP. (MNDOTCATEGORY 3)CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEPERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPROVIDE REDUNDANTPERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ALONGWETLAND EDGE WHEREBUFFER TO REMAIN ISLESS THAN 50'.PROVIDE REDUNDANTPERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ALONGWETLAND EDGE WHEREBUFFER TO REMAIN ISLESS THAN 50'.PLACE EROSION CONTROLBLANKET ON ALL SLOPES 4:1OR STEEPER, TYP. (MNDOTCATEGORY 3)PROVIDE PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ALONG POND ONCECONSTRUCTED.PROVIDE PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ALONG POND ONCECONSTRUCTED.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cCook Lake Highlands Corcoran, Minnesota 135 Crabapple Lane, Excelsior, MN 55331 Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECT P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:200112/5/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL3/15/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .12/15/20 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KIT, DKDK, MP. .. .. .. .. .. .. .202048776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.3/15/21REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS. .. .. .. .. .. .01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKET S88°50'44"W 305.00S01°09'16"E 175.00 N88°50'44"E 305.00N01°09'16"W 175.00 S88°50'44"W 168.59S89°09'17"E 670.07S01°09'16"E 1325.73 75.74 S00°17'10"E345.90Δ=10°00'33"R=1980.04N83°33'44"W 334.45N00°10'59"W38.85S01°09'16"E1085.00N00°49'56"W 241.21 S88°50'44"W 551.60N26°02'57"E 1219.94S67°31'58"E22.56209.98Δ=40°06'09"R=300.00N72°21'53"E 234.13112.73Δ=21°31'47"R=300.00S86°06'20"E 169.3746.34Δ=8°51'03"R=300.00S77°15'17"E 190.75337.09R=250.00Δ=77°15'17"S0°00'00"E 84.29 40.41N63°30'53"E28.94Δ=8°59'14"R=184.5074THAVENUES88°50'44"W 557.70Line Parallel with the East Line ofSec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 East Line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 East Line of the W 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of theNE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23;and the West Line of the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4of the NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23 Found 1/2 Inch Iron Pipe with Cap #44890NW Corner of E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of theNE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23Found 3 Inch Open Iron PipeSE Corner of E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 ofthe NE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23(LARKIN ROAD)C.S.A.H. NO. 1038.85 16.40S Line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23;and the N Line of the NE 1/4 of theSE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23N Line of C.S.A.H. NO. 10(LARKIN ROAD) per HENNEPIN COUNTYSTATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 10 PLAT 855.25 S86°06'20"E 679.35322.86281.8014.55 20.49 950.58168.04 86.33 90.83Δ=18°35'14"12.9315.36Δ=5°41'42"296.64Δ=77°15'17"82.25 N03°53'40"E 304.99 133.2290.04N06°32'00"W52.32Δ=11°06'07"49.14Δ=10°25'40"169.3741.71Δ=8°51'03"57.53176.9730.80161.2141.83 24.44123.52Δ=21°26'44"220.69224.81 W Line of the E 168.59 feet of theE 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23West Line of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of theSE 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23Wet LandWet LandSE'ly Line of BASS LAKE CROSSING Drainage & UtilityEasement12112East Line of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23N Line of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23S00°17'10"E 2580.51 N01°09'16"W1325.73NE Corner of Sec. 25, Twp. 119, Rng. 23SE Corner of Sec. 25,Twp. 119, Rng. 23OUTLOT AOUTLOT COUTLOT B123456789101112S55°37'11"E 207.17131.16287.96429.72S88°50'44"W93.42S3 3 ° 5 7 ' 2 7 " W 67. 0 0 190.75Δ=8°51'03"50.986.26N09°14'38"E 103.85206.9727.15N17°38'07"W69.4076.24Δ=43°41'04"R=100.00N84°19'42"ES76°38'27"ES63°57'03"E165.36129.91125.00125.0050.0073.8399.0743.0220.68Δ=39°29'53"186.1339.38Δ=15°16'16"34.65Δ=19°01'51"43.18Δ=9°22'57"21.2924.1050.00 Utility, Access andDrainage Easement perDoc. No. A10548351270.12221.21S01°09'16"E 390.81 Utility Easement per Doc. No. A10027482 COOK LAKEORDINARY HIGH WATER=942.1 FEET(NGVD 29 DATUM)Edge ofWet LandEdge ofWet LandCorner Falls in Water.No Monument Found or Set.NEW Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #44890Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #40062Found 1/2 InchIron Pipew/Cap #23300(Width Varies)Corner Falls in Water. No Monument Found or Set. Monument Set On Line 108.60WetLandWet LandOUTLOT D70.03 N00°49'56"WN89°09'17"W 305.1177.37 Drainage & Utility EasementOver All of OUTLOT DS08°47'49"W55.7927.09S03°53'40"W 245.24 22.00 Drainage & Utility Easement Drainage & UtilityEasementDrainage & Utility EasementOver All of OUTLOT COUTLOT E51.92S17°38'07"E82.0631.2931.29Δ=21°12'44"103.66Δ=11°19'25"42.3911.10Δ=25°08'54"122.902N02°48'33"W 274.25 100.13N26°02'57"E 33.78Δ=19°21'20"R=100.00 63.87N45°24'17"E 33.66Δ=12°51'31"R=150.00 89.97N58°15'48"E 319.71Δ=279°27'07"R=65.55S63°57'03"E 162.09N80°12'43"E21.86S67°24'01"E 98.25S41°31'50"E 99.42S26°57 '59 "E33.51 S01°32'54"W 93.82 S26 ° 0 2 ' 5 7 " W 9 6 . 7 3 5 4 . 0 9 S 4 8 ° 2 8 ' 5 2 "WS80°55'16"W86.9053.67S47°20'59"W51.99S41°57'31"WS17°38'07"E39.4730.84Δ=21°31'47"124.00146.13163.1117.04 452.07 539.40 43.8439.4053.37Δ=43°41'04"52.64 47.492.51Δ=2°03'11"21.14Δ=17°22'15"31.06S63°57'03"E 139.21S63°57'03"E 125.00S63°57'03"E 144.49S63°57'03"E 196.07145.64S63°57'03"EN77°19'19"E138.28N22°35'59"E 125.00 S63°57'03"E 170.48S09°06'22"E79.50S19°48'29"E42.83S63°57'03"E 165.41S63°57'03"E 183.47S63°57'03"E 183.22S63°57'03"E 162.24N63°57'03"W 143.20S63°57'03"E 127.23S63°57'03"E26.0332.7431.14 13.2523.95Δ=20°56'15"25.14Δ=21°58'23"25.14Δ=21°58'23"52.57Δ=45°5 6 ' 5 0 "46.59Δ=40°43'21"60.54Δ=52°55'01"40.96Δ=35°48'12"S63°57'03"E44.82Δ=39°10'43"Δ=10°11'43"6.2319.81Δ=8°43'48"24.11Δ=10°37'32"55.0 0 41. 7 3 53.2145.0320.93Δ=9°59'44"32.8122.41Δ=7°07'57"N81°27'45"W65.5565.55S17°59'21"WC1C2C3C4C513.2550.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 1314151617181920Δ=14°18'17"79.5613.0630.0730.0731.53 31.08 30.0630.0625.06125.973Drainage & Utility Easement ST VICINITY MAPCook Lake Development Corcoran, Hennepin County, Minnesota Eden Prairie, Minnesota Trek Real Estate & Development PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 20011COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTIONV2.0PRELIMINARY PLAT2-2-21 Add Outlot E2-4-21 Add Lot 3, Blk 2; Renumber Blk 2 Lots3-12-21 Lot Configuration. .. .. .N44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-10-2020NCLIENT OVERHEAD UTILITIESFIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERTELEPHONE LINECABLE LINE WATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECABLE TV BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXTRAFFIC SIGNALGAS METERELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVEAIR CONDITIONERBOLLARDCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFLAG POLEHANDICAP SYMBOLFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEPAVER SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRECONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEGUARDRAILROOF DRAINCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BY.CJRS.PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTESPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:All that part of Section 25, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:All that part of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 lying North of County Road No. 10; The East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast1/4 and commencing at the Northwest corner of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section; thence parallel with the East line of saidSection 1085 feet; thence at right angles West 557.7 feet; thence Northeasterly in a straight line to place of beginning.EXCEPT that part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, Section 25, Township 119, Range 23, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described asfollows:Commencing at the Southeast corner of said East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North 01 degrees09 minutes 16 seconds West, along the East line of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 50.58 feet; thence South 88degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 168.59 feet to the West line of the East 168.59 feet of said East Half of Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter andthe point of beginning; thence continuing South 88 degrees 50 minutes 44 seconds West 305.00 feet; thence South 01 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds East175.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 50 minutes 41 seconds East 305.00 feet to said West line of the East 168.59 feet; thence North 01 degrees 09 minutes16 seconds West, along last said line, a distance of 175.00 feet to the point of beginning.DATE OF PREPARATION:11-10-2020NOTE: Background existing conditions shown hereon per survey by Sunde Land Surveying, provided to us by client.FLOOD ZONE:This property is partially contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) and partially contained in Zone A (Special FloodHazard Area Without Base Flood Elevation) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27053C0159F, effective date of November 4, 2016.APPLICANT:Trek Real Estate & DevelopmentBeth HustadPhone: 952-914-9610Eden Prairie, MN 55347EXISTING ZONING:RSP-3 (Single & 2 Family Residential)2040 Land Use Guide: Mixed Residential (8-10 u/a)PROPOSED ZONING:PUDProposed Setbacks:See Site Plan________________________________________________________Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565rory@civilsitegroup.comPRELIMINARY PLAT:TREK CORCORAN160408004080SCALE IN FEETAREAS YORK PLUS GALA CRISPIN CRISPIN REGENT BRAEBURN BRAEBURN REGENT GOLDEN BRAEBURN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP SOUTHERN ROSE HONEYCRISP HARALSON FIRESIDE ROME BEAUTY BRAEBURN W/ SUN ROME BEAUTY SOUTHERN ROSE WASHINGTON ROME BEAUTY TRASH ELEC STORAGE TRASH ELEC STORAGE STORAGE ARTS & CRAFTS RR RR CLUB ROOM LOUNGE CONF. ROOM OPEN TO BELOW GARDEN STORAGE MECH RR HOBBY SHOP TRASH WATER TRASH BUILDING MAINTENANCE MECH. BICYCLE REPAIR, CLEANING, STORAGE ELEC CRISPIN CRISPIN REGENT BRAEBURN BRAEBURN REGENT GOLDEN BRAEBURN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP SOUTHERN ROSE HONEYCRISP HARALSON FIRESIDE ROME BEAUTY BRAEBURN W/ SUN ROME BEAUTY SOUTHERN ROSE WASHINGTON ROME BEAUTY TRASH ELEC STORAGE TRASH ELEC STORAGE STORAGE FITNESS OFFICE VEST. LIBRARY MAIL GREAT ROOM GUEST GUEST PARLOR LOBBY MONUMENT SIGN YORK PLUS GALA BRAEBURN GOLDEN BRAEBURN WASHINGTON CRISPIN CRISPIN REGENT BRAEBURN BRAEBURN REGENT GOLDEN BRAEBURN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP SOUTHERN ROSE HONEYCRISP HARALSON FIRESIDE ROME BEAUTY BRAEBURN W/ SUN ROME BEAUTY SOUTHERN ROSE WASHINGTON ROME BEAUTY TRASH ELEC STORAGE TRASH ELEC STORAGE STORAGE YORK PLUS GALA CRISPIN CRISPIN REGENT BRAEBURN BRAEBURN REGENT GOLDEN BRAEBURN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN SOUTHERN ROSE W/ SUN HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP HONEYCRISP SOUTHERN ROSE HONEYCRISP HARALSON FIRESIDE ROME BEAUTY BRAEBURN W/ SUN ROME BEAUTY SOUTHERN ROSE WASHINGTON ROME BEAUTY TRASH ELEC STORAGE TRASH ELEC STORAGE STORAGE BRAEBURN GOLDEN BRAEBURN WASHINGTON F.F.E.100'-0"ABC1112222223344445555566TYP.TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.7779999131311111121212114211616161417TYP.101212121214141414991413212114SIGN 'B'A44WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET119'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"F.F.E100'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"123414111112222333455555556TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.77774449999999910111111411111113131414212114141421141515161617TYP.131321212114212135161414SIGN 'A'A43WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET121'-6"WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"1413ELEVATION KEY NOTES1. STONE VENEER - SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE 'CHARDONNAY' BY CULTURED STONE2. COMPOSITE WOOD SHAKE SIDING - HARDIESHINGLE - STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL 'NAVAJO BEIGE' BY JAMES HARDIE3. COMPOSITE WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING - HARDIEPLANK - SMOOTH -'KHAKI BROWN' BY JAMES HARDIE4. COMPOSITE WOOD BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING - SMOOTH - 'COBBLESTONE' WITH HARDIETRIM BOARD - SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD - 'COBBLESTONE' BY JAMES HARDIE5. PREFINISHED METAL COPING - 'WHITE'6. ALUMIUNUM STOREFRONT FRAMING / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES7. ALUMINUM DOOR / TRANSOM / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES8. HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME - PAINT TO MATCH 'DARK BRONZE'9. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE SILL10. 14'-3" x 3'-7" EXTERIOR LED 'NEW HORIZON ACADEMY' AND 'SUN' SIGNAGE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.11. EIFS CORNICE - PAINT 'WHITE'12. PREFINISHED METAL SCUPPER AND 4"x6" DOWNSPOUT - 'DARK BRONZE'. CONNECT DOWNSPOUT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.13. LED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELCTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION14. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'WHITE'15. 'BLACK' FABRIC AWNING. SEE DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION16. DASHED LINE DENOTES TOP OF ROOF BEYOND17. COMPOSITE WOOD DENTIL - PAINT 'WHITE'18. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN CAP19. 8x8 COMPOSITE WOOD COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION20. 4x12 COMPOSITE WOOD BEAM21. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'NEW HORIZON BLUE'22. WALL MOUNTED CT CABINET - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH23. ELECTRICAL METER - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH24. 1'-0" HIGH x 2'-0" WIDE SCUPPER OPENING25. WOODEN TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE AND POST ASSEMBLY26. ROOF TOP SCREENING BEYOND. #/9A 202EXTERIOR SIGN 'A' - APPROX. 31 S.F.2'-11"8"4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"10"2'-9"14'-3"EXTERIOR SIGN 'B' - APPROX. 31 S.F.4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"14'-3"8"2'-11"2'-9"10"8"2'-11"4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"2'-9"10"14'-3"EXTERIOR SIGN 'C' - APPROX. 31 S.F.8"2'-11"4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"2'-9"10"14'-3"EXTERIOR SIGN 'D' - APPROX. 31 S.F.RBuilding a Better Worldfor All of UsRSEH ProjectChecked ByDrawn ByProject StatusIssue DateThis drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing and the concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH.ArchitectOwnerShort Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.3535 Vadnais Center Dr.St. Paul, Minnesota 55110800.325.2055Short Elliott Hedrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2020New Horizon Academy3405 Annapolis Lane N.Suite 100Plymouth, Minnesota 55447763.557.1111PRELIMINARY EXTERIORELEVATIONSA201NEW HORIZON ACADEMYCORCORAN, MN 55340New Horizon Academy3/16" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"1EAST ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"3EXTERIOR SIGN SCHEDULERevision IssueRev. # DescriptionDate F.F.E.100'-0"123411111111222234455556TYP.6TYP.66666TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.79999991011111314211414211415161617TYP.17TYP.181920334445555111113131421141421151617TYP.181920161621212134511131414SIGN 'C'WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"WINDOW SILL102'-8"F.F.E.100'-0"TOP OF PARAPET122'-3"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"BOTTOM OF CANOPY112'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF SCREENING120'-4"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"ABC1111122222334445555556TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.777889999991111111212121213131314212121141414141616212114112223A201310SIGN 'D'WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"TOP OF PARAPET121'-6"F.F.E.100'-0"A124569112114WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"A12456911211497WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"ELEVATION KEY NOTES1. STONE VENEER - SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE 'CHARDONNAY' BY CULTURED STONE2. COMPOSITE WOOD SHAKE SIDING - HARDIESHINGLE - STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL 'NAVAJO BEIGE' BY JAMES HARDIE3. COMPOSITE WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING - HARDIEPLANK - SMOOTH -'KHAKI BROWN' BY JAMES HARDIE4. COMPOSITE WOOD BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING - SMOOTH - 'COBBLESTONE' WITH HARDIETRIM BOARD - SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD - 'COBBLESTONE' BY JAMES HARDIE5. PREFINISHED METAL COPING - 'WHITE'6. ALUMIUNUM STOREFRONT FRAMING / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES7. ALUMINUM DOOR / TRANSOM / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES8. HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME - PAINT TO MATCH 'DARK BRONZE'9. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE SILL10. 14'-3" x 3'-7" EXTERIOR LED 'NEW HORIZON ACADEMY' AND 'SUN' SIGNAGE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.11. EIFS CORNICE - PAINT 'WHITE'12. PREFINISHED METAL SCUPPER AND 4"x6" DOWNSPOUT - 'DARK BRONZE'. CONNECT DOWNSPOUT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.13. LED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELCTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION14. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'WHITE'15. 'BLACK' FABRIC AWNING. SEE DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION16. DASHED LINE DENOTES TOP OF ROOF BEYOND17. COMPOSITE WOOD DENTIL - PAINT 'WHITE'18. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN CAP19. 8x8 COMPOSITE WOOD COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION20. 4x12 COMPOSITE WOOD BEAM21. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'NEW HORIZON BLUE'22. WALL MOUNTED CT CABINET - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH23. ELECTRICAL METER - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH24. 1'-0" HIGH x 2'-0" WIDE SCUPPER OPENING25. WOODEN TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE AND POST ASSEMBLY26. ROOF TOP SCREENING BEYOND. #/9A 2023519351935193519'BLACK' AWNING FABRIC1" 'BLACK' ALUMINUM AWNING FRAMING -TYP.1x COMPOSITE LEDGER BOARD. PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT LAP SIDING. COORINDATE FINAL LOCATION WITH AWNING MANUFACTURER -TYP.2x TREATED WOOD BLOCKING. COORINDATE FINAL LOCATION WITH AWNING MANUFACTURER -TYP.PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING. COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT LAP SIDINGPREFINISHED METAL FLASHING. COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT AWNING FABRICLAP SIDING OVER WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER5/8" PLYWOOD SHEATHING2x WOOD STUD FRAMING1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM -PAINT 'WHITE'2'-0"AWNING ASSEMBLY110'-8"BTM. FABRICAWNING ASSEMBLY115'-5"TOP FABRIC4'-10"RBuilding a Better Worldfor All of UsRSEH ProjectChecked ByDrawn ByProject StatusIssue DateThis drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing and the concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH.ArchitectOwnerShort Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.3535 Vadnais Center Dr.St. Paul, Minnesota 55110800.325.2055Short Elliott Hedrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2020New Horizon Academy3405 Annapolis Lane N.Suite 100Plymouth, Minnesota 55447763.557.1111PRELIMINARY EXTERIORELEVATIONSA202NEW HORIZON ACADEMYCORCORON, MN 55340New Horizon Academy3/16" = 1'-0"1WEST ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"2NORTH ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"3SOUTH ENTRY ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"4NORTH ENTRY ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"5TRASH ENCLOSURE3/4" = 1'-0"6FABRIC AWNING DETAILRevision IssueRev. # DescriptionDate F.F.E.100'-0"ROOF -HIGH120'-0"1234ROOF -LOW115'-0"14111112222333455555556TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.777744499999999101111114111111131313141414212114141421141515161617TYP.131321212114212135161414SIGN 'A'F.F.E.100'-0"ABCROOF -LOW115'-0"1112222223344445555566TYP.TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.7779999131311111121212114211616161417TYP.101212121214141414991413212114SIGN 'B'EXTERIOR SIGN 'A' - APPROX. 31 S.F.2'-11"8"4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"10"2'-9"14'-3"EXTERIOR SIGN 'B' - APPROX. 31 S.F.4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"14'-3"8"2'-11"2'-9"10"8"2'-11"4'-9"3'-6"6'-0"2'-9"10"14'-3"EXTERIOR SIGN 'C' - APPROX. 31 S.F.ELEVATION KEY NOTES1. STONE VENEER - SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE 'CHARDONNAY' BY CULTURED STONE2. WOOD SHAKE SIDING - HARDIESHINGLE - STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL 'NAVAJO BEIGE' BY JAMES HARDIE3. HORIZONTAL SIDING - HARDIEPLANK - SMOOTH - 'KHAKI BROWN' BY JAMES HARDIE4. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING -SMOOTH - 'COBBLESTONE' WITH HARDIETRIM BOARD - SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD - 'COBBLESTONE' BY JAMES HARDIE.5. PREFINISHED METAL COPING - 'WHITE'6. ALUMIUNUM STOREFRONT FRAMING / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES7. ALUMINUM DOOR / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES8. HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME - PAINT TO MATCH 'DARK BRONZE'.9. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE SILL10. EXTERIOR LED SIGNAGE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.11. DECORATIVE COMPOSITE WOOD CORNICE - PAINT 'WHITE'12. PREFINISHED METAL SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT - 'DARK BRONZE'. CONNECT DOWNSPOUT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.13. LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELCTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.14. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'WHITE'15. 'BLACK' FABRIC AWNING. 16. DASHED LINE DENOTES TOP OF ROOF BEYOND17. DECORATIVE WOOD DENTAL - PAINT 'WHITE'.18. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN CAP.19. 8x8 COMPOSITE WOOD COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.20. 4x12 COMPOSITE WOOD BEAM.21. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'BLUE'22. WALL MOUNTED CT CABINET - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH23. ELECTRICAL METER - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH#NEW HORIZON ACADEMY -CORCORAN, MN, COCOOK LAKE HIGHLANDS| New Horizon Academy | 3405 Annapolis Lane North, Suite 100 | Plymouth, MN 55447 |10/21/20 |3/16" = 1'-0"1EAST ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"2NORTH ELEVATION1/4" = 1'-0"3EXTERIOR SIGN SCHEDULEBOARD AND BATTEN SIDING -HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING - 'COBBLESTONE' WITH HARDIETRIM BOARD -SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD - 'COBBLESTONE' BY JAMES HARDIEWOOD SHAKE SIDING - HARDIESHINGLE -STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL 'NAVAJO BEIGE'BY JAMES HARDIEHORIZONTAL SIDING - HARDIEPLANK -SMOOTH - 'KHAKI BROWN' BY JAMESHARDIESTONE VENEER - SOUTHER LEDGESTONE' CHARDONNAY' BY CULTURED STONECOMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINTED TOMATCH 'ARCTIC WHITE' BY JAMES HARDIEARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE -INDIANA LIMESTONEALUMINUM STOREFRONT FRAMING -'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZEDCOMPOSITE WOOD TRIM (LIMITEDLOCATIONS) - PAINT 'BLUE'EXTERIOR MATERIAL BOARD CITY SUBMITTALN O T F O RCONSTRUCTIONDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:REVISIONS:PROJECT #:cCOPYRIGHT 2020DATE:RRROSA ARCHITECTURAL GROUPSHEET1084 Sterling StreetSt. Paul, MN 55119tel: 651-739-7988fax: 651-739-3165RosaArchitecturalGroupInc.PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.REG. NO.SIGNED:PRINT NAME:DATE:PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.REG. NO.SIGNED:PRINT NAME:DATE:Cook LakeHighlands22026DEC. 10, 2020JLPROPOSEDA4.1COLORSuite LivingELEVATIONSA4.173/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.A4.183/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.A4.193/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.A4.1103/16" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEV.Corcoran, MN 55340of CorcoranA4.113/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATIONA4.123/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION (MEMORY CARE)A4.153/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED EAST ELEVATIONA4.133/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION (ASSISTED LIVING)A4.143/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (ASSISTED LIVING)A4.163/32" = 1'-0" (ON 24x36 SHEET)PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION Square Feet: 1,734 Bedrooms: 2 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 0 Garages: 2 Stories: 1 Cedarwood Elevation B Elevation C Elevation E Elevation D Because we are constantly improving our product, we reserve the right to revise, change, and/or substitute product features, dimensions, specifications, architectural details and designs without notice. This brochure is for illustration purposes only and is not part of a legal contract. Prices are subject to change without notice. Room dimensions are approximate and calculated from inside of partition. Printed 8-20 Square Feet: 1,752 Bedrooms: 2 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 0 Garages: 2 Stories: 1 Graystone Elevation E Elevation B Elevation C Elevation D Elevation F Because we are constantly improving our product, we reserve the right to revise, change, and/or substitute product features, dimensions, specifications, architectural details and designs without notice. This brochure is for illustration purposes only and is not part of a legal contract. Prices are subject to change without notice. Room dimensions are approximate and calculated from inside of partition. Printed 10-20 Square Feet: 1,769 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 0 Garages: 2 Stories: 1 Hillcrest Elevation B Elevation C Elevation D Elevation F Because we are constantly improving our product, we reserve the right to revise, change, and/or substitute product features, dimensions, specifications, architectural details and designs without notice. This brochure is for illustration purposes only and is not part of a legal contract. Prices are subject to change without notice. Room dimensions are approximate and calculated from inside of partition. Printed 10-20 Square Feet: 1,935 Bedrooms: 3 Full Baths: 2 Half Baths: 0 Garages: 2 Stories: 1 Sycamore Elevation A - Stone Elevation E - Stone Elevation C - Stone Because we are constantly improving our product, we reserve the right to revise, change, and/or substitute product features, dimensions, specifications, architectural details and designs without notice. This brochure is for illustration purposes only and is not part of a legal contract. Prices are subject to change without notice. Room dimensions are approximate and calculated from inside of partition. Printed 8-20 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:37 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Rezoning Proposal For Cook Lake Highlands Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Steve Scudder <sjscud@yahoo.com> Date: February 16, 2021 at 2:52:22 PM CST To: Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Rezoning Proposal For Cook Lake Highlands Mr Nichols, Congratulations on your appointment to the Corcoran City Council. I live in the MI Homes Bass Lake Crossing housing development next to the Cook Lake Highlands property off of Bass Lake Road. Actually, the back of my house looks directly into that property. It has come to my attention that Trek Development will be making another proposal to the Corcoran City Council in late March to build a number of four story buildings on the Cook Lake Highlands site. This same proposal was made by Trek Development last year and their request for rezoning was shot down by the council at that time. I urge you to not even consider Trek's proposal for rezoning of that property. You met with a number of us last fall as you were campaigning for the city council position and I voted for you primarily due to your position that the Cook Lake Highlands property should not be rezoned. Thank you for your attention on this important topic and helping us maintain the integrity of our neighborhood and quality of life. Steve ang Geri Scudder 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:37 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Corcoran Park and Trail Commision Feb. 18th meeting - New Business item 8a, Cook Lake Highlands Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Sue Zappa <smzappa@yahoo.com> Date: February 17, 2021 at 5:24:57 PM CST To: Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Brad Martens <bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov>, Alan Schultz <ASchultz@ci.corcoran.mn.us>, Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Jonathan Bottema <jbottema@ci.corcoran.mn.us> Subject: Corcoran Park and Trail Commision Feb. 18th meeting ‐ New Business item 8a, Cook Lake Highlands This email is addressed to several new Corcoran elected leaders, Tom McKee, Jeremy Nichols, Manoj Thomas, Congratulations on your election. Many of my Bass Lake Crossing neighbors have spoke highly of you when campaigning in our neighborhood last fall, they spoke of your commitment to future development happening in Corcoran. This is also addressed to Alan Schultz, Jonathan Bottoma and Brad Martens, your previous experience on the Cook Lake project will prove valuable as that project proceeds. Tomorrow the Corcoran Parks and Trail Commission will be discussing as new business the Cook Lake Highlands. I have several concerns regarding this. First the existing trail between Bass Lake Crossing and Cook Lake Highlands. From the Agenda packet: A private sidewalk connection to the off-road trail is proposed which runs east from the cul-de-sac and connects to the private drive running between the market rate apartments and the senior co-op. If the Parks Commission is supportive of the request to realign the trail, then the applicant would need to submit an easement vacation application to vacate the existing trail easement and dedicate a new easement with the final plat for the small connecting portion north of the cul-de-sac. 4. Summary The proposed trail realignment would change the character of the trail from being solely an off-road trail to one with an on-road segment. The Comprehensive Plan designates this section as an off-road trail. The Parks Commission should discuss if moving the proposed section of off-road trail to an on-road trail is desirable for the community. The current trail is used extensively by current residents from both sides of Bass Lake Crossing (North and South of County Rd 10). In this area there is not much room for outdoor activities right outside your door. I see this as only a desirable situation for the developer - removing an existing community feature, 2 making it private to their proposed development and leaving the new community to maintain the connecting path. Also potentially denying access to those outside the new development. As this is a Parks and Trail agenda/ meeting, I won't write of other project concerns in this email. I believe there are work sessions and council meetings coming up that the whole project is discussed. I may be wrong, if so please correct me. I will be electronically attending tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the concerns. Sue Zappa 612-387-8526 7482 Fir Lane Corcoran, Mn. 55034 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:38 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: CORCORAN PARK & TRAIL COMMISSION / COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS / DO NOT MOVE OUR EXISTING BASS LAKE COMMUNITY TRAIL Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: judy baluty <judy.2340@hotmail.com> Date: February 18, 2021 at 9:59:54 AM CST To: Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: CORCORAN PARK & TRAIL COMMISSION / COOK LAKE HIGHLANDS / DO NOT MOVE OUR EXISTING BASS LAKE COMMUNITY TRAIL Good Morning, We have emailed you with your last proposal for changes to our lovely Bass Lake neighborhood. Appreciated your support greatly. The new public notice of removing our trail is overly concerning and heartbreaking to us. When we purchased this home to live in this neighborhood, we were looking for a neighborhood that is very safe and quiet. One that is would be appealing to us to be able to be outdoors. That trail is one of our very favorite amenities in this neighborhood. We feel safe to walk , just the two of us or three of us with son who is Down Syndrome. Adding Senior Living, Memory and Day Care would be devastating change. It would drastically change the safety and add instability. Simply put, we dont like the higher traffic idea by foot or car in the area. This is our retirement home that we saved effortlessly for and we cannot afford to have our home lose value with the proposed changes of taking that trail out and having Trek Development come in. We dont want to have to walk on a street to walk that trail or have higher traffic coming through. Please do not approve an on‐road trail, it would completely change the character of the trail, is not desirable!! We use the trail extensively in this neighborhood as we dont have much room for outdoor activities. We spoke highly of you when you campaigned in our neighborhood last fall. Please stay truly committed to the future happening of Cocoran and stand strong for what is 2 best for us in this Bass Lake neighborhood. Judy & Paul Grannes & Josh 7498 Fir Lane N Corcoran, MN 55340 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:36 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: COOK LAKE PROJECT Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: icy7rain@aol.com Date: February 16, 2021 at 2:00:12 PM CST To: Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, mthomas@corcoran.gov Subject: COOK LAKE PROJECT Reply‐To: icy7rain@aol.com Gentleman, we have talked with you previously, so thank you for listening and your help. However, we just saw the public notice and cannot be believe the audacity of Trek to try again with the same plan...the same commercial zoning with memory care and day care, the same 2 four story units the size of the senior living at the corner of 101 & Bass Lake Rd. Their only change was to cut the market price apartment units in half....so we would have 18% of the entire Corcoran population in 21 buildable acres instead of 20%....but the same loss of home value, the same residential instability, the same infrastructure difficulties. Furthermore, when this came up last fall, Ron Thomas (former mayor) told us that market price apartments were in the 20 year plan to be placed in the Corcoran Town Center area....so obviously Trek changed nothing and wanted to try again on you three.......Thanks again Ruby & Dennis Schmid 7442 Fir Lane N. Corcoran, MN. 55340 M/I Home owner Bass Lake Crossing 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:38 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Cook Lake Highlands Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Rosemary Mueller <rosemaryim@comcast.net> Date: February 22, 2021 at 4:59:14 PM CST To: Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov>, Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Cook Lake Highlands Greetings Gentlemen. Congratulations on your elections. When you campaigned in our neighborhood last fall, many of us had the opportunity to meet you. When we voted for you, we appreciated and welcomed your commitment to no rezoning and protecting our neighborhood. As you know Trek is returning to the Council 3‐25 with the Cook Lake Highlands Project. It is basically the same proposal with minor insignificant changes.......the same Commercial rezoning daycare and memory care, the same 4 story buildings similar in size to the senior facility at the corner of 101 and Bass Lake Road and the closest multi story building next to our one level single family homes will be rental apartments. Particularly glaring in the proposal are rental apartments. They should not even be in any proposal. Last fall, Ron Thomas(the former mayor) told us that rental apartments are designated to be in the Corcoran Town Center Development. Thank you for protecting our single family homes....protecting our wonderful neighborhood...protecting our home values. For many of us retired neighbors, this is our last home. Sincerely, Rosemary Mueller Bass Lake Crossing 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:39 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Sharon Benton <sharon.benton@comcast.net> Date: February 24, 2021 at 11:04:27 AM CST To: Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Happy Wednesday Gentlemen. Congratulations on your elections. When you campaigned in our neighborhood last fall, many of us had the opportunity to meet you. When we voted for you, we appreciated and welcomed your commitment to no rezoning and protecting our neighborhood. As you know Trek is returning to the Council 3‐25 with the Cook Lake Highlands Project. It is basically the same proposal with minor insignificant changes.......the same Commercial rezoning daycare and memory care, the same 4 story buildings similar in size to the senior facility at the corner of 101 and Bass Lake Rd, and the closest multi story building next to our one level single family homes will be rental apartments. Particularly blatant in the proposal are rental apartments. They should not even be in any proposal. Last fall, Ron Thomas(the former mayor) told us that rental apartments are designated to be in the Corcoran Town Center Development. Thank you for protecting our single family homes....protecting our wonderful neighborhood...protecting our home values. For many of us retired neighbors, this is our last home. Sincerely, Sharon & Ron Benton 7432 Hickory Lane Bass Lake Crossing M/I Homes Sent from Xfinity Connect App From:Jeremy Nichols To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Cook Lake Highlands Project Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:36:34 AM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: linda_ziegler@comcast.net Date: February 16, 2021 at 2:37:32 PM CST To: Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov>, Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Cook Lake Highlands Project Good Morning Gentlemen, Congratulations on your elections. We have heard that the Cook Lake Highlands 27 acre project is coming back on March 25, 2021 to try their concept proposal on our 3 new members. Many of us neighbors met you as you campaigned in our neighborhood last fall during Trek Development’s original awful and distressing rezoning proposal. All of us who voted for you appreciated and welcomed your commitment to NO REZONING. Thank you for your help and support protecting our nice single family homes neighborhood. However, we just saw the public notice and cannot be believe the audacity of Trek to try again with the same plan...the same commercial zoning with memory care and day care, the same 2 four story units the size of the senior living at the corner of 101&Bass Lake Rd. Their only change was to cut the market price apartment units in half....so we would have 18% of the entire Corcoran population in 21 buildable acres instead of 20%....but the same loss of home value, the same residential instability, the same infrastructure difficulties. We would appreciate your help on this. Furthermore, when this came up last fall, Ron Thomas (former mayor) told us that market price apartments were in the 20 year plan to be placed in the Corcoran Town Center area....so obviously Trek changed nothing and wanted to try again on the new members. Sincerely, William and Linda Ziegler Bass Lake Crossing 7418 Fir Lane N Corcoran From:Jeremy Nichols To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Cook Lake Highlands Development Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:36:50 AM Attachments:Cook Lake Proposed Zoning Changes.msg Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: jimkmiec@comcast.net Date: February 16, 2021 at 2:44:41 PM CST To: Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Cc: jimkmiec@comcast.net Subject: Cook Lake Highlands Development Congratulations on being elected to the City of Corcoran City Council! I see that the Cook Lake development project is back on the agenda, looking for approval of their concept plan. This plan is requesting the land be re-zoned from RMF- 2 Mixed Use Residential per the September 2020 city zoning map and is guided according to the Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Guide Plan as Mixed Residential with medium density allowing for 8-10 units/acre. As you already know, many of us in the Bass Lake crossing neighborhood are opposed to having the zoning changed to accommodate apartments. (Mixed residential with Medium density is good) All of us who voted for you appreciated and welcomed your commitment to NO RE- ZONING. Thank you in advance for your ongoing support in protecting our nice single- family homes neighborhood. I have also attached my previous e-mail sent to the prior city council members back in Sept when Trek first presented their plan. Please hold to your commitment of no re-zoning! Regards, Sue & Jim Kmiec 7466 Fir Lane N M/I Homes – Bass Lake Crossing From:Jeremy Nichols To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Cook Lake Development Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:37:21 AM Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Gerry Tucker <13catcher@gmail.com> Date: February 17, 2021 at 1:12:03 PM CST To: tmkee@corcoranmn.gov, Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Cook Lake Development Hi guys, We hope this finds you well, safe and warm. Congrats, too, on your election. We were glad to play a small part. Let us begin by saying we are not opposed to development. We have been aware, from the very first time we set foot in Bass Lake Crossing, that development (and the extension of 74th Ave.) is a possibility. This proposed development, however, raises many questions focused around need and costs. NEED 1. Does Corcoran need another day care center when 2 others are already under construction within a very short distance of the proposal? 2. Does Corcoran need a new apartment building when many other units are already built or under construction, again very close by? 3. Does Corcoran need an Applewood Pointe when Haven Wood is open and for sale? 4. Do we need to rezone to accomplish all that the developers want to do? Or are we better off with a much scaled back plan? COSTS 1. What will be the cost (price) of the 12 villas? If the price is low (to address all of the other pieces; after all, it is not BLC), that potentially lowers my property value? 2. Since the off-road trail will connect with CLD, are there costs to be shared by BLC? There shouldn't be since the new trail will be on CLD property. 3. What are the costs of a shared access controlled intersection? The developer suggests that BLC would share in those costs. Not my property, not my costs. In sum, our property, 7402 Fir Lane, stands to bear a lion's share of the noise, dirt, activity, and potential loss of value due to this development. We do not see a zoning change as necessary. We would ask you to deny any zoning change requests and send this proposal back to the developer for significant scaling back. Thanks for your time. Gerry and Mary Tucker 7402 Fir Lane Corcoran 55340 952-484-2888 call/text 13catcher@gmail.com From:Jeremy Nichols To:Brad Martens; Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:Fwd: COOK LAKE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:35:43 AM I am forwarding the resident correspondence I have received on the Cook Lake project since it looks like not all of these made it into the packet. I take blame for this- apparently I need to forward these if they don’t copy Brad directly. Expect a slew of messages from me this morning as I forward them all. Please make the planning commission aware of these and include them in the council packet when/if this makes it to council. Thanks very much, Jeremy Nichols Begin forwarded message: From: Steve <stevem1000@comcast.net> Date: February 8, 2021 at 6:13:44 AM CST To: Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: COOK LAKE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Good morning gentlemen and congratulations on your elections. We have heard that the Cook Lake Highlands 27 acre project is coming back on March 25, 2021 to try their concept proposal on you 3 new members. Many of us neighbors met you three as you campaigned in our neighborhood last fall during Trek Development’s original awful and distressing rezoning proposal. All of us who voted for you appreciated and welcomed your commitment to NO REZONING. Thank you for your help and support protecting our nice single family homes neighborhood. Sincerely, Steve and Rosemary Mueller 7474 Fir Ln N M/I Homes Bass Lake Crossing 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:38 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Cook Lake 27 Rezoning Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Craig and Nannette <cnn68@centurylink.net> Date: February 17, 2021 at 5:58:40 PM CST To: Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Subject: Cook Lake 27 Rezoning Dear gentlemen, We have heard that the Cook Lake Highlands 27 area project is being readdressed on March 25, 2021 to our new mayor, Tom McKee and two councilmen, Jeremy Nichols and Manoj Thomas. Many of our neighbors met you last fall when you introduced yourselves to our neighborhood. All of us who voted for you and welcomed your commitment to no rezoning. We would appreciate your help at looking at the new proposal fairly keeping your neighbors in mind. We are also writing to you about wanting to move our existing trail which is going to be addressed tomorrow at The Parks and Trails meeting. So many of us have become accustomed to using the trail. We use the trail for walking and are so glad that this is kept up throughout the year. Our home on Fir Lane backs up to the trail. We see how many neighbors use the trail for walking themselves and with their children or dogs. The trail was in the original land drawings when we purchased our lot and home in August 2018. Construction on our home began in November 2018. We also see that the same company, Trek, who was turned down last fall is presenting the same proposal for 2 four story units, a memory unit and a daycare. With this proposed building coinciding with our home, we worry about the loss of our home value, resident instability as is seen in apartments and difficulties in infrastructure with the large population increase. As we said in our letter to the mayor and council last fall, we chose to move to Corcoran because of the MI Homes development. We are retired and decided to downsize as we moved from acreage in Andover to Corcoran. We felt that the home and lot that we chose, gave us the country like feel and yet the availability of near by businesses. We again ask you to consider our area as a quiet community and allow it to remain zoned as it is. We hope for your support. Please reply to us that you have received our email. 2 Thank you, Nannette and Craig Ness 7426 Fir Lane Corcoran, MN 55340 Bass Lake North Crossing MI Homes Sent from my iPhone 1 Kevin Shay From:Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov> Sent:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:36 AM To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP; Brad Martens Subject:Fwd: Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Gail Dahl <gdahlmax@gmail.com> Date: February 16, 2021 at 2:25:42 PM CST To: Tom McKee <tmckee@corcoranmn.gov>, Jonathan Bottema <jbottema@ci.corcoran.mn.us>, Jeremy Nichols <jnichols@corcoranmn.gov>, Alan Schultz <ASchultz@ci.corcoran.mn.us>, Manoj Thomas <mthomas@corcoranmn.gov> Gentlemen, Back in October I watched the council meeting where Trek Development brought forth their Cook Lake proposal. Afterwards, I thought it was clear that Trek needed to go back to the drawing board and change their proposal to meet what various members were saying, like: We have rejected past proposals for apartment buildings in that area, both due to the aesthetics and due to the fact that the downtown design includes them in the Town Center plans. Treks proposal was not consistent with the City's overall plan. So how is it they are coming back with almost the same identical plan? I moved into this area from Andover with the belief that the City of Corcoran would honor the zoning that was set up then as residential medium density. I took the City at their word not thinking that within 1 1/2 years of my home being built they might want to surround us with 4 story buildings and commercial businesses. If you have faith in your Town Center planning, then that is where the apartment buildings and commercial high density businesses should be located. It seems to me Trek took a very calculated risk believing they could get the City to rezone the land for what will be an enormous profit for Trek, unlike those of who moved into a rural neighborhood only to see it possibly destroyed because of $$$$. Gail Dahl 7437 Fir Lane M/I homeowner Bass Lake Crossing 2 To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office preventeddownload of this picture from the Internet. Virus-free. www.avast.com Dear Planning Commissioners, The purpose of this letter is to voice our opposition to the proposal for Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for Cook Lake Highlands. When we purchased our lot and home in Bass Lake Crossing South in December 2018, I did my due diligence to determine how the property was zoned around us. The 80 acres to the north was and still is zoned RSF -2 (Single Family Residential 2). The 27 acres to the east was zoned RSF-3(Single and two family residential 3). I felt comfortable purchasing knowing that the surrounding land would have similar type of housing. I knew that the 27 acres could have some duplex type housing. I talked to Ms. Lindahl on September 16, 2020 to confirm the definition of RSF-3 and she stated that RSF-3 would include single family housing and two - family buildings. The official zoning map that was on the Corcoran website on December 2018 had that 27 acres zoned as RSF-3 and not mixed residential. I was told that the 2030 and 2040 comprehensive plan had the 27 acres listed as mixed residential in the Comprehensive Plan but that is not the “Official Zoning Map” on the Corcoran website that I based my decision on to purchase our home. I have attached the “Official Zoning Map” that was on the Corcoran Website in December 2018 when I made my decision to purchase our lot. The“Official Zoning Map” attached to the 2040 plan still has it zoned RSF-3. Based on what I have been told, the city had an incorrect “Official Zoning Map”. On February 22, 2021, I talked to Ms. Lindahl about why the home owners were not notified about the change in zoning. She said that the city put the change to the official zoning map on the city website and in newsletters. I asked why each home owner within 500 feet of the zoning change were not notified separately. She stated that the city is not required to send individual notices when there are numerous changes to the zoning map and the change is to more than 5 acres. Ms. Lindahl stated that the city had made a mistake on the zoning map because two of the legends for the map were similar. The people that bought homes in Bass Lake Crossing used the “Official Zoning Map” that was mistakenly produced by the city of Corcoran. I understand that mistakes happen but this is a major mistake when people invest between $400,000 to $600,000 in their home. The official zoning map is what most people base their decision on when purchasing land. The Official Zoning Map was not changed until January 2020. This official zoning map was changed one month after the Cook Lake Highlands was sold according to Hennepin tax records. I have attached a copy of the “Official Zoning Map” dated January 2020. On one of the last pages of the 2040 comp plan table 11-1 land use states “amend the official zoning map to be consistent with the land use designations.” I would like to address some items listed in the Cook Lake Highlands narrative. The narrative states that MI Homes agreed to the trail relocation plan. We are the home owners and the Homeowners Association owns that out lot. By what authority would MI Homes agree to the relocation of the off road trail. The lot map produced by MI Homes that was used as their sales information of Bass Lake Crossing shows an off road trail. This is another reason we purchased our lot. There are at least 20-30 people and dogs that walk that path daily. The people on the other side of Bass Lake Road use the trail also. The homeowners association currently maintains the trail. This trail maintenance does not cost the city of Corcoran anything. The proposal wants to put a New Horizon child care on the property. This does not make any sense. There are currently two child care centers being built within ¼ of a mile of this proposed location. This would require the council to change the current zoning to commercial. There is also a request to build a Hampton Company memory care. Why would you build another memory care building when within ¼ of a mile Havenwood offers a memory care unit. This would also need the council to change the current zoning to commercial. If the city allows these two parcels to be rezoned to commercial, what would be allowed to be built on the three acres at the entrance to Bass Lake Crossing. I thought there was a current moratorium on buildings over 3 stories. Applewood Pointe is four stories. The 84 unit 3-story apartment is also being proposed. On page 48 of the 2040 comp plan states that “mixed residential” includes detached homes and attached side-by-side townhomes or stack townhomes. The “mixed use” developments include townhomes, low and high-rise apartments. Apartment complexes are to be built in mixed use developments. The city of Corcoran has over 200 acres west of Maple Hills road that is zoned Downtown Mixed use. Why not put an apartment complex, daycare, and memory care on that land. The total acreage for Cook Lake Highlands is 27.19 AC. The site map shows post development density as 16.33 AC. The Met council shows a density of 19.87 AC. The 2040 comp plan states that mixed residential is guided at 8-10 units per acre. There is one problem with the density calculation of 198 units. The daycare is 1.88 AC and the memory care is 2.14 AC and common area between the two lots are not included in this calculation. When you take out this acreage it would be approximately 15 acres remaining or a maximum 150 units for the remainder of the property. If you are going to determine density, wouldn’t you have to take out the acreage for the daycare and memory care lots. You can’t have it both ways. Bass Lake Crossing housing density is less than 3 units per acre. Map 1-7 in the 2040 comp plan shows that the property is in a shoreland overlay district. Part of the 27 acres is designated High Quality Natural Community and has a Rare Species Occurrence. The Corcoran 2040 plan states on page 48 that “residential development within or adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas will be guided as Low Density Residential to reduce development impacts to these areas”. The narrative states that it is challenging to build single family homes on this 27acres. Bass Lake Crossing south has sold 86 single family houses out of a total 95 in 3 years. Please do not rezone this property. Sincerely, Lynn and Mary Alberts 7490 Fir Lane Bass Lake Crossing N 763-420-4631 Lynnalberts@comcast.net 1 Kevin Shay From:Steve <stevem1000@comcast.net> Sent:Friday, March 5, 2021 8:05 AM To:Brad Martens; Tom McKee; Manoj Thomas; Jeremy Nichols; Alan Schultz; Jonathan Bottema Subject:Cook Lake Development public hearing 3-4-21 Greetings Gentlemen.......I was the first neighbor to speak at the public hearing last evening. I probably summarized the thoughts, concerns and suggestions for the vast majority of the neighborhood. My email below was used as the outline for my talk. (Please put this on the record and use as a discussion tool if needed) As you know on 2‐18‐21, 80% of the Parks and Trails Commission denied the request to remove, revise or relocate the trail. And then last evening, the Planning Commission by an unanimous vote declined the PUD from moving forward. So the next step is the Council on March 25,2021. You have received many emails, calls and letters both currently and last fall. So you are aware of the involvement and concern in the neighborhood. Thank you for listening and thank you for protecting our homes, our neighborhood and our home values. Steve Mueller Bass Lake Crossing Homeowner ========================================================== We will have 149 single family homes between both sides of Bass Lake Road(Bass Lake Crossing and Bass Lake Crossing South). Therefore the development of Cook Lake Highlands and its impact is extremely important to our homes and neighborhood. The consensus in the neighborhood is primarily 4 major areas of concern: 1) We suggest no rezoning to achieve more units from the current mixed residential. This would also include any rezoning to Commercial for the Day Care and Memory Care. Either leave it as mixed residential, or you could even follow M/I homes example and rezone downward for single family homes. 2) We originally were going to suggest limiting the Applewood Pointe senior co-op to the zoning maximum allowable height of 3 stories from the proposed 4 stories. However this property includes a shoreland overlay district from Cook Lake with the applicable standards in Section 1050.020 2 of the City Code. The Shoreland Overlay Standard limits the maximum building height to 25’. Therefore, even a 3 story Applewood would be too tall. No building should be over two stories. 3) It appears that rental apartments should not be in this proposal. Based on the long term vision and the city comprehensive plans, Ron Thomas (the former mayor) said last fall that rental apartments are designated to be in the Corcoran Town Center Development. If you read page 46 in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, you will find clearly defined zoning definitions of mixed residential vs mixed use as in the 200 acre Corcoran Town Center Development. Therefore based on the city’s vision, the city’s 2040 comprehensive plans, and the mixed residential zoning definition, Cook Lake Highlands should be 100% ownership. 4) And here is our last concern...We would like to keep our existing 2 year old Asphalt trail without removal, revision or relocation. It is used extensively by the neighborhoods on both sides of Bass Lake Road . As you know, Trek Development already did go to the Parks and Trails meeting on February 18 trying to remove 800 feet of this existing path and relocate it. 80% of the commission rejected the proposal. One final thought, Trek Development proposes 198 total units. When discussing their net buildable acres, they conveniently and erroneously included the commercial daycare and memory care acreage. So subtract that out and you have an incredible 198 units in just 15 net buildable acres. Comparing apples to apples, they propose 198 units ....plus a day care ....plus a memory care in only 27 total acres vs Bass Lake Crossing’s 95 units in 53 total acres. Cook Lake Highlands would have over twice the units plus a daycare, plus a memory care in half the total acreage. So in summary, we advocate: no rezoning, comply with the Shoreland Overlay standard which mandates no building taller than 2 stories, no apartments and please leave our existing trail just as it is! A practical solution is either all single family homes or otherwise transition from Bass Lake Crossing with single family homes followed by 2 story townhouses. We would hope that Elisabeth Hustad of Trek Development will consider the changes and comments so that she can proactively move forward and develop her Cook Lake Highlands. 3 Sincerely, Steve Mueller Bass Lake Crossing homeowner From:Steve To:Kendra Lindahl, AICP Subject:Cook Lake Highlands Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:43:36 AM Good morning Kendra, I am a Bass Lake Crossing homeowner and hope that you can get this email in the 3-4-21 planning package and public hearing. We will have 149 single family homes between both sides of Bass Lake Road(Bass Lake Crossing and Bass Lake Crossing South). Most of us are retired so this will be our last home. Therefore the development of Cook Lake Highlands is extremely important to our homes and neighborhood. The consensus in the neighborhood is primarily 4 areas of concern: 1) We suggest no rezoning to achieve more units from the current mixed residential. This would include any rezoning to Commercial for the Day Care and Memory Care. 2) We propose no variance to maximum height. The current height moratorium is 3 stories so Applewood Pointe senior co-op would be reduced to 3 stories from the proposed 4 stories. 3) It appears that rental apartments should not be in this proposal. Based on long term vision and the city comprehensive plans, Ron Thomas (the former mayor) said last fall that rental apartments are designated to be in the Corcoran Town Center Development. Therefore based on the city’s mission, vision and plans, Cook Lake Highlands should be 100% ownership. 4) We would like to keep our existing 2 year old Asphalt trail without removal, revision or relocation. It is used extensively by the neighborhoods on both sides of Bass Lake Road Please consider revising the acreage closest to our neighborhood.A smooth transition from Bass Lake Crossing homes to Applewood Pointe senior co-op could be achieved with single family homes followed by 2 story townhouses. Thank you, Steve Mueller M/I homeowner From:Sue Zappa To:Tom McKee; Brad Martens; Manoj Thomas; Alan Schultz; Jeremy Nichols; Jonathan Bottema Subject:Corcoran Park and Trail Commision Feb. 18th meeting - New Business item 8a, Cook Lake Highlands Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:24:53 PM This email is addressed to several new Corcoran elected leaders, Tom McKee, Jeremy Nichols, Manoj Thomas, Congratulations on your election. Many of my Bass Lake Crossing neighbors have spoke highly of you when campaigning in our neighborhood last fall, they spoke of your commitment to future development happening in Corcoran. This is also addressed to Alan Schultz, Jonathan Bottoma and Brad Martens, your previous experience on the Cook Lake project will prove valuable as that project proceeds. Tomorrow the Corcoran Parks and Trail Commission will be discussing as new business the Cook Lake Highlands. I have several concerns regarding this. First the existing trail between Bass Lake Crossing and Cook Lake Highlands. From the Agenda packet: A private sidewalk connection to the off-road trail is proposed which runs east from the cul-de-sac and connects to the private drive running between the market rate apartments and the senior co-op. If the Parks Commission is supportive of the request to realign the trail, then the applicant would need to submit an easement vacation application to vacate the existing trail easement and dedicate a new easement with the final plat for the small connecting portion north of the cul-de-sac. 4. Summary The proposed trail realignment would change the character of the trail from being solely an off-road trail to one with an on-road segment. The Comprehensive Plan designates this section as an off-road trail. The Parks Commission should discuss if moving the proposed section of off-road trail to an on-road trail is desirable for the community. The current trail is used extensively by current residents from both sides of Bass Lake Crossing (North and South of County Rd 10). In this area there is not much room for outdoor activities right outside your door. I see this as only a desirable situation for the developer - removing an existing community feature, making it private to their proposed development and leaving the new community to maintain the connecting path. Also potentially denying access to those outside the new development. As this is a Parks and Trail agenda/ meeting, I won't write of other project concerns in this email. I believe there are work sessions and council meetings coming up that the whole project is discussed. I may be wrong, if so please correct me. I will be electronically attending tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the concerns. Sue Zappa 612-387-8526 7482 Fir Lane Corcoran, Mn. 55034 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!City of GreenfieldCityofMapleGroveCity of Medina City of Rogers Bechtold RdPioneer Trl TrailHavenRdCounty Road 116County Road 30 S c h u t t e R d Oakdale Dr County Road 10 Horseshoe Trl C o u n t y R o a d 5 0 Larsen Rd Willow DrHunterRdCounty Road 19Homestead Trl Cain RdRolling Hills RdCountry Rd Mohawk DrLarkin RdFoxline DrStrehler Rd Dassel Ln OldSettlersRd Stieg Rd Kalk RdMeister Rd Maple Hill Rd93rd Ave N Tessmer Rd Blue Bonnet DrJubertLn456710 456750 456719 456730 4567116 4567101 4567117 Brockton Ln N109th Ave N 4567101 ")55 Hackamore Rd MorinLake ScottLake JubertLake GooseLake CookLake R u sh CreekRushCreek South F o rk R u sh Creek SouthForkRu shC reekThe method and timing ofregional wastewater service tobe determined through future study. 6/21/2022 6/21/2022 1/25/2026 1/25/2026 1/22/2023 6/21/2022 4/28/2021 1/22/2023 1/22/2023 1/21/2021 10/2020 12/13/22 4/27/2022 4/27/2022 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet ± Path: \\MS PFSV 02\DesignDepot\Library\S oftware\GIS \Client\City of Corcoran\City wide maps\2040 Future Land Use.mxdDate: 6/16/2020 Time: 10:58:05 AM User: KShay Rural/Ag Residential Existing Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential High Density Residential Rural Service/Commercial Commercial Mixed Use Business Park Light Industrial Public/Semi-Public Parks/Open Space Agricultural Preserve (Date of Expiration) Open Water Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Future MUSA Expansion Area !!! !!! !!!Future Study Area Parcel Boundaries Streams Lake/Open Water Wetlands Map 2-12040 Future Land Use Source:Revised National Wetland Inventory (MN DNR, 2009-2014) I ~ 1I J Mi I I ---- I -- ;;: _ , rs- ::--- - P 3 " :--:--_ - =::; I / 1- / \ 1---- l )1" K=,J \ \\\' / / I (, I AN9.= 0 SF Ai7>= 316TSF =f.-- JOpl -fy1I"f\\ I r--- / \ ""\ 12 12 12 - 1.2 ... ;;R.;T..-L-- I I I I I I I I "-..""--§... I \ I I I r n I .... I\ ( / /T I I I i I I I 1 I ) I l) 111, /1 I LJ /_ _L I I I / I I :I 1 · f(((( I I I MG-PR1B-OFFSITE - 2 I / I I MTLAND J /t "' I In PR OPMT'l NE- .:::.=.._. .. ,_ PR IMPV NEW= 19166 SF PR IMPV EX = 0 SF PR PERV = 10019 SF . I ( , I . I \ ' I IJh-.'..... - - I I • -...; --------- <: Ii'i ,,.- I WETCAND , /, / ,wi\\ii 1 PR WETLAND = 0 SF TOTAL= 29185 SF OC= 10.0MIN /l 11*rROM SEH I !./ \ I '::::s'==-'" I I I 'I \ \ \ : (/( ·' 1 I \\ I WETtASD j/ / 17 I .( /; Vi ' 'IJ; I L B-OFFSITE -1 NEW= 28847 SF I I I,' - ' l Cc./... ../2 '// I r --L EX= 0 SF = 4507 SF PR IMP NEW= 23387 S P I1MP1V EX= 2147 SF , -.........._...:;:;.--- ---:Y::- "- M 9• I E V= 46379 SF ,,,-.-;;.-- 7,;rR-PR1l ..-- = 33354 SF 10.0 MIN · D = 0 SF '/ / . c .. 1 \ R1B-2 if iTA f -.,= 71913 SF d/; // ---qJ // \' MPV NEW= 648 SF ----- LOT 16 / ' <i:iiI \ \ ) \ I 1_ \ \ \ "I - ) \ a - -- 7 - - ,... ,_,_, I '- / \ -- "" \ \ \ l I L / / ! \ ' 1 \ V Q.J) ,>. vy .:.V..: V V}''--j V · \ / I / /"' '-- _. , .., ..."" - - 12 - ....... _ --......... -------I PR IMPV NEW= 11391 SF PR IMPV EX = 0 SF PR PERV = 21100 SF PR POND= 5121 SF TOTAL= 37612 SF TOC = 5.0 MIN COOK LAKE - CORCORAN / MAPLE GROVE, MN PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP - 1 . - - / AND= 0 SF :::- ;:::::: 'P' <-- I GO MPV EX= 0 SF RV= 25).4 SF / _ ) - / i I I N 1 APPLEWOOD POINTE OF CORCORAN MARCH 4, 2021 2 About United Properties BEST OF BUSINESS AWARD Twin Cities Business readers voted United Properties the best commercial real estate company to do business with in 2016 and 2017. NAIOP AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE Applewood Pointe of Champlin at Mississippi Crossings was awarded the NAIOP Awards of Excellence in the senior living category in 2019 and Applewood Pointe of Eagan was a runner up that year. United Properties has been awarded this honor for various property types in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. TOP DEVELOPER United Properties ranked #1 on the Minneapolis St. Paul Business Journal’s annual list of commercial real estate developers in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. For more than 100 years, we have been proud to create deep roots in our communities, we are especially honored when organizations and publications recognize our work: 3 Applewood Pointe Map 4 What is a Senior Cooperative? •Cooperative units are “for-sale” housing. The cooperative by-laws require all homes to be owner occupied and prohibit renting of units •One owner must be 62+ •4 financing equity options –20%, 40%, 60%, 80% •Balance is a 40-year, fixed rate, HUD guaranteed master mortgage •2% annual fixed appreciation –predictable pricing builds waitlist •All Applewood Pointe Communities are professionally managed 5 Senior Housing Helps Assure a Youthful City •Serves the long-term residents of your City, many have lived in the community 30+ years •Seniors typically will not move from single family homes without quality options. Promotes housing stock turnover and reinvestment in existing homes •Supports school systems –New residents in seniors’ homes will be younger and likely have school-aged children •Adds to the tax base through the new senior housing development and reinvestment in single family homes 6 Traffic –Senior Cooperative •Low traffic generator •3.7 trips per unit per day •Residents avoid peak rush hour •Comparison:Apartment 7.2 trips per day Condominium 5.8 trips per day Single Family 10.0 trips per day 7 Senior Population Growth (Age 70+) Seven County Twin Cities Metro Area 2000 -2045 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Age 70-74 Age 75 - 79 Age 80+ Source: Minnesota State Demographic Center 75% growth in senior population→125% growth in senior population→ Demand 8 Project Details •100 Market Rate Cooperative Units •14 Home Styles Ranging in Size from 1,297 –1,906 •Common Areas Included: Great Room, Library, Club Room, Fitness Center, Guest Suites, Craft Room, Hobby Shop •4-Story Building with Underground Heated Garage •1.9 Parking Stalls Per Unit •75 Surface Parking Stalls •121 Underground Parking Stalls 9 Applewood Pointe of Corcoran –Site Plan 10 Applewood Pointe of Corcoran –Rendering 11 Applewood Pointe of Maple Grove at Arbor Lakes 12 Exterior Amenities 13 Thank You F.F.E.100'-0"123411111111222234455556TYP.6TYP.66666TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.TYP.79999991011111314211414211415161617TYP.17TYP.181920334445555111113131421141421151617TYP.181920161621212134511131414SIGN 'C'WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"WINDOW SILL102'-8"F.F.E.100'-0"TOP OF PARAPET122'-3"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"BOTTOM OF CANOPY112'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF SCREENING120'-4"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"ABC1111122222334445555556TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.6TYP.777889999991111111212121213131314212121141414141616212114112223A201310SIGN 'D'WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"TOP OF PARAPET117'-0"WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"TOP OF PARAPET121'-6"F.F.E.100'-0"A124569112114WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"F.F.E.100'-0"A12456911211497WINDOW SILL102'-8"WINDOW HEAD110'-0"TOP OF PARAPET118'-0"ELEVATION KEY NOTES1. STONE VENEER - SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE 'CHARDONNAY' BY CULTURED STONE2. COMPOSITE WOOD SHAKE SIDING - HARDIESHINGLE - STRAIGHT EDGE PANEL 'NAVAJO BEIGE' BY JAMES HARDIE3. COMPOSITE WOOD HORIZONTAL SIDING - HARDIEPLANK - SMOOTH -'KHAKI BROWN' BY JAMES HARDIE4. COMPOSITE WOOD BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING - HARDIEPANEL VERTICAL SIDING - SMOOTH - 'COBBLESTONE' WITH HARDIETRIM BOARD - SMOOTH BATTEN BOARD - 'COBBLESTONE' BY JAMES HARDIE5. PREFINISHED METAL COPING - 'WHITE'6. ALUMIUNUM STOREFRONT FRAMING / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES7. ALUMINUM DOOR / TRANSOM / GLAZING ASSEMBLY - TINTED INSULATED LOW-E GLASS WITH 'DARK BRONZE' ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES8. HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME - PAINT TO MATCH 'DARK BRONZE'9. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE SILL10. 14'-3" x 3'-7" EXTERIOR LED 'NEW HORIZON ACADEMY' AND 'SUN' SIGNAGE. SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.11. EIFS CORNICE - PAINT 'WHITE'12. PREFINISHED METAL SCUPPER AND 4"x6" DOWNSPOUT -'DARK BRONZE'. CONNECT DOWNSPOUT TO UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.13. LED LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE ELCTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION14. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'WHITE'15. 'BLACK' FABRIC AWNING. SEE DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION16. DASHED LINE DENOTES TOP OF ROOF BEYOND17. COMPOSITE WOOD DENTIL - PAINT 'WHITE'18. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE COLUMN CAP19. 8x8 COMPOSITE WOOD COLUMN. SEE STRUCTURAL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION20. 4x12 COMPOSITE WOOD BEAM21. 1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM - PAINT 'NEW HORIZON BLUE'22. WALL MOUNTED CT CABINET - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH23. ELECTRICAL METER - PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH24. 1'-0" HIGH x 2'-0" WIDE SCUPPER OPENING25. WOODEN TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE AND POST ASSEMBLY26. ROOF TOP SCREENING BEYOND. #/9A 2023519351935193519'BLACK' AWNING FABRIC1" 'BLACK' ALUMINUM AWNING FRAMING -TYP.1x COMPOSITE LEDGER BOARD. PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT LAP SIDING. COORINDATE FINAL LOCATION WITH AWNING MANUFACTURER -TYP.2x TREATED WOOD BLOCKING. COORINDATE FINAL LOCATION WITH AWNING MANUFACTURER -TYP.PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING. COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT LAP SIDINGPREFINISHED METAL FLASHING. COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT AWNING FABRICLAP SIDING OVER WEATHER RESISTIVE BARRIER5/8" PLYWOOD SHEATHING2x WOOD STUD FRAMING1x COMPOSITE WOOD TRIM -PAINT 'WHITE'2'-0"AWNING ASSEMBLY110'-8"BTM. FABRICAWNING ASSEMBLY115'-5"TOP FABRIC4'-10"RBuilding a Better Worldfor All of UsRSEH ProjectChecked ByDrawn ByProject StatusIssue DateThis drawing is an instrument of service and shall remain the property of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). This drawing and the concepts and ideas contained herein shall not be used, reproduced, revised, or retained without the express written approval of SEH. Submission or distribution of this drawing to meet official or regulatory requirements or for other purposes in connection with the project is not be construed as publication in derogation of any of the rights of SEH.ArchitectOwnerShort Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.3535 Vadnais Center Dr.St. Paul, Minnesota 55110800.325.2055Short Elliott Hedrickson, Inc.All Rights ReservedCOPYRIGHT © 2020New Horizon Academy3405 Annapolis Lane N.Suite 100Plymouth, Minnesota 55447763.557.1111PRELIMINARY EXTERIORELEVATIONSA202NEW HORIZON ACADEMYCORCORON, MN 55340New Horizon Academy3/16" = 1'-0"1WEST ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"2NORTH ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"3SOUTH ENTRY ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"4NORTH ENTRY ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"5TRASH ENCLOSURE3/4" = 1'-0"6FABRIC AWNING DETAILRevision IssueRev. # Description Date GAZEBO OUTDOOR PATIO FIRE ACCESS ROAD CHAINED GATE BY COUNTY FIRE ACCESS ROAD CHAINED GATE BY COUNTY C 2020 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC D10 CONCEPT SITE PLAN SCHEMATIC DESIGN 03/31/21 20005 Applewood Pointe of Corcoran N PERSPECTIVE VIEW SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVE VIEW SITE ENTRY PERSPECTIVE VIEW SOUTHEAST C 2020 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC D11 CONCEPT SITE - VIEWS SCHEMATIC DESIGN 03/31/21 20005 Applewood Pointe of Corcoran N C 2020 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC D12 CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES SCHEMATIC DESIGN 03/31/21 20005 Applewood Pointe of Corcoran CONCEPT IMAGE - BASS LAKE ROAD - SITE ENTRY C 2020 MOMENTUM DESIGN GROUP LLC D13 CONCEPT PERSPECTIVES SCHEMATIC DESIGN 03/31/21 20005 Applewood Pointe of Corcoran CONCEPT IMAGE - BASS LAKE ROAD - SOUTHWEST CONCEPT IMAGE - BASS LAKE ROAD - SOUTHEAST 105 South Fifth Avenue Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 www.landform.net Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Item: 8d. TO: Corcoran City Council FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform DATE: April 15, 2021 for the April 22, 2021 City Council Meeting RE: PUD Sketch Plan Review for “Refuge at Rush Creek” (PID 03-119-23-13-0002) (city file no. 21-013) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: May 15, 2021 1.Description of Request The applicant (Rains Properties, LLC) is requesting an opportunity to appear before the City Council to solicit informal comments on a PUD sketch plan for a proposed nine lot open space and preservation (OS&P) plat. 2. Background The original 80-acre parcel was split between two family members in the 1970’s. In 2015, a preliminary and final plat for the property (Fehn Meadow) was approved to divide the original parcel and create this Outlot. In 2018, the Council approved a 14-lot OS&P plat for this parcel. The applicant requested and received an extension to those approvals, which will expire on September 27, 2021. The applicant has been working to establish a wetland bank on the site. The City Council approved a vacation of the existing easements on March 25th to 3. Context Zoning and Land Use The property is guided Rural/Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential. The property is located outside of the 2030 Metropolitan Urban Service Area boundary. Surrounding Properties The surrounding properties are guided Rural / Ag Residential and zoned Rural Residential. The property across County Road 117 is located in the City of Rogers. Rains PUD Sketch Plan (21-013) 2 April 22, 2021 Natural Characteristics of the Site The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a number of wetlands scattered throughout the site. A channel of Rush Creek runs along the south portion of the portion of the property. The area adjacent to the creek is located in the Shoreland Overlay District. There are floodplain areas on the south and west portion of the property. The Parks and Trails map shows a greenway corridor along the south and east portions of the site. 4. Analysis Sketch Plan The sketch plan shows nine single family housing units on 62.7 acres. The nine homes would be clustered on the northwestern 3.7-acres and the remainder of the site would be preserved. The majority of the site (47.3 acres) would be in a permanent wetland conservation easement. The remaining 12 acres in the southeastern corner of the property would be retained for potential future development should access become available from the east. Lot Standards and Setbacks The applicant notes that the lots would be 1,200 sq. ft. in area (30 ft. by 40 ft.). The OS&P does not have a minimum lot size, but the maximum lot size cannot exceed four acres in the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district. The homes would be a mix of slab on grade and tuck-under garages in order to work with the existing grades. The final architecture has not yet been determined, but the applicant indicates a modern prairie-style architecture is preferred. The homes would be 1,000 – 3,000 sq. ft. with 2-4 bedrooms. The resulting neighborhood is intended to provide a unique housing opportunity in Corcoran. A homeowner's association will manage the finances and take care of all common areas including landscaping, sewer, water, lighting, driveway maintenance, plowing and conservation easement. The minimum building setbacks shall be as follows: a. Front: 25 feet (100 feet from County Road 117) b. Side, internal: 10 feet. c. Side, street: 25 feet. d. Rear: 25 feet. The concept plan does not identify building setbacks, but we expect that these smaller lots would likely request reduced setbacks. Variations from the dimensional requirements for lot size, setbacks or impervious surface may be approved with a PUD if the City Council finds that the request is consistent with the PUD standards. Rains PUD Sketch Plan (21-013) 3 April 22, 2021 Open Space Preservation OS&P plats are required to preserve a minimum of 50% of the land as open space and at least half of that must be upland area. The concept plan provides 59 acres of open space (12 temporary and 47.3 permanent). However, over time the wetland bank would be established and the upland area in the open space would be reduced. This flexibility could be provided with the PUD if the Council finds that the intent of the OS&P ordinance is met. Utilities The applicant is proposing to provide a community septic system and individual wells for the homes. Community septics are permitted by PUD in compliance with MPCA standards as permitted by Hennepin County. The following standards must be met in an OS&P development: • Centralized wastewater treatment systems may be located in temporarily restricted open space within an easement. This area shall not be included in the land area designated as preserved or restored open space. • A sewage treatment system management plan must be submitted to the city that must be reviewed and approved prior to being recorded with the final plat. • The applicant must provide a management (maintenance, replacement and repair) plan for centralized wastewater treatment system as approved by the City. The management plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Council and recorded with the final plat. The plan should clearly identify the following: o The ownership of the centralized wastewater treatment system. o An annual schedule for maintenance, inspection and monitoring of the centralized wastewater treatment system. o Assignment of responsibility for the management of and payment for the centralized wastewater treatment system. o Contingency plan in the event of failure of the centralized wastewater treatment. o Financial guarantees, covering the estimated cost of maintaining and replacing a centralized system. o Provisions describing how the sewage treatment portion of the system will be protected from vehicles, animals, humans and other sources of risk. o The name and license number of the system's designer. Rains PUD Sketch Plan (21-013) 4 April 22, 2021 o Provision for cost effective future connection of the wastewater treatment system(s) to urban services within one year after such services are provided at the boundary of the development, with sufficient financial guarantees to ensure no added cost to the City. o If financial guarantees for any of the above provisions are part of an association assessment or treasury fund, the City shall be given access to annual audit records, at the expense of the association, to ensure proper funding. If such guarantees are the private responsibility of the developer, the City shall require guarantees from the responsible individual(s). This would be the first community septic system in the City, but they do exist in several area communities, including Elk River and Lake Elmo. Both of those communities have experienced community septic failures, so the City should work closely with the applicant to provide and protect a secondary site in case of failure. The applicant’s narrative notes that the system will be designed to connect to city sewer and water when they become available. Transportation and Access The plans show construction of a new private drive off a single curb cut off County Road 117. The County policy is to require turn lanes where 10 or more homes are proposed. The proposed nine lot subdivision would not trigger turn lanes. The private drive would be required to comply with city private drive standard. The concept includes a gate at the entrance to the private drive. The developer would need to ensure that the proposed cul de sac meets fire standards. The developer is proposing 10 guest parking stalls as well as the parking available in the garage and in the driveway. Driveways should be a minimum of 22 feet to ensure adequate parking. Stormwater The sketch plan shows a stormwater pond north of the proposed homes. Adequate separation between the stormwater pond and septic system is required. The city engineer has reviewed the plans and provided comments which have been attached to this report. Public Safety Public safety has provided comments for the developer to consider as the project moves forward. These comments are attached. Wetlands The wetland bank will protect the wetlands and a new drainage and utility easement will be provided over the wetlands and buffers. Rains PUD Sketch Plan (21-013) 5 April 22, 2021 Landscaping No landscape plan was provided with the concept plan, but the plans note that a native landscape with prairie plantings will be provided on the entire site and trees and/or a hedgerow will be provided near the homes. This would be consistent with the OS&P standards. Parks and Trails The sketch plan is showing a private walking trail near the homes as an amenity for the neighborhood. The Parks and Trails map shows an on-road trail that would be constructed when County Road 117 is improved and an off-road trail south of the creek. The Parks and Trails Commission reviewed the previous plan and recommended cash-in-lieu of land for park dedication. Next Steps If the applicant chooses to proceed with the application, they will need to submit applications for: a. A rezoning to PUD, Preliminary PUD Development Plan and Preliminary Plat then b. A Final PUD Development Plan and Final Plat While this is not the formal application, the Council should provide direction to the applicant so that they can decide whether to proceed with formal application. Summary The intent of the OS&P plat is to: A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. B. Preserve permanent natural habitat and vegetated corridors for the shelter and movement of diverse wildlife. C. Preserve viable tracts of land for long-term agricultural use. D. Allow greater flexibility in the design of residential developments in order to create a more esthetically pleasing visual impact than standard development, particularly along arterial roadways and with respect to abutting properties. E. Create cohesive neighborhoods to establish local identity and increase community interaction. F. Reduce the costs of future public street and utility infrastructure by designing to improve the efficiency of future connections and minimize site restoration costs associated with future utility construction. Rains PUD Sketch Plan (21-013) 6 April 22, 2021 G. Provide economic incentives to land owners to preserve, protect and/or restore high quality woodlots and other identified natural resources areas. H. Accomplish the objectives of the comprehensive plan in a voluntary manner through the use of incentives. If the Council finds that the intent of the OS&P ordinance is met, they should provide feedback on the proposed plan, which requires a PUD for reduced lot size (and possibly setbacks), less upland than typically required in the open space area due to the wetland bank and a community septic. 5. Recommendation The applicant is requesting comments on this sketch plan. Any comments given by the City Council are advisory in nature and non-binding. While the comments are non-binding, the applicant will consider the comments from the City Council when they prepare their formal submittal. Attachments 1. Site Location Map 2. City Engineer’s Memo dated April 14, 2021 3. Public Safety Memo dated April 7, 2021 4. Hennepin County comments dated March 29, 2021 5. Applicant Narrative and plans received March 16, 2021 Hennepin County Property Map Date: 3/18/2021 Comments: 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 0311923130002 OWNER NAME: Rains Properties Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 52 Address Unassigned, Corcoran MN 00000 PARCEL AREA: 62.71 acres, 2,731,628 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract SALE PRICE: $625,000 SALE DATA: 04/2017 SALE CODE: Vacant Land ASSESSED 2020, PAYABLE 2021 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead MARKET VALUE: $738,500 TAX TOTAL: $8,019.50 ASSESSED 2021, PAYABLE 2022 PROPERTY TYPE: Farm HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $601,300 This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (ii) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2021 Memo To:Kevin Mattson, PE Public Works Director From:Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project:Refuge at Rush Creek-Concept Date:April 14, 2021 Exhibits: This memorandum is based on a review of the Concept Site Plan by DJR Architecture for 9 lots on 62.7 acres along CR 117 in Corcoran. A significant portion of the site is in process to be enrolled in wetland bank which results in a conservation easement (adjacent to this concept plan). Comments: General: 1. Consistent with the review process, a comment response letter shall be provided in response to the following comments provided in this Memorandum in which the applicant provides a written response to each item. 2. In addition to engineering related comments per reviews, the project is subject to additional planning, zoning, land-use, and other applicable codes of the City of Corcoran. 3. Wetland delineation was approved and additional work performed for the adjacent wetland banking project. 4. Stormwater management plan is required to receive approval from the City prior to submittal to the Elm Creek WMO. CR 117 Access and Private Street The development access is shown aligned with a driveway to the north of CR 117. Concept shows a paved road, this review is assuming curb and gutter are installed. 1. The County controls the access approval process including site lines, location, etc. 2. County initial comments suggest turn lanes will not be required. 3. Street section (although private) will meet City standards. Grading, Drainage and Stormwater Management The site drainage is majority to the west/southwest towards a shared ditch along the west property line. 1. Drainage and utility easements over stormwater BMPs and conveyances will be reviewed during preliminary plat process. 2. A pond area is shown adjacent to community septic area and may need to be relocated based on septic (County) requirements. April 2021 Refuge at Rush Creek Concept Plan Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 3 3. As noted previously, drainage appears to flow west/southwest into shared ditch. City may require this be maintained/cleaned/stabilized as part of this development upon additional review. Applicant shall be responsible for work and obtaining access under the BWSR easement. 4. City’s Stormwater Guidelines shall be used in modeling and design. 5. If filtration is required to meet WMO water quality and abstraction, a NURP pond with filtration bench is preferred by City and will reduce long term maintenance costs for owner. Community Septic A Community Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) with design wastewater flows greater than 10,000 gpd are permitted through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) program. As the wastewater flow for Refuge at Rush Creek would be less than 10,000 gpd, it would be permitted by Hennepin County. 1. Specifically, the Hennepin County, Chapter 19 Subsurface Sewage Treatment System ordinance, provides minimum standards and requirements for SSTS. Chapter 19 has adopted provisions within Minnesota Rules 7080-7082. 2. Prior to SSTS design and construction, a soil and site evaluation will be required. This evaluation would be conducted by a certified SSTS designer and/or professional soil scientist by means of hand augered soil borings or backhoe excavated test pits. a. The investigation will provide important information related to soil morphology, permeability, soil loading rates, area requirement, system location, and the type of soil-based technology that can be utilized. If a limiting condition is observed (bedrock, hardpan, or redoximorphic features/seasonally saturated soils) at shallow depth within the profile, an above-grade system or mound would be required. Otherwise, a below grade technology like trenches or absorption beds is appropriate. b. The concept plan shows a stormwater basin within the vicinity of the proposed SSTS location. Horizontal setback distances should be shown and the minimum vertical separation from the bottom of the SSTS to seasonally saturated soils shall be 36- inches. April 2021 Refuge at Rush Creek Concept Plan Kevin Mattson Page 3 of 3 Individual Lots City requires that individual lot grading/site plans be submitted and approved (with final plat) that show the well, driveway culverts and building setback constraints. 1. Show radius for individual well setbacks. End of Comments CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us Memo To: Planning (Planners Lindahl and Davis) From: Director Gottschalk Date: April 7, 2021 Re: Refuge at Rush Creek A Public Safety plan review meeting was held on 04/07/2021. In attendance were: Director of Public Safety Gottschalk, Lieutenant Ryan Burns, Planner Davis, Fire Chief Feist, Fire Chief Dave Malewicki, and Fire Chief Leuer. The comments are preliminary and additional meetings with the developer and building officials will be required. This project presents the unique challenge of higher density (small) building set-backs in a rural firefighting area. The specific implications of this will need to be well vetted with the building official. The following public safety comments are provided for the project: 1. The roadway will need to meet private drive standards for weight and width and, depending on size, may require the addition of a hammerhead at the midway point of the road. 2. Since it is the sole access to these properties the roadway will likely need to be signed no parking on both sides. 3. The developer will need to demonstrate that the cul-de-sac meets all City turn radius specifications for fire apparatus. 4. If the pond specifications support it, public safety recommends a dry hydrant for the holding pond to support firefighting efforts. 5. Due to the rural firefighting necessary in this area, public safety is recommending a minimum of 10-foot side yard setbacks. This memo serves as a preliminary review and assumes that all specifications not articulated in the concept meet City standards. Additional fire and building codes will apply. Refuge at Rush Creek PUD Sketch Plan Narrative 1 Rains Properties, LLC Chris Rains 624 Central Ave Osseo MN 55369 Background and previous approval We are requesting a review of a new Sketch PUD, and I wanted to give City Staff and the Council some background on this site before getting into the specifics of the actual project we are proposing. This site was previously approved for a 14 lot OS&P, PUD. That preliminary plat was approved in 2018, and that approval will expire in September of 2021. (Attached to the application also) During the 14 lot subdivision process, we had applied for approval of an Army Corps of Engineers approved wetland bank. The wetland bank process has taken four years, and we received final approval for the wetland bank from the Army Corps, City of Corcoran, EPA, DNR, and the State of Minnesota (BSWR) in January of 2021. Since then, we have applied for the approval and release of our drainage and utility easement from the city of Corcoran. This DNU release will be going before the city council in March of 2021. Once we receive that conditional release, we will proceed with the establishment of the wetland bank. Since the wetland bank has been approved by the Army Corps, City of Corcoran, EPA, DNR, and the State of Minnesota (BSWR), it will require us to place a perpetual easement on 47.3 acres of the 62.7‐acre site. The bank easement will be recorded in favor of the State of Minnesota. That is different than the requirement of the OS&P code. The provision in the code requires the easement to be in favor of the city of Corcoran. All of the maps, designs, and vegetation requirements of the wetland bank conservation easement will also be attached for further review by staff if needed. New Request Rains Properties, LLC is proposing a new nine lot OS&P, PUD cluster development, along with a 47.3 acre Army Corps of Engineers approved wetland bank. The development will consist of 9 homes on a private and gated driveway. The gate will be far enough into the development to allow people to turn around if they enter the driveway by accident. The homes will have a private well and a shared septic system. The water and septic system will be designed to hook‐ up to city sewer and water services when they become available. The neighborhood will have the look and feel of prairie and modern‐style architecture. The homes will have a focus on quality and outdoor living, not interior space. The building sites will be compact with the land elevation on the private drive sloping down away from the Cty rd 117. We are expecting different garage locations. Some will be in front of the homes and tuck‐under or sideloading style depending on the final land elevation and road curvatures. Refuge at Rush Creek PUD Sketch Plan Narrative 2 The homes will be in the 1000‐3000 sq ft range with 2‐4 bedrooms. Each of the homes will have outdoor living space with water features and outdoor fireplaces. All of the home sites will have the rear of the house facing the conservation easement area and provide privacy through architectural design and landscaping. A homeowner's association will manage the finances and take care of all landscaping, sewer, water, lighting, driveway maintenance, plowing, and conservation easement. Current Site and New Site Layout The current site consists of 62.7 acres of raw land. The previous land use has been farmed crops; no other structures currently exist on the site. The City of Corcoran staff established that we have seven building entitlements during the last OS&P process. The project location is separated into three distinct areas. They will consist of 3.7 acres of land in the northwest corner of the property, 47.3 acres of federally approved conservation easement stretching from the north of the property down the east and west property lines, and leaving an additional 12 acres outside the easement in the southeast corner of the site. That 12 acres in the southeast area will be an out‐lot left for a future extension of sewer and water as the city develops. We don't expect the 12‐acre out‐lot to be available for development for 30 years or more. The 12‐acre area does not have any road access other than the area outside of the bank easement for long‐term maintenance of the native grasses. Because of the timeline before it may develop, we plan on planting that entire area in native grasses. The conservation easement has rigorous requirements for the establishment of grasses. We cannot allow weeds to take hold inside of our conservation easement. For this reason, all 62.7 acres will be established in native grasses to safeguard the property until the plants are established and can maintain themself. That includes the 3.7 acres we are proposing for the new development. Reason for the PUD A PUD is required because of the shared septic system. Technical questions on OS&P compliance based on the code listed below 940.50 – DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. Subd. 1. OS&P or restoration plats shall comply with the following minimum standards: Under an OS&P plat a minimum of 50% percent of the gross land area (of no more than two non‐contiguous pieces) of the development site shall be dedicated as preserved open space. The open space must be protected by a conservation easement or deed restrictions in favor of the city. Of that amount, 50 percent (net 25%) shall be upland area. Refuge at Rush Creek PUD Sketch Plan Narrative 3 o The total lot size is 62.7 acres. The amount total of open space proposed is 59‐acres. 47.3 in the conservation easement and 12 acres in the outlot for future development. The total amount of upland buffer area in the easement is 28.7 acres, and the wetland area will be 19 acres once established. Plus 12‐acres of upland as an outlot. o 62.7 total lot size– 47.3 acres of permanent open‐space, 12 temporary open‐space. Total of 59 acres of open‐space. 94% of the site is open‐space. Of that, 40.3 acres is upland. So the total opens‐space upland area is 68% of the site. o We are asking for clarification and guidance on how the city will view the proposal from the open space standpoint and calculations. o Must the open space be counted before or after the easement is in place? o Can upland buffer in a federally protected wetland still be considered upland even though it is in a wetland conservation easement? It will never be wet by design. Will it qualify under the OS&P as upland credit? o Because this is federally protected, we must follow the rules they set forth. All 47.3 acres must be considered a federally protected wetland even though the vast majority of the land is upland and currently farmable. Is this in conflict with the OS&P, even though it more than complies with the intent of the code. o The approval of our wetland bank could expire prior to the city approval of an OS&P plat. That is why we are asking about this aspect of the code now. Comprehensive Plan Natural Resources Open Space Map The entire western and southern property line of the site is highlighted on the city of Corcoran's comprehensive plan. In the natural resource/open‐space corridor map. Private Drive We are asking for approval of a private drive. A future public street with on‐street parking is not viable. Therefore we are proposing additional visitor parking on the private road with on‐street parking spots. The private drive will be built to city standards as stated in the city code. Setbacks Setbacks from lot lines and drives will be called out in the PUD Refuge at Rush Creek PUD Sketch Plan Narrative 4 Development Rights Generally, under the OS&P, the code allows for a 150 ‐ 300% increase in density over the allowed entitlements depending on the design. We have seven building entitlements that could potentially increase to 21 lots that the code permits under a shared septic PUD. 7 building rights X 300% = 21 building rights as per 940.070 All of these extenuating circumstances are the reason we are asking for the PUD. We have a unique site, especially with the addition of the wetland bank, which will be filtering all the water coming from off‐site. The water will come to our site from Cty rd 117 ditches and many properties to the north, draining at about 700 acres through farm drain tiles. All of that water will be treated in our wetland before going into Rush Creek and making a significant improvement on the water filtration for Rush Creek. © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota Project Description The project proposes a modest development of nine single family homes sensitivity integrated into a landscape of native wetland prairie and shrubland. Lo- cated South of 109th Ave. North, the development site is situated amidst other single-family homes, open farm fields and meadows, and predominantly hard- wood lot lines. It is a goal of the project that the new homes will be refined, understated, and modern in appearance, taking material cues from the surround- ing pastoral iconography of wooden farmhouses, red barns, silos, and corrugated tin agricultural structures. New access roads will be designed mitigate run-off through a system of drainage swales and an onsite storage pond. Landscaping will be done in a natural style and employ hardy native perennials that create interest throughout the year and create habitat for wildlife. Woven into the development will be a recreational trail. Development Narrative © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota MASTER PLAN 47.3 Acres Permanent Wetland Conservation Easement Nine Lots / Single family Homes 12 Acres 0 100ft 3.7 Acres © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota SITE PLAN - AERIAL OVERLAY NOTE: Approved Native plantings for Wetland Conservation Areas are proposed to be strategically included within in the Development site. Utilizing native plantings to connect the wetland area and homes site will more naturally integrate the devel- opment into existing view corridors and context. © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota SITE PLAN - LINEWORK NOTE: Approved Native plantings for Wetland Conservation Areas are proposed to be strategically included within in the Development site. Utilizing native plantings to connect the wetland area and homes site will more naturally integrate the devel- opment into existing view corridors and context. © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota Site Planning Goals The proposed homes development would be sited on 3.7 acres of land at the North West corner of the 62.7 acre tract. It is proposed to put the bulk of the cen- tral portion of the site equaling 47.3 acres, into a permanent wetland conservation easement. Formerly devoted to agriculture. By preserving such a compa- rable large area for native wetland, the project identifies an opportunity for a symbiotic relationship between development and drainage pressure on the land and in the area. Wet prairies containing native prairie grasses, shrubs, forbs, and wildflowers, are by nature an ecological system capable of far greater water retention and infiltration than mono-cropped farmland. The roots structures of native plants such as big blue stem can grow very large in mass and very deep enabling them break up hardpan non-draining soils, create near infinite channels for surface water infiltration and evaporative transpiration, while simultane- ously sequestering carbon. Wetland prairie habitat on this site could thus provide valuable hydrological and ecological services while simultaneously creating a dynamic seasonal backdrop for the proposed homes and existing farms and dwellings. The remaining 12 acres on the South Eastern corner of the property would be retained for potential future development should road access to that area become feasible in the future. Development Narrative Section Diagram illustraiting potential for permanent wetland conservation easement Section Diagram showing root systems in Native Wet Prairie © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota BIRDS-EYE VIEW FROM THE NORTH-WEST 47.3 Acres Permanent Wetland Conservation Easement Nine Lots / Single family Homes 3.7 Acres 12 Acres © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota POND - COMMUNITY ASSET RECREATIONAL PATH BLOOM SUCCESION - HABITAT SUN SHADING AGRICULTURAL CONNECTION GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE WOOD CLADDINGWET PRAIRIE PRESERVE BAIRDSEYE VIEW FROM THE NORTH-WEST © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota MATERIALS Horizontal Rainscreen Agricultural Pattern Variation Multi-stemmed Serviceberry Trees Copper Patina Tone Flashing Sharp Aperture WindowsCorrugated TinCor-Ten SteelThermally Modified Pine © 2020 DJR Architecture Refuge at Rush Creek - Concept Siteplan 21-026.00 Corcoran, Minnesota AE PROJECT NO. 14606 USACE PROJECT NO. 2017-01589 BWSR TRACKING NO. s08302 MITIGATION PLAN (FULL APPLICATION) REFUGE AT RUSH CREEK, LLC 20901 County Road 117 City of Corcoran Hennepin County, Minnesota April 29, 2020 13605 1st Avenue North #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn .com 13605 1 st Avenue North#100,Plymouth, MN 55441 TABLE OF CONTENTS WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 2 CONTENTS SECTIONS FULL APPLICATION FORM ....................................................................................................................... 4 1. REGULATORY REVIEW STATUS AND PROJECT HISTORY ............................................................................ 5 2. PROJECT SPONSOR - LANDOWNER ....................................................................................................... 5 3. PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................... 6 4. HISTORICAL CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................... 6 5. EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................................................ 7 6. OBJECTIVES, NEED, AND FEASIBILITY................................................................................................... 12 7. ECOLOGICAL SUITABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY.................................................................................... 17 8. VEGETATION PLAN ........................................................................................................................... 18 9. CONSTRUCTION PLAN....................................................................................................................... 18 10. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................ 21 11. MONITORING PLAN ........................................................................................................................ 21 12. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS............................................................................................................... 21 SIGNATURE ........................................................................................................................................ 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 3 FIGURES FIGURE 1 Site Location Map FIGURE 2 Easement Boundary Map FIGURE 3 1856 Plat Map FIGURE 4 DNR Public Water Inventory Map FIGURE 5 Web Soil Survey Map FIGURE 6 Existing Land Use Map FIGURE 7 Existing Vegetation Communities Map FIGURE 8 Watershed Map FIGURE 9 Existing Drainage Map FIGURE 10 Wetland Delineation Map FIGURE 11 Credit Actions Map ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A Agency Comments ATTACHMENT B Title Work ATTACHMENT C Historic Aerial Photographs ATTACHMENT D Van Schilfgaarde Calculations ATTACHMENT E Existing Wetlands Photographs ATTACHMENT F Alternative Method for Determining Credit Potential ATTACHMENT G Projected Credit, Credit Release Schedule, and Performance Standards ATTACHMENT H Vegetation Establishment and Monitoring Plan ATTACHMENT I Construction Plan Sheets ATTACHMENT J Wetland Bank Drainage Analysis WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 4 FULL APPLICATION FORM Wetland Mitigation Proposal Mitigation Plan (Full Application) Submit this document to the Corps of Engineers and Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Local Government Unit (LGU). PROJECT NAME Project Type Wetland Bank In Lieu Fee Site Project Specific (PRM) SPONSOR INFORMATION Agent Information Chris Rains Ben Hodapp Company Company Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC Street Address Street Address 624 Central Avenue 13605 1st Ave N. # 100 City State Zip Code City State Zip Code Osseo MN 55369 Plymouth MN 55441 Phone (Primary) Phone (Secondary) Phone (Other) Phone (Primary) Phone (Secondary) Phone (Other) 612-599-0372 (763) 412-4005 E-mail Address E-mail Address chris@rainsproperties.com bhodapp@ae-mn.com Fee Title Owner Contract for Deed Contract or agreement with fee owner Other: (describe) STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION (required if agent is authorized to represent, and sign for, sponsor) I hereby authorize, Anderson Engineering of Minnesota, LLC to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this document and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this document. Signature of Sponsor Date PROJECT LOCATION (Include a Site Location Map) County Est. Easement Size (acres) Watershed Name/No. or HUC 8 Bank Service Area Hennepin 47.3 20 - Mississippi River BSA 7 Latitude: Longitude: Section No. Township No. Range No. 45.149 -93.572 3 119 N 23 W Check this box if you are only requesting review under WCA. Check this box if this is a Minnesota Agricultural Wetland Bank proposal. WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 5 SECTIONS 1. REGULATORY REVIEW STATUS AND PROJECT HISTORY Identify and discuss the extent of review and comments received to date on this pending wetland mitigation project. Reference previous reviews and document how comments from local, state, and federal reviewers are addressed by this document. This document is a revision to the full application and addresses comments received from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) following the previous submittal. A summary of agency comments and responses are provided in Attachment A. The Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Wetland Bank project includes the following events: 2017, May 23 Draft Prospectus submittal 2017, May 26 USACE acknowledgment letter 2017, June 19 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) comments 2017, July 11 Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission (ECWMC) comments 2017, July 25 BWSR comments 2017, September 8 USACE comments 2018, January 5 Revised Draft Prospectus submittal 2018, January 26 EPA comments 2018, February 15 BWSR comments 2018, March 28 USACE comments 2019, September 3 Prospectus submittal 2019, October 17 BWSR comments 2019, November 7 BWSR engineering comments 2020, January 7 USACE comments 2. PROJECT SPONSOR - LANDOWNER 2.1 Project Sponsor, Ownership, and Long-Term Management Identify the project sponsor who will complete the project, the proposed land ownership, the credit owner(s), the long-term management strategy, and any agreements among these parties. Chris Rains is the liable sponsor completing the project and will be responsible for ensuring implementation of the management. The sponsor will own the resulting wetland credits. The sponsor is the title fee owner of the parcel containing the proposed wetland bank easement. Title work is presented in Attachment B. 2.2 Sponsor Qualifications Describe how you and/or your agent(s) are qualified to successfully complete the mitigation project proposed and include information describing relevant past activities or previous mitigation projects. WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 6 The sponsor is a realtor with extensive experience in land management and development in the northwest metro region. With this experience, the sponsor has established connections with contractors and is familiar with the processes necessary to carry out a project from a conceptual design to construction/implementation and has a long history of engineering, survey, and natural resource management including design, construction oversight, establishment, monitoring and adaptive management. 3. PROPOSED EASEMENT DESCRIPTION Discuss the proposed easement boundary in terms of its location (e.g. coincides with property line, follows road or ditch right-of-way boundary, etc.), access to the easement from a public road right-of-way, and reasons for including or excluding certain areas (e.g. excludes field road to allow access to adjacent property, etc.). The proposed easement boundary should be accurately shown and identified on all Prospectus figures and maps. The project is located at 20901 County Road 117, Corcoran, Minnesota (Figure 1). The proposed easement, shown in Figure 2, is a 47.3-acre area contained within Hennepin County parcel 053-0311923130002. The majority of the easement boundaries coincide with the parcel boundaries, however, portions in the northwest and southeast of the of the parcel would remain outside of the easement. The boundaries were defined to encompass existing wetlands that have historically been manipulated and that have potential for restoration, rehabilitation, or reestablishment. The easement would be accessible from County Road 117 right-of-way. 4. HISTORICAL CONDITIONS Provide an assessment of historical site conditions from pre-settlement to current condition. Utilize historical aerial photos, soil mapping, on-site investigations, and other available information to describe historical conditions on and near the site including historical wetland types and extent. Attach and reference supporting documents as necessary. The earliest known record of the easement area dates to 1856 when the original public land survey plat was developed (Figure 3). The plat map depicts a hand-drawn wetland area in the northern portion of the project parcel and a stream-like feature surrounded by wetland to the southeast of the parcel. Rush Creek, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) public water course M-062-004 (Figure 4), presently runs along the southern border of the parcel, but is not depicted in the 1856 plat map. According to the MnDNR Ecological Classification System, the Big Woods Subsection, which contains the easement area, consisted of oak woodland and maple-basswood forests prior to settlement. Most land in the region has since been converted for crop production and pasture and only 10 to 15 percent remains forested or wetland. Historic aerial images containing the parcel are presented in Attachment C. The earliest available aerial image was taken in 1937. By this time, the landscape had been transformed from pre-settlement conditions and the majority of the parcel cleared for agricultural production. The 1937 aerial image shows portions of the project parcel farmed. Some wetland areas where reestablishment is planned, however, do not yet appear cropped. Ditches that connect wetland areas within the parcel to Rush Creek can be observed in the 1937 aerial. Ditches are distinct in the 1947 and 1956 aerials. The ditch that runs along the western border appears to have been rerouted to the present location between 1947 and 1956. The 1956 aerial also shows signatures of possible drain tile in areas that appeared wet and uncropped in 1947. The 1967 aerial shows the parcel entirely cropped with exception of areas WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 7 immediately adjacent to Rush Creek. The signatures observable in historic aerial imagery suggest that wetlands on-site likely supported shallow marsh with fresh wet meadow fringe plant communities. The sponsor provided federal crop history records from 1996 to 2016. The records demonstrate that the parcel was split into northern and southern fields while some wetland areas in the central portion were left out of production. The northern field is approximately 17 acres and the southern field is approximately 40 acres. The fields have generally been under a corn and soybean rotation. The northern field, however, was planted with alfalfa in 1998, 2000, and 2001. An approximately 5-acre area between the fields (Wetland 1) has been left out of production throughout this time. Google Earth aerial photos are available from 1991 to 2018 and reveal a varying degree of farming success. Areas proposed for wetland reestablishment appear to support a crop in some years (such as 2008 and 2009) and are clearly unsuccessful at supporting a crop in other years (such as 2012 and 2013). In 2017, drain tile malfunctioned in the northern field. An aerial image taken that year (Attachment C) shows the resulting saturated conditions. The saturated conditions suggest that wetlands, shallow marsh fringed by fresh wet meadow, were present prior to drainage and would reestablish once drain tile is again disabled. The Hennepin County Soil Survey maps six soil units in the easement area: Klossner muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes (L13A); Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded (L22C2); Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes (L24A); Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes (L36A); Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (L37B); Nessel loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes (L44A); and Dundas-Cordova complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes (L45A). Figure 5 depicts the soil map units with their respective hydric ratings. Additional information on mapped soils is provided in Section 5.4. 5. EXISTING CONDITIONS Address all of the following subparts. Attach and reference supporting documents as necessary: 5.1 General Description Provide a description of existing features on and near your proposed mitigation-site including current land uses, landscape features, roads, structures, wells, utility lines, etc. Also discuss and identify the presence of known conservation easements, contracts, or public lands adjacent to your proposed mitigation area. The project parcel is designated as farmland by the Hennepin County Land Use Map (Figure 6). Surrounding parcels are also designated farmland, farm-homestead, or residential. Seven residences/homesteads border the subject parcel. One homestead and associated gravel driveway form the northeast boundary of the proposed easement. County Road 117 (109th Avenue North) forms the northern boundary of the proposed easement. An overhead electrical distribution line also runs along the northern boundary and parallel to the road. A patch of forested area is located along the west proposed easement boundary. There are no known conservation easements, contracts, or public lands adjacent to the proposed wetland bank easement area. The project parcel was previously being considered for development of a subdivision. Due to this consideration, drainage and utility easements were established with the city to protect aquatic resources throughout the parcel. The proposed wetland bank plan benefits aquatic resources and causes the drainage and utility easements to be essentially irrelevant. The sponsor and consultant team has kept the city informed on the proposed wetland bank WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 8 plan. The drainage and utility easements are expected to change with the implementation of the plan and are not expected to be an issue. 5.2 Vegetation Describe all existing plant communities on and adjacent to your mitigation-site. Include information on community composition, dominant species, and location and abundance of invasive or exotic species. The Minnesota Land Cover Classification Map (Figure 7) identifies agricultural land in the farmed fields, wetland with emergent vegetation in the southwestern corner and near the central portion of the parcel, and a sliver of forest along the western boundary. The majority of the proposed easement area has been intensively cultivated post-settlement under a corn- soybean rotation. The parcel has historically been split into two fields, north and south. The boundary of the north field corresponds with the parcel boundaries and the boundary of Wetland 1 to the southwest of the field. The south field has consisted of the upland island within Wetland 1 and its boundaries are restricted by the wooded area along the western parcel boundary, the wetland in the southwest corner of the parcel (Wetland 2), and wooded area along the southeastern parcel boundary. According to Farm Service Agency records, the north field has generally been approximately 14 acres of corn and soy row crop production and the south field has generally been approximately 25 acres of corn and soy row crop production within the easement boundary. Accordingly, roughly 8 acres (consisting of part of Wetland 1 and Wetland 2) of the proposed easement is generally not cropped. Although the northern field has been cropped, volunteer vegetation was observed in areas proposed for wetland rehabilitation and reestablishment. During a field visit in early 2020, volunteer species observed in the northern field included river bulrush, cattail, smartweed, and water plantain. An unfarmed wetland is located in the central portion of the parcel and extends off-site to the west. The vast majority of the wetland is dominated by river bulrush, however, a few patches of cattail were observed (particularly in the southern portion of the wetland). A fringe of reed canary grass was observed along the edges of the wetland along with vervain species. Red osier dogwood and sandbar willow shrubs were also observed near the edge of the wetland area and to the north of the upland island. A larger cattail colony was present in the off- site portion of the wetland to the west of the parcel. The forested area is located on the western edge of the southern field. The forested area is dominated by box elder trees. Some black cherry trees and a few buckthorn trees and shrubs were also observed. Most of the buckthorn shrubs occurred on the side slope of the prominent ditch that runs along the western boundary of the parcel. A wetland fringe north of Rush Creek enters the southern portion of the parcel and is dominated by reed canary grass. Common agricultural weeds including prostrate pigweed, dandelion, and common ragweed have been observed throughout the cropped fields. 5.3 Hydrology WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 9 Describe and show the location, flow direction, and condition of any drainage systems or hydrology alterations on your mitigation-site (e.g. ditches and tile, level grading, wetland fill, slope reshaping, etc.) and demonstrate that sufficient water supply is available to sustain the proposed wetland(s) in the short- and long-term. Also identify public drainage systems, drainage agreements, or other legal documents/agreements (e.g. rights to remove water, soil, minerals, or biomass and/or any flowage easements) that may affect the use or modification of drainage systems or site hydrology. If monitoring well data has been collected, include and summarize this information as well. The proposed wetland bank easement area is in the Rush Creek minor sub-watershed (20102) within the Elm 8). The wetlands on-site are depressional and primarily receive hydrological inputs from precipitation. However, groundwater discharge may also supply hydrologic inputs to these wetlands. Farming in the easement area has been enabled by a substantial amount of subsurface drain tile. The existing drainage features are presented in Figure 9. An existing drain tile transports water from a wetland north of the parcel, under County Road 117, and across the northern portion of the easement area. Two existing drain tiles within the northern field transport excess water west from existing Type 1 wetlands on-site (Wetlands 4, 5, and 6) toward the larger wetland in the center of the easement area (Wetland 1). An open ditch within Wetland 1 runs west into a private ditch along the western border of the parcel. The private ditch runs south from Wetland 1 along the parcel boundary for approximately 600 feet before turning west and ultimately running into Rush Creek. The lateral effect of the ditch is approximately 130 feet according to Van Schilfgaarde calculations (Attachment D). A network of drain tiles run generally southwest across the southern field draining Wetland 7. This drain tile runs off-site toward the ditch along the western boundary and also ultimately discharges into Rush Creek. 5.4 Soils Describe existing soil conditions on and adjacent to the site. Include soil maps that identify mapped soils, hydric versus non-hydric status, and results of any on-site soil investigations completed. Mapped soils in the easement area are presented in Figure 5. Existing soils within areas proposed for wetland credit actions are mapped Glencoe clay loam, Hamel, Klossner muck, and Lester loam soil series. The Glencoe Clay Loam series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils that formed in loamy sediments from till. These soils are in closed depressions on moraines. The series is classified hydric. The Hamel series consists of very deep, poorly drained and somewhat poorly drained soils that formed in slope colluvium and glacial till on moraines. These soils have moderately slow permeability and are classified predominantly hydric. The Klossner series consists of very deep, very poorly drained soils that formed in well decomposed organic material overlying loamy or silty lacustrine deposits, slope alluvium, or till. These soils are depressions on moraines, till plains, lake plains, flood plains, and seeps. The series is classified hydric. The Lester loam soil series consists of very deep, well drained soils that formed in calcareous, loamy till. These soils are convex slopes on moraines and till plains. The series is classified predominantly non-hydric. Areas proposed for upland credit actions consist of Dundas-Cordova complex, Nessel loam, and Angus loam. Dundas-Cordova complex forms in concave depressions on moraines. The series is somewhat poorly drained and WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 10 partially hydric. The Nessel loam series is very deep, moderately well drained soil that formed in calcareous loamy glacial till on glacial moraines. These soils have moderate permeability and are predominantly non-hydric. Angus loam consists of very deep, well drained soils formed in loamy calcareous till. These soils are on slightly convex slopes on backslopes, shoulders, and summits on ground moraines and till plains. The series is classified predominantly non-hydric. Investigation of soils on-site occurred with the wetland delineation in 2014 and 2015. Soil profiles observed on- site generally consisted of dark, clay loam, surface horizons underlain by depleted, clay loam, horizons with varying amounts of redox concentrations. Most soils that were determined hydric in the easement area met the thick dark surface (A12) indicator. Some profiles met the depleted below dark surface indicator (A11). Soils within Wetland 1 were unique among investigated profiles on-site, consisted of several horizons of organic material with varying redox concentrations, and met the histisol (A1) indicator. 5.5 Existing Wetlands Include a discussion of existing wetlands on the site including reference to, and approval status of, any wetland delineations or determinations conducted. If off-site hydrology review was used to estimate wetland boundaries include this information as well. Include and reference figures to supplement the narrative. A wetland investigation was completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company (KES). KES initially reviewed the site on November 14, 2014. The delineation was reviewed on-site on August 14, 2015 and a notice of decision approving the wetland boundaries and types was issued in September 2015. The field visits resulted in delineation of seven wetlands (Figure 10). The observations and classifications given to each wetland area at that time are described in the following paragraphs. Photographs of the wetland areas were taken in July 2017 and November 2018 and are presented in Attachment E. Wetland 1: Wetland 1 is an approximately 6.1-acre, Type 1, PEMAd, seasonally flooded basin that extends off-site to the west. The dominant vegetation in the wetland area includes reed canary grass and river bulrush. The underlying soils are mapped as the hydric soil map unit, Klossner muck, 0 to 1 percent slopes (L13A). The investigated soil profile met the histisol (A1) hydric soil indicator. The hydrology indicators observed include saturation (A3), dry-season water table (C2), geomorphic position (D2) and the FAC-neutral test (D5). The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by gentle slopes and the underlying soils are mapped as the hydric soil unit, Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes (L24A). The transition area was farmed and contained corn stubble at the time of sampling. Hydric soil and wetland hydrology indicators were not observed in the transition area. Wetland 2: Wetland 2 is an approximately 2.2-acre, Type 1, PEMA, seasonally flooded basin that fringes Rush Creek and extends off-site to the west and south. The dominant vegetation in the wetland area is reed canary grass and some cattail was observed along the banks of Rush Creek. The underlying soils are mapped as the hydric soil unit, Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes (L24A). The investigated soil profile met the thick dark surface (A12) WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 11 hydric soil indicator. The hydrology indicators observed include geomorphic position (D2) and the FAC-neutral test (D5). The wetland-upland transition areas are formed by gentle slopes and underlain by the partially hydric soil map unit, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes (L36A). The transition area had been farmed and lacked vegetation at the time of sampling. Hydric soil and wetland hydrology indicators were absent from the transition area. Wetland 3: The parcel has been split since the time of the wetland delineation. The part of the parcel that contained Wetland 3 is no longer part of the project parcel. Wetland 4: Wetland 4 is an approximately 0.1-acre, Type 1, PEMAf, farmed seasonally flooded basin located entirely on-site and within the northern field. The wetland had been farmed, however, slender cinquefoil (Potentilla gracilis) was a dominant volunteer species. The underlying soil are mapped as the predominately nonhydric soil map unit, Lester loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes, moderately eroded (L22C2). The investigated soil profile met the thick dark surface (A12) hydric soil indicator. The wetland hydrology indicator, geomorphic position (D2), was observed and saturation was observed at a depth of 24 inches. The adjacent upland consisted of corn stubble from the growing season. The delineated boundary was determined through a Farm Service Agency (FSA) aerial photograph analysis. The median wetland signature area was used to represent the total wetland area based upon U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) guidelines. Wetland Wetland 5: Wetland 5 is an approximately 0.1-acre, Type 1, PEMAf, farmed seasonally flooded basin located entirely on-site and within the northern field. The wetland had been farmed and was largely unvegetated at the time of sampling. However, the area was sparsely covered by cattail. The underlying soils are mapped as the partially hydric soil map unit, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes (L36A). The investigated soil profile met the thick dark surface (A12) hydric soil indicator. The hydrology indicators observed include geomorphic position (D2) and the FAC-neutral test (D5). Saturation was also observed at a depth of 20 inches. The delineated boundary was determined through analysis of FSA aerial photographs. The median wetland signature area was used to represent the total wetland area based upon USACE guidelines. Wetland 6: Wetland 6 is an approximately 0.1-acre, Type 1, PEMAf, farmed seasonally flooded basin located entirely on-site and within the northern field. The area had been cropped and no living vegetation was present at the time of sampling. The underlying soils are mapped as the as the partially hydric soil map unit, overwash-Hamel complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes (L36A). The investigated soil profile met the thick dark surface (A12) hydric soil indicator. The wetland hydrology indicator, geomorphic position (D2), was observed. The delineated boundary was determined through analysis of FSA aerial photographs. The median wetland signature area was used to represent the total wetland area based upon USACE guidelines. Wetland 7: WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 12 Wetland 7 is an approximately 0.3-acre, Type 1, PEMAf, farmed seasonally flooded basin located entirely on-site and within the southern field. The area had been cropped, however, dominant volunteer vegetation observed at the time of sampling included blunt spikerush (Eleocharis obtusa), cattail, and soft rush (Juncus effuses). The underlying soils are mapped as the predominately hydric soil map unit, Glencoe clay loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes (L24A). The investigated soil profile met the thick dark surface (A12) hydric soil indicator. Wetland hydrology indicators observed include geomorphic position (D2) and the FAC-neutral test (D5). The boundary was determined based on review of aerial photography and regulator input. 6. OBJECTIVES, NEED, AND FEASIBILITY 6.1 Objectives Describe your project objective(s) and how they will be achieved. Discuss these objectives in terms of plant communities, wetland types, hydrology, and wetland functions. The project goals are to restore self-sustaining and high-functioning fresh wet meadow and shallow marsh wetlands with mesic prairie upland buffers, to preserve existing forest, and to generate certified U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act wetland banking credits. Objectives to meet this goal include discontinuing agricultural use; breaking and blocking existing drain tile; planting native, noninvasive vegetation; and controlling nonnative, invasive species. Wetland hydrology has historically been removed from the site for crop production. Breaking and blocking drain tile would eliminate its impact and restore hydrology that would be similar to pre-settlement conditions. The easement area would be seeded with diverse seed mixes of native vegetation designed for the expected plant community types (shallow marsh, fresh wet meadow, and mesic prairie upland). The return of wetland hydrology would also encourage the growth of hydrophytic vegetation seeds lying dormant on-site. It is expected that the fresh wet meadow plant community type would develop in areas of saturated soils that are not inundated throughout most of the growing season and that support a fresh wet meadow community of native grasses, rushes, sedges, and forbs. A shallow marsh community type would develop in areas with saturated soils that are inundated with up to 6 to 12 inches of water during the growing season. This vegetation community would be dominated by emergent herbaceous species such as bulrushes, arrowhead, and sedges. Nonnative and invasive species would be monitored and managed in both wetland and upland buffer areas. Following the vegetation and monitoring plans in the early stages of redevelopment would ensure establishment of a diverse plant community that would become self-sustaining. Meeting the project objectives would increase the quality and quantity of several wetland functions: wildlife (including amphibian and insect pollinator) habitat, landscape aesthetic, flood/stormwater attenuation, water quality protection (on-site and downstream), vegetation diversity, and groundwater recharge. The improvement of these wetland functions would be beneficial to the site and the greater subwatershed, which has been significantly altered post-settlement and is lacking in beneficial wetland functions. 6.2 Need WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 13 Describe the need for your project relative to regulatory programs, expected wetland impacts, other mitigation options, and overall watershed conditions. The Minnesota Wetland Inventory: User Guide and Summary Statistics Cities Watershed contains a total of 136,573 acres of wetlands, 37 percent of which consists of shallow marsh and seasonally flooded/saturated emergent wetland types. Restoration and reestablishment of the functions of these wetland types would not only be beneficial to the local area, but also to the greater watershed where wetland functions have historically been degraded by years of agricultural production. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency lists the segment of Rush Creek immediately adjacent to the bank site as impaired by E. coli and low dissolved oxygen. These types of impairments are caused by a multitude of issues related to large-scale agricultural production in the region. Livestock and the spread of their manure on fields as fertilizer contribute to the presence of E. coli. Runoff from manure, other fertilizers, and sediment contribute to the low rate of dissolved oxygen and stresses on aquatic life. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission identified in their 3rd Generation Watershed Management Plan (2015) a broad goal of reducing peak flow rates to Rush Creek. Taking the easement area out of agricultural production would eliminate future nutrient inputs on- site. Reestablishing vegetation across the site would stabilize soils and reduce nutrient and sediment run-off. Restoring and reestablishing wetlands would provide functions, such as flood/stormwater attenuation and increased infiltration, that would ultimately increase the quality of water leaving the site. These actions and resulting functions would be beneficial to water quality in Rush Creek and be in line with the Elm Creek Watershed Management plan. The Corcoran 2040 Comprehensive Plan lists guiding principles for achieving the 2040 Corcoran vision. The first maintaining and improving water quality in wetlands and streams and suggests policy to support the development and implementation of water quality improvement projects. The establishment of an over 40-acre wetland bank would restore and reestablish wetlands, positively impact streams, and create and preserve open natural space, 7. According to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources application for searching available wetland bank credits, there are only about 19 USACE certified wetland credits within the same county, major watershed, and and Hennepin County have approximately 83, 25, and 13 credits respectively. The project is needed to provide certified USACE and Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act wetland bank credits for the BSA 7 and Hennepin County, which includes a significant portion of the Twin Cities metro area. As development continues, locations for potential bank sites diminish and demand for certified wetland bank credits increases. According to the USACE and BWSR (Fall 2019), approximately 80 wetland credits were withdrawn from banks in BSA 7 in 2018 alone. 6.3 Technical Feasibility WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 14 Describe why your project is technically feasible and capable of providing the desired mitigation. Include a description of the expertise and experience possessed by you or your contractors in completing similar projects and a description of proven construction and restoration methods used in comparable landscape positions. Describe any constraints that may prevent full restoration of historical conditions (e.g. access to other lands, encroachment on other lands, drainage maintenance from other properties, etc.). If the project is a wetland creation, discuss historical watershed conditions, current hydrology sources, and how the project will replace or enhance important wetland functions. The project is technically feasible due to the relative simplicity of the design. The project has been designed by professional engineers and wetland specialists with experience planning placement and disablement of subsurface drainage tile systems. To restore hydrology to tile-drained wetlands, the subsurface tile drainage system will need to be disabled. Strategically identified portions of the tile drainage system will be excavated, restoration is often considered the easiest or simplest type of wetland restoration to perform. Minor grading is also proposed to prevent adverse drainage impacts to adjoining property and to enable surface hydrology connection among wetlands. Evidence of historic wetland conditions: mapped aquatic features in the 1856 plat; mapped and sampled hydric soils; volunteer hydrophytic vegetation; saturation visible in historic aerial imagery; and the presence of existing wetlands on-site that have persisted despite drainage, indicate that much of the easement area was wetland prior to settlement and artificial drainage. The straight-forward breaking and blocking of drain tile will replenish wetland hydrology to identified portions of the easement area. Hydrophytic vegetation will be able to reestablish upon the return of wetland hydrology, thereby meeting wetland criteria and providing the desired mitigation. Potential Constraints: Drain tile that originates from the property to the north crosses the easement area and wetland reestablishment areas on its way to a ditch along the western border of the site (as discussed in Section 5.3). To maintain the around wetland reestablishment areas in the northern field. The replaced tile would outlet into Wetland 1 and the water transported would eventually make its way into the ditch along the western border and, ultimately, Rush Creek to the south. Another project constraint involves the restoration of wetland areas that occur along the border of the easement area. Since the project sponsor does not have control land adjacent to the parcel, therefore restoration areas along the easement border cannot be provided with the ideal area of buffer and may receive negative impacts from off-site land use. Due to potential for negative impact, a 50-foot setback of reduced credit will be allocated to wetlands along the easement boundaries. A portion of the County Road 117 right-of-way may be impacted by the restoration of Wetland 6. The sponsor and project engineer have been working with the county highway department to determine what, if any, protections may be needed within the road right-of-way as a result of restoring Wetland 6. To date, no special protection activities have been identified. 6.4 Credit Eligibility and Allocation WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 15 For each map ID on the Credit Area Map, identify state and federal credit actions used and describe why your project is eligible for each credit action identified. Wetland credits are generally allocated based on a nditions. Off-site hydrology/wetland determinations, approved wetland delineations, drainage setback tables, and pre-project hydrology monitoring may be required to demonstrate the extent of functional lift. If credit eligibility or allocation is dependent on cropping or cultivation frequency, include detailed assessment results supporting your request. Identify credit areas on a Credit Allocation Map and attach a Wetland Credit Allocation Table. Figure 11 depicts the easement area separated into credit action areas. Credit action areas were determined based on a combination of existing conditions, proposed actions, and expected resulting conditions. The Alternative Method for Determining Wetland Mitigation Credit Potential for Hydrologic Restorations on Cultivated Fields in Minnesota was used to determine the cultivated field credit (CFC) potential for areas with hydrologic restoration planned. Attachment F illustrates the process of determining credit potential using the CFC method. For areas that hydrologic restoration is not planned and the CFC method is not appropriate, the MN Rule 8420.0526 was consulted to determine credit potential. The proposed credit amounts for each map ID area are summarized in Attachment G, Table 1. A summary of credit action and justification of corresponding credit potential are provided for each category of credit area in the following paragraphs. Credit Area A These credit areas cover wetlands that have been effectively drained and cropped and where hydrologic restoration is proposed. These wetland areas were all classified as Type 1 seasonally flooded basins in the 2015 wetland delineation. Disabling drainage on-site is expected to restore hydrology to these credit areas that supports fresh we meadow and shallow marsh plant communities. A review of aerial imagery demonstrates that each of these credit areas have been cropped for at least 8 of the past 10 years. Due to these factors and according to the CFC method, these areas have 100 percent credit potential. Rehabilitating wetlands in these A areas, which have been intensively cultivated, has clear potential for significant functional lift. Simply ceasing agricultural production and establishing vegetation will stabilize soils and increase water infiltration. Disabling drain tile and allowing the hydrology associated with shallow marshes to return will provide breeding ground for amphibians. The mix of open water and established native, noninvasive vegetation will provide food and resting areas for migratory birds and other wildlife. Credit Area B This credit area covers an existing wetland that has significant hydrologic and vegetation impairments and where rehabilitation is proposed. The area has not been consistently farmed post-settlement. A review of aerial imagery demonstrates that most of the area has not been cropped in the past ten years. The area has full coverage of hydrophytic vegetation, including river bulrush and cattail and contains functioning ditches that have resulted in moderate changes to hydrology. Restoration of hydrology (to the extent practicable) and native, noninvasive vegetation to support a shallow marsh plant community is planned. Since the entire wetland area has not been equally degraded by drainage or cultivation, standard credit actions were applied. The area fits under MN Rule 8420.0526 Subp. 4B and has 50 percent credit potential. The rehabilitation this area will decrease the abundance of invasive vegetation and its potential to spread to vulnerable areas. Rehabilitation will also increase the diversity and cover of native, noninvasive vegetation, which WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 16 will provide higher quality wetland functions such as habitat and a food source for insect pollinators, migratory birds, and other wildlife. Credit Area C This credit area covers historic wetlands that have been drained and cropped and where re-establishment is proposed. These credit areas are presumed to have been wetland prior to settlement and artificial drainage. A review of aerial imagery demonstrates that these areas have been cropped for 9 of the past 10 years. They are expected to meet wetland criteria once drainage features are disabled and native, noninvasive vegetation is reintroduced. Fresh wet meadow plant communities are expected to be supported by restored hydrology in these areas. These credit areas border credit area B, which has not been equally degraded by drainage or cultivation. Due to this association, the CFC method was deemed inappropriate and standard credit actions were applied. According to MN Rule 8420.0526 Subp. 3, these areas are eligible for 100 percent credit potential. Reestablishing wetlands in these areas, which have been drained and intensively cultivated will provide functional lift similar to that described for credit area A. The fresh wet meadow areas will collect excess runoff during periods of high rainfall, reduce flooding, filter excess nutrients, and act as habitat and food supply for insect pollinators and other wildlife. Credit Area D The project sponsor does not have control of adjacent properties and, therefore, cannot feasibly provide a buffer for portions of wetland that abut the easement boundary. For that reason, an area of reduced credit is proposed within 50 feet of the easement boundary. These areas would have 25 to 50 percent credit potential depending on credit actions in adjacent areas. Credit Area E These areas cover historic upland where wetland conditions will be created. These areas of wetland creation would result from the site design to allow surface water connection between wetlands. The connections would be excavated to a depth that would support fresh wet meadow plant communities. These areas fall under MN Rule 8420.0526 Subp. 7 and are proposed to receive 50 percent credit potential. Wetland creation in E areas occupy a miniscule portion of the parcel. Their function, however, is crucial in reestablishing a hydrologic connection between wetland areas. The connections will reflect a natural system likely similar to that which was present pre-settlement. Credit Area F F credit areas consist of cropped upland areas that do not have hydrologic restoration potential. Restoration of native, noninvasive vegetation is proposed. According to MN Rule 8420.0526 Subp. 2, these areas have 25 percent credit potential. However, the rule also limits the area for which replacement credit is granted for upland buffers to not exceed the area of replacement credit granted for wetlands. Therefore, a portion of upland buffer is not proposed to receive credit. Restoring F areas, which have been intensively cropped post-settlement, has significant potential for functional lift. Establishing native, noninvasive vegetation in these areas will increase soil stabilization, plant diversity, wildlife habitat and protect the integrity of restored and rehabilitated wetlands. The buffer area will also improve water quality and minimize influence of invasive species. WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 17 Area G No action is proposed in Area G. 6.5 Credit Release Schedule and Performance Standards The proposed schedule for the percentage of credit releases is shown in Attachment G, Table 2. The basis for credit release will be tied to specific interim performance standards developed for hydrology and vegetation, which are presented in Attachment G, Table 3. 7. ECOLOGICAL SUITABILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY 7.1 Ecological Suitability Describe suitability of the site to achieve the objectives of the proposed mitigation bank, including physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the bank site and how that site will support the planned types of aquatic resources and functions. Proposals involving preservation of aquatic resources must also include the information required under 33 CFR 332.3(h). The soils, vegetation, topography, and hydrology of the site enable it to be ecologically suitable to achieve the objectives of the proposed mitigation bank. Disabling the drain tile will restore hydrology, which will restore conditions that support hydrophytic vegetation. The soil survey maps partially hydric, predominately hydric, and hydric soils throughout the easement area, suggesting that significant portions of the site were historically wetland and the soils are capable of supporting wetland conditions. Hydrophytic volunteer species identified in across the easement area suggest hydrophytic vegetation is already has been supported in the past and can be supported upon return of hydrology. Depressions in the easement area currently contain delineated wetlands and the topography of the site suggest that water will be retained on-site, markedly expanding existing wetland areas, before excess leaves the site. The existing wetlands across the site were classified as seasonally flooded basins. Disabling drain tile and ditches is expected to return enough hydrology to the area to expand wetland areas and shift plant communities (varying by locations) to fresh wet meadow and shallow marsh plant communities. The expected hydrologic shift is supported by the degree of saturation visible across the easement area in aerial imagery in wet years (despite presence of drain tile). These wetter communities, buffered by the reestablished upland prairie, will provide and support the increased quality and quantity of wetland functions presented in Section 6.1: wildlife habitat, landscape aesthetic, flood/stormwater attenuation, water quality protection, vegetation diversity, and groundwater recharge. 7.2 Sustainability Discuss the relative permanence of your mitigation actions in the context of reasonably foreseeable land wetland functions into the future. The technologically simple design of breaking and blocking drain tile and disabling ditches greatly reduces the possibility of the project physically failing or malfunctioning. The persistence of presently existing wetlands despite the functioning drain tile, indicates that hydrologic conditions are and will be sustainable into the future. WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 18 Following the vegetation and monitoring plan will ensure that wetland and upland buffer vegetation is well- established and becomes self-sustaining. Vegetation establishment will, in turn, stabilize soils and reduce erosion on-site. The resulting conditions will reflect a natural system that is self-sustainable, similar to that which is assumed to have been present pre-settlement. The surrounding landscape is currently intensively drained and cropped, which leaves little room for surrounding land use to increase negative impacts on conditions within the easement area. 8. VEGETATION PLAN Identify and discuss planned actions to restore vegetation including (but not limited to) seeding, planting, invasive species control, and anticipated maintenance/management activities. Include a seeding/planting zone map (a required figure) and correspondingly identify seed mixes, planting materials, planting rates, and installation methods (hand planted, native seed drill, etc.). Include a schedule of anticipated maintenance and aftercare activities for the initial 5 years of the project and beyond as applicable. Identify and discuss any potential issues (invasive species, sedimentation, drown-out, etc.) and potential corrective actions. Attach and reference supporting documents as necessary. A complete vegetation and monitoring plan is presented in Attachment H. The vegetation plan includes information on the proposed plans for site preparation, invasive species control, seeding, and maintenance. The sponsor plans to conduct the vegetation reestablishment and ongoing vegetation maintenance. 9. CONSTRUCTION PLAN Address the following subparts and attach and reference supporting documents as necessary: Construction documents have been included in Attachment I for reference as part of this section. 9.1 Design Approach Discuss the general design approach proposed to achieve the planned restoration goals for hydrology such as disable drainage system, divert water, impound water, etc. Provide a detailed description of the proposed construction work to be performed for each wetland area to be restored or created. North Area (Attachment I, Sheet 1/4): Restoration within the northern field will be achieved by disabling drain tile at strategically selected locations. The proposed construction activity would consist of excavation to the existing the break. Four break locations have been identified along existing drain tile line to achieve the disconnect. Impoundment of storm water will occur in multiple basins as a result of disabling existing drain tile and placement of control elevation culverts at select locations. The two existing northeast wetland basins will be combined into one basin by minor grading of a berm between the existing basins. Control elevation culverts are proposed at locations that work with existing topography to minimize excavation work. Culvert crossing will also function as maintenance access to various restoration areas on the property. Adjacent property to the east will be protected by placement of embankment on the adjacent property in a select area to raise grade above restored wetland elevations. The elevated grade on the adjacent property will not WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 19 negatively affect the restored wetland. A temporary construction easement has been secured with the adjacent property owner. Existing drain tile that serves upstream off-site properties north of County Road 117 will be re-routed with new non-perforated HDPE pipe. The existing drain tile currently discharges to the existing drainage ditch along the west property boundary. The re-routed drain tile will discharge to the northeast corner of the middle area wetland restoration basin. Middle Area (Attachment I, Sheet 2/4): Restoration within the middle area will be achieved by disabling drain tile (as described for the north area) at strategically selected locations. One break location has been identified along existing drain tile line to achieve the disconnect. Within the existing wetland basin adjacent to the west boundary, existing west flowing agriculture ditches will have a ditch plug earthen embankments constructed to impound additional storm water within the basin. Ditch plug installation will include segments of ditch filling to more effectively prevent seepage through the ditch plug. Re-routing the drain tile discharge will be beneficial in that discharge will provide additional source water for the restoration area, and discharge will filter through the restoration area before ultimately routing to the existing drainage ditch along the west property boundary. Adjacent property to the east will be protected by placement of embankment on the adjacent property in a select area to raise grade above restored wetland elevations. A temporary construction easement has been secured with the adjacent property owner. The placement of embankment will also extend onto the restoration property and function as a maintenance access route from the restoration north area to the restoration south area. Excavation of a swale is proposed on the adjacent east property south boundary that abuts this property. The proposed swale will provide positive drainage discharge of an existing depression that is currently drained by drain tile riser and drain tile pipe that extends south into the proposed restoration south area. The existing drain tile is to be disabled in the restoration south area to allow for storm water impoundment. South Area (Attachment I, Sheet 3/4): Restoration within the south area will be achieved by disabling drain tile (as described for the north area) at strategically selected locations. Five break locations have been identified along existing drain tile line to achieve the disconnect . Impoundment of storm water will occur in multiple basins as a result of disabling existing drain tile and placement of control elevation culverts at select locations. Control elevation culverts are proposed at locations that work with existing topography to minimize excavation work. Culvert crossing will also function as maintenance access to various restoration areas on the property. 9.2 Site Capability Discuss the capability of the site to produce and maintain wetland characteristics related to drainage area, wetland area, soils, and topography. Areas within the parcel where most reestablishment and rehabilitation is proposed are underlain by mapped soil units with 33 percent or greater hydric components (Figure 5). Soil profiles investigated at the time of delineation corroborated the presence of hydric soils. During the delineation, hydric soil indicators were also observed within WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 20 areas mapped as predominately nonhydric (specifically in credit area A3). The presence of mapped and investigated soil profiles that exhibit hydric characteristics suggest that soils have supported wetland conditions in the past and are capable of supporting wetland conditions upon reestablishment, restoration, and creation. Wetland credit actions are proposed in areas of the parcel that are situated in depressions in the landscape. The site topography is illustrated in construction plan sheets provided in Attachment I. Most credit action areas are proposed around wetlands that were present and delineated during the 2015 delineation despite the existing drainage features. Upon disabling drainage features, it is expected that wetland conditions will reestablish upgradient of the existing wetland boundaries and across the parcel in topographically similar landscape positions. Additionally, wetland creation is expected to result from minor grading intended to guide excess water between reestablishment areas. 9.3 Site Investigations Discuss and provide information about the locations, methods, and results of any subsurface investigations and analysis performed for the project site. Subsurface investigations on-site include soil investigations associated with the wetland delineation and drain tile exploration. The soil profile investigations during the 2015 delineation were performed using standards outlined in the 1987 United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1; January 1987) and all supplemental guidance documents. In December 2019, an exploratory dig was conducted to determine the presence or absence of drain tile near the northeast corner of the parcel. A 7 to 10-foot trench was dug parallel to County Road 117 and no drain tile was found. Locations of drain tile intakes in credit area A1 were confirmed (Attachment I). 9.4 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis Discuss the hydrologic and hydraulic analyses conducted to define existing site conditions and to design the proposed wetland bank project. Report the following related to hydrology/hydraulics report: Method of analysis, values used for pertinent variable and computed peak flows and water surface elevations for the 2-year, 10-year, 25-year, and 100-year, 24-hour events and associated wetland storage volumes. Hydraulic design of existing and proposed water control structures. Discussion of both upstream and downstream impacts. Calculations have been generated using HydroCAD 10.00 for runoff rate analysis based on Atlas 14 rainfall data. Attachment J, Appendix A and Appendix B provide drainage area plans and hydrographs for the 24 hour 2-year Individual subcatchment areas have been identified and runoff rates and basin data have been calculated in the HydroCAD model. The Wetland Bank Project Drainage analysis in Attachment J provides the comparisons for the existing and proposed drainage condition. Maintenance access has been provided between the wetland basins. Culverts have been incorporated into the proposed embankments needed for that access. WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 21 No impacts to downstream properties are anticipated. Existing natural drainage ways and wetland areas will be expanded and enhanced with additional impoundment of stormwater on the restoration property. The existing drainage ditch along the west property boundary will not be altered. The proposed routing of stormwater discharge to the middle wetland restoration area will result in reducing peak flows to the existing ditch. No impacts to upstream properties are anticipated. Drainage function of existing drain tile that serves the upstream area north of County Road 117 will be maintained with installation of new non-perforated drain tile. The existing drain tile currently outlets at the existing drainage ditch along the west property boundary. The new drain tile will be re-routed to the northeast corner of the middle area wetland. 10. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION If your project involves protection of wetlands previously restored via conservation programs/easements, restoration and protection of exceptional natural resource value, or preservation credit actions (WCA rule subparts 6, 8, and 9 respectively), provide a narrative discussion of how the project meets the requirements of the proposed actions. Discuss and reference applicable guidance documents and support materials. If necessary, include any other information relevant to the Mitigation Plan that is not discussed in the other sections of this document. This wetland bank site is not associated with protection of wetlands previously restored via conservation easements; restoration and protection of exceptional natural resource value; or preservation of wetlands owned by the state or local unit of government. 11. MONITORING PLAN Describe a plan to annually monitor vegetation and hydrology as it relates to the identified credit release criteria. The monitoring plan should include anticipated transects and sampling point numbers and locations, and a description of the methodology to estimate important measures such as vegetation areal coverage, species diversity, and water table elevations. Plans should identify the proposed frequency and timing of annual monitoring efforts. A complete vegetation and monitoring plan is presented in Attachment H. 12. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS WCA rules (8420.0515) identify factors that must be considered when submitting a wetland replacement/ banking plan. Identify and discuss any of these factors that are potentially applicable to the site. MN Rule 8420.0515 Subp. 2. Endangered and threatened species. the possibility of supporting threatened and endangered species or their habitat. Reestablishment of wetland and upland prairie may create potential habitat and preservation of the forested area may preserve potential habitat for these and other native species. Subp. 3. Rare natural communities. The presence of natural communities has been impeded in the majority of the easement area by intensive cultivation post-settlement WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 22 Subp. 4. Special fish and wildlife resources. agriculture and the lack of open water has diminished the possibility of such resources to exist in the easement area. Reestablishment of wetland and upland prairie may allow special resources such as deer wintering areas and wildlife travel corridors to become established once the project is complete. Subp. 5. Archaeological, historical, or cultural resource sites. The area has been intensively cropped post-settlement and there are no known archaeological, historic, or cultural resource sites present on the property. Subp. 6. Groundwater sensitivity. The project would not have an adverse impact on groundwater quality. Instead, it is expected that the reestablished wetland and upland buffer areas will increase groundwater quality by acting as a natural filter, slowing runoff, and increasing infiltration. Subp. 7. Sensitive surface waters. There are no sensitive surface waters near the property, therefore the project does not have the potential to negatively impact the water quality of such. In the long-term, reestablishment of wetland and upland buffer areas is expected to positively impact water quality in the surrounding watershed. Subp. 8. Education or research use. No wetlands on-site are used for educational or research purposes. Subp. 9. Waste disposal sites . There are no known hazardous waste materials or contaminants on the site. Subp. 10. Consistency with other plans. The proposed restoration plan is consistent with the goals of the City and Watershed District (see Section 6.2). WETLAND BANK APPLICATION Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Hennepin County, MN April 29, 2020 P a g e 23 SIGNATURE By signing this form, I acknowledge that: A. I am authorizing the review of my Mitigation Plan by the appropriate regulatory authorities as part of establishing a compensatory wetland mitigation project. B. I am familiar with the information contained in this submittal and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all information is true, complete, and accurate. C. No areas proposed to receive wetland bank credit were previously restored or created under a prior approved WCA wetland replacement or banking plan. D. No areas proposed to receive wetland bank credit were impacted under a WCA exemption during the previous 10 years. E. No areas proposed to receive wetland bank credit will be restored, created, or preserved with financial assistance from public conservation programs or for other unrelated regulatory purposes. F. All individuals and entities providing funding for this project are aware that this project will provide credits to offset regulatory wetland impacts. G. The project will be monitored in accordance with the approved monitoring plan. H. I understand that Mitigation Plan review may require regulatory agency staff to inspect my project site, that agency staff will contact me in advance to schedule a site visit, and I agree (or am authorized) to allow agency staff reasonable access to the property when prior notification is given. If I am not the fee title owner of property, I have obtained permission from the fee title owner to allow agency staff reasonable access to the property when prior notification is given. Signature: Date: Chris Rains Figures Project Location Legend Project Location SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure 1 Project Location Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 1 inch = 1 miles 0 1 20.5 Miles 47.3 Acres Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure 2 Easement Boundary 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery 1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels Hennepin Co. Land Use Commercial Farm Farm-Hmstd (House & 1 Acre) Residential Seasonal Residential Rec. Utility Vacant Land - Residential SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure LandUse Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery 1 inch = 1,000 feet 0 1,000 2,000500 Feet Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure Minnesota Land Cover Classification (MLCCS) Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery Land Cover - MLCCS 5-10% Impervious 11-25% Impervious 26-50% Impervious 51-75% Impervious 76-100% Impervious Short Grasses Agricultural Land Tree Plantation Forest Wetland Forest Wetland Shrubs Tall Grasses Wetland Emergent Veg. Dry Tall Grasses Wetland Open Water 1 inch = 2,000 feet 0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet Wright County Anoka County Hennepin County Ramsey County Carver County Dakota County Rush Creek BSA 7 BSA 9 Mississippi River - St. Cloud North Fork Crow River South Fork Crow River Mississippi River - Twin Cities Rum River Lower Minnesota River Legend Project Location Wetland Bank Service Area Major Watershed Minor Watershed County Boundary SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure Watersheds Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 1 inch = 5 miles 0 5 102.5 Miles Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels Existing Drain Tile Existing Ditch Existing Wetland SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure Existing Drainage Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery 1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet L22C2 L24A L22D2 L37B L22D2L22C2L44AL22C2 L22D2 L22D2 L23A L44A L36A Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hydric Rating by Map Unit 0% Hydric Components 1-32% Hydric Components 33-65% Hydric Components 66-99% Hydric Components 100% Hydric Components SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure Hennepin Co. Soil Survey Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery 1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet Revised Delineation Map (2013 FSA Photograph) 109th Ave N (KES 2014-237) Corcoran, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. 0 350 Feet Ditch Final Wetland Boundary Wetland 1 Wetland 2 Wetland 5 Wetland 4 Wetland 7 Wetland 3 Wetland 6 Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure 1856 Plat Map Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery 1 inch = 1,000 feet 0 1,000 2,000500 Feet 2701630027033500 Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels MN DNR Inventoried Public Watercourse MN DNR Inventoried Public Waterbasin SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure MnDNR Public Water Inventory Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 1.8.2020 2018 Henn. Co. Imagery 1 inch = 1,000 feet 0 1,000 2,000500 Feet A2 A1 A3 F3 A4 A5 C2 F2 B1 C3 F1 A6 F4 E1 E2 E3 E4 C1 G1 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Legend Wetland Bank Easement Project Parcel Hennepin Co. Parcels Vegetative Buffer Reestablishment Culitvated Field Credit Rehabilitation - No Crop History Creation Reduced Credit Area No Action/Credit SOURCE: MN DNR, USDA, ESRI, TIGER, Bing, Hennepin Co., Anderson Engineering Project Location City of Corcoran Hennepin County, MN13605 1st Ave N #100, Plymouth, MN 55441 P 763.412.4000 F 763.412.4090 ae-mn.com Refuge at Rush Creek, LLC Corcoran, MN Figure 11 Credit Actions Project Address: 20901 County Road 117 Corcoran, Hennepin County, MN PID: 053-0311923130002 Project No: 14606 Date: 3.24.2020 1 inch = 500 feet 0 500 1,000250 Feet Memo To: Kevin Mattson, PE, PW Director From: Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Nick Wyers, PE File: 227701079 Date: April 15, 2021 Subject: Bid Results -- 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements Council Action Requested Staff is recommending Council authorize a contingent Notice of Award for the construction of the 66 th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements. The contingency award is necessary to secure the escrow from the developer, finalize easement acquisition and other associated permit requirements. The 66th Avenue/ Gleason Parkway improvements will provide a valuable connection from the Ravinia development to County Road 116. The turn lanes associated to the street construction will provide a safer intersection for the residents and commuters on County Road 116. The sanitary sewer will provide the necessary sewer connection to the Tavera development to the west of County Road 116. Bid Results Four bids were received on Tuesday, April 13th for the 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements. Bid results are summarized below and details are in the attached table. Contractor Bid Amount •New Look Contracting, Inc.$ 1,908.607.40 •Minger Construction Companies, Inc.$ 2,109,753.95 •Meyer Contracting, Inc.$ 2,305,779.70 •Geislinger and Sons, Inc.$ 2,545,449.50 The low bidder was New Look Contracting, Inc. with a bid of $1,908,607.40. The Engineer’s estimate was $2,841,076.25. The authorization of work includes construction, field compliance testing, and engineering management costs estimated at an additional $150,000. The design, permitting, surveying costs to date for the three design components (road, turn lanes and sewer) are approximately $215,000) Prior to the April 22nd Council meeting, Stantec Consulting Services has reached out to New Look Contracting and confirmed their commitment to the bid. Funding Funding is through developer funds. Engineer’s Recommendation The bids were competitive, therefore, Stantec recommends that the project be awarded to New Look Contracting, Inc. for $1,908,607.40 contingent upon the City securing funds, easements, and associated permit requirements. Agenda Item 9a. BID TABULATION CITY OF CORCORAN 66TH AVENUE/GLEASON PARKWAY CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 2294-17-031 4/14/2021 Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price BASE BID: 1 MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 150,000.00$ 150,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 67,000.00$ 67,000.00$ 115,000.00$ 115,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 135,000.00$ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 6,300.00$ 6,300.00$ 5,250.00$ 5,250.00$ 4,700.00$ 4,700.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 PROVIDE ACCESS & MAINTENANCE LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 4,900.00$ 4,900.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 4 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 2711 3.50$ 9,488.50$ 1.50$ 4,066.50$ 2.00$ 5,422.00$ 1.98$ 5,367.78$ 5.00$ 13,555.00$ 5 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 1875 4.50$ 8,437.50$ 6.75$ 12,656.25$ 9.10$ 17,062.50$ 4.24$ 7,950.00$ 3.50$ 6,562.50$ 6 CLEARING AND GRUBBING ACRE 1 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 7,600.00$ 7,600.00$ 7,650.00$ 7,650.00$ 6,880.00$ 6,880.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 7 CLEAR AND GRUB TREE TREE 17 500.00$ 8,500.00$ 200.00$ 3,400.00$ 209.00$ 3,553.00$ 188.00$ 3,196.00$ 200.00$ 3,400.00$ 8 REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE LF 193 25.00$ 4,825.00$ 13.00$ 2,509.00$ 17.00$ 3,281.00$ 34.68$ 6,693.24$ 25.00$ 4,825.00$ 9 REMOVE CMP FLARED-END SECTION EACH 3 100.00$ 300.00$ 150.00$ 450.00$ 140.00$ 420.00$ 257.12$ 771.36$ 75.00$ 225.00$ 10 SALVAGE & REINSTALL SIGN EACH 1 50.00$ 50.00$ 333.00$ 333.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 300.00$ 300.00$ 185.00$ 185.00$ 11 REMOVE SIGN AND POST EACH 7 50.00$ 350.00$ 45.00$ 315.00$ 90.00$ 630.00$ 40.00$ 280.00$ 45.00$ 315.00$ 12 REMOVE FENCE LF 1092 3.00$ 3,276.00$ 3.00$ 3,276.00$ 1.15$ 1,255.80$ 6.05$ 6,606.60$ 1.00$ 1,092.00$ 13 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,700.00$ 5,700.00$ 5,570.00$ 5,570.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 14 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EACH 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 2,576.00$ 2,576.00$ 17,000.00$ 17,000.00$ 4,712.27$ 4,712.27$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 15 12" PVC C-900 DR-18 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 330 180.00$ 59,400.00$ 107.00$ 35,310.00$ 178.25$ 58,822.50$ 95.72$ 31,587.60$ 129.00$ 42,570.00$ 16 12" PVC SDR 26 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 400 170.00$ 68,000.00$ 61.00$ 24,400.00$ 92.30$ 36,920.00$ 78.22$ 31,288.00$ 129.00$ 51,600.00$ 17 12" PVC SDR 35 SANITARY SEWER PIPE LF 1903 160.00$ 304,480.00$ 51.00$ 97,053.00$ 74.50$ 141,773.50$ 65.48$ 124,608.44$ 180.00$ 342,540.00$ 18 12" PVC PLUG EACH 2 150.00$ 300.00$ 238.00$ 476.00$ 350.00$ 700.00$ 1,196.93$ 2,393.86$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 19 IMPROVED PIPE FOUNDATION - 24" THICK LF 722 200.00$ 144,400.00$ 8.00$ 5,776.00$ 30.80$ 22,237.60$ 58.58$ 42,294.76$ 45.00$ 32,490.00$ 20 PIPE JACKING 36" STEEL CASING LF 140 800.00$ 112,000.00$ 856.00$ 119,840.00$ 710.00$ 99,400.00$ 898.82$ 125,834.80$ 723.00$ 101,220.00$ 21 4' DIA. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE EACH 5 4,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 6,340.00$ 31,700.00$ 6,585.00$ 32,925.00$ 6,623.98$ 33,119.90$ 7,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 22 4' DIA SANITARY STRUCTURE OVERDEPTH (>12' DEPTH)LF 2 100.00$ 200.00$ 1,100.00$ 2,200.00$ 135.00$ 270.00$ 1,799.15$ 3,598.30$ 350.00$ 700.00$ 23 ANTI-SEEPAGE COLLAR EACH 5 250.00$ 1,250.00$ 275.00$ 1,375.00$ 544.00$ 2,720.00$ 529.51$ 2,647.55$ 600.00$ 3,000.00$ 24 INSTALL STRUCTURE SIGN POST AND MARKER EACH 9 200.00$ 1,800.00$ 167.00$ 1,503.00$ 185.00$ 1,665.00$ 150.00$ 1,350.00$ 200.00$ 1,800.00$ 25 CONNECT TO EXISTING 24" CMP EACH 1 400.00$ 400.00$ 490.00$ 490.00$ 370.00$ 370.00$ 472.90$ 472.90$ 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 26 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE EACH 1 1,100.00$ 1,100.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 1,150.00$ 1,150.00$ 1,882.21$ 1,882.21$ 1,700.00$ 1,700.00$ 27 24" CMP STORM SEWER PIPE LF 7 75.00$ 525.00$ 77.00$ 539.00$ 85.00$ 595.00$ 123.59$ 865.13$ 105.00$ 735.00$ 28 24" CMP FLARED-END SECTION W/ TRASH GUARD EACH 1 500.00$ 500.00$ 940.00$ 940.00$ 665.00$ 665.00$ 805.16$ 805.16$ 700.00$ 700.00$ 29 12" RCP SEWER CLASS V LF 330 45.00$ 14,850.00$ 57.00$ 18,810.00$ 46.00$ 15,180.00$ 50.34$ 16,612.20$ 70.00$ 23,100.00$ 30 15" RCP SEWER CLASS V LF 857 50.00$ 42,850.00$ 59.00$ 50,563.00$ 50.75$ 43,492.75$ 54.97$ 47,109.29$ 71.00$ 60,847.00$ 31 18" RCP SEWER CLASS V LF 110 60.00$ 6,600.00$ 63.00$ 6,930.00$ 54.10$ 5,951.00$ 67.57$ 7,432.70$ 71.00$ 7,810.00$ 32 21" RCP SEWER CLASS V LF 134 90.00$ 12,060.00$ 70.00$ 9,380.00$ 69.65$ 9,333.10$ 76.06$ 10,192.04$ 76.00$ 10,184.00$ 33 48" RCP SEWER CLASS V LF 122 150.00$ 18,300.00$ 306.00$ 37,332.00$ 277.00$ 33,794.00$ 339.59$ 41,429.98$ 350.00$ 42,700.00$ 34 21" RCP FLARED END SECTION W/ TRASH GUARD EACH 4 1,800.00$ 7,200.00$ 2,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 2,385.00$ 9,540.00$ 2,323.17$ 9,292.68$ 1,700.00$ 6,800.00$ 35 48" RCP FLARED END SECTION EACH 2 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 5,550.00$ 11,100.00$ 8,965.00$ 17,930.00$ 2,881.85$ 5,763.70$ 5,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 36 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE - 4' DIA MH EACH 10 5,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 3,387.00$ 33,870.00$ 4,050.00$ 40,500.00$ 4,692.60$ 46,926.00$ 7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 37 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE W/ STRUCTURAL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE - 6' DIA MH EACH 1 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,087.00$ 15,087.00$ 15,525.00$ 15,525.00$ 20,471.93$ 20,471.93$ 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 38 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE - 2'X3' CB EACH 6 3,500.00$ 21,000.00$ 2,130.00$ 12,780.00$ 2,580.00$ 15,480.00$ 3,820.33$ 22,921.98$ 3,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 39 CONSTRUCT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - 5' DIA MH EACH 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 8,568.00$ 8,568.00$ 9,075.00$ 9,075.00$ 13,596.46$ 13,596.46$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 40 4" PVC DRAINTILE PIPE LF 875 8.00$ 7,000.00$ 21.00$ 18,375.00$ 14.00$ 12,250.00$ 31.49$ 27,553.75$ 21.00$ 18,375.00$ 41 6" PVC DRIANTILE PIPE LF 235 10.00$ -$ 27.00$ 6,345.00$ 22.50$ 5,287.50$ 38.32$ 9,005.20$ 28.00$ 6,580.00$ 42 4" PVC DRAINTILE CLEANOUT EACH 2 200.00$ 400.00$ 295.00$ 590.00$ 245.00$ 490.00$ 914.03$ 1,828.06$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 43 6" PVC DRAINTILE CLEANOUT EACH 2 225.00$ 450.00$ 430.00$ 860.00$ 385.00$ 770.00$ 914.03$ 1,828.06$ 550.00$ 1,100.00$ 44 FILTRATION BENCH SY 131 100.00$ 13,100.00$ 140.00$ 18,340.00$ 55.00$ 7,205.00$ 67.39$ 8,828.09$ 35.00$ 4,585.00$ 45 4" INSULATION SF 200 10.00$ 2,000.00$ 4.00$ 800.00$ 4.40$ 880.00$ 68.70$ 13,740.00$ 6.00$ 1,200.00$ 46 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III (GRANITE)TON 100 125.00$ 12,500.00$ 100.00$ 10,000.00$ 103.00$ 10,300.00$ 98.85$ 9,885.00$ 110.00$ 11,000.00$ 47 ADJUST EXISTING VALVE BOX EACH 6 350.00$ 2,100.00$ 480.00$ 2,880.00$ 495.00$ 2,970.00$ 141.65$ 849.90$ 400.00$ 2,400.00$ 48 ADJUST EXISTING CURB STOP & BOX EACH 1 250.00$ 250.00$ 235.00$ 235.00$ 240.00$ 240.00$ 85.00$ 85.00$ 400.00$ 400.00$ 49 HYDRANT EXTENSION EACH 2 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,240.00$ 2,480.00$ 1,385.00$ 2,770.00$ 1,613.12$ 3,226.24$ 1,300.00$ 2,600.00$ 50 INSTALL WATERMAIN OFFSET LUMP SUM 1 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 12,066.00$ 12,066.00$ 13,530.00$ 13,530.00$ 33,145.58$ 33,145.58$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 51 IRRIGATION SYSTEM & DESIGN LUMP SUM 1 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 33,250.00$ 33,250.00$ 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 38,896.00$ 38,896.00$ 65,000.00$ 65,000.00$ 52 IRRIGATION BOOSTER PUMP LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 640.00$ 640.00$ 640.00$ 640.00$ 2,682.00$ 2,682.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 53 4" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT CROSSING (IRRIGATION)LIN FT 345 10.00$ 3,450.00$ 3.00$ 1,035.00$ 11.85$ 4,088.25$ 9.20$ 3,174.00$ 17.00$ 5,865.00$ 54 STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND RESPREAD TOPSOIL LUMP SUM 1 88,000.00$ 88,000.00$ 27,320.00$ 27,320.00$ 14,225.00$ 14,225.00$ 131,502.85$ 131,502.85$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 55 SALVAGE & RESPREAD EXISTING WETLAND SOILS (AS REQUIRED BY PERMIT)LUMP SUM 1 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 12,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 6,700.00$ 6,700.00$ 21,019.55$ 21,019.55$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 56 COMMON EXCAVATION - ONSITE (EV) (P)CU YD 10440 10.00$ 104,400.00$ 8.00$ 83,520.00$ 8.75$ 91,350.00$ 6.69$ 69,843.60$ 15.00$ 156,600.00$ 57 COMMON EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (LV)CU YD 9700 20.00$ 194,000.00$ 13.00$ 126,100.00$ 17.80$ 172,660.00$ 16.41$ 159,177.00$ 15.00$ 145,500.00$ 58 COMMON BORROW (EV) (POND)CU YD 250 15.00$ 3,750.00$ 0.01$ 2.50$ 9.60$ 2,400.00$ 19.11$ 4,777.50$ 15.00$ 3,750.00$ New Look ContractingEngineer's Estimate Bid No. 1 Minger Construction Companies Meyer Contracting, Inc.Geislinger & Sons Bid No. 2 Bid No. 3 Bid No. 4 Project No. 2294-17-031 BID TABULATION CITY OF CORCORAN 66TH AVENUE/GLEASON PARKWAY CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS 2294-17-031 4/14/2021 Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price 59 COMMON BORROW - IMPORT (LV)CU YD 250 25.00$ 6,250.00$ 0.01$ 2.50$ 10.50$ 2,625.00$ 29.47$ 7,367.50$ 18.00$ 4,500.00$ 60 LOAM TOPSOIL (LV)CU YD 50 25.00$ 1,250.00$ 0.01$ 0.50$ 36.00$ 1,800.00$ 57.91$ 2,895.50$ 45.00$ 2,250.00$ 61 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION - OFFSITE (EV)CU YD 3900 20.00$ 78,000.00$ 13.00$ 50,700.00$ 17.80$ 69,420.00$ 16.66$ 64,974.00$ 20.00$ 78,000.00$ 62 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V NON-WOVEN SQ YD 11745 2.00$ 23,490.00$ 2.00$ 23,490.00$ 2.00$ 23,490.00$ 2.99$ 35,117.55$ 3.50$ 41,107.50$ 63 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, 5% MOD TON 800 20.00$ 16,000.00$ 18.00$ 14,400.00$ 18.45$ 14,760.00$ 17.23$ 13,784.00$ 12.00$ 9,600.00$ 64 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5, 100% CRUSHED TON 9900 22.00$ 217,800.00$ 19.00$ 188,100.00$ 21.65$ 214,335.00$ 21.25$ 210,375.00$ 16.00$ 158,400.00$ 65 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 2, 100 % CRUSHED LIMESTONE TON 240 40.00$ 9,600.00$ 35.00$ 8,400.00$ 36.75$ 8,820.00$ 78.46$ 18,830.40$ 24.00$ 5,760.00$ 66 STABILIZING AGGREGATE, 3" MINUS TON 1500 35.00$ 52,500.00$ 0.01$ 15.00$ 29.70$ 44,550.00$ 35.21$ 52,815.00$ 33.00$ 49,500.00$ 67 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT MATERIAL GAL 515 3.50$ 1,802.50$ 3.50$ 1,802.50$ 6.40$ 3,296.00$ 5.75$ 2,961.25$ 6.00$ 3,090.00$ 68 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 1830 90.00$ 164,700.00$ 80.00$ 146,400.00$ 75.30$ 137,799.00$ 67.75$ 123,982.50$ 75.00$ 137,250.00$ 69 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (3,C)TON 1830 80.00$ 146,400.00$ 78.00$ 142,740.00$ 72.25$ 132,217.50$ 65.00$ 118,950.00$ 66.00$ 120,780.00$ 70 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,B)TON 425 120.00$ 51,000.00$ 103.00$ 43,775.00$ 81.40$ 34,595.00$ 73.20$ 31,110.00$ 75.00$ 31,875.00$ 71 B618 CURB AND GUTTER LF 3181 25.00$ 79,525.00$ 14.50$ 46,124.50$ 15.00$ 47,715.00$ 15.17$ 48,255.77$ 13.75$ 43,738.75$ 72 6" CONCRETE WALK SQ FT 595 20.00$ 11,900.00$ 10.00$ 5,950.00$ 13.90$ 8,270.50$ 12.89$ 7,669.55$ 13.50$ 8,032.50$ 73 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 96 60.00$ 5,760.00$ 112.00$ 10,752.00$ 55.60$ 5,337.60$ 50.00$ 4,800.00$ 52.00$ 4,992.00$ 74 SIGN PANELS TYPE C SQ FT 93 75.00$ 6,975.00$ 38.00$ 3,534.00$ 27.70$ 2,576.10$ 25.00$ 2,325.00$ 19.00$ 1,767.00$ 75 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C AND POST EACH 14 250.00$ 3,500.00$ 5.50$ 77.00$ 250.00$ 3,500.00$ 5.00$ 70.00$ 110.00$ 1,540.00$ 76 INSTALL SIGN POST EACH 2 150.00$ 300.00$ 500.00$ 1,000.00$ 440.00$ 880.00$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 110.00$ 220.00$ 77 STREET NAME SIGN PLATE EACH 10 500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5.50$ 55.00$ 6.00$ 60.00$ 5.00$ 50.00$ 42.00$ 420.00$ 78 INSTALL STREET NAME SIGN PLATE AND POST EACH 2 250.00$ 500.00$ 450.00$ 900.00$ 445.00$ 890.00$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 310.00$ 620.00$ 79 INSTALL TYPE III BARRICADE EACH 2 450.00$ 900.00$ 450.00$ 900.00$ 445.00$ 890.00$ 400.00$ 800.00$ 425.00$ 850.00$ 80 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 4 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 450.00$ 1,800.00$ 430.00$ 1,720.00$ 390.00$ 1,560.00$ 400.00$ 1,600.00$ 81 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (LT ARROW) THERMOPLASTIC (GROUND-IN)EACH 4 300.00$ 1,200.00$ 450.00$ 1,800.00$ 430.00$ 1,720.00$ 390.00$ 1,560.00$ 400.00$ 1,600.00$ 82 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 3241 1.50$ 4,861.50$ 2.00$ 6,482.00$ 1.20$ 3,889.20$ 1.10$ 3,565.10$ 1.15$ 3,727.15$ 83 6" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 2882 0.75$ 2,161.50$ 2.00$ 5,764.00$ 1.00$ 2,882.00$ 0.90$ 2,593.80$ 1.00$ 2,882.00$ 84 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 1200 0.75$ 900.00$ 1.00$ 1,200.00$ 0.60$ 720.00$ 0.55$ 660.00$ 0.60$ 720.00$ 85 4" BROKEN LINE WHITE - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 495 0.75$ 371.25$ 1.00$ 495.00$ 0.60$ 297.00$ 0.55$ 272.25$ 0.60$ 297.00$ 86 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - MULTI-COMPONENT (GROUND-IN)LIN FT 256 10.00$ 2,560.00$ 10.00$ 2,560.00$ 9.00$ 2,304.00$ 8.11$ 2,076.16$ 9.00$ 2,304.00$ 87 TEMPORARY MAILBOXES LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 2,700.00$ 2,700.00$ 1,315.00$ 1,315.00$ 2,250.00$ 2,250.00$ 600.00$ 600.00$ 88 BOULDER RETAINING WALL LUMP SUM 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 12,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 12,644.00$ 12,644.00$ 18,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 89 3" NON-METALLIC CONDUIT CROSSING (SMALL UTILITIES)LIN FT 870 8.00$ 6,960.00$ 13.00$ 11,310.00$ 6.00$ 5,220.00$ 13.75$ 11,962.50$ 8.00$ 6,960.00$ 90 BARBWIRE FENCE LIN FT 965 10.00$ 9,650.00$ 5.50$ 5,307.50$ 11.00$ 10,615.00$ 8.00$ 7,720.00$ 15.00$ 14,475.00$ 91 SEED MIXTURE - 34-171 SQ YD 24005 1.50$ 36,007.50$ 0.20$ 4,801.00$ 0.20$ 4,801.00$ 0.16$ 3,840.80$ 0.20$ 4,801.00$ 92 SEED MIXTURE - 25-131 SQ YD 6522 1.00$ 6,522.00$ 0.20$ 1,304.40$ 0.20$ 1,304.40$ 0.19$ 1,239.18$ 0.20$ 1,304.40$ 93 SEED MIXTURE - 25-141 SQ YD 26325 1.00$ 26,325.00$ 0.15$ 3,948.75$ 0.15$ 3,948.75$ 0.12$ 3,159.00$ 0.15$ 3,948.75$ 94 SEED MIXTURE - 33-261 SQ YD 1910 1.50$ 2,865.00$ 0.50$ 955.00$ 0.45$ 859.50$ 0.41$ 783.10$ 0.50$ 955.00$ 95 SODDING TYPE LAWN SQ YD 2350 6.00$ 14,100.00$ 12.00$ 28,200.00$ 11.65$ 27,377.50$ 10.71$ 25,168.50$ 10.75$ 25,262.50$ 96 PERENNIAL - #1 CONT EACH 226 15.00$ 3,390.00$ 20.00$ 4,520.00$ 20.00$ 4,520.00$ 21.00$ 4,746.00$ 20.00$ 4,520.00$ 97 DECIDUOUS SHRUB (#5 CONT.)EACH 68 60.00$ 4,080.00$ 81.00$ 5,508.00$ 80.00$ 5,440.00$ 82.00$ 5,576.00$ 45.00$ 3,060.00$ 98 DECIDUOUS TREE - 2.5" B&B EACH 24 500.00$ 12,000.00$ 667.00$ 16,008.00$ 665.00$ 15,960.00$ 462.00$ 11,088.00$ 395.00$ 9,480.00$ 99 DECIDUOUS TREE - 1.5" CAL B&B EACH 3 400.00$ 1,200.00$ 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 550.00$ 1,650.00$ 390.00$ 1,170.00$ 310.00$ 930.00$ 100 DECIDUOUS TREE - 6' HT. B&B CLUMP EACH 4 400.00$ 1,600.00$ 525.00$ 2,100.00$ 525.00$ 2,100.00$ 370.00$ 1,480.00$ 320.00$ 1,280.00$ 101 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT - MAINTAINED LUMP SUM 1 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 2,250.00$ 2,250.00$ 2,871.64$ 2,871.64$ 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 102 SILT FENCE, TYPE MS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 6465 3.00$ 19,395.00$ 1.50$ 9,697.50$ 1.65$ 10,667.25$ 1.53$ 9,891.45$ 1.75$ 11,313.75$ 103 BALE BARRIERS - MAINTAINED LIN FT 11320 5.00$ 56,600.00$ 3.50$ 39,620.00$ 3.45$ 39,054.00$ 3.16$ 35,771.20$ 3.25$ 36,790.00$ 104 BIOLOG - MAINTAINED LIN FT 1200 2.50$ 3,000.00$ 2.75$ 3,300.00$ 2.65$ 3,180.00$ 2.45$ 2,940.00$ 2.50$ 3,000.00$ 105 INLET PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 18 250.00$ 4,500.00$ 160.00$ 2,880.00$ 120.00$ 2,160.00$ 203.06$ 3,655.08$ 150.00$ 2,700.00$ 106 CULVERT PROTECTION - MAINTAINED EACH 2 150.00$ 300.00$ 225.00$ 450.00$ 220.00$ 440.00$ 204.08$ 408.16$ 225.00$ 450.00$ 107 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM)HOUR 50 125.00$ 6,250.00$ 0.01$ 0.50$ 145.00$ 7,250.00$ 150.00$ 7,500.00$ 145.00$ 7,250.00$ 108 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 50 50.00$ 2,500.00$ 42.00$ 2,100.00$ 45.00$ 2,250.00$ 71.55$ 3,577.50$ 50.00$ 2,500.00$ 109 EROSION CONTROL MAT SQ YD 25 100.00$ 2,500.00$ 4.50$ 112.50$ 4.45$ 111.25$ 4.08$ 102.00$ 5.00$ 125.00$ 110 STRAW MULCH TYPE 3 SQ YD 45480 0.20$ 9,096.00$ 0.10$ 4,548.00$ 0.10$ 4,548.00$ 0.10$ 4,548.00$ 1.00$ 45,480.00$ 111 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CATEGORY 3N STRAW 2S SQ YD 13282 3.50$ 46,487.00$ 1.50$ 19,923.00$ 1.45$ 19,258.90$ 1.33$ 17,665.06$ 1.35$ 17,930.70$ Total Bid:2,841,076.25$ Total Bid:1,908,607.40$ Total Bid:2,109,753.95$ Total Bid:2,305,779.70$ Total Bid:2,545,449.50$ Watkins, MN 55389Rogers, MN 55374 New Look Contracting, Inc. Bid No. 1 14045 Northdale Blvd. 620 Corporate Drive Jordan, MN 55352 11000 93rd Avenue N Maple Grove, MN 55369 511 Central Avenue South Bid No. 2 Minger Construction Companies, Inc. Bid No. 3 Meyer Contracting, Inc. Bid No. 4 Geislinger and Sons, Inc Project No. 2294-17-031 Memo To: Kevin Mattson, City of Corcoran From: Kent Torve, PE, City Engineer Steve Hegland, PE Project: 227702426 Date: April 16th, 2021 Subject: Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project Council Action Requested ·Motion to accept plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement project as an Alternate Bid to the Maple Grove 2021 Street Reconstruction Program Project. Background ·The Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project is a roadway improvement project to recondition a small portion of existing pavement as well as improve the remainder of the road from gravel to a bituminous surface within the Corcoran portion of the Appaloosa Woods Development. This project will be bid as an alternate bid as part of the City of Maple Grove Street Reconstruction Program Project which is also occurring in this neighborhood. ·Plans for this project are attached to this memo. As this is being bid as an addendum to the City of Maple Grove Street Reconstruction Program Project, the project specifications for that improvement project will be used. Schedule The following is an anticipated schedule: ·Council Authorizes Bids April 22 ·Bid Opening May 3 ·Improvement Hearing May 13 ·Council Awards Bid April 13 ·Project Construction June - July Agenda Item 9b. April 16, 2021 Kevin Mattson Page 2 of 2 Reference: Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement – Authorization to Bid skh t:\2294-corcoran\01-general\appaloosa woods\02-plans\authorize for bid reccomendation memo.docx Cost and Funding An updated Engineers Cost Estimate has been provided for the improvement. The costs provided in the attached estimate are the estimated construction costs and do not include the $32,640 which is a pass through cost from the City of Maple Grove for the two properties who are surrounded by the Maple Grove Boundary within their project area. This project will be funded through special assessments and local funds: Special Assessments Local Funds* Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project $136,107.49 $0 Maple Grove Pass Through $32,640.00 $0 Total $168,747.49 $0 *if project costs are in excess of those presented in the feasibility study, local funds will be used to cover those project costs. Recommendations Staff is recommending that Council take action accepting the plans and specifications and authorize bidding for the Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project as an Alternate Bid to the Maple Grove 2021 Street Reconstruction Program Project. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Kent Torve, PE City Engineer Phone: 763-479-4209 ktorve@wenck.com Attachments: · Cost Estimate · Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Plans 19340 81ST PL N19360 81ST PL N19263 81ST PL N19233 81ST PL N19223 81ST PL N19203 81ST PL N19165 81ST PL N19125 81ST PL N19105 81ST PL N19180 81ST PL N19138 81ST PL N19114 81ST PL N81ST PL NRIDGE CT (PRIVATE S T R E E T )26'28'20.5'CONTRACTOR SHALLMATCH IMPROVEMENT &ELEVATION AT ADJACENTROADWAY DESIGN0+001+002+002+1129+3016+9117+0018+0019+0020+0021+0022+0023+0024+0025+0026+0027+0028+0029+0090'R2 0 ' R45'R45'DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.:DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:227702426M:\2294\00 GENERAL\APALOOSA WOODS\Preliminary Design.dwg DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:4/15/2021 10:21:25 AM APPALOOSA WOODS STREET IMPROVEMENT CORCORAN, MN PROJECT TITLE:GRMCHK'D BY:GRMAPP'D BY:SKHCERTIFICATION:CLIENT:CITY OFCORCORAN8200 COUNTY ROAD 116CORCORAN , MN 553401800 PIONEER CREEK CENTERMAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359PHONE: 763-479-4200FAX: 763-479-4242WWW.WENCK.COM04/09/2021004/09/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 0 LEGENDPROJECT LIMITSREPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSHAPE AGGREGATE BASE & PAVE1 OF 2ALTERNATESITE PLANREPLACE BITUMINOUSDRIVEWAY PAVEMENTREPLACE GRAVEL DRIVEWAYGOPHER STATE ONE CALLTWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166WARNING:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALLCOOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FORTHE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIEDSTRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.CALL BEFORE YOU DIGGRAVEL SHOULDERTEMP HYDROMULCH/PERMANENT SOD1.SALVAGE AND INSTALL MAILBOX AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER INFIELD.2.RECLAIMED MATERIAL MAY BE USED AS AGGREGATESHOULDERING WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.NOTES ℄THRU LANERIGHT-OF-WAY14'THRU LANE2.0%4:1 MAX (H:V)4:1 MAX (H:V)TYPICAL SECTIONEXISTING GRAVEL28' STREET4:1 MAX (H:V)4:1 MAX (H:V)14'APPROXIMATELY 16" OF SILTY SAND & GRAVELAGGREGATE BASE, UNDERLAIN WITH LEAN CLAYWITH GRAVEL, MOIST, BROWN TO GRAYEXISTING SUBGRADE℄THRU LANE2.0%RIGHT-OF-WAY13'THRU LANE2.0%4:1 MAX (H:V)4:1 MAX (H:V)TYPICAL SECTIONEXISTING BITUMINOUS26' STREETAPPROXIMATELY 4" OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED4:1 MAX (H:V)4:1 MAX (H:V)13'APPROXIMATELY 12" OF SILTY SAND & GRAVEL AGGREGATE BASE TO REMAIN TO PAVEEXISTING SUBGRADE℄THRU LANE2.0%RIGHT-OF-WAY13'THRU LANE2.0%TYPICAL SECTIONFUTURE BITUMINOUS26' STREET1.5" SP12.5 WEARING COURSE (2,B)4:1 MAX (H:V)4:1 MAX (H:V)13'2" SP12.5 NON-WEARING COURSE (2,B)EXISTING AGGREGATE BASEEXISTING SUBGRADEBITUMINOUS TACK COAT2.0%3.5" OF SAND & GRAVELTO BE REMOVED4:1 MAX (H:V)4:1 MAX (H:V)4" CLASS 2AGGREGATE SHOULDER1'1'DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM ADULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.LICENSE NO.:DWN BY:ISSUE DATE:PROJECT NO.:227702426M:\2294\00 GENERAL\APALOOSA WOODS\Preliminary Design.dwg DESCRIPTION:DATE:ISSUE NO.:ISSUE NO.:SHEET NO.:SHEET TITLE:4/15/2021 10:21:26 AM APPALOOSA WOODS STREET IMPROVEMENT CORCORAN, MN PROJECT TITLE:GRMCHK'D BY:GRMAPP'D BY:SKHCERTIFICATION:CLIENT:CITY OFCORCORAN8200 COUNTY ROAD 116CORCORAN , MN 553401800 PIONEER CREEK CENTERMAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359PHONE: 763-479-4200FAX: 763-479-4242WWW.WENCK.COM04/09/2021004/09/2021 PRELIMINARY DESIGN 0 2 OF 2ALTERNATE TYPICALSECTIONS & DETAILS1.THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE THE STREETSECTION BASED ON SOIL CONDITIONS.2.SAW & SEAL ACCORDING TO MN/DOT 3725, AS DIRECTED BYTHE CITY ENGINEER.3.REFER TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BICYCLE TRANSPORTATIONPLAN FOR TRAIL DETAILS.4.RECYCLED MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED IN BITUMINOUSWEAR COURSE.NOTES ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CITY OF CORCORAN APPALOOSA WOODS STREET IMPROVEMENT Item No. MNDOT Spec No.Description Unit Estimated Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost 1 2104.502 SALVAGE MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 12 $45.00 $540.00 2 2104.503 SAWING BIT PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LF 132 $2.05 $270.60 3 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 170 $8.00 $1,360.00 4 2106.507 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 450 $30.00 $13,500.00 5 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST 1.3 $300.00 $390.00 6 2118.507 AGGREGATE SURFACING (CV) CLASS 2 CY 50 $40.00 $2,000.00 7 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION SY 1160 $3.00 $3,480.00 8 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(3;C) 1.5" THICK SY 4655 $6.50 $30,257.21 9 2360.504 TYPE SP 9.5 WEAR CRS MIX(3;C) 3.0" THICK SY 167 $28.00 $4,685.02 10 2360.504 TYPE SP 12.5 NON WR CRS MIX(3;C)2" THICK SY 4655 $8.50 $39,567.12 11 2540.602 REINSTALL MAIL BOX SUPPORT EACH 12 $55.00 $660.00 12 2540.602 TEMPORARY MAIL BOX EACH 12 $100.00 $1,200.00 13 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LF 40 $3.20 $128.00 14 2574.507 COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW (CV)CY 116 $42.00 $4,872.00 15 2575.504 SODDING TYPE LAWN SY 580 $9.25 $5,365.00 16 2575.508 HYDRAULIC MULCH MATRIX LB 87 $1.50 $130.50 107,594.86$ CONTINGENCY (10%)10,759.49$ 118,354.34$ INDIRECT PROJECT COSTS (15%)17,753.15$ 136,107.49$ TOTAL PROJECT COSTS CONSTRUCTION TOTAL SUBTOTAL April 14, 2021 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10a. Council Meeting: April 22, 2020 Prepared By: Brad Martens, Kevin Mattson, Pat Meister Topic: 2021 Dust Control Program Action Required: Call Public Hearing Summary: The gravel road maintenance program for the City of Corcoran includes the application of a chloride product on certain gravel roads (approximately 27 miles of our 34 miles of gravel road) for dust control. The cost of the project is estimated at $111,600. It is proposed to bill properties for the application as in years past with unpaid fees to be assessed later in the year, if necessary. The percentage of the project to be assessed has been reduced overtime with incremental budget adjustments. The City anticipates the following costs for the program for 2021: Neighborhood Road Assessment Collector/Adjacent Road Assessment Other Assessment City Share Total $8,232 $28,009 $1,260 $74,099 $111,600 The next step in the process is to call a public hearing through approving the attached resolution. After the public hearing, the Council may approve the project which is anticipated to be completed in June. Upon project completion, properties would be billed based upon the actual project costs. Financial/Budget: Costs for this project are included in the adopted 2021 budget along with projected revenue from billing in the amount of $37,500. Options: 1. Approve Resolution 2021-32 calling for a public hearing on the potential assessment of the cost of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2021 as presented. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Approve Resolution 2021-32 calling for a public hearing on the potential assessment of the cost of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2021 as presented. Page 2 Council Action: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 2021-32 calling for a public hearing on the potential assessment of the cost of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2021 as presented. Attachments: 1. Resolution 2021-32 calling for a public hearing on the potential assessment of the cost of dust control treatments to be applied to city streets in 2021. 2. Dust Control Map City of Corcoran April 22, 2020 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-32 Page 1 of 1 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT OF COSTS OF DUST CONTROL TREATMENTS TO BE APPLIED TO CITY STREETS IN 2021 WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council determined the application of dust treatments to City streets to be necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; and WHEREAS, the Corcoran City Council awarded a contract to Northern Salt Incorporated (NSI) on April 13, 2020 for application of calcium chloride to City streets for dust control in 2020 and 2021 (the Project); and WHEREAS, the total cost of the project is estimated to be approximately $111,600; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to bill the benefitting property owners for a portion of the cost of the Project, estimated to be approximately $37,500, and to assess any unpaid costs to benefitting properties pursuant to Minnesota Statute §429.101 and Corcoran City Ordinance 2011-261; and WHEREAS, under Minnesota Statute §429.031 a Public Hearing needs to be held prior to adoption of a Special Assessment with proper notice to property owners. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Corcoran City Council: 1. To call a public hearing on the potential assessments of costs of calcium chloride applications to City streets for dust control in 2021, for May 27, 2021. 2. Directing staff to give notice required by Stat. §429.031 to all property owners who may be assessed for this Project. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee - Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ City Seal Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City of Corcoran Dust Control Map 2021 STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10b. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Corcoran Trail East/West Improvements Finance Plan Action Required: Direction Summary: Staff is in the process of finalizing the feasibility study for street improvements for Corcoran Trail East/West. Staff is requesting direction on how to finalize the finance plan prior to bringing to Council for approval. Road condition information obtained for the feasibility study has concluded that an overlay is not an acceptable solution due to the age and condition of the roadway. The paved portion was constructed in the 1980’s, making the road over 30 years old (this is based upon staff memory as the project files are temporarily unavailable due to the relocation of files for the City Hall remodel project). A rehabilitation is necessary for the paved road to continue to function long term. A reconstruction to pavement is planned for the gravel portion. The approved special assessment policy outlines the assessable costs to properties with street improvements. Below is a quick reference to the categories, see the full policy attached to this report. • Reconstruction and Rehabilitation o Obtain letter of benefit; assess at 90% of the low range of the benefit • Mill and Overlays o Obtain letter of benefit; assess at 90% of the median range of the benefit o Exception of assessment for one overlay on specific roads, including Corcoran Trail East and Corcoran Trail West Staff is requesting direction on the following items: 1. Does the Council support the staff recommendation of rehabilitating/reconstructing the road instead of an overlay? o Engineering reviews completed of soil and pavement samples have resulted in a conclusion that an overlay would not be a valuable solution at this time as cracks would propagate through the new pavement in a short time period. 2. Does the Council support proceeding with the assessment approach as outlined in the special assessment policy? o This is the same approach staff is proceeding with for the Appaloosa Woods improvement project. o If so, an expanded letter of benefit must be obtained to establish the proposed assessment amounts for the rehabilitation/reconstruction. Page 2 Once staff has received direction from the Council, and data from the letter of benefit, staff will finalize the feasibility study and recommend calling a public hearing related to the project. Staff is holding a virtual neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, April 21st at 6:00 pm for residents to learn more about the proposed project. Staff will share what is heard from that meeting at the City Council meeting. Financial/Budget: Costs for the project and proposed assessment amounts will be outlined in the feasibility study. The cost to expand the letter of benefit will be less than $1,000. Options: 1. Direct staff to proceed with completion of a feasibility study for a rehabilitation and reconstruction project using the approved special assessment policy; authorize staff to obtain an expanded letter of benefit report. 2. Direct staff to utilize a different financial approach. 3. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Staff recommend obtaining the letter of benefit and completing the feasibility study with the rehabilitation and reconstruction project. This will allow for the final project estimates to be completed, giving the Council better information in advance of calling the public hearing. Council Action: Consider a motion to direct staff to proceed with completion of a feasibility study for a rehabilitation and reconstruction project using the approved special assessment policy; authorize staff to obtain an expanded letter of benefit report. Attachments: 1. Special Assessment Policy STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10c. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: Planning Commission Appointment Action Required: Approval Summary: At the February 25, 2021 Council meeting, re-appointments to the Planning Commission were considered. One of the members had elected to no longer serve which resulted in a vacancy on that commission effective March 1, 2021. Council directed the Mayor, Councilmember Nichols, and City Administrator Martens to review candidates and recommend an appointment at a future meeting. Over the past two months staff has advertised the vacancy and has received two applications which are attached to this report. Application re view will take place by the above mentioned individuals prior to the m eeting. Financial/Budget: Planning Commission members serve without compensation. Options: 1.Appoint an individual to the Planning Comm ission for a term ending February 29, 2024. 2.Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Staff recommends appointing an individual to the Planning Commission in advance of the May meeting. Council Action: Consider a motion to appoint an individual to the Planning Commission for a term ending February 29, 2024. Attachments: 1.Planning Commission Application – Mark Lanterman 2.Planning Commission Application – Randall Ferrian CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 – Office 763.420.6056 – Fax E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us COMMISSIONS APPLICATION Please indicate by order which of the following you are interested in (1,2,3, etc.): ________Parks and Trails Commission Meets the 3rd Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. - City Hall ________ Planning Commission Meets the 1st Thursday of the month at 7:00 PM - City Hall ________ Watershed Commission Meets the 2nd Wednesday of the month, 11:30 AM – Maple Grove City Hall ________ Other ________ We welcome you as an applicant for one of the City’s commissions. Residents of Corcoran are eligible for nomination to any of the City’s commissions as established by the City Council. Please complete the following information, attach extra sheets if necessary, and return. Accommodations will be provided, upon request, to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in the application process. DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY We are required to provide the following information to you. Under Minnesota law, your name and home address are public information, which must be provided to anyone who requests it. If appointed to a commission, the following information will also be public: education and training background, previous work experience, work location, a work telephone number, and any expense reimbursement. The other information requested below is classified as private. This information will be used by the Commissioners, and the City Council in determining whether you should be appointed to a commission. Therefore, all of the information will be provided to the Commissioners and City Council in a public forum and will be reviewed in public. Failure to provide the requested information may result in your not being considered for an appointment. H:\City Hall Information\Forms\Administrative Applications Information\2012 Commission Application.doc Please complete the information below: Name: Address: Phone: (h)(w)(c) Fax:E-mail: Please answer the following questions (use the back side if more space is needed): 1) How long have you been a Corcoran resident? 2)Please list any city committees/ commissions you have served on in the past, either for the City of Corcoran or another community. Please include the dates of service and if you held any positions such as Chair or Secretary. 3)Please describe why you feel qualified to serve on the Commission for which you are applying, including any other relevant experience with the issues faced by the Commission. 4)Why are you interested in serving on this Commission? H:\City Hall Information\Forms\Administrative Applications Information\2012 Commission Application.doc H:\City Hall Information\Forms\Administrative Applications Information\2012 Commission Application.doc If appointed, I agree to disclose any conflict of interest I might have in reviewing or approving any contract, license, permit, application, appointment, land use decision, public improvement, or other matter that comes before me? Please sign and date this Application and return to: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN 55340 ______________________________________ Date_________________ Applicant Signature Mark Lanterman Chief Technology Officer Professional Biography Mark has over 25 years of experience in digital forensics, e-discovery, and has provided education and training to a variety of audiences. Prior to founding Computer Forensic Services in 1998, Mark was a sworn law enforcement investigator with the United States Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force. Both federal and state court judges have appointed Mark as a neutral computer forensic analyst. Mark is a member of the Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board and serves as Chairperson of its Opinion Committee. Mark frequently provides training within the legal community, including presentations for the United States Supreme Court, Georgetown Law School, the 11th Circuit Federal Judicial Conference, the 8th Circuit Federal Judicial Conference, the American Bar Association, the Federal Bar Association, and the Department of Homeland Security, among others. As a member of its faculty, Mark has presented to the entire Federal Judiciary through the Federal Judicial Center. Mark is faculty at the National Judicial College, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, and is an adjunct instructor in the University of Minnesota’s MSci Security Technologies program. Mark is also a professor at the Saint Thomas School of Law. Mark provides frequent commentary about cyber security issues for national print and broadcast media, including ABC, Bloomberg, BusinessWeek, CBS, Fox News, NBC, The New York Times, NPR, and the Wall Street Journal. Education and Certifications Upsala College – B.S. Computer Science; M.S. Computer Science Harvard University – Cybersecurity Department of Homeland Security – Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Seized Computer Evidence Recovery Specialist National White-Collar Crime Center – Advanced Computer Forensics Publications Co-author of the E-Discovery and Forensic Desk Book Regular columnist for Bench & Bar magazine Office 800 Hennepin Avenue 5th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55403 Fax (952)924-9921 Email mlanterman@compforensics.com Web www.compforensics.com ;<2*% =>/?@ >?9A>>?( CITY OF CORCORAN 8200 County Road 116, Corcoran, MN 55340 763.420.2288 – Office 763.420.6056 – Fax E-mail - general@ci.corcoran.mn.us / Web Site - www.ci.corcoran.mn.us COMMISSIONS APPLICATION Please indicate by order which of the following you are interested in (1,2,3, etc.): ________Parks and Trails Commission Meets the 3rd Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. - City Hall ________ Planning Commission Meets the 1st Thursday of the month at 7:00 PM - City Hall ________ Watershed Commission Meets the 2nd Wednesday of the month, 11:30 AM – Maple Grove City Hall ________ Other ________ We welcome you as an applicant for one of the City’s commissions. Residents of Corcoran are eligible for nomination to any of the City’s commissions as established by the City Council. Please complete the following information, attach extra sheets if necessary, and return. Accommodations will be provided, upon request, to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in the application process. DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY We are required to provide the following information to you. Under Minnesota law, your name and home address are public information, which must be provided to anyone who requests it. If appointed to a commission, the following information will also be public: education and training background, previous work experience, work location, a work telephone number, and any expense reimbursement. The other information requested below is classified as private. This information will be used by the Commissioners, and the City Council in determining whether you should be appointed to a commission. Therefore, all of the information will be provided to the Commissioners and City Council in a public forum and will be reviewed in public. Failure to provide the requested information may result in your not being considered for an appointment. H:\City Hall Information\Forms\Administrative Applications Information\2012 Commission Application.doc X Additional Planning Application Please complete the information below: Name: Address: Phone: (h)(w)(c) Fax:E-mail: Please answer the following questions (use the back side if more space is needed): 1) How long have you been a Corcoran resident? 2)Please list any city committees/ commissions you have served on in the past, either for the City of Corcoran or another community. Please include the dates of service and if you held any positions such as Chair or Secretary. 3)Please describe why you feel qualified to serve on the Commission for which you are applying, including any other relevant experience with the issues faced by the Commission. 4)Why are you interested in serving on this Commission? H:\City Hall Information\Forms\Administrative Applications Information\2012 Commission Application.doc Mikael Moseley 21150 Horseshoe Trail , Corcoran MN 55340 N/A (651) 210-7039 (651) 210-7039 mikael.a.moseley@gmail.com Three years No prior service I am passionate about the growth and vision of this city and would like to be apart of the group of individuals responsibe for setting the direction of where Corcoran canbe three, five even twenty years from now. With more movement westward, Corcoran is at a pivotal point and needs to tackle things like widespread broadband access, affordable housing green/public space as well as be an attractive suburb to open a business. Decade plus experience leading global teams with strong background in sales, marketing and supply chain. Currently responsible for all inbound material and logistics operations for the global manufactuing locations at a large Fortune 500 company. Futher, I currently manage $500M in global logstics procurement. Much of my focus has been around the long range planning, and strategy for how we shouldoperate our business over that planning horizon. I am confident my experience would add value to this Commission and the challenges and opportunities it faces. H:\City Hall Information\Forms\Administrative Applications Information\2012 Commission Application.doc If appointed, I agree to disclose any conflict of interest I might have in reviewing or approving any contract, license, permit, application, appointment, land use decision, public improvement, or other matter that comes before me? Please sign and date this Application and return to: City of Corcoran 8200 County Road 116 Corcoran MN 55340 ______________________________________ Date_________________ Applicant Signature April 15, 2021 651.210.7039 linkedin.com/in/mikaelmoseley P R O F I L E Outdoor junkie passionate about cutting edge products and sustainable operations. Versatile leader recognized for delivering results and driving value. Passion for aligning teams around a customer-centric vision. Thrive in a fast-paced and dynamic environment, applying a balance of innovation and analytics to advance the business goals forward. A W A R D S Sales Leader of the Year Largest market share gain in North America Employee Choice Award Visioneering best new vehicle concept P E R S O N A L I T Y ENFP (Meyers Briggs) enthusiastic, sociable, creative, forward-thinking, empathetic, adaptable, supportive IMPLEMENTER (CPI 260) industrious, efficient, ambitious, organized, enterprising, team- oriented, active E D U C A T I O N Bachelor of Science and Business Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota Master’s in Business Administration W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University MBA Executive Course Universidad Torcuato Di Tella Buenos Aires, Argentina International Studies Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain L E A D E R S H I P E X P E R I E N C E Polaris Inc. SR. MANAGER GLOBAL LOGISTICS, PROCUREME NT & OPERATIO NS Lead team responsible for global logistics procurement and material operations ▪ Negotiate and manage $0.4B in logistics spend; responsible for exceeding cost, quality and service goals ▪ Lead end-to-end logistics operations for global inbound material into all manufacturing plants ▪ Drive strategy development and execution of global procurement for all 3PLs and truckload/LTL/intermodal transportation MANAGER GLOBAL SUPPLY PLANNI NG & QUALITY Led inventory and operations planning and quality teams for North America ▪ Stood up logistics quality team and achieved best-in-class results ▪ Reduced safety-critical failures by 95% ▪ Implemented process controls across North American operations centers, resulting in 60% overall warranty reduction over 18 months ▪ Reduced operational costs by 23% through process improvement, root cause analysis and cross-functional collaboration BRAND MANAGER -EUROPE /MIDDLE EAST/AFRICA Led creative strategy, brand management and content creation teams for Europe, Middle East and Africa region ▪ Developed long-range strategy plan delivering hyper-localized content across forty countries and markets ▪ Led global teams through planning, development and execution of all brand content and agency management ▪ Successfully drove launch and execution of major twelve-month re- branding for off-road and snowmobile across Europe, Middle East and Africa SALES MANAGER -CALIFORNIA/ARIZONA/HAWAII Responsible for revenue and market share targets across three-state territory ▪ Managed off-road markets across three-state territory ▪ Led market share growth in key off-road consumer segment through implementation of robust sales training program ▪ Largest market share gain in North America for on-road in 2012 LEADERSHIP AND SALES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM High potential talent accelerator rotation ▪ Strategically grew sales in Central America through distribution agreements in Panama, Belize, Honduras and Costa Rica ▪ Led four-month focus groups across North American and Latin America for launch of two new vehicles ▪ Completed exhaustive Japan motorcycle market research, laying the foundation for successful market entry 2019 2017 2016 2013 mikael.a.moseley@gmail.com m 2019 Current 2013 2011 2009 2011 MA [;[ik MIKAEL MOSELEY STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10d. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Brad Martens Topic: 2021 Work Session Schedule Action Required: Direction Summary: Staff would like the City Council to provide direction on the potential for additional work sessions to focus on the following items. • May 13, 2021: Comparable City discussion for compensation philosophy • June 10, 2021: Joint work session with Planning Commission on residential zoning standards Financial/Budget: Costs associated to work sessions would be tied to staff/consultant time and is budgeted for. Options: 1. Schedule work sessions for May 13, 2021 and June 10, 2021 as presented. 2. Send back to staff for further review. Recommendation: Schedule work sessions for May 13, 2021 and June 10, 2021 as presented. Council Action: Schedule work sessions for May 13, 2021 and June 10, 2021 as presented. Attachments: None. STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 10e. Council Meeting: April 22, 2021 Prepared By: Director Matt Gottschalk Topic: Full-Time Police Officer Job Offer Action Required: Authorization Summary: Staff has been conducting a Police Officer hiring process to fill three vacancies in the police department. After the second round of interviews, staff elected to move forward with conducting background investigations on the top four candidates for the three openings. In March, the Council authorized staff to extend an employment offer to Clayton Decker. Staff has now completed the City’s background investigation on candidate Josh Lawson. Staff is recommending that the Council authorize staff to extend a conditional employment offer to Josh Lawson for the position of full-time Police Officer at the starting Police Officer wage. This conditional offer would be contingent upon the recommendations to hire from subsequent psychological and physical evaluations. The official start date would be dependent on the timeline for completion of the other conditions. Financial/Budget: The 2021 budget includes the wages and benefits for this position. Options: 1.Authorize staff to extend a conditional employment offer to Josh Lawson for the position of Full-Time Police Officer. 2.Provide staff with other direction. Recommendation: Authorize staff to extend a conditional employment offer to Josh Lawson for the position of Full-Time Police Officer. Council Action: Authorize staff to extend a conditional employment offer to Josh Lawson for the position of Full-Time Police Officer. Attachments: None City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-34 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 2020 DONATIONS WHEREAS, the City of Corcoran received several generous donations in 2020 for City events and for the Police Department; WHEREAS, with the COVID-19 Health Pandemic, many of the City’s events was unable to be hosted; WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations as offered for the Truck Safety Seminar as follows: Ende Septic Service $50.00 Duane's Septic Service LLC $50.00 Farmers State Bank of Hamel $100.00 A-1 Outdoor Power $100.00 Kothrade Sewer, Water & Excavating $125.00 Trueman Welters $150.00 Lano Equipment Inc $200.00 Westside Wholesale Tire $200.00 Satellite Shelters Inc. $200.00 Beaudry Oil and Propane $200.00 Grove Nursery $200.00 Designing Nature Inc $200.00 Midstate Crane Service Inc. $200.00 Miller Trucking $250.00 Elmer J Peterson Co $250.00 Hassan Sand $300.00 Ess Brothers and Sons Inc. $300.00 RMS $300.00 Ebert Construction $500.00 L and L Underground $200.00 RDO $600.00 Burschville Construction $200.00 Corcoran Lions $750.00 Doboszenski and Sons $1,000.00 Anonymous $50.25 In Kind Donations Dobo's Café/Discount on Rolls/Donuts Hanover City/Public Works (Help/Tables/Chairs) Watertown NAPA - Grand Prize ($200) Swifty Sweep / Larry Dalchow BA Entertainment and Production Addition - 11f. City of Corcoran April 22, 2021 County of Hennepin State of Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 2021-34 WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donations as offered for the Firearm Safety Program as follows: Northwest Area Jaycees $1,000.00 Corcoran Lions $750.00 Farmers State Bank of Hamel $550.00 WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation in the amount of $500 offered by the Corcoran Lions for the purchase of Deterra Bags by the City’s Police Reserve Program; WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the donation in the amount of $1,000 offered by the Northwest Area Jaycees for Night to Unite; WHEREAS, The City Council finds that it is appropriate to accept the in kind donation for food for the City’s Police officers from the Stanchion and resident Tim Seehussen; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Corcoran acknowledges the generosity of all the donors and graciously accepts the donations. VOTING AYE VOTING NAY McKee, Tom McKee, Tom Bottema, Jon Bottema, Jon Nichols, Jeremy Nichols, Jeremy Schultz, Alan Schultz, Alan Thomas, Manoj Thomas, Manoj Whereupon, said Resolution is hereby declared adopted on this 22nd day of April, 2021. ________________________________ Tom McKee – Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Jessica Beise – Administrative Services Director City Seal Landform®, SensiblyGreen® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. 1 MEMORANDUM 105 South Fifth Street, Suite 513 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-252-9070 Fax: 612-252-9077 www.landform.net DATE April 15, 2021 TO Brad Martens CC City Council, Planning Commission, Parks & Trails Commission FROM Kendra Lindahl, City Planner RE Active Corcoran Planning Applications Projects/Comments in blue italics are new The following is a summary of project status for current, active projects: 1.Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for Cook Lake Highlands (PID 25-119-23- 14-0003) (city file no. 20-047). Trek Development has requested approval for a mixed usedevelopment with a senior co-op, market rate apartment, villa homes, day care and memory care. Thisitem was reviewed at the Parks and Trails Commission on February 18th and a public hearing washeld at the March 4th Planning Commission meeting. The applicant submitted a revised application onMarch 15th. The changes are significant enough that it will go back to the Planning Commission onApril 1st, Parks and Trail Commission on April 15th and City Council action on April 22nd. 2.Preliminary Plat and Variance for the Property located at 23020 Strehler Road (PID 17-119-23- 32-0003) (city file no. 20-049). Greg Franzen has requested approval of a subdivision to create threelots and a variance from the minimum lot frontage and private drive standards. The application is scheduled for a public hearing at the April 1st Planning Commission meeting and City Council action on April 22nd. 3.Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Site Plan for a new NAPA at 19905 75th Avenue (PID 26- 119-23-11-0040) (city file no. 21-004). Kinghorn Construction, on behalf of REH Auto LLC., hasrequested approval of a conditional use permit, variance and site plan for a new 16,400 sq. ft. building. The item was reviewed at a public hearing on at the Planning Commission on April 1st and is scheduled for City Council action on May 27th. 4.Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for the Property located at 23240 County Road 30 (PID 07- 119-23-13-0003) (city file no. 21-007). Trevor Scherber has requested approval of a conditional usepermit and site plan approval to operate a business at 23240 County Road 30. The application is scheduled for a public hearing at the Planning Commission on May 6th and City Council review on May 27th. 5.Variance for a deck and porch at 6433 Bluestem Circle (PID 36-119-23-42-0032) (city file no. 21- 010). Andrew and Pamela Krominga have requested approval of a variance from the rear yard setbackrequirements to build a four-season porch and deck on their new home in the Ravinia development. The application was reviewed at the April 1st Planning Commission meeting and City Council action is expected on April 22nd. 6.KMM Land Development, LLC request for Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance at 23405 CR 10 (PID 18-119-23-12-0001) (city file 21-012). The applicant is requesting approval toallow a new office with storage yard for their construction company. This request is similar to theComLink operation that was approved on this site but never built. The application has been scheduled Agenda Item 11a. MEMORANDUM 2 for a public hearing at the May 6th Planning Commission meeting and action at the May 27th City Council meeting. 7. William Tombers request for Certificate of Compliance 8901 Cain Road (PID 15-119-23-13-0005) (city file 21-013). The applicant is requesting approval to allow construction of a new agriculture accessory building. The request has been administratively approved. 8. Request from Westside Tire for a Zoning Ordinance text amendment (city file 21-014). The applicant is requesting approval of a text amendment to allow outside storage and parking as a principal use in the I-1 zoning district. If approved, the change would apply to all property in the I-1 zoning district. Staff is reviewing the application for completeness. If complete, the application will be scheduled for the June 3rd Planning Commission and action at the June 24th City Council meeting. The following projects were recently acted upon and will be closed out: 1. Certificate of Compliance for the Orht property located at 20600 County Road 30 (PID 11-119- 23-23-0004) (city file no. 20-038). The request is to allow ground mounted solar on the residential property. The application has been administratively approved. 2. Final Plat and Final Planned Unit Development for “Tavera” (city file no. 20-042). The application for the first phase of this development includes 33 single family homes south of the main entrance off County Road 116. The project was approved at the April 8th City Council meeting. 3. Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association request for Wetland Waiver, Preliminary Plat, Variance and Administrative Permit at 19835 Larkin Road. (PID 25-119-23-32-0001) (city file 20-048). The applicant has submitted a request for a new electric substation (an essential service) on the southwest portion of the site. The wetland waiver was approved by the City Council on January 28th. The application has been withdrawn by the applicant. 4. Interim Use Permit (IUP) for a Conditional Home Occupation License (CHOL) and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to exceed the sidewall height at 23405 CR 30 (PID 07-119-23-42-0003) (city file no. 21-003). Jason Larson has requested approval of an IUP for a CHOL to allow auto detailing and a CUP to exceed sidewall height on an accessory building. The application was reviewed at a public hearing at the Planning Commission on March 4th and approved by the City Council on March 25th. 5. Easement Vacation for Refuge at Rush Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank (PID 03-119-23-13-0002) (city file no. 21-005). Chris Rains has requested approval of an easement vacation and proposes new easements to be dedicated over a proposed wetland bank on the property. The application was reviewed at a public hearing and approved by the City Council on March 25th. 6. Lot Line Adjustment for the Property located at 20420 Duffney Circle (PID 11-119-23-23-0004 and PID 11-119-23-31-0005) (city file no. 21-006). Shawn and Michele Tharp have requested approval of a lot line adjustment. The application was administratively approved. 7. Meadow Trails 2nd Addition Preliminary Plat, Final Plat and Variance (PID 35-119-23-12-0002) (city file no. 21-009). Lennar has submitted a request for a subdivision to create two outlots for the Dempsey property. This property has preliminary plat approval as part of the Tavera project, but the applicant is requesting approval to allow the property to be split in two outlots to allow them to purchase the property in two phases. The applicant has filed an exempt lot split at Hennepin County. Therefore, this application has been withdrawn. City of Corcoran 2021 City Council Schedule Agenda Item 12. May 13, 2021 Work Session – 5:30 pm – NOT SCHEDULED • Compensation discussion – Comparable cities May 13, 2021 • Employee Handbook Update • 2020 Budget Transfers • Discussion on Open Book meeting vs. Local Board of Appeals and Equalization (December 1 deadline) • Financial Performance report • Recreational Vehicle Ordinance • Job Description Update – Administrative Services Director • Bridge Replacements - Accept Feasibility Study & Authorize Plans and Specs • Corcoran Trail East/West Feasibility Study • Water Supply Work Supplemental information • Improvement Hearing – Appaloosa Woods Street Improvement Project • FEMA Floodplain Mapping • Term Limits/Conflict of office Discussion • Closed Session – Easement Agreement for 66th Avenue/Gleason Parkway Corridor Improvements May 27, 2021 • 2020 Audit • Active Corcoran Planning Applications • Hackamore Road Improvement Plan Update • Bring Your Own Device Policy • Public Hearing – 2021 Dust Control Program • Financial Management Plan update • Commissioner appointment process • Scherber Roll Off CUP and Site Plan • D&D Service CUP, Site Plan, and Variances • Napa Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance at 19905 75 th Avenue North